Intermodal Map (Large) - bnsf.com · Intermodal Map (Large) - bnsf.com ... kj ...
The North American Intermodal Marketplace @ YE2009
-
Upload
thom-a-williams -
Category
Documents
-
view
602 -
download
0
description
Transcript of The North American Intermodal Marketplace @ YE2009
Select Views Of The
North American Intermodal Marketplace, Past & Present
Including Its Key Participants,* The Railroads, Intermediaries, and Truckers
*Excepting privately-held Schneider National, Inc., for which data details are not publicly available.
Thom A. Williams, managing director
March 9, 2010
The Objects of Our Affection:
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
BNI
UNP
NSC
CSX
CNR
CP
KSU$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
$5,000
$5,500
RR Intermodal RevenuesUS$s in millions
Class 1 Railroads' Intermodal Revenues
KSU, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +12.4%
CP, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +4.2%
CNR, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +4.3
CSX, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +0.3
NSC, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +3.5%
UNP, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +3.0%
BNI, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +4.5%
The North American Intermodal sector's
fortune is inextricably linked to international
trade! About 60 percent of N. A. rail intermodal traffic
consists of merchandise imports and exports. In 2008,
the number of international
intermodal containers moved by rail from
the seaports totaled 7.8 million.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: RITA-BTS, NRF-PortTracker, and AAR reports and records.
U.S. Maritime Port and Railroad Container Volumes
45,000
38,000
19,70021,300
23,900
26,10027,600
28,96928,190
11,996
32,700
36,300
38,700
44,400
42,000
12,7
00
11,6
00
12,4
65 14,0
27 15,4
02
16,4
28
16,5
04
15,2
00
11,38312,108
13,16013,939
14,639 14,437 13,959
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
TEUs in thousands
RITA-BTS U.S. Total All Loaded & Empty TEU Traffic RITA-BTS U.S. Total International International TEU Traffic
NRF-PortTracker Total Loaded TEUs Shipped to Major Retail Ports American Assoc. of Railroads Total Intermodal (COFC + TOFC) Volumes
Totals are for all container ports, reflecting only loaded containers(as TEUs) in U.S. international maritime activity, U.S. imports and exports.
Totals are for all container ports, including all container traffic (both loaded and empty TEUs) in U.S. international maritime activity, U.S. imports and exports.
Totals reported by the National Retail Federation's & Global Insight's Port-Tracker data, TEUs shipped through major U.S. container ports.
AAR reported total U.S. and Canadian container(COFC + TOFC) load volumes.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
Class 1 Railroads' Intermodal Revenues
$2,669 $2,618 $2,783 $3,072$3,608
$4,383$5,140 $5,168 $5,551
$3,979
$1,909 $1,905$1,995
$2,066
$2,240
$2,466
$2,805 $2,925$3,023
$2,486$1,119 $1,123$1,181
$1,239
$1,537
$1,826
$1,971 $1,921
$2,058
$1,530
$1,168 $1,112$1,180
$1,264
$1,346
$1,362
$1,412 $1,356
$1,466
$1,204
$919 $969$1,052
$1,101
$1,117
$1,270
$1,394 $1,382
$1,580
$1,337
$782 $804$882
$940
$1,035
$1,161
$1,257 $1,318
$1,400
$1,130
$50 $44
$51
$53
$60
$220
$213 $254
$161
$143
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009$1.150
$1.350
$1.550
$1.750
$1.950
$2.150
$2.350
$2.550
$2.750
$2.950
$3.150
$3.350
$3.550
$3.750
GrossRevenuesUS$s in millions
Avg. On-road DieselPrice, US$s/gal.
KSU, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR =+12.4%CP, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +4.2%
CNR, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +4.3
CSX, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +0.3
NSC, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +3.5%
UNP, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +3.0%
BNI, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +4.5%
Avg. On-roadDiesel Price,US$s/gal.
Fuel surcharges increases considerably masked otherwise dull revenue growths.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K and reports and records of the AAR and NRF-PortTracker.
Container and Intermodal Volumes vs. RR Intermodal Revenues,2006 - 2009
13,746
16,051
16,865
17,375
12,700
15,200
16,50416,428
$14,192 $14,324
$15,238
$11,809
10,000
12,500
15,000
17,500
20,000
2006 2007 2008 2009
Total Container Volumes,in thousands
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
Total RR Intermodal Revenues,US$s in millions
RR Intermodal Shipments NRF Port Volumes RR Intermodal Revenue
YE2009 vs. YE2006: Container counts of imported goods fell ~23%, to 12.7 million at YE '09, and the railroads carried ~21% fewer intermodal shipments in '09 than during '06.
