The Lunar Conspiracy.docx

7/29/2019 The Lunar Conspiracy.docx

1/7

The Lunar Conspiracy?Did Man Really go to the Moon?

My name is Peter Bown. I am a senior school physics teacher and part time

photographer in England. I don't profess to know the answers. I am merely asking

questions.Consider this question...

Have you ever seen a rocket take off, land vertically and then take off again?It was attempted once. In 1996 the Delta rocket DC-X toppled over on landing andexploded. NASA is still trying to find a team of engineers that can get a rocket to

land vertically. Strange really, they managed to do this on the Moon twenty-seven

years earlier.If a rocket did manage to land and take off vertically, it would have blown huge

amounts of dust and debris in all directions. However, when the Apollo 11 landed,

Neil Armstrong famously left his footprint in undisturbed dust.Do you still think the Americans went to the Moon? Take a close look at these

photos.


2/7

The 'sunlight' in this photograph is clearly coming from the right and flaring into

the lens. How come there are shadows on the roof of the exit and why is Buzz

Aldrin so well lit?

The 'sunlight' here is coming from low down on the right. What's lighting Buzz

Aldrin's back-pack? He should be in shadow, like the ground. On TV he bounced


3/7

down the ladder with both feet together.

Very odd this one... The shadows are going in different directions. Sunlight

generates parallel shadows. If you draw a line through each of the shadows and

find the position where they meet, this will give you the position of the light

source. Could this be a studio light about 30 feet away? The reflected light in the

helmet is not that of the Sun, nor is it the surface of the Moon. The Sun wouldgenerate a very small point of light in the helmet.

Note the Lunar Module on the left. Can you see any disturbed dust around it?

There should be a large 'star burst' pattern or even a crater generated by theblast of the rocket engine.


4/7

Why is the horizon darker than the foreground? Sunlight doesn't generate hot

spots, but studio lights do.

The rock in the background (top left) appears to be lit from the side. If the lightis coming from behind, the rock should have more shadow area on it.

NASA claim that the camera used on the Moon was designed to be used at waist

height. If this photograph was taken at waist height, the horizon would have been

lower down. The horizon in this photograph is at eye level, therefore the camera

must have been at eye level.


5/7

No sign of any blast damage on the surface of the Moon. If we assume that the

mass of the module is in the region of 5,000kg, a force of over 10,000 newtons

would be required to slow the module and act against the Moon's gravity. This

amount of force would not leave the surface undisturbed.

On Earth, we have not been able to land a rocket vertically. The rocket has a

tendency to slide horizonally. If the rocket is even a few degrees off horizonal or

the surface is uneven, the force of the engine will cause the rocket to tip over as

it nears the surface. Try it yourself with a water rocket... Its easy to make the

rocket take off, but try landing it.Whilst the physics is slightly different in a vacuum, the force of the engine would

have been reflected by the surface as the module landed, this would have made the

landing very complicated. The British Hawker Harrier fighter jet can achieve

vertical landings, but it requires four jet outputs for stability.

How come every lunar blast-off was perfect? How many engineers did they have up

there?


6/7

The dust being thrown up by the Apollo 16 Lunar Rover is forming clouds. Dust

clouds can only form in an atmosphere. In a vacuum, the dust should be thrown

back in a arc. If this much dust was moved by the wheels of vehicle, how come the

blast of a rocket appears to have moved no dust at all.

Kodak say that normal Ektachrome slide film was used. What happens to slide filmif you try to use it below minus 20 degrees Celsius? It shatters! Radiation and UV

doesn't do it a lot of good either!Transparency film has to be exposed very accurately, an error of one stop will

produce an unusable photograph. The cameras that were taken to the Moon had no

light meters or automatic exposure system. NASA provided the astonauts with an

'exposure guide'. How could they know what the exposure should be when nobody

had ever been there before?

p.s. nasa.gov and senate.gov have been looking at this page.I know, I've got a site log!

You may be watching me, I'm watching you too!

There's only one way that NASA can clear this up... Send a probe to the Moon and


7/7

take some pictures of the landing sites.

Come on NASA, you know you want to!

The Lunar Conspiracy.docx

Documents

Transcript of The Lunar Conspiracy.docx