The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.
-
Upload
edith-peters -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.
![Page 1: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Nature of Law
Katarzyna Gromek BrocYork University Law School
![Page 2: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Form and Function of the law debate
Function• Focus on purpose of law, e.g. Llewellyn’s law
jobs: dissolution of the trouble case; preventative channelling and reorientation of conduct; allocation of authority; net drive
• The function of the law is more important than its shape
![Page 3: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Form or function?
• Is the form (shape) or function (job) of rule governance most important?
• Limitations of formal conception: Doesn’t answer “why do we need law?”Only applies to developed hierarchical systemsDoesn’t account for law-like functions carried out in more primitive societies or in less structured environments.
![Page 4: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Form or function?
• Limitations of functional conception: Doesn’t distinguish strict formal hierarchical systems from non-formal systems; Doesn’t distinguish between the common-sense conception of law as being concerned with state power and other exercises of power where the law jobs are performed.
![Page 5: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A moral or non moral conception
Legal Positivism:• There is no necessary conceptual connection
between law and morality• Legal validity separate to moral validityLegal Idealism: • There is a necessary conceptual connection
between law and morality• Legal validity requires, in some sense, moral
validity
![Page 6: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Legal Pluralism
Law [emanates] from the state but not only from the state’
- Cownie, Bradney and Burton, (2003), English Legal System in Context, 22.
![Page 7: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Positivism and beyond
John Austin(1790–1859)
Herbert Hart (1907-1992)
Ronald Dworkin (1931 - )
![Page 8: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
John Austin and Command Theory of Law
Two key notions:
- Command
- Obedience
![Page 9: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Key features:- General: maintaining the normativity of law
consists in a subject ability to predict the chances of incurring punishment
- Every legal norm must comprise a thread backed up by a sanction
- Habit of obedience- of the political sovereign
![Page 10: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Law for Austin consists in general commands issued by sovereigns to their subjects (who have a general habit of compliance), and backed up by threat of force (in the form of sanctions).
![Page 11: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Problems with Austin’s account:
Some laws do not command anything, but rather:- give instructions on how to successfully achieve certain legal ends;- confer the power to make law.
![Page 12: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Two lessons:
1) The Social Thesis: Law is a matter of social facts
2) The Separation Thesis: Law is only a matter of social facts. Law and morality are conceptually distinct
Legal Positivism: The existence and content of law depend on social facts, not on its moral qualities.
![Page 13: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
H.L.A. Hart and the Concept of Law
Law is a system of social rules.
1)Internal aspect of social rules;
2)Rules have different functions.
![Page 14: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Primary rules
• Secondary rules: - Rules of recognition- Rules of change - Rules of adjudication
Law is the union of primary and secondary rules.
![Page 15: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Ronald Dworkin: principles vs rules
Difference between rules and principles:
• legal rules are an all-or-nothing concept
principles of justice have “weight”
• legal rules are created by their enactment
principles are to be inferred as the best explanation for existing legal practice
![Page 16: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
judges need to make a judgement that will: • provide the “best fit” with the body of
legislative and judicial rules, decisions and unwritten principles of the common law;
• reveal the law in its “best light” in terms of moral and political soundness.
![Page 17: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Natural law
At least some laws are authoritative in virtue of their moral content
There is some kind of non-conventional relation between law and morality.
![Page 18: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Classical Natural Law Theory (Aquinas, Blackstone)
Conceptual naturalism: a norm that does not conform to the natural law cannot be legally valid.
“[E]very human law has just so much of the nature of law as is derived from the law of nature. But if in any point it deflects from the law of nature, it is no longer a law but a perversion of law” (Aquinas)
![Page 19: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
“This law of nature, being co-eval with mankind and dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe, in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive all their force, and all their authority, mediately or immediately, from this original” (William Blackstone).
![Page 20: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Natural Law
Two core claims of conceptual naturalism:
1) there can be no legally valid standards that conflict with the natural law;
2) all valid laws derive what force and authority they have from the natural law.
![Page 21: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
John Finnis’ Neo-Naturalism
Basic goods:
- Life- Health- Knowledge- Play- Friendship- Religion- aesthetic experience.
![Page 22: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Natural Law• “A ruler’s use of authority is radically defective if he
exploits his opportunities by making stipulations intended by him not for the common good but for his own or his friends’ or party’s or faction’s advantage, or out of malice against some person or group” (Finnis 1980, 352).
• The ultimate justification for the ruler’s moral authority “is the fact that he has the opportunity, and thus the responsibility, of furthering the common good by stipulating solutions to a community’s co- ordination problems” (Finnis 1980, 351).
![Page 23: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Lon L. Fuller’s functionalist conception of law
Law’s essential function is to “achiev[e] [social] order through subjecting people’s conduct to the guidance of general rules by which they may themselves orient their behavior” (Fuller 1965, 657).
![Page 24: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Functionalist conception of law: nothing can count as law unless it is capable of performing law’s essential function of guiding behavior.
But to be capable of performing this function, a system of rules must satisfy the following principles:
• (P1) the rules must be expressed in general terms;• (P2) the rules must be publicly promulgated;• (P3) the rules must be prospective in effect;• (P4) the rules must be expressed in understandable terms;• (P5) the rules must be consistent with one another;• (P6) the rules must not require conduct beyond the powers of
the affected parties;• (P7) the rules must not be changed so frequently that the
subject cannot rely on them; and• (P8) the rules must be administered in a manner consistent
with their wording.
![Page 25: The Nature of Law Katarzyna Gromek Broc York University Law School.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649ccc5503460f94995646/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
• “What I have called the internal morality of law is … a procedural version of natural law … [in the sense that it is] concerned, not with the substantive aims of legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be” (Fuller 1964, 96- 97).