The Obesity Epidemic and Health Care Utilization in the United States
-
Upload
whitney-moss -
Category
Documents
-
view
19 -
download
0
description
Transcript of The Obesity Epidemic and Health Care Utilization in the United States
The Obesity Epidemic and Health Care Utilization in the United States
Ramzi G. SalloumDepartment of Economics
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan
December 3, 2007
2
Overview
Introduction Cost – Benefit Analysis Existing Models Data Model (Tobit Regression) Conclusions
3
Why Obesity?
U.S. Health Care expenditures (2006) - $1.89 trillion 1
59 million59 million adult Americans (31%) are obese 2
Almost 65% are overweight
U.S. - Obesity Trends: 12.8% - 1976-1980 22.5% - 1988-1994 30.0% - 1999-2000
Americans spend more than $90 billion$90 billion annually in overweight and obesity costs 3
1 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD 2007)
2 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General (2001)
3 Finkelstein et al., “National Medical Spending Attributable to Overweight And Obesity: How much and who is paying?” Health Affairs (2003)
4
What is Obesity? Associated with:
diabetes heart disease hypertension sleep apnea osteoarthritis gallbladder disease some types of cancer
Causes: diet high in fat and calories sedentary lifestyle
An accumulation of excess body fat to an extent that may impair health 1
1 World Health Organization (WHO 2007)
Weight (kilograms)
Weight (pounds)
5
Cost – Benefit Analysis 1
Direct Benefits / Costs ↓ treatment expenditures vs. ↑ prevention expenditures
Indirect Benefits / Costs ↑ productivity, ↓ sick time, ↑ opportunity costs
Controversial Issue should obesity be classified as a disease?
Non-Market Factors quality of life
Comparable to Smoking (treatment/prevention)
1 Folland, Goodman, Stano, The Economics of Health and Health Care. 5th edition. Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2007
6
Cost – Benefit Analysis (2)
Other Concerns discounting risk adjustment
(public project) future inflation human life valuation
MSB MSC
$
E
Q* 100Q1 Q2
percentage reduction in obesity
Possible Use of QALYs Quality Adjusted Life Years
Point E:Point E:
MSB=MSCMSB=MSCNet Net
BenefitBenefit
7
Existing Models
studystudy data typedata type sourcesource resultsresults
Wolf & Colditz (1998) x-section NHIS1 direct costs of obesity: 5.7% of U.S. national health expenditures
Sturm (2002) x-section HCC2 obesity: 36% increase in annual medical costs
Finkelstein, Fiebelkorn, & Wang
(2003)
panel MEPS/
NHIS3
obesity: 37% increase in annual medical costs;
direct costs of obesity: 5.3% of U.S. national health expenditures
1 National Health Interview Survey, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (1988, 1994)
2 Healthcare for Communities, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (1997-1998)
3 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (1998), and NHIS (1996, 1997)
8
Data
National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) Conducted by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse
and Alcoholism (NIAAA) 1st wave interviews in 2001-2002 survey of 43,093 Americans results weighted to represent U.S. population focused on female and male samples, aged 40+
samples representative of 59.9 million females (n=13,615) and 52.3 million males (n=10,027)
9
Model hdays = 0011obese 22 smoker33 drinker44 injuries55crimes 66mental77age +
u
Variable Definitions: hdays: number of hospital days in past 12 months obese: bmi ≥ 30 *
smoker: current or ex-smoker *
drinker: current or ex-drinker *
injuries: number of injuries in past 12 months crimes: number of times crime victim in past 12 months mental: diagnosis of mental disease *
age: participant age in years
* dummy variables
10
Linear and Tobit Regressionslinearlinear tobittobit
femalefemale malemale femalefemale malemale
parameter p-value parameter p-value parameter p-value parameter p-value
obeseobese.212
(.130).103
.182
(.123).140
3.257
(.697).000
3.326
(.773).000
smokersmoker.184
(.126).142
.314
(.124).011
3.573
(.690).000
4.206
(.822).000
drinkerdrinker-.644
(.148).000
-.530
(.194.006
-3.410
(.774).000
-4.310
(1.140).000
injuriesinjuries.399
(.058).000
.417
(.073).000
1.711
(.214).000
2.919
(.326).000
crimescrimes.295
(.176).093
.146
(.146).320
2.928
(.774).000
1.853
(.755).014
mentalmental2.428
(.622).000
2.776
(.634).000
14.088
(2.558).000
13.168
(2.970).000
ageage.044
(.004).000
.042
(.005).000
.330
(.024).000
.422
(.029).000
conscons-1.253
(.316).000
-1.334
(.332).000
-46.694
1.949.000
-50.926
(2.393).000
RR22 .0143 - .0151 - .0139* 356.95 .0230* 386.11
* pseudo R-squared = 1 – LL(full model)/LL(constant only model)
11
Limitations Low R-Squared
survey does not account for many determinants of hospital utilization
Non-Comprehensive Measure survey does not cover outpatient utilization of health care
Self-Reported Weight and Height overweight and obese people tend to underreport their weight
Other Non-Sampling Errors differences in interpretation of questions inability/unwillingness to provide correct information Inability to recall information errors in data collection and processing errors in estimating values for missing data
12
Conclusions
Prevention vs. treatment expenditures Obesity has significant positive effects on
health care utilization (rivals effects of smoking)
Obesity and its costs will continue to rise Full effect of obesity epidemic yet to be
realized! Policy needed to curb the growth in obesity
13
Need for Policy
Economic incentive for payers to reduce prevalence of obesity (similar to smoking)
Health insurers (including Medicaid) established strong incentives against smoking (higher rates for smokers, sponsored smoking cessation treatments, etc.), but weak incentives to fight obesity
Government heavily involved in reducing smoking rates (taxation, regulation, etc.), however, little done to curb weight gain
14
References OECD Health Data 2007 (oecd.org) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the
Surgeon General (surgeongeneral.gov) World Health Organization, Obesity (who.org) Folland, Goodman, Stano, The Economics of Health and Health Care.
5th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2007 Wolf, A.M., Colditz, G.A., “Current estimates of the economic cost of
obesity in the United States” Obesity Res 1998 6: 97-106 Roland Sturm, “The Effects Of Obesity, Smoking, And Drinking On
Medical Problems And Costs,” Health Affairs, 2002; 21(2): 245-253 Finkelstein, Fiebelkorn, Wang, “National Medical Spending
Attributable to Overweight And Obesity: How much and who is paying?” Health Affairs (2003)
Grant, B.F., Kaplan K., Shepard J., Moore T. Source and Accuracy Statement for Wave 1 of the 2001-2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: Bethesda MD; 2003.