The “Pangaea” Simulator -- An Decision-Maker-Oriented International Climate Simulator
description
Transcript of The “Pangaea” Simulator -- An Decision-Maker-Oriented International Climate Simulator
The “Pangaea” Simulator -- An Decision-Maker-Oriented International Climate Simulator
Drew JonesSustainability Institute
Working with Ventana Systems and MIT System Dynamics Group
September 2008
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Simulation Creation Team• Lead Modeler
– Dr. Tom Fiddaman, Ventana Systems• http://www.metasd.com/index.html
• Modeling, Framing, and Presentation Design– Andrew Jones, Sustainability Institute
• http://www.sustainabilityinstitute.org/ • [email protected]
– Dr. Lori Siegel, contractor to SI• Modeling and Framing
– Dr. John Sterman, MIT• http://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
“Climate Interactive” is a growing coalition of business, academic, & nonprofit organizations
Creating a portfolio of fast, accessible, robust, transparent simulations to help address climate change
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Dr. John Sterman, MIT Sloan School of ManagementDirector, System Dynamics GroupAuthor, Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World
Dr. Bill Moomaw, The Fletcher School, Tufts UniversityDirector of the Center for International Environment & Resource PolicyLead author, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2003 (IPCC)
Dr. Peter Senge, MITSenior Lecturer, Sloan School of ManagementFounding Chairman, Society for Organizational LearningAuthor, The Fifth Discipline
Climate Interactive Senior Team Members
Dr. Michelle Erickson, CitigroupDirector, Sustainable Information Technology Program
Purpose of Simulator is to Help Decision Makers Understand Dynamics of Climate Mitigation
Regional FF Emissions6 B
4.5 B
3 B
1.5 B
02007 2023 2038 2054 2069 2085 2100
Time (year)
TonsC/year
CO2 concentration in the atmosphere750
600
450
3002000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
ppm
• Fossil fuel emissions by countries or “economy group”• Land use emissions• Additional sequestration from aforestation• Other greenhouse gas emissions
Inputs• CO2 in the atmosphere• Global temperature• Total emissions• Total removals to oceans, biomass etc.• Sea level rise
Outputs
Emissions from Developed Major
Economies
And Developing Major Economies
And Non-Major Economies
One goal
CO2 in the atmosphere
Simulator Helps Users Conduct Customized Tests: What If…..?
Regional FF Emissions6 B
4.5 B
3 B
1.5 B
02007 2023 2038 2054 2069 2085 2100
Time (year)
TonsC/year
Regional FF Emissions6 B
4.5 B
3 B
1.5 B
02007 2023 2038 2054 2069 2085 2100
Time (year)
TonsC/year
Regional FF Emissions6 B
4.5 B
3 B
1.5 B
02007 2023 2038 2054 2069 2085 2100
Time (year)
TonsC/year
Regional FF Emissions6 B
4.5 B
3 B
1.5 B
02007 2023 2038 2054 2069 2085 2100
Time (year)
TonsC/year
Regional FF Emissions6 B
4.5 B
3 B
1.5 B
02007 2023 2038 2054 2069 2085 2100
Time (year)
TonsC/year
All reduced 80% by 2050? Or by 2030?
Some by 2030 and others 2060? Starting in 2018?
Developed acts but undeveloped
doesn’t?
Regional FF Emissions10 B
7.5 B
5 B
2.5 B
02007 2023 2038 2054 2069 2085 2100
Time (year)
TonsC/year
Business as usual
Developed
Developing
Non Major
(all graphs fossil fuel emissions)
What Would Be the Effect on CO2 Concentrations
in the Atmosphere Over Time? CO2 in the Atmosphere
1,000
825
650
475
3002000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
ppm
ppm CO2 in Atmosphere : cap at 95 emissionsppm CO2 in Atmosphere : all 80% by 2050 plus seqppm CO2 in Atmosphere : baseppm CO2 in Atmosphere : mostly developedGoal for CO2 in the atmosphere : cap at 95 emissions
What Would Total Emissions Looks Like, Divided by Economy Group, since 1900?
