The “New Morality” of the 1920s Single, working class women use work to: Break away from...
-
Upload
stephen-heath -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of The “New Morality” of the 1920s Single, working class women use work to: Break away from...
The “New Morality” of the 1920s
Single, working class women use work to:
• Break away from parental authority
• Establish a personal identity
• Participate in the consumer culture
Women’s colleges encourage women to:
• Pursue careers
• Challenge traditional ideas about women’s role in society
Wordsplash: “flapper”
Young skirts bobbed haird
Short "new breed” Jazz
unacceptable behavior excessive makeup
Drinking sex smoking
Automobiles
Women in the 1920s
• Flapper—bobbed hair, carefree, chic with fashion, young– Smoked, drank,
provocative clothing
• Majority of women remained in the home
• Others entered the workforce
The automobile allows young people to:
• Be more independent• Escape parental
control• Seek new form of
entertainment outside the family
• Find privacy
Wordsplash, “Scopes Monkey Trial”
Evolution Tennessee Divine Creation
Bible science teacher John Scopes Charles Darwin
the Butler Act Animals monkey trial
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/monkeytrial/sfeature/sf_music.html#
The Scopes Trial
• The Butler Act forbade the teaching of evolution in Tennessee; only divine creation allowed
• Am. Civil Liberties Union wanted to challenge the law and vowed to defend anyone who fought the Butler Act.
• John Scopes was contacted and was asked to teach the theory of evolution
• Scopes was indicted for teaching evolution after three students testified against him
• William Jennings Bryan, former Presidential candidate, would lead the prosecution
• Clarence Darrow, an agnostic, defended Scopes
End of the Trial
• Trial lasted for 8 days
• Scopes didn’t even testify; but scientist, priests, professors all spoke on the subject
• Jury took 9 minutes to decide Scopes was guilty
• $100 fine ($1,165 today)
Scopes’ Only Words
“Your honor, I feel that I have been convicted of violating an unjust statute. I will continue in the future, as I have in the past, to oppose this law in any way I can. Any other action would be in violation of my ideal of academic freedom — that is, to teach the truth as guaranteed in our constitution, of personal and religious freedom. I think the fine is unjust”
The Monkey Trial
• Present an argument for the defense of John Scopes based upon the scientific validity of teaching evolution and the fact that the Butler Act was unconstitutional.
• Present an argument for the prosecution based upon the right of a state to determine what is taught in its school system.