What does not arrive at the ports is not transported across the Nation.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
2005 Intermodal Railroads' Market SharesHow the 7 Class 1 RRs divided US$12.7 billion of '05 Intermodal revenues:
UNP19%
BNI35%
CNR10%
CP9%
KSU2%
CSX11%
NSC14%
BNI CNR CP CSX KSU NSC UNP
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
2009 Intermodal Railroads' Market SharesHow the 7 Class 1 RRs divided US$11.8 billion of '09 Intermodal revenues:
UNP21%BNI
34%
CNR11%
CP10%
KSU1%
CSX10%
NSC13%
BNI CNR CP CSX KSU NSC UNP
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
CSX & NSC
BNI, UNP & KSU
BNI,UNP
& KSU$4,628
BNI,UNP
& KSU$4,567
BNI,UNP
& KSU$4,829
BNI,UNP
& KSU$5,191
BNI,UNP
& KSU$5,908
BNI,UNP
& KSU$7,069
BNI,UNP
& KSU$8,158
BNI,UNP
& KSU$8,347
BNI,UNP
& KSU$8,735
BNI,UNP
& KSU$6,608
CSX& NSC$2,287
CSX& NSC$2,235
CSX& NSC $2,361
CSX& NSC$2,503
CSX& NSC$2,883
CSX& NSC$3,188
CSX& NSC$3,383
CSX& NSC$3,277
CSX& NSC$3,524
CSX& NSC$2,734
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
Intermodal Revenues,US$s in millions
Western (BNI, UNP & KSU) vs. Eastern (CSX & NSC)U.S. Railroad Intermodal Revenues
Total annual Freight Ton Miles (Rail and Truck movements, combined) incurred within States east of the Mississippi consistently account for near 60% of total U.S. freight ton mileage, but now just 29% of total RR Intermodal revenues. Keep an eye on NSC's new alliance with JBHT and CSX's with Schneider National; from the freight ton per mile perspective, Eastern U.S. Intermodal revenues may soon far surpass what they are today.
The Mississippi River essentially separates the spheres of influence of the Western-focused railroads (BNI, UNP and KSU) from CSX and NSC, which likewise dominate the Eastern third of the U.S.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC
Population Density Drives Overall Freight Ton Miles:
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
Freight Tonnage on Highways, Railroads, and Inland Waterways:
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: reports of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and the International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
Tonnage on Trailer-on-Flatcar and Container-on-Flatcar RR Intermodal Moves: 2006
This display illuminates: (1) Intermodal’s strengths west of the Mississippi, where longer transport distances (avg. 1,500+ miles) are dominant; and, (2) Intermodal’s still-present challenges to capture revenues from trucking in the much-larger freight markets of the Eastern States, where the shorter transport distances handicap Intermodal’s “rail vs. truck” pricing advantages. Note, e.g., how little Intermodal flows to or from the East via rail from or to St. Louis, Memphis and Dallas.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
Major Truck Routes on the National Highway System:
The Interstate Highways are congested, the Rails are open, and Shippers always seek to reduce costs. Herein lie the substantial future Intermodal opportunities for CSX, NSC, JBHT, and others!
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
Major Freight Corridors:
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
Components of the Major Freight Corridors:
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
Current Train Volumes Compared to Current Capacity:
Clearly, CSX & NSC (dominant holders of rail lanes east of the Mississippi River) are far from lacking capacity to increase their revenues via growing Intermodal activities!
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: public records of the USDOT FHWA & FRA, and International Union of Combined Rail-Road Transport Companies (UIRR).
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: JB Hunt Transport Inc.
How the Truckload vs. Intermodal Freight Mix Appears Today:
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: JB Hunt Transport Inc.
How the Truckload vs. Intermodal Freight Mix Will Look in 10-15 Years:
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC
Now, Let’s Take a Closer Look at JB Hunt Intermodal’s Very Successful Journey via Train:
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K and AAR reports.