FF Emissions by Country Group8 B
6 B
4 B
2 B
01900 1930 1960 1990 2020 2050 2080
Time (year)
TonsC/year
Developed ME CO2 FF emissions : all 80% by 2050 plus seqDeveloping ME CO2 FF emissions : all 80% by 2050 plus seqNon ME CO2 FF emissions : all 80% by 2050 plus seq
Developed MEs
DevelopingNonME
(fossil fuel emissions)
How About for Specific Countries?
Regional Emissions by country/region6 B
4.5 B
3 B
1.5 B
01900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
tonsC/year
Historical and forecast national CO2 FF emissions[US] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqHistorical and forecast national CO2 FF emissions[EU] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqHistorical and forecast national CO2 FF emissions[Russia] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqHistorical and forecast national CO2 FF emissions[Japan] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqHistorical and forecast national CO2 FF emissions[China] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqHistorical and forecast national CO2 FF emissions[India] : all 80% by 2050 plus seq
US
EU
China
Russia
(fossil fuel emissions)
Japan
India
Or Cumulative Fossil Fuel Emissions?
Fraction of Global Cumulative Emissions by country/region0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
01990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
National fraction of accumulated world FF CO2 emissions[US] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqNational fraction of accumulated world FF CO2 emissions[EU] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqNational fraction of accumulated world FF CO2 emissions[Russia] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqNational fraction of accumulated world FF CO2 emissions[Japan] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqNational fraction of accumulated world FF CO2 emissions[China] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqNational fraction of accumulated world FF CO2 emissions[India] : all 80% by 2050 plus seq
Cumulative Emissions by country/region400 B
300 B
200 B
100 B
02000 2015 2030 2045 2060 2075 2090
tonsC
Accumulated national FF CO2[US] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqAccumulated national FF CO2[EU] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqAccumulated national FF CO2[Russia] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqAccumulated national FF CO2[Japan] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqAccumulated national FF CO2[China] : all 80% by 2050 plus seqAccumulated national FF CO2[India] : all 80% by 2050 plus seq
US
EU
China
Russia
India
Japan
Or Global Temperature?
Global Temperature Increase3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
01980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
DegreesC
Relative Temperature : all 80% by 2050 plus seqRelative Temperature : cap at 95 emissionsRelative Temperature : baseRelative Temperature : mostly developedGoal for Temperature : all 80% by 2050 plus seq
What If We Boost Removals With Sequestration Through Aforestation?
Sources of Total Removals6 B
4.475 B
2.95 B
1.425 B
-100 M1900 1930 1960 1990 2020 2050 2080
Time (year)
TonC
/yea
r
biomass
oceans
seq.
Results with 80% reduction in fossil fuel emissions plus 1.6 GTC/year in additional sequestration by 2050
CO2 in the Atmosphere800
700
600
500
400
3002000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
ppm
Goal
Users Move Sliders to Select “What If” Experiments Using the Prototype Control Panel
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Historical Fit Results
CO2 vs Data900 B
800 B
700 B
600 B
500 B1740 1770 1800 1830 1860 1890 1920 1950 1980 2010
Time (year)
TonC
CO2 in Atmosphere : all 80% by 2050 plus seqMauna Loa CO2 TonC : all 80% by 2050 plus seqSiple Ice CO2 TonC : all 80% by 2050 plus seq
Temperature -- Model vs Data1
0.625
0.25
-0.125
-0.51850 1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990
Time (year)
DegreesC
Modeled TemperatureHadley dataJWW dataAngell data
Exploring Implications of Uncertainty in Parameters Through Sensitivity Testing
