The Normative Dimensions of SBC as Part of a Community Action Cycle SUSAN IGRAS
-
Upload
core-group -
Category
Healthcare
-
view
74 -
download
2
Transcript of The Normative Dimensions of SBC as Part of a Community Action Cycle SUSAN IGRAS
Susan Igras Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University
Using the Power of Social Networks to Influence Norms That Affect Unmet Need
for Family Planning in Benin
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
1. Effecting normative change using social networks 2. The social network package designed for scale 3. Cycles of reflection, diffusion, and tipping points 4. How well did it work? 5. Reflections
TÉKPONON JIKUAGOU
PARTNERS: Institute for Reproductive
Health, Georgetown University
CARE Benin
Plan International
Reduce unmet need by addressing social barriers that stop women and men from acting on their desires to space or limit births
GOAL:
WHY DOES NORMATIVE CHANGE MATTER? “I don’t know what my wife thinks about family planning; we have never talked about it. In our culture men and women should not talk about these things – this is the reason I have never discussed FP with my wife.”
WHY A SOCIAL NETWORK APPROACH?
SOCIAL LEARNING
Network members exchange ideas and information; and evaluate the relative benefits of innovation
SOCIAL INFLUENCE
Network members follow norms of gatekeepers to gain approval and avoid conflict
BASELINE RESEARCH - DIFFUSION
10% of women shared knowledge or positive experiences with FP use with friends or family (baseline)
Programmatically and evaluatively
Self-efficacy, Intentions, Behaviors Individual women & men with unmet need
FP-enabling environment Women & men’s social
networks
Shift social norms/ attitudes to foster more equitable
behaviors
Systematic use of reflective dialog to generate new
ideas at community level
Equal access by women and men
Gender synchronized
Designed for scale – low cost, simple, minimal
training & support
Systematic use of social network
principles
Iterative use of evidence to
develop, refine & implement package
GOAL:
ENGAGE COMMUNITIES IN SOCIAL MAPPING
SUPPORT INFLUENTIAL GROUPS IN REFLECTIVE DIALOGUE
ENCOURAGE INFLUENTIAL INDIVIDUALS TO ACT
LINK FP PROVIDERS WITH INFLUENTIAL GROUPS
USE RADIO TO CREATE AN ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
1
2
3
4
5
Women and men with unmet need for for family planning receive new ways of thinking and acting via their social networks
TÉKPONON JIKUAGOU:
SOCIAL NETWORK INTERVENTION PACKAGE
Light Touch, Time Bound
Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
STAFF PREPARE
COMMUNITY IDs INFLUENTIALS
GROUPS REFLECT, DISCUSS & DIFFUSE IDEAS
INFLUENTIALS ENGAGE CONSTITUENCIES
RADIO BROADCASTS EXPAND EXPOSURE TO STORIES/DISCUSSIONS
FP PROVIDERS LINK TO INFLUENTIAL GROUPS
EACH ONE INVITES THREE
CEREMONY
SOCIAL NETWORK DIFFUSION PACKAGE: ILLUSTRATIVE TIMELINE
FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS AND THE ‘EACH ONE INVITES 3’ CAMPAIGN LINK FP PROVIDERS TO INFLUENTIAL GROUPS
5
ENGAGE 3 INFLUENTIAL
GROUPS AND 5 INFLUENTIALS
WEEKLY BROADCASTS
OF GROUP REFLECTIVE DIALOGUES
50% OF ADULT WOMEN AND MEN REACHED TO CREATE A
SOCIAL TIPPING POINT OF NORM
CHANGE
+ = IN ONE VILLAGE OVER 12 MONTHS:
Quasi-experimental Base and endline surveys in intervention and control groups
Stratified 2-stage cluster samples Benin: 2,160 women and men
• Perceived social norms and support for family planning
• Perceived access to services
• Peer &couple communication
• Intention to use FP
• Contraceptive use
METHODS AND OUTCOME MEASURES
19
“I have often talked with 15 or so people at a time. During these sessions we talked a lot about the number of children we have and
family planning... I have talked about these things with my sisters; my co-wives; my mother,
with my friends and with my sister-in-law.”
Discusses FP 2.7 odds (2.05-3.50)***
1.3 odds (1.00-1.65)*
Approves of FP 3.4 odds (2.54-4.45)***
2.0 odds (1.51-2.53)***
Uses FP 4.0 odds (3.04-5.13)***
2.5 odds (1.91-3.26)***
Adjusted for age, education, religion, number of children, number of co-wives; P-values: * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001
…THE ODDS THAT I WILL USE FP INCREASE GREATLY IF I BELIEVE THAT MY NETWORK…
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
TALKS TO PARTNER ABOUT WHICH METHOD TO USE
2.5 odds (2.00-3.16)***
1.8 odds (1.47-2.20)***
TALKS TO PARTNER ABOUT HOW TO OBTAIN A METHOD
2.7 odds (2.17-3.46)***
1.9 odds (1.56-2.37)***
EXPOSURE TO GROUP DISCUSSIONS AND INFLUENTIALS INFLUENCED COUPLE COMMUNICATION ABOUT FP
Adjusted for age, education, religion, number of children, number of co-wives; P-values: * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001
FAMILY PLANNING BEHAVIOR
USES A METHOD
1.5 odds (1.17-1.97)**
1.1 odds (.894-1.49)
MET NEED
1.5 odds (1.19-2.00)**
1.2 odds (1.02-1.57)*
Adjusted for age, education, religion, number of children, number of co-wives; P-values: * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001
FAMILY PLANNING BEHAVIOR
EXPOSURE TO THE PACKAGE INFLUENCED FP METHOD USE & MET NEED
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Radio Influentials Groups Story/activitycards
Infograph EOI3 Anycomponent
Women (n=1080) Men (n=1080)
OVERALL EXPOSURE TO TJ: INTERVENTION & CONTROL AREAS
Before, I didn’t understand, but now I deeply understand and see that for us to be happy, we need to speak about this subject…
- MALE PARTICIPANT
…before, our husbands did not know that they could communicate with us, but they are doing it now.
- FEMALE PARTICIPANT
Start change process from within
Catalyze discussion and critical reflection, “trust the process”
Repetition and cumulative building on reflection and ideas
Interventions at different levels
Gender- synchronized interventions
FOSTERING SHIFTS IN SOCIAL NORMS
Embed normative change in all activities and materials
Staff mindset to ‘pass the baton’ to new scale-up actors
Staff mindset to embrace diffusion and ‘doing the minimum needed’ to support implementation
DEVELOPING SCALABLE NORMATIVE INTERVENTIONS
REACHING THE TIPPING POINT
Greater depth and
coverage needed
May require Time
Effort
Better diffusion strategies
Stickiness factor