Intermodal Load Volumes: AAR U.S. vs. JBHT Intermodal
9,286,000 9,045,000
9,350,000
9,956,000
11,000,000
11,690,000
12,280,000 12,030,000
11,5
10,0
00
9,88
1,00
0
425,304446,569
473,856
527,404
581,894598,857
629,533
738,207
915,413
837,575
9.3%
7.3%
6.1%
5.1%5.1%5.3%5.3%
5.1%4.9%
4.6%
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
12,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
AAR Total U.S.Intermodal Loads,in thousands
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
JBHT TotalIntermodal Loads
AAR Total US IntermodalLoads, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = 0.7%
JBHT Total IntermodalLoads, 9-yr. (''00-'09)CAGR = 8.9%
JBHT Intermodalas % of AAR totalU.S. Intermodal
AAR U.S. RRs' 9-year IntermodalVolume CAGR = +0.7%
JBHT's 9-year IntermodalVolume CAGR = +8.9%
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
Intermodal Gross Revenues: Class 1 Railroads vs. JBHT Intermodal
$8,616 $8,574$9,124
$9,735
$10,943
$12,688
$14,192
$11,
809
$15,
238
$14,
324
$681$741
$809
$936
$1,115
$1,284
$1,430
$1,653
$1,952
$1,764
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Class 1 RRs' IntermodalGross Revenues,US$s in millions
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
$2,000
JBHT's IntermodalGross Revenues,US$s in millions
7 North AmericanClass 1 RRs, 9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +3.6%
JBHT Intermodal,9-yr. ('00-'09)CAGR = +11.2%
JBHT's 9-year Intermodal Revenue CAGR = 11.2%
Class 1 RR's 9-year Intermodal Revenue CAGR = 3.6%
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K and IANA reports.
20042005
20062007
20082009
1,306,237
1,165,0151,135,582 1,137,938
1,053,771994,174
581,894 598,857 629,533
738,207
837,575
915,413
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1,100,000
1,200,000
1,300,000
Intermodal Load Totals
Intermodal Marketing Companies (IMCs) vs. JBHT IntermodalLoad Volumes
JBHT total Intermodal loads,5-yr. CAGR = +9.5%
IANA IMC total Intermodal loads,5-yr. CAGR = -5.3%
Since YE '04 independent Intermodal Marketing Companies (the IMCs tracked by IANA) have watched their annual Intermodal volumes decline by ~312,000
shipments/yr. During that same time span JBHT's annual Intermodal volumes grew by an near identical amount,
~334,000 shipments/yr.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K and AAR reports.
Recent Railroad & JBHT Intermodal Unit Volumes
KSU
CP
CNR
CSX
NSC
UNP
BNI629,533
738,207
837,575
915,413
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
2006 2007 2008 2009
Railroad IntermodalUnit Volumes
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
JBHT IntermodalUnit Volumes
KSU3-year('06-'09)CAGR =-7.4%%
CP3-year('06-'09)CAGR =-6.0%
CNR3-year('06-'09)CAGR =-2.1%
CSX3-year('06-'09)CAGR =-4.4%
NSC3-year('06-'09)CAGR =-8.1%
UNP3-year('06-'09)CAGR =-7.1%
BNI3-year('06-'09)CAGR =-10.7
JBHT3-year('06-'09)CAGR =+13.3%
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
Key Intermediaries' Intermodal Revenues
$1,055$1,004
$959
$1,191
$681
$1,764
$0
$250
$500
$750
$1,000
$1,250
$1,500
$1,750
$2,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Intermodal Revenues,US$s in millions
LSTR CHRW HUBG PACR JBHT
Little has changed forPacer and Hub Groupin the nine full years
between2000 and 2009!
In the meantime, JB Hunt has nearly tripledits Intermodal revenues, and surely to
Pacer's and Hub's considerable detriment!Now facing JBHT's formidable traction here, do
either PACR or HUBG have muchchance for substantive Intermodal growth?
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
Key Intermediaries Gross Intermodal Revenues
$0
$250
$500
$750
$1,000
$1,250
$1,500
$1,750
$2,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Gross IntermodalRevenues,US$s in millions
$0.000
$0.500
$1.000
$1.500
$2.000
$2.500
$3.000
$3.500
$4.000
Avg. On-roadDiesel Price,
US$s/gal.