Temperature Uncertainty5
4
3
2
1
01900 1940 1980 2020 2060 2100
Time (year)
DegreesC
Developedmajor
economies
Carbon cycle Climate
GHGs in atm
Total fossil fuel CO2
emissions Temp
Developingmajor
economies
Nonmajor
economies
Forests
Land useCO2 emissions
CO2
Sequestration
Changes to:AforestationDeforestation
Specific countryemissions
OtherGHGs
Overview of Model Structure
Specific countryemissions
Specific countryemissions
The Core of the Carbon Cycle Sector
CO2 inAtmosphere
CO2 inMixed Layer
CO2 in DeepOcean
Flux Atm to Ocean
Diffusion Flux
CO2 inHumus
CO2 inBiomass
Flux Atm to Biomass
Flux Biomass to Atmosphere
Flux Biomass to Humus
Flux Humus to Atmosphere
<CO2Emissions>
Simplified Carbon Cycle Sector
(7 layers)
(7 layers)
The Core of the Climate SectorClimate Sensitivity
Relative Atmosphereand Upper Ocean
Temperature
Temp Diff
CO2 Radiative Forcing
Climate Feedback Param
Relative DeepOcean Temp
Heat inAtmosphereand UpperOcean
Heat in DeepOcean
Heat Transfer
Feedback Cooling
Radiative ForcingCH4 and N2O
RF input
Other Forcings
CFC Forcing
We Use Metaphors to Help Explain Model Behavior:Think of CO2 in the Atmosphere as a Bathtub
Emissions
CO2 in the atmosphere
Net Removals
The “flat path” caps emissions above removals. More is still flowing into the bathtub than is flowing out. So the level of water in the bathtub continues to rise.
The tub is filled by emissions and drained by net removals into oceans and biomass.
The inflow is roughly double the outflow
For Example: 80% Reduction Brings Emissions Down to Meet Removals
Total Emissions and Removals24 B
18 B
12 B
6 B
02000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
TonC
/yea
r
Emissions
Net Removals
So levels of CO2 in the atmosphere stabilize.
Emissions CO2 in the atmosphere
Net Removals
Our Simulator Use Philosophy• Runs fast for high-iteration model testing
– Model simulates 500 years in less than .1 second– Allows for practical analysis in areas such as uncertainty, trade-
offs, optimization, and robustness • Hands-on use by policy-makers
– Simulators designed to be used easily on a laptop by non-modelers
• Transparency– We share model equations– No black box models
• Understanding causes of dynamics– We take the time to ensure users understand why the model is
doing what it is doing. We don’t say, “because the model says so”.
Simulator to Benefit From and Supplement Other Models
• Pangaea uses data, structure and insights from other, larger, more disaggregated and detailed models– EG, the Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)
• Nations model generates internally consistent scenarios that could be tested and refined and verified in larger models
• Our purpose is to create a small model and make it useful to policy setting and learning about complex dynamics
Sources of Structure and Data
Carbon Cycle and Temperature
Bolin, B. 1986. Fiddaman. T.S. 1997. Nordhaus, W. D. 1992, 1994, 2000 Goudriaan, J. and P. Ketner. 1984. Oeschger, H., U. Siegenthaler, et al. 1975.Rotmans, J. 1990. Schwartz, S.E. 2007. Schneider, S.H., and S.L. Thompson. 1981. Socolow, R.H. And S.H. Lam. 2007. Wullschleger, S. D., W. M. Post, et al. 1995.
Sea Level Rise Rahmstorf, S. 2007.
Sources of Historical DataHistorical FF CO2 Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center.
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp030/CSV-FILES/
Historical Population
Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center.Calculated by dividing FF emissions by FF emissions per capita
Historical GDP Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/tableh1cco2.xls.
Historical CO2 atmospheric concentrations
Mauna Loa – National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administrationhttp://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/Siple Ice - Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. 1994. Historical CO2 Record from the Siple Station Ice Core http://cdiac.ESD.ORNL.GOV/trends/co2/siple.htm
Historical Temperature Changes
HADCRUT3, Hadley Centre of the UK Met Office. National Climatic Data Center, NCDC.
