Innovation platforms, power and representation: Lessons from the Nile Basin Development Challenge
The Nile Basin Development Challenge: A component of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food
-
Upload
ilri -
Category
Technology
-
view
3.157 -
download
0
description
Transcript of The Nile Basin Development Challenge: A component of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food
The Nile Basin Development Challenge: a component of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food
Alan DuncanILRI Ethiopia projects meetingAddis Ababa, 11 March 2013
• CPWF aims to increase water productivity and resilience of social and ecological systems
• Through its broad partnerships, it conducts research that leads to local impact and wider change
Phase 2, start 2009
Basin Development Challenges (BDCs)• Nile – rainwater management in landscapes
• Andes – Benefit sharing mechanisms
• Ganges – intensification in coastal areas
• Limpopo – rainwater management and water access
• Mekong – dams, reservoirs and livelihoods
• Volta – rainwater management and small reservoirs
Programme StructureLearning about rainwater management systems. This project reviews past and ongoing activities, compiles an inventory of actors, and identifies best practices for dissemination and use.
Integrating technologies, policies and institutions. This project will develop integrated rainwater management strategies - to slow down land degradation and reduce downstream siltation.
Targeting and scaling out of rainwater management systems. This project will better target or ‘match’ promising technologies with particular environments, thus overcoming the limited success and impact of many past agricultural development efforts.
Assessing and anticipating the consequences of innovation in rainwater management systems. This project will quantify the consequences of improved rainwater management, measuring downstream, cross-scale consequences of successful innovation in the Ethiopian highlands.
Catalyzing platforms for learning, communication and coordination. This project provides a multi-stakeholder platform for all the projects in support of improved communication, innovation and adaptive management.
Nile BDC scales and sites
LocalNational
Basin
ILRI inputs into NBDC
• Work on livestock water productivity
• Diagnosis of current status of local planning and implementation around NRM
• Piloting approaches to bottom up NRM: innovation platforms, participatory planning tools (Wat-a-game etc)
• Suitability mapping
8Simplified framework for assessing livestock-water productivity can help identify options to reduce water depletion associated with animal keeping and increase goods and …. (Peden et al., 2007).
Livestock water productivity
Calculating livestock water productivity
More milk per cow means less water use per litre of milk
Assessment of current NRM planning approaches
Diagnosis of current status of local planning and implementation around NRM
Preliminary findings: RWM planning & implementation
RWM planning is based on a top-down quota system... with some perverse incentives affecting woreda officials and DAs
Woreda offices have an incentive to increase woreda targets to win resources, leading to pressure on implementaters at kebele level
DAs’ performance assessment is based on how far targets are met --> limited opportunity / incentive to innovate or listen to farmers.
Farmers report that they have very little say in where and how RWM is implemented, and some feel that government imposes on them.
Joint identification of common NRM issue to ensure collective
action
Innovation platforms
Conventional approach to agricultural research for development (especially
in Ethiopia)
Technologies
Why Innovation Platforms?
Or...
Experimenting with local participatory planning tools
A lot of talk about ‘participation’ but little knowledge about how to put it into action.
WAT-A-GAME- Participatory planning for NRM(www.watagame.info)
Nile Goblet Tool
Suitability mapping of rainwater management strategies
Global OLMUsed by:
NDBC Outputs
Impact assessment of future widespread
adoption of improved RMS in the Ethiopian
Highlands
Communication, documentation and
synthesis developed and used
+
RMS Synthesis, Scenarios, Maps and
Tools for planning
Tools for RMS planning at community, national and regional level developed
and tested
Maps identifying what RMS work best and where in the basin
Networks / platforms for improved RWM in
identified and strengthened
Institutions and incentives for RMS implementation
identified and strengthened
Analysis of the best land use systems for different parts of the
basin
Evidence at the lanscape level
Practice changes
OUTCOMES
Test, adapt and adopt RMS
Use more effective tools for planning for RMS at landscape scale and to negotiate
fair use and win- win solutions for the available resources
Improve planning, decision making and resource allocation processes
Work beyond traditional institutional boundaries
Knowledge, Attitude and skills changes
Main Actor groups
Farmers and Farming
Communities
Experience RMS that actually work
Greater capacity to engage in collective action in resource use
and management
Receive better incentives to do their work, are more aware of
benefits and cumulative impacts of strategic trans- insttitutional
boundary work on RWMStengthen abil ity to use tools,
such as integrated planning and scenario analysis
RWS Planners at local, national and
regional levels
Regional and local policy makers
Evidence-based planning and decision making supportive of RWMS
Have improved access to inputs, negotiate land use policy and
can facil itate community action
IMPACT
Improved farming l ivelihoods
More resil ient social and ecological
systemsImproved food
security
Actively create market opportunities and
incentive mechanisms, facil itate institutions,
influence the investment of time and
money in RWM systems
Policy Makers and investors (scaling up)
Increased adoption, adaptation and promotion of effective RMS
Work beyond traditional institutional boundaries and employ participatory research methods, considering gender
and end user prioritiesConduct research on fundamental basin
problemsPromote more problem-oriented RWM
research in university curricula
Have an increased understanding of the benefits of RWM research approaches, of
different landscapes and of the socio-economic contexts
Have improved skil ls in spatial analysis, scenario analysis and
modeling
Researchers at national and basin
levels
http://nilebdc.org