The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

13
The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI) By: Ben Vail and Marianne Needham

description

The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI). By: Ben Vail and Marianne Needham. Population Rank California – 1Washington - 27th Oregon – 13Hawaii – 42nd. Source: US Census Bureau. Population Density. HI. CA. OR. WA. Classification of States. State. Political Culture. Tolbert/Hero. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Page 1: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

The Pacific States(CA, WA, OR, HI)

By: Ben Vail and Marianne Needham

Page 2: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Population Change 2000-2006

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

18.00%

20.00%

Hawaii USA California Oregon Washington

Population Rank

California – 1 Washington - 27th

Oregon – 13 Hawaii – 42nd Source: US Census Bureau

Page 3: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Population Density

Page 4: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Classification of States

California Moralistic Heterogeneous

Hawaii Individualistic Heterogeneous

Oregon Moralistic Homogeneous

Washington Moralistic/

Individualistic

Homogeneous

Page 5: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Percentage of Hispanics/ Latinos

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

California USA Oregon Washington Hawaii

Source: US Census Bureau Fact Sheet 2006 American Community Survey

Page 6: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Percentage of Blacks

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

USA California Washington Hawaii Oregon

Source: US Census Bureau Fact Sheet 2006 American Community Survey

Page 7: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Percentage of Whites

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%

100.00%

Oregon

Washington

USACalifornia

Hawaii

Source: US Census Bureau Fact Sheet 2006 American Community Survey

Page 8: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Racial Makeup of Hawaii

39.90%

26.30%

21.50%

8.70%

2.20%

Asian American

White

Mixed Race

Native Hawaiian

African American

Source: US Census Bureau Fact Sheet 2006 American Community Survey

Page 9: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Measure of State High Tech Economy

Source: The 2002 New State Economy Index

Rank

2. Washington (Score 86.2)

3. California (Score 85.5)

11. Oregon (Score of 68.9)

35. Hawaii (Score of 53.7)

Page 10: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Racial Diversity v. Health Coverage

80.4% 84.1% 80.3% 89.3%

78.8% 76.7% 76.6% 86.4%

Rank 45 Rank 39 Rank 45 Rank 32

13.4% 8.3% 11.8% 6.2%

% of White Mothers receiving Prenatal Care

% of Black Mothers receiving Prenatal Care

Infant Mortality Rate

% Uninsured under the age of 19

Source: Policy Outcomes Excel File and March of Dimes

Page 11: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Racial Diversity v. Personal Wealth

Source: 2006 American Community Survey, US Census Bureau Fact Sheet

$24,418 $26,974 $27,346 $25,267 $27,251

$55,293 $64,563 $63,705 $58,526 $70,277

13.3% 13.1% 11.8% 13.3% 9.3%

Per Capita Income

Median Family Income

Individuals below Poverty Level

Page 12: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Analysis of States

• Hawaii successful state – cohesiveness and diversity. (Mixed Race – common ground) – high health standards, - strong economy (tourism)

• California – high diversity yet lack of integration (Hispanic/White/Black/Asian population)

• Oregon – least successful of group - lack of high tech jobs/economy and diversity.

• Washington – some diversity especially coastal areas and strong high tech economy.

Page 13: The Pacific States (CA, WA, OR, HI)

Conclusions

• Racial Diversity is a positive influence on policy outcomes when races are at equal level and can compete yet work together.

• Heterogeneous states have stronger personal wealth and health standards.

• Diversity equals diversity of ideas

• Individualistic v. Moralistic States