CFC Forcing Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS). http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/ghgases/
Other Forcings GISS. http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/
Sources of Projected DataProjected FF CO2 emissions, atmospheric concentrations, and temperature
BAU:US MiniCAM EMF Standard ReferenceEurope AIM96 Standard ReferenceChina MiniCAM EMF Standard ReferenceIndia MERGE 3.0 RefWorld MiniCAM EMF14 Standard ReferenceWorld CETA EMF14 Standard ReferenceWorld AIM EMF14 Standard ReferenceWorld ASF SRES A1 ScenarioReduction:World MiniCAM EMF14 Accelerated TechnologyWorld CETA EMF14 Accelerated Technology
Projected N2O and CH4 atmospheric concentrations
IPCC Third Assessment Report. 2001. Chapter 6. Radiative Forcing of Climate Change. P.358.
We Have Calibrated Our Future Global Fossil Fuel Emissions to Track MiniCAM Most Closely
Global Fossil Fuel Emissions40 B
30 B
20 B
10 B
01990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
Time (year)
tons
C/y
ear
World CO2 FF emissions : BAUMiniCAM EMF14 Standard ReferenceCETA EMF14 Standard ReferenceAIM96 Standard Standard ReferenceASF SRES A1 Data
We Have Calibrated Our Country-Level Fossil Fuel Emissions to Track MiniCAM, AIM, and MERGE
China Emissions Calibration8 B
6 B
4 B
2 B
01990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
Time (year)
tons
C/y
ear
CO2 FF emissions[China] : BAUChina MiniCAM EMF Stnd RefChina AIM96 Standard Scenario
India Emissions Calibration4 B
3 B
2 B
1 B
01990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
Time (year)
tons
C/y
ear
CO2 FF emissions[India] : BAUIndia MERGE3 Ref
US Emissions Calibration4 B
3 B
2 B
1 B
01990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
Time (year)
tons
C/y
ear
CO2 FF emissions[US] : BAUUSA MiniCAM EMF Stnd RefUS Emissions AIM EMF16 Mod Ref
EU Emissions Calibration4 B
3 B
2 B
1 B
01990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
Time (year)
tons
C/y
ear
CO2 FF emissions[EU] : BAUEU Emissions AIM EMF16 Mod Ref
We Compared Our Model’s Business as Usual Scenario for CO2 Concentrations to Other Models
IPCC CO2 Atm Conc Models vs Nations Model1,000
750
500
250
01990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100
Time (year)
ppm
ppm CO2 in Atmosphere : BAUMiniCAM Stnd RefCETA EMF14 Stnd RefRICE EMF14
We Compared Our Model’s Response to the MiniCAM Business as Usual Fossil Fuel
Emissions Scenario
800
400
0
1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
Time (year)
ppm
Our Model
MiniCAM
CO2 concentration in the atmosphere
Result when our carbon cycle is fed
by MiniCAM’s emissions
We Compared Our Model’s Response to the MiniCAM “Accelerated Tech” Reduction
Fossil Fuel Emissions ScenarioCO2 concentration in the atmosphere
600
400
200
1990 2020 2050 2080Time (year)
ppm
Our Model
MiniCAM
Result when our carbon cycle is fed
by MiniCAM’s emissions
MiniCAM FF Emissions for Accel Tech Reduction Scenario8 B
6 B
4 B
2 B
01990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
Time (year)
tonsC/year
Emissions World MiniCAM Accel Tech : bau
We Plan to Post the Sim Online for Global Use
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
More information• Models on which the model that created these runs were based
– http://www.metasd.com/models/index.html#Climate • Interactive version covering some of these ideas
– http://www.seed.slb.com/en/scictr/watch/climate_change/challenge.htm– http://www.sustainabilityinstitute.org/tools_resources/
climatebathtubsim.html – http://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/GHG.html
• Video version– http://video.google.com/videoplay?
docid=8235725143334110601&pr=goog-sl • Other related simulations
– http://www.sustainabilityinstitute.org/climate_change/simulations.html \• Project blog
– http://climateinteractive.wordpress.com/ • For an interactive, online demonstration, contact