The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area...

9
The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1) Final Report 4-8 (2) Traffic at Screen Line The total number of vehicle trips passing Rimac river and Av. Panamericana Sur are 632 thousand and 144 thousand, respectively, at both directions per day. Figure 4.2-2 Traffic Volume Crossing Screen Lines Figure 4.2-2 through Figure 4.2-6 show the traffic volume counted at each station on the screen lines. On the screen line on Rimac river, the traffic volume at Del Ejercito bridge is highest at 114 thousand vehicles (559 thousand passenger trips), followed by Faucett bridge at 75 thousand (400 thousand passenger trips) and Huascar bridge on the Av. Panamericana Sur, at 75 thousand (392 thousand passenger trips). In the case of Av. Panamericana Sur, the highest volume (62 thousand vehicles/day or 428 thousand passenger trips) is observed at Atocongo bridge where Traffic observed at each survey station can be summarized in Table 4.2-2. In general, all station has a very low value in terms of peak ratio, except a few stations. This means that there is no concentration of traffic and congestion observe all day. The ratio of public transport traffic ranges 20% to 40%, except three stations where the public transport is prohibited to operate. Hourly fluctuation of traffic counted both two-screen lines is illustrated in Figure 4.2-7 through Figure 4.2-11. 320 (1,737) 312 (1,777) 71 (380) 73 (461) Vehicle (person) Unit: 1,000 / day

Transcript of The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area...

Page 1: The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area ...open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11798238_06.pdf · The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation

The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)

Final Report

4-8

(2) Traffic at Screen Line The total number of vehicle trips passing Rimac river and Av. Panamericana Sur are 632 thousand and 144 thousand, respectively, at both directions per day.

Figure 4.2-2 Traffic Volume Crossing Screen Lines

Figure 4.2-2 through Figure 4.2-6 show the traffic volume counted at each station on the screen lines. On the screen line on Rimac river, the traffic volume at Del Ejercito bridge is highest at 114 thousand vehicles (559 thousand passenger trips), followed by Faucett bridge at 75 thousand (400 thousand passenger trips) and Huascar bridge on the Av. Panamericana Sur, at 75 thousand (392 thousand passenger trips).

In the case of Av. Panamericana Sur, the highest volume (62 thousand vehicles/day or 428 thousand passenger trips) is observed at Atocongo bridge where Traffic observed at each survey station can be summarized in Table 4.2-2. In general, all station has a very low value in terms of peak ratio, except a few stations. This means that there is no concentration of traffic and congestion observe all day. The ratio of public transport traffic ranges 20% to 40%, except three stations where the public transport is prohibited to operate. Hourly fluctuation of traffic counted both two-screen lines is illustrated in Figure 4.2-7 through Figure 4.2-11.

320 (1,737)312 (1,777)

71 (380)

73 (461)

Vehicle (person) Unit: 1,000 / day

Page 2: The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area ...open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11798238_06.pdf · The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation

The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)

Final Report

4-9

Figure 4.2-3 Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Vehicle/day)

Figure 4.2-4 Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Passenger/day)

Pte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa Rosa

Pte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del Ejercito

Pte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. Nuevo

Pte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. Faucett

400,160

559,125

400,257

392,004

Passesnger volume (total, x 1000pers)200

Person

Pte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Ricardo PalmaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa RosaPte. Santa Rosa

Pte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. HuascarPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del EjercitoPte. del Ejercito

Pte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. NuevoPte. Nuevo

Pte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. FaucettPte. Faucett

75,110

113,974 74,976

Traffic Volume (x 1000 vehs)100

Page 3: The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area ...open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11798238_06.pdf · The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation

The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)

Final Report

4-10

Figure 4.2-5 Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Vehicle/day)

Figure 4.2-6 Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Passenger/day)

SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-117,36517,36517,36517,36517,36517,36517,36517,36517,365

SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-28,1908,1908,1908,1908,1908,1908,1908,1908,190

SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4211,377211,377211,377211,377211,377211,377211,377211,377211,377

SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6427,634427,634427,634427,634427,634427,634427,634427,634427,634

SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7175,748175,748175,748175,748175,748175,748175,748175,748175,748