LSTR9-year ('00-'08)CAGR = +1.4%
CHRW9-year ('00-'08)CAGR = +10.4%
PACR9-year ('00-'09)CAGR = +2.4%
HUBG9-year ('00-'09)CAGR = +0.5%
JBHT9-year ('00-'09)CAGR = +11.2%
Avg. On-roadDiesel Price,US$s/gal.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
Comparing HUBG, PACR and JBHT Intermodal Revenues
$1,080
$1,173$1,206
$1,329
$1,055
$959
$1,076 $1,053
$1,154
$1,250
$1,403
$1,492
$1,568$1,633
$1,191
$681$741
$809
$936
$1,115
$1,284
$1,430
$1,653
$1,952
$1,764
$977$1,015
$915$905
$1,004
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
$2,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Gross IntermodalRevenues,US$s in millions
$1.000
$1.250
$1.500
$1.750
$2.000
$2.250
$2.500
$2.750
$3.000
$3.250
$3.500
$3.750
$4.000
Avg. On-roadDiesel Price,
US$s/gal.
HUBG9-year ('00-'09)CAGR = +0.5%
PACR9-year ('00-'09)CAGR = +2.4%
JBHT9-year ('00-'09)CAGR = +11.2%
Avg. On-roadDiesel Price,US$s/gal.
As fuel prices and fuel surcharges declined, HUBG's and PACR's Intermodal
revenues fell even faster.Little wonder that neither HUBG nor PACR
disclose Intermodal segment shipping volumes or margins.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
YE 2000 Key Intermodal Intermediaries' Market SharesHow the Top 5 divided US$2.8 billion of 2000 Intermodal Revenue
LSTR, $67 mil., 2%
CHRW, $76 mil., 3%
JBHT$681 million
24%
HUBG$1,004 million
37%
PACR$959 million
34%
LSTR CHRW HUBG PACR JBHT
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
YE 2006 Key Intermodal Intermediaries' Market SharesHow the Top 5 divided US$4.4 billion of 2006 Intermodal Revenue
LSTR, $123 mil., 3%
CHRW$167million
4%
HUBG$1,173 million
27%
PACR$1,492 million
33%
JBHT$1,430 million
33%
LSTR CHRW HUBG PACR JBHT
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
YE 2009 Key Intermodal Intermediaries' Market SharesHow the Top 5 divided US$4.3 billion of 2009 Intermodal Revenue
JBHT$1,764 million
41%PACR
$1,191 million28%
HUBG$1,055 million
25%
CHRW$186 million
4%
LSTR, $76 mil., 2%
LSTR CHRW HUBG PACR JBHT
While these top 5 generated ~$4.27 billion of gross Intermodal revenue during 2009, or ~$1.49 billion more than during 2000, JBHT Intermodal captured 74% (~$1.1 billion) of that total increase.
Have HUBG and PACR been "asleep at the switch" for the past 9 years?
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
JBHT Total and Intermodal Revenues
$2,160$2,100
$2,248
$2,433
$2,786
$3,128
$3,328
$3,490
$3,732
$3,203
$681$741
$809$936
$1,115
$1,284
$1,430
$1,653
$1,952
$1,764
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenues,US$s in millions
Total revenue (FSC included), 9-yr. CAGR = +4.5% Intermodal revenue (FSC included), 9-yr. CAGR = +11.2%
JBHT's 9-yearTotal RevenueCAGR = 4.5%
JBHT's 9-yearIntermodal Revenue
CAGR = 11.2%
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
JBHT Operating Incomes, Total vs. Intermodal
$63,400$72,200
$101,000
$185,635
$310,223
$343,900
$373,000 $369,000$358,418
$247,971
$36,700$42,100
$54,600
$91,200
$131,000
$149,800
$182,000
$239,000
$253,913
$183,377
57.9% 58.3%
54.1%
49.1%
42.2%43.6%
48.8%
64.8%
70.8%
74.0%
$0
$25,000
$50,000
$75,000
$100,000
$125,000
$150,000
$175,000
$200,000
$225,000
$250,000
$275,000
$300,000
$325,000
$350,000
$375,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Opr. Income,US$s in thousands
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Intermodal's % ofTotal Opr.Income
Total operating income (FSC included),9-yr. CAGR = +16.4%
Intermodal operating income (FSC included),9-yr. CAGR = +19.6%
Intermodal's % of Total Operating Income
JBHT's 9-year TotalOpr.Income
CAGR = 16.4%
JBHT's 9-year IntermodalOpr.Income
CAGR = 19.1%
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
JBHT Intermodal Revenues and Operating Incomes
$681$741
$809
$936
$1,115
$1,284
$1,430
$1,653
$1,952
$1,764
$91
$131
$150
$182
$239
$254
$183
$37$42
$55
$0.0
$200.0
$400.0
$600.0
$800.0
$1,000.0
$1,200.0
$1,400.0
$1,600.0
$1,800.0
$2,000.0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
