Educator Evaluation: A Case Study of Massachusetts’ Approach
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan...
description
Transcript of The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan...
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation
S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan DevelopmentAugust 2012
1
Agenda Connecting to District and School Goals Learning what Makes a SMART and
SMARTer Goal Implementing Wrap-Up
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
2
Intended OutcomesAt the end of this session, participants will be able to:Identify characteristics of “not-so-S.M.A.R.T.,” “S.M.A.R.T.,” and “S.M.A.R.T.er” goals.Translate student learning and professional practice goals into S.M.A.R.T.er goals.Develop a sample Educator Plan that describes what the educator and evaluator will do, support that will be provided, and timelines.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
3
Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
Every educator conducts an analysis
of evidence of student learning,
growth, and achievement.
Every educator conducts an assessment of practice against
Performance Standards.
Every educator prepares to
strategically identify professional practice and student learning
goals.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
4
Goal setting and plan development facilitates a process that… Promotes professional growth and
continuous learning by empowering educators and by meeting real needs of the educator and his or her students.
Establishes a plan for every educator that emphasizes continuous improvement.
Keeps student learning at the core of all instructional and professional practice decisions.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
5
Coherence Through Aligned Goals
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
6
An Example of Goal CoherenceDan, a ninth-grade biology teacher:
Level Goal TopicSchool Improvement Grants focus topic
Literacy
Individual student learning goal topic
Scientific reading and writing
Team professional practice goal topic
Teaching content literacy in ninth-grade science
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
7
S.M.A.R.T. Goals S = Specific and Strategic M = Measurable A = Action Oriented R = Rigorous, Realistic, and
Results Focused (the 3 Rs) T = Timed and Tracked
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
8
What Makes a Goal “S.M.A.R.T.”?Individually: Read “What Makes a Goal “S.M.A.R.T.”?” Underline one phrase that you find most
significant in the reading.At your table: Pair with a partner. Discuss the phrases that emerged and any
insights about the document.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
9
Identifying S.M.A.R.T. Goals
Work with a partner. Determine if each of the four statements on the
handout are S.M.A.R.T. or if they need revision. Revise one statement to make it S.M.A.R.T.er.
I will improve student outcomes in Grade 4 mathematics during the 2012–13 school year. –Teacher LevelDuring the 2012–13 school year, our beginner ELL students will improve their English language proficiency as measured by a second administration of the district language proficiency assessment used to determine student placement at the beginning of the year. –Team LevelTo increase my staff’s use of student data, I will design meetings to review, analyze, and interpret student data to inform curriculum and instruction. –Administrator LevelI will manage my time more effectively in order to increase the frequency of classroom observations. –Administrator Level
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
10
Identifying S.M.A.R.T. Goals S = Specific and Strategic M = Measurable A = Action Oriented R = Rigorous, Realistic, and
Results Focused (the 3 Rs) T = Timed and Tracked
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
11
Goal StatementExample Revision
I will improve student outcomes in Grade 4 mathematics during the 2012–13 school year.
–Teacher Level
I will improve student performance on district-created benchmarks from 47.5 percent proficient (baseline) to 80 percent proficient in Grade 4 mathematics during the 2012–13 school year.
During the 2012–13 school year, our beginner ELL students will improve English language proficiency as measured by a second administration of the district language proficiency assessment used to determine student placement at the beginning of the year.
–Team Level
During the 2012–13 school year, at least 80 percent of our beginner ELL students will improve English language proficiency in all language domains as measured by a second administration of the district language proficiency assessment used to determine student placement at the beginning of the year.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
12
Goal Statement Example Revision
To increase my staff’s use of student data, I will design meetings to review, analyze, and interpret student data to inform curriculum and instruction.
–Administrator Level
To increase my staff’s use of student data, I will schedule monthly meetings for each department in which our data team works with teachers to review, analyze, and interpret student data to inform lesson planning, assessment, teaching strategies, and instructional interventions.
I will manage my time more effectively in order to increase the frequency of classroom observations.
–Administrator Level
I will manage my time more effectively in order to increase the frequency and impact of classroom observations by learning how to do 10-minute observations with feedback, and by the start of the second semester, conducting eight visits per week, on average, that an increasing percentage of teachers report are useful.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
13
Identifying S.M.A.R.T. Goals With members of your team, use the
goal setting form to draft two goals:o Student Learning SMART Goalo Professional Practice SMART Goals
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
14
Making a S.M.A.R.T. Goal S.M.A.R.T.er
S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statement+
Key Action Steps+
Benchmarks (Process and Outcome)
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
15
Educator Plan Development Educator Plan Form
Student Learning Goal(s) and Professional Practice Goal(s) Planned Activity
Action Supports/Resources From School/District
Timeline/Benchmark or Frequency
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
16
Principal Educator Plan ExampleSample Professional Practice Goal for a Principal: I will manage my time more
effectively in order to increase the frequency and impact of classroom observations by learning how to do 10-minute observations with feedback and, by the start of the second semester, conducting eight visits per week, on average, that an increasing percentage of teachers report are useful.
Student Learning Goal(s) and Professional Practice Goal(s) Planned ActivityAction Supports/
Resources From School/District
Timeline/Benchmark or Frequency
1. By September 1, I will develop a schedule and method for logging at least eight classroom observations with feedback per week between October 15 and Memorial Day.2. By October 15, I will study with colleague principals and my administrative team how to conduct 10-minute unannounced observations and write brief, useful feedback.3. By January 1, I will share at least five samples of feedback with colleague principals and collect their feedback.4. By January 1 and again on June 1, I will solicit anonymous feedback from teachers about their perceptions of the usefulness of the unannounced visits and feedback.
Superintendent to facilitate teams of principals to collaborate on enhancing the observation and feedback process. Superintendent will help identify teams and provide scheduled time to hold study groups and conduct feedback sessions.
1. September 1—schedule developedJanuary 15/March 15/May 15—check in to determine if eight observations per week (on average) have been completed2. October 15—documented study time with colleague3. January 1—five feedback samples will be shared with colleagues4. January 1 and June 1—will have collected feedback via teachers regarding their perceived value of the process
*Evidence provided through principals’ logs and example artifacts
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
17
Process and Outcome Benchmarks Process benchmarks—monitor plan
implementationo January 15/March 15/May 15—check in to
determine if eight observations per week (on average) have been completed
Outcome benchmarks—monitor effectiveness of the plano January 1 and June 1—will have collected
feedback via teachers regarding their perceived value of the process
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
18
Implementation Responsibility
Educator Responsibilities:o Identifying, collecting & organizing artifacts/evidence related
to goal progress.o Documenting action steps completed.o Collecting and submitting common artifacts.o Collecting and submitting evidence related to Standards III
and IV. Evaluator Responsibilities:
o Making resources and supports available.o Identifying common artifacts/evidence.o Observing practice and providing regular and specific
feedback on performance.o Monitoring progress – including midpoint check-ins.
19
Laying the Foundation1. School teams will work together to develop a
completed educator plan. 2. As a team, identify SMART goals. 3. Identify action steps.4. Outline supports and resources and determine a
timeline.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
20
Student Learning Goal(s) and Professional Practice Goal(s) Planned Activity
Action Supports/Resources From School/District
Timeline/Benchmark or Frequency