Passenger Volume (per day)100,000

PER

SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-6SS-661,91561,91561,91561,91561,91561,91561,91561,91561,915

SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-7SS-730,15730,15730,15730,15730,15730,15730,15730,15730,157

SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-1SS-15,5685,5685,5685,5685,5685,5685,5685,5685,568

SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-2SS-25,4275,4275,4275,4275,4275,4275,4275,4275,427

SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-4SS-439,87939,87939,87939,87939,87939,87939,87939,87939,879

Traffic Volume (per day)10,000

VEH

Page 4: The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area ...open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11798238_06.pdf · The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation

The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)

Final Report

4-11

Table 4.2-2 Summary of Traffic at Screen Line Stations

No. of Trips Counted

Vehicles PassengersPeak Ratio

Public Transport

Ratio Truck Ratio

Screen Line No. Station Name

(000) (000) (%) (%) (%) SL-01 Puente Gambetta 25 99 9.3 23.7 22.1 SL-02 Puente Faucett 75 400 7.1 32.1 2.0 SL-03 Puente Union 55 283 6.6 23.7 5.7 SL-04 Puente Duenas 36 161 7.4 24.0 4.0 SL-05 Puente del Ejercito 114 559 6.5 20.7 6.2 SL-06 Puente Santa Rosa 51 389 7.7 29.8 0.4 SL-07 Puente Trujillo 15 17 9.3 0.0 0.1 SL-08 Puente Ricardo Palma 53 400 7.2 24.3 0.6 SL-09 Puente Balta 3 4 9.1 1.4 2.6 SL-10 Puente Huanuco 54 268 7.2 28.9 6.7 SL-11 Puente Huascar 75 392 7.5 35.3 14.2 SL-12 Puente Miguel Grau 54 282 6.1 29.0 7.8

Rimac River

SL-13 Puente Huachipa 20 104 7.2 28.1 18.6 SS-01 AV. Pachacutec 6 17 7.1 18.7 22.4 SS-02 AV. Sol 5 8 9.5 0.7 12.6 SS-04 AV. Vargas Machuca 40 211 7.2 35.4 6.4 SS-06 AV. Pachacutec 62 428 6.5 38.4 2.6

South Pan-American Highway

SS-07 AV. ROSA LOZANO 30 176 7.2 29.5 6.8

Page 5: The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area ...open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11798238_06.pdf · The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation

The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)

Final Report

4-12

Figure 4.2-7 Hourly Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Vehicle/day)

Figure 4.2-8 Hourly Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Passenger/day)

Hourly Traffic Volume on Screenline Rimac River

25,217

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

06:0

0 - 0

7:00

07:0

0 - 0

8:00

08:0

0 - 0

9:00

09:0

0 - 1

0:00

10:0

0 - 1

1:00

11:0

0 - 1

2:00

12:0

0 - 1

3:00

13:0

0 - 1

4:00

14:0

0 - 1

5:00

15:0

0 - 1

6:00

16:0

0 - 1

7:00

17:0

0 - 1

8:00

18:0

0 - 1

9:00

19:0

0 - 2

0:00

20:0

0 - 2

1:00

21:0

0 - 2

2:00

22:0

0 - 2

3:00

Hour

Traf

fic V

olum

e(ve

h/hr

)

N-SS-N

Hourly Passenger Volume on Screenline Rimac River

189,486

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

180,000

200,000

06:0

0 - 0

7:00

07:0

0 - 0

8:00

08:0

0 - 0

9:00

09:0

0 - 1

0:00

10:0

0 - 1

1:00

11:0

0 - 1

2:00

12:0

0 - 1

3:00

13:0

0 - 1

4:00

14:0

0 - 1

5:00

15:0

0 - 1

6:00

16:0

0 - 1

7:00

17:0

0 - 1

8:00

18:0

0 - 1

9:00

19:0

0 - 2

0:00

20:0

0 - 2

1:00

21:0

0 - 2

2:00

22:0

0 - 2

3:00

Hour

Traf

fic V

olum

e(ve

h/hr

)

N-S

S-N

Page 6: The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area ...open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11798238_06.pdf · The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation

The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)

Final Report

4-13

Figure 4.2-9 Hourly Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Vehicle/day)

Figure 4.2-10 Hourly Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Passenger/day)

Hourly Passenger Volume on Screenline P.A.S.

36,363

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

06:0

0 - 0

7:00

07:0

0 - 0

8:00

08:0

0 - 0

9:00

09:0

0 - 1

0:00

10:0

0 - 1

1:00

11:0

0 - 1

2:00

12:0

0 - 1

3:00

13:0

0 - 1

4:00

14:0

0 - 1

5:00

15:0

0 - 1

6:00

16:0

0 - 1

7:00

17:0

0 - 1

8:00

18:0

0 - 1

9:00

19:0

0 - 2

0:00

20:0

0 - 2

1:00

21:0

0 - 2

2:00

22:0

0 - 2

3:00

Hour

Pass

enge

rs/h

r

W-EE-W

Hourly Traffic Volume on Screenline P.A.S.

4,887

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

06:0

0 - 0

7:00

07:0

0 - 0

8:00

08:0

0 - 0

9:00

09:0

0 - 1

0:00

10:0

0 - 1

1:00

11:0

0 - 1

2:00

12:0

0 - 1

3:00

13:0

0 - 1

4:00

14:0

0 - 1

5:00

15:0

0 - 1

6:00

16:0

0 - 1

7:00

17:0

0 - 1

8:00

18:0

0 - 1

9:00

19:0

0 - 2

0:00

20:0

0 - 2

1:00

21:0

0 - 2

2:00

22:0

0 - 2

3:00

Hour

Traf

fic V

olum

e(ve

h/hr

)W-EE-W

Page 7: The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area ...open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11798238_06.pdf · The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation

The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)

Final Report

4-14

Figure 4.2-11 Modal Share on the Screen line

(3) Traffic at Principal Road Sections Figure 4.2-12 through Figure 4.2-15 show traffic volume counted in periods from 6:00 to 10:00. The following can be obvious:

a) In time period from 6:00 – 7:00 and 7:00 – 8:00, there is traffic generated in the north part of the Study area, which is going to the central area.

b) In time period from 8:00 – 9:00, there is a generation in the central and south area, and the congestion in the central area starts.

c) The congestion in the north area and south area are relieved and the congestion in the central area still remains.

Modal Share of Screenline-Rimac Riverby Vehicle (Total)

M/C1.9% Car

28.6%

Taxi36.4%

Combi13.9%

Microbus8.2%

Bus4.4% Truck

6.6%

Modal Share of Screenline-Rimac River by passenger (Total)

M/C0.3%

Car10.3% Taxi

7.3%

Combi26.7%Microbus

29.9%

Bus24.2%

Truck1.2%

Modal Share of Screenline-P.A.Sby Vehicle (Total)

M/C3.7% Car

24.2%

Taxi32.9%

Combi18.0%

Microbus10.9%

Bus4.6%

Truck5.7%

Modal Share of Screenline-P.A.Sby passenger (Total)

M/C0.5%

Car7.5%

Taxi5.5%

Combi29.7%

Microbus33.2%

Bus22.6%

Truck1.0%

Page 8: The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area ...open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11798238_06.pdf · The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation

The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)

Final Report

4-15

Figure 4.2-12 Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 6:00 to 7:00

Figure 4.2-13Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 7:00 to 8:00

Traffic Volume(7:00 - 8:00)

2,500 - 9,9991,500 - 2,5001,000 - 1,500

500 - 1,0000 - 500

Traffic Volume(6:00 - 7:00)

1,500 - 2,5001,000 - 1,500

500 - 1,0000 - 500

Page 9: The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area ...open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11798238_06.pdf · The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation

The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1)

Final Report

4-16

Figure 4.2-14 Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 8:00 to 9:00

Figure 4.2-15 Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 9:00 to 10:00

Traffic Volume(8:00 - 9:00)

2,500 - 9,999 (15)1,500 - 2,500 (44)1,000 - 1,500 (29)

500 - 1,000 (30)0 - 500 (7)

Traffic Volume(9:00 - 10:00)

2,500 - 9,9991,500 - 2,5001,000 - 1,500

500 - 1,0000 - 500