US$s in millions
$0.0
$50.0
$100.0
$150.0
$200.0
$250.0
$300.0
JBHT Intermodal Gross Revenue9-yr. ('00-'09) CAGR= +11.2%
JBHT Intermodal Operating Income9-yr. ('00-'09) CAGR= +19.6%
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
Comparing Gross Revenuesof JBHT Intermodal to Regular-truckers Werner & Swift
$1,115
$1,284
$1,430
$1,653
$1,952
$2,654
$3,115$3,048 $3,043
$3,163
$1,438WERN
$1,507
$1,742$1,801
$1,882$1,795 $1,764
JBI
$2,338Swift
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Gross RevenuesUS$s in millions
Werner - Trucking Revenues,5-yr. ('04-'09)CAGR= -0.9%
JBHT Intermodal Revenues,5-yr. ('04-'09)CAGR= +9.6%
Swift - Trucking Revenues,5-yr. ('04-'09)CAGR= -2.5%
During YE 2009, the TL segments of Swift and WERN failed to match even their YE 2004
revenues; yet JBHT Intermodal (JBI) was ~58% above its '04
performance.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
JBHT Intermodal's Operating Income Grows ('09 vs. '04)Amidst Declines of Regular-truckers Werner & Swift
$131
$150
$182
$239
$254
$170
$184
$235
$113 $115
WERNTrucking$68 mil.
$136
$156
$122
$95
$122
JBHTIntermodal$183 mil.
SwiftTrucking$132 mil.
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Operating IncomesUS$s in millions
Werner - Trucking Opr.Income5-yr. ('04-'09)CAGR= -12.9%.
JBHT Intermodal Opr.Income5-yr. ('04-'09)CAGR= +7.0%
Swift - Trucking Opr.Income5-yr. ('04-'09)CAGR= -4.9%
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
JBHT Intermodal's Per-truck Per-month Operating IncomesFar Surpass Those of Regular-truckers Werner & Swift
$9,158
$9,915$10,213
$11,792
$10,475
$763 $840$1,091
$505 $524
WERN$962
$1,339 $1,488 $1,489
$986$1,187
JBHT$6,927
Swift$659 $0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Operating IncomesPer-Truck Per-Month
Werner - Trucking Opr.IncomePer Trk. Per Month5-yr. ('04-'09) CAGR= -6.4%
JBHT Intermodal Opr.IncomePer Trk. Per Month5-yr. ('04-'09) CAGR= -5.4%
Swift - Trucking Opr.IncomePer Trk. Per Month5-yr. ('04-'09) CAGR= -2.9%
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: SEC Forms 10-K.
JBHT Intermodal % of JBHT Overall Results
31.5%
35.3%36.0%
38.5%40.0%
41.0%
43.0%
47.4%
52.3%
55.1%
57.9% 58.3%
54.1%
49.1%
42.2%43.6%
48.8%
64.8%
70.8%
74.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
%
Intermodal's % of Total Revenue Intermodal's % of Total Operating Income
Intermodal's % of JBHT's total operating income.
Intermodal's % of JBHT's total revenue.
AmherstAlphaAdvisors LLC Source Data: NYSE and NASDAQ records.
Publicly-held North American Intermodal Participants - Market Values on March 8, 2010
CH Robinson - CHRW, $8,840
JB Hunt Transport - JBHT, $4,510
Landstar System - LSTR, $2,000
Hub Group - HUBG, $1,060
Pacer International - PACR, $234
Union Pacific - UNP, $35,590
Burlington Northern - BNI, $34,140
Canadian National - CNR, $27,170
Norfolk Southern - NSC, $19,830
CSX Corp. - CSX, $19,420
Canadian Pacific - CP, $9,140
Kansas City SouthernKSU, $3,490
$0.001 $10.000 $100,000.000
Market Capitalizations@ 3/09/2009, US$s in millions
SPECIAL NOTE: This a 3 decimal point logarithmic scale, from Zero to $100.0 billion ($100,000 millions).
Intermodal accounted for 76% of PACR's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 70% of HUBG's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 4% of LSTR's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 55% of JBHT's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 2% of CHRW's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 12% of KSU's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 26% of CP's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 28% of CSX's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 19% of NSC's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 18% of CNR's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 28% of BNI's 2009 gross revenue.
Intermodal accounted for 18% of UNP's 2009 gross revenue.
Q & A
For further details and/or inquiries, please contact: