THE LEBANON BRIEFimages.mofcom.gov.cn/lb/201507/20150727155316148.pdf · Demand for the dollar in...
Transcript of THE LEBANON BRIEFimages.mofcom.gov.cn/lb/201507/20150727155316148.pdf · Demand for the dollar in...
Your Investment Reference
THE
LEBANON BRIEF
ISSUE 928
Week of 20-25 July, 2015
ECONOMIC RESEARCH DEPARTMENT
BLOMINVEST Bank Headquarters
Bab Idriss, Beirut, Lebanon
T (01) 991 784/2 F (+961) 1 991 732
www.blom.com.lb
S A L
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
TABLE OF CONTENT
FINANCIAL MARKETS 3
Equity Market 3
Foreign Exchange Market 5
Money & Treasury Bills Markets 5
Eurobond Market 6
ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL NEWS 7
BDL’s Total Assets Stood at $91.13B by Mid-July 7
Deflationary Pressures on the Lebanese Economy in H1 2015 8
6-Year Low Continued to Characterize Building Permits in H1 9
Declining Demand Putting a Toll on Total Real Estate Transaction By June 10
Airport Passengers Improved by 6.49% by June 10
CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS 11
EuroMena Fund Sold its Share in Chedid Capital Holding 11
Bank Audi Consolidated Profits Rose by 6.52% to $202.09M in H1 2015 11
FOCUS IN BRIEF 12
International Monetary Fund’s Article IV Consultation for Lebanon – 2015 12
This report is published for information purposes only. The information herein has been compiled from, or based upo n sources we believe to be
reliable, but we do not guarantee or accept responsibility for its completeness or accuracy. This document should not be cons trued as a
solicitation to take part in any investment, or as constituting any representation or warranty on our part. The consequences of any action taken
on the basis of information contained herein are solely the responsibility of the recipient .
The Lebanon Brief Page 3 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
FINANCIAL MARKETS
Equity Market
Stock Market
24/07/2015 16/07/2015 % Change
BLOM Stock Index* 1,182.88 1,189.72 -0.57%
Average Traded Volume 318,416 200,699 58.65%
Average Traded Value 2,316,147 1,375,911 68.34%
*22 January 1996 = 1000
The Beirut Stock Exchange (BSE) reversed its
upward trend this week, with the BLOM Stock
Index (BSI) dropping 0.57% to 1,182.88 points. The
average traded volume and value grew from last
week’s 200,699 shares worth $1.38M, to 318,416
shares worth $2.32M. Accordingly, the market
capitalization decreased from $10.02B to $9.96B.
The BSI however managed to outperform the
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Index (MSCI)
which lost 1.54%. Meanwhile the S&P Pan Arab
Composite Large-Mid-Cap Index and the S&P AFE
40 Index gained weekly 0.42% and 0.37%,
respectively.
On the regional front, the top performing bourse
was the Egyptian bourse which gained 4.31% and
was followed by the Dubai bourse which grew by
2.42% and the Abu Dhabi bourse which added a
weekly 1.87%.
The BSE was the worst performer, followed by
Qatar and Bahrain, with weekly losses of 0.54%
and 0.07%, respectively.
Back to the Beirut Stock Exchange, and in the
banking sector, Audi listed shares were the only
common shares to close in the green with a 3%
weekly upturn to $6.19, partly due to the release of
their financials which revealed a positive
performance during the 1st half of 2015. In
contrast, BLOM listed shares, Audi GDR share, and
Byblos listed shares dropped 1.03%, 3.06%, and
0.62% to end the week at $9.6, $6.01, and $1.6,
respectively.
On the other hand, the preferred shares exhibited a
progress, where the BLOM Preferred Stock Index
(BPSI) added a weekly 0.23% to 104.85 points. In
details, the preferred shares of Audi class “G”,
Byblos 08, and BLC class “A” improved 0.4%, 1.3%
and 1.1% to $100.5, $101.5, and $101.1,
respectively. Similarly, Bank of Beirut Preferred
shares class “H” added 0.39% to $25.6. Byblos
preferred 09 shares were the only preferred shares
to end the week in the red, sliding by 0.2% to
$100.7.
Banking Sector
Mkt 24/07/2015 16/07/2015 % Change
BLOM (GDR) BSE $10.00 $10.00 0.00%
BLOM Listed BSE $9.60 $9.70 -1.03%
BLOM (GDR) LSE $9.90 $10.00 -1.00%
Audi (GDR) BSE $6.01 $6.20 -3.06%
Audi Listed BSE $6.19 $6.01 3.00%
Audi (GDR) LSE $6.10 $6.20 -1.61%
Byblos (C) BSE $1.60 $1.61 -0.62%
Byblos (GDR) LSE $80.50 $80.50 0.00%
Bank of Beirut (C) BSE $18.40 $18.40 0.00%
BLC (C) BSE $1.70 $1.70 0.00%
Fransabank (B) OTC $27.00 $27.00 0.00%
BEMO (C) BSE $1.90 $1.90 0.00%
Mkt 24/07/2015 16/07/2015 % Change
Banks’ Preferred
Shares Index *
104.85 104.61 0.23%
Audi Pref. E BSE $102.20 $102.20 0.00%
Audi Pref. F BSE $100.50 $100.50 0.00%
Audi Pref. G BSE $100.50 $100.10 0.40%
Audi Pref. H BSE $100.60 $100.60 0.00%
Byblos Preferred 08 BSE $101.50 $100.20 1.30%
Byblos Preferred 09 BSE $100.70 $100.90 -0.20%
Bank of Beirut Pref. E BSE $25.50 $25.50 0.00%
Bank of Beirut Pref. I BSE $25.50 $25.50 0.00%
Bank of Beirut Pref. H BSE $25.60 $25.50 0.39%
BLOM Preferred 2011 BSE $10.15 $10.15 0.00%
BEMO Preferred 2013 BSE $101.10 $100.00 1.10%
* 25 August 2006 = 100
1150
1170
1190
1210
1230
1250
Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Mar-15 May-15 Jul-15
BLOM Stock Index HI: 1,236.40
LO: 1,159.48
The Lebanon Brief Page 4 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
Real Estate
Mkt 24/07/2015 16/07/2015 % Change
Solidere (A) BSE $11.40 $11.91 -4.28%
Solidere (B) BSE $11.40 $11.61 -1.81%
Solidere (GDR) LSE $11.30 $11.60 -2.59%
On the London Stock Exchange, Solidere GDRs
lost 2.59% to $11.30. GDRs of Bank Audi and
BLOM Bank declined weekly by 1.61% and
1.00% to $6.1 and $9.90, respectively.
Manufacturing Sector
Mkt 24/07/2015 16/07/2015 % Change
HOLCIM Liban BSE $14.90 $15.20 -1.97%
Ciments Blancs (B) BSE $3.02 $3.02 0.00%
Ciments Blancs (N) BSE $2.75 $2.75 0.00%
In the real-estate sector, Solidere shares classes
“A” and “B” dropped 4.28% and 1.81% to close
at the same price of $11.4, despite the
company’s optimistic expectations for its H1
results as stated during the analyst day, which it
holds annually for equity analysts and capital
markets agents.
In the industrial sector, HOLCIM shares lost
1.97% to $14.90.
For the coming week, the BSI will probably be
affected by the mid-year results of the listed
banks, which are expected to be released during
the week.
Funds
Mkt 23/07/2015 15/07/2015 % Change
BLOM Cedars Balanced
Fund Tranche “A” -----
$7,539.18 $7,559.73 -0.27%
BLOM Cedars Balanced
Fund Tranche “B” -----
$4,980.78 $4,995.47 -0.29%
BLOM Cedars Balanced
Fund Tranche “C” -----
$5,726.06 $5,741.67 -0.27%
BLOM Bond Fund ----- $9,507.13 $9,507.13 0.00%
Retail Sector
Mkt 24/07/2015 16/07/2015 % Change
RYMCO BSE $3.23 $3.23 0.00%
ABC (New) OTC $27.00 $27.00 0.00%
Tourism Sector
Mkt 24/07/2015 16/07/2015 % Change
Casino Du Liban OTC $323.00 $323.00 0.00%
SGHL OTC $7.00 $7.00 0.00%
The Lebanon Brief Page 5 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
Foreign Exchange Market
Lebanese Forex Market
24/07/2015 16/07/2015 %Change
Dollar / LP 1,505.00 1,508.00 -0.20%
Euro / LP 1,649.51 1,641.22 0.51%
Swiss Franc / LP 1,568.03 1,575.56 -0.48%
Yen / LP 12.16 12.15 0.08%
Sterling / LP 2,335.42 2,353.96 -0.79%
NEER Index** 165.97 165.82 0.09%
*Close of GMT 09:00+2
**Nominal Effective Exchange Rate; Base Year Jan 2006=100
**The unadjusted weighted average value of a country’s currency relative to all major
currencies being traded within a pool of currencies. The NEER represents the
approximate relative price a consumer will pay for an imported good.
Demand for the dollar in the Lebanese Forex market
declined during the week as the Lebanese pound’s peg
against the dollar went from 1,506–1,510 with a mid-price
of $/LP 1,508 to $/LP 1,503–1,507 with a mid-price of $/LP
1,505. Foreign assets (excluding gold) at the Central Bank
grew by a monthly 0.7% to reach $38.86B at the end of
June. As for the dollarization rate of private sector
deposits, it slid from 65.71% in December 2014 to 65.15%
by May.
Nominal Effective Exchange Rate (NEER)
The euro recovered against the dollar by 0.51% to stand at
€/$ 1.0942, on Friday 24th of July. This probably came after
Athens avoided default on the ECB by tapping into a 7
billion-Euro bridge loan, which might have put food for
thought about the improvement of the situation in Europe.
Gold continued its bearish trend over the week, as the prices
dropped from last week’s $1,143.96/ounce to $1,079.46/ounce
today at 12:30 pm, Beirut time. This is possibly due to the world's
largest gold producer (China) stockpiling gold reserves at a slower
pace than previously thought, keeping gold investors on their toes.
Furthermore, a strong dollar might be holding the yellow metal as
well.
By Friday 24th of July, 2015, 12:30 pm Beirut time, the
dollar-pegged LP depreciated against the euro going from
€/LP 1,641.22 to €/LP 1,649.51. The Nominal effective
exchange Rate (NEER) increased by a weekly 0.09% to
165.97 points, bringing its year-to-date gains to 12.66%.
Money & Treasury Bills Markets
Money Market Rates
Treasury Yields
24/07/2015 16/07/2015 Change bps
3-M TB yield 4.39% 4.39% 0
6-M TB yield 4.87% 4.87% 0
12-M TB yield 5.08% 5.08% 0
24-M TB coupon 5.84% 5.84% 0
36-M TB coupon 6.50% 6.50% 0
60-M TB coupon 6.74% 6.74% 0
24/07/2015 16/07/2015 Change bps
Overnight Interbank 3.00% 2.75% 0
BDL 45-day CD 3.57% 3.57% 0
BDL 60-day CD 3.85% 3.85% 0
During the week ending July 9 2015, broad Money M3
increased by LP 111B ($73.96M), to reach LP 181,580B
($120.45B) with a 4.61% yearly growth and a 2.36% y-t-d
uptick. In contrast, M1 decreased by LP 61B ($40.53M) due to
the decrease in demand deposits by LP 190B ($126.03M) and
the increase in money in circulation by LP 129B ($85.57M).
Total deposits (excluding demand deposits) went up by LP
173B ($114.49M), over the week, given the LP 247B growth in
term and saving deposits and the $49M contraction in
deposits denominated in foreign currencies. Over the above
mentioned period, the broad money dollarization rate
experienced a down-tick from 58.05% on July 2, to 57.97%
on July 9. According to the Central Bank, the overnight
interbank rate dropped from 3.00% at the end of April 2015 to
2.75% at the end of May 2015.
In the TBs auction held on the 16th of July 2015, the Ministry
of Finance raised LP 166.48B ($110.44M), through the
issuance of bills and notes maturing in 3M, 1Y and 5Y. The
highest demand was achieved on the 5Y notes, with a
79.39% share of total subscriptions, while the 3M and 1Y bills
captured the remaining 10.90% and 9.71%, respectively. The
3M and 1Y bills yielded 4.39% and 5.08%, while the coupon
rate of the 5Y notes stood at 6.74%. New subscriptions
exceeded maturing bills by LP 63.03B ($41.82M).
129
132
135
138
141
144
147
150
153
156
159
162
165
168
Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Mar-15 May-15 Jul-15
The Lebanon Brief Page 6 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
Eurobond Market
Eurobonds Index and Yield
23/07/2015 15/07/2015 Change Year to Date
BLOM Bond Index (BBI)* 107.244 107.078 0.16% 1.10%
Weighted Yield** 5.45% 5.50% -4 43
Weighted Spread*** 378 384 -6 -52
*Base Year 2000 = 100; includes US$ sovereign bonds traded on the OTC market
** The change is in basis points ***Against US Treasuries (in basis points)
Lebanese Government Eurobonds
Maturity - Coupon
23/07/2015
Price*
15/07/2015
Price*
Weekly
Change%
23/07/2015
Yield
15/07/2015
Yield
Weekly
Change bps
2016, Nov - 4.750% 100.85 100.70 0.15% 4.05% 4.19% -13
2017, Mar - 9.000% 107.45 107.5 -0.05% 4.29% 4.32% -3
2017, Oct - 5.000% 101.12 100.75 0.37% 4.46% 4.64% -18
2018, Jun - 5.150% 101.46 101.923 -0.45% 4.60% 4.44% 17
2018, Nov - 5.150% 101.23 100.88 0.35% 4.74% 4.86% -12
2019, Apr - 5.500% 101.75 101.523 0.22% 4.98% 5.05% -7
2020, Mar - 6.375% 104.38 104.25 0.12% 5.29% 5.33% -4
2020, Apr - 5.800% 101.88 101.75 0.13% 5.34% 5.38% -3
2020, Jun - 6.150% 103.13 102.965 0.16% 5.41% 5.45% -4
2021, Apr - 8.250% 113.25 113 0.22% 5.51% 5.57% -6
2022, Oct - 6.100% 102 101.63 0.36% 5.75% 5.82% -6
2023, Jan - 6.000% 101 100.88 0.12% 5.83% 5.85% -2
2024, Dec - 7.000% 106.88 106.5 0.36% 6.03% 6.08% -5
2025, Jun - 6.250% 101 100.75 0.25% 6.06% 6.09% -3
2026, Nov - 6.600% 102.63 102.5 0.13% 6.27% 6.29% -2
2027, Nov - 6.750% 103.63 103.5 0.13% 6.32% 6.34% -2
Mid Prices ; BLOMINVEST bank
Demand for Lebanese Eurobonds showed a minor improvement as the BLOM Bond Index (BBI) ticked up by 0.16%
over the week to 107.24 points. Lebanon’s BBI still managed to outperform the JP Morgan Emerging Markets’ Bond
Index which slightly increased by a weekly 0.02% to settle at 674.85 points.
The yields on the Lebanese Eurobonds maturing in 5Y and 10Y lost 3 basis points (bps) and 2 bps to 5.16% and
6.06%, respectively. In the U.S, the yield on 5Y treasuries added 2 bps to 1.65%, while that of the 10Y dropped 8 bps
to 2.28%. The increase in demand for long term US notes came as a result of low inflation expectations, driven by
falling commodity prices. Accordingly the spread between the yields on the 5Y Lebanese Eurobonds and their US
comparable narrowed by 5 bps to 351 bps, while the spread between yields on 10Y notes widened from 372 bps to
378 bps.
Lebanon 5Y Credit Default Swaps (CDS) steadied at 355-380 bps. 5Y CDS quotes of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Brazil
widened from 219-222 bps, 55-60 bps, and 260-263 bps to 225-228 bps, 57-62 bps, and 290-293 bps, respectively. As
for Dubai’s 5Y CDS quotes, they narrowed from last week’s 179-188 bps to 175-180 bps.
4.50%
5.00%
5.50%
6.00%
Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Mar-15 May-15 Jul-15
Weighted Effective Yield of Eurobonds
The Lebanon Brief Page 7 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL NEWS
BDL’s Total Assets by Mid-July ($B)
Source: BDL
BDL’s Total Assets Stood at $91.13B by Mid-July
Lebanon’s Central Bank’s (BdL) revealed a 0.41% monthly growth
by Mid-July in its total assets to $91.13B compared to a lower
amount of $90.76B by June 15.
Foreign assets, which grasped 42.87% of total assets, went down
by 0.24% month-on-month to $39.06B by July 15, 2015. Similarly,
gold (11.69% of total assets) declined by 1.80% from last month to
$10.65B on the back of the 3.09% fall in international gold prices,
over the same period. In contrast, securities’ portfolio (18.03% of
total assets) improved 1.93%, from June 15, to $16.43B by Mid-
July, while loans to the financial sector (5.03% of total assets)
dropped by 0.73% m-o-m to $4.58B.
On the liabilities side, financial sector deposits grew by 0.78% m-o-
m to $72.21B, taking 79.24% of total liabilities in July 15, while
public sector deposits (7.32% of total liabilities) down ticked by
3.13% to $6.67B, over the same period.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
57.77
67.55
74.27
77.66
83.19
91.13
The Lebanon Brief Page 8 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
Yearly CPI Components Change in June
Source: CAS
Deflationary Pressures on the Lebanese Economy in
H1 2015
According to the Central Administration of Statistics (CAS), the
consumer price index (CPI) has been prone to deflationary
pressures in H1 2015 compared to H1 2014. The CPI dropped from
100.61 in June 2014 to 97.22 in June of this year, registering a
3.37% year-on-year (y-o-y) drop. Since “water, electricity, gas &
other fuels” and “transportation” constitute two of the major
weights in the CPI with a cumulative share of 25%, it’s expected
that consumer prices will fall on the back of the approximate 45%
yearly decline in the average international oil prices for June 2015.
Furthermore, the appreciating dollar versus the Euro influenced the
price decrease bearing in mind that a major part of Lebanon’s
imports are from Europe. Worth mentioning that overall prices have
also been decreasing year-to-date by 2.09%.
In terms of the CPI’s components, “Food and non -alcoholic
beverages” (20.6% of CPI) decreased by a 1.69% y-o-y in H1 2015.
Moreover, “Transportation” (13.1% of CPI) and “Water, electricity,
gas & other fuels” (11.9% of CPI), experienced yearly falls of 9.26%
and 18.66%, respectively. In addition, other 2 sub-indices that
respectively waned were “Health” (7.8% of CPI) and
“Communication” (4.6% of CPI), recording a 4.80% and 3.51% y-o-y
decline over the same period. The final sub-index that declined was
“Recreation, amusement & culture”, which witnessed an annual
downtick of 0.26% from June 2014 to 100.97 in June 2015.
However, Education sub-index, constituting 4.50% of the CPI,
augmented by 4.52% y-o-y in H1 2015. Furthermore, clothing and
footwear (5.4% of CPI) prices went up by an annual 4.13%. In
addition, actual rent sub-index for households (old and new rent),
with a stake of 3.4% in the CPI, augmented by an annual 9.88%
over the above mentioned period.
-18.66%
-9.26%
-4.80%
-3.51%
-1.69%
-0.26%
9.88%
4.52%
4.13%
Water, electricity, gas & other fuels
Transportation
Health
Communication
Food & non-alcoholic beverages
Recreation,amusement & culture
Actual Rent
Education
Clothing & footwear
The Lebanon Brief Page 9 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
Monthly Number of Construction Permits
Source: Orders of Engineers in Beirut and North
6-Year Low Continued to Characterize Building Permits
in H1
The number of construction permits witnessed a yearly plunge of
15.87% to reach its lowest level in 6 years at 7,387 in H1 2015,
compared to a higher level of 8,780 in 2014. In this context, the
construction area authorized by permits (CAP) registered a 19.43%
year-on-year (y-o-y) drop amounting to 5.92M sqm by June,
compared to 7.34M sqm by June 2014.
Noting that permits are usually issued at least 6 months after
applications are filed, the fall in construction activity is due to the
declining trend in demand that has started in 2011 following the
Arab spring and the Syrian unrest. Coupled with that, construction
permits might have taken a big hit in the past year to reach this
lowly level, as the presidential vacuum is ever prominent.
The average area per transaction dropped by June 2015, from
836.52 sqm/permit in 2014 to 801.09 sqm/permit, bearing in mind
that mainly only large developers are still in the market.
In June alone, the number of permits stood at 1,571, a 0.38% y-o-y
down tick from June 2014’s level. CAP also exposed a 13.88%
yearly plunge to 1.08M sqm from 1.25M sqm recorded in June of
last year. In terms of regions, Mount Lebanon grasped 42.84% of
total permits, while South Lebanon and Nabatiye took respective
shares of 17.12% and 12.48%.
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Dec-10
Apr-11
Aug-11
Dec-11
Apr-12
Aug-12
Dec-12
Apr-13
Aug-13
Dec-13
Apr-14
Aug-14
Dec-14
Apr-15
Construction Permits
6-Month Moving Average
The Lebanon Brief Page 10 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
Total Real Estate Transactions by June
Source: Cadastre
Airport Passengers by June (in Millions)
Source: RHIA
Declining Demand Putting a Toll on Total Real Estate
Transaction By June
Total real estate transactions (local and foreign transactions) stood
at 28,722 by June, with a 14.97% yearly drop from 33,780. In
addition, those total transactions were worth $3.59B, declining by
an annual 20.00%, over the same period.
The decline in demand for real estate has been quite prominent
following the Arab Spring in 2010 and the Syrian conflict in 2011, as
the six-month moving average by June 2015 had tumbled by
35.87% from June 2010. In addition, the six month moving average
depicts a seasonal effect as the main drops are experienced in H1
of each year, ensued by a recovery in the second half of the year.
However, this seasonal effect confirms the declining drift in the real
estate with peak points illustrating drops from year to year. The
reason for this fall in demand could be attributed to the pent up
demand that was exhausted during the four years prior to the
Syrian crisis and the implications of the latter mainly on foreign
demand for the Lebanese real estate.
In contrast, figures revealed that foreigners’ share of total real
estate transactions went up annually from 1.51% to 2.33% by June
2015. This progression probably is due to the improving security
situation in Lebanon relative to other countries in the region, which
positively affected tourism.
On another note, average value of real estate transactions went
down by 5.91% y-o-y from $132,748 by May 2014 to $124,905 in
the same period this year.
Airport Passengers Improved by 6.49% by June
Rafic Hariri International Airport (RHIA) activity increased during the
first 6 months of 2015, where the total number of passengers
improved by 6.49% year-on-year (y-o-y) to 3.11M, compared to a
lower number of 2.92M by June 2014.
In details, the number of arrivals went up by a yearly 6.97% to
1.55M by June 2015, as well as departures summing to 1.56M,
rising by an annual 6.03%. This is due to the improving security
situation in Lebanon, coupled with a positive winter season this
year. Moreover, transit travelers augmented by 6.24% to 8,579.
However, taking the month of June alone, the total number of
airport passengers shrank by 2.75% yearly to reach 593,382.
Arrivals decreased by 2.18% to 317,852, and departures also
declined by 4.14% reaching 271,651. In contrast, transit travelers
went up from 1,842 in June 2014 to 3,879 in the same month this
year.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Dec-12
Mar-13
Jun-13
Sep-13
Dec-13
Mar-14
Jun-14
Sep-14
Dec-14
Mar-15
Jun-15
Total Real Estate Transactions
6-Month Moving Average
2.43 2.42
2.76
2.97 2.92
3.11
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
The Lebanon Brief Page 11 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS
Chedid Capital Holding Companies
Aim Country
Chedid
Corporate
Dolutions LLP
Provides end-to-end
consultancy services to
entities in the insurance
sector with specific
focus on life and health
insurance Lebanon
SEIB Insurance
and Reinsurance
Company LLC
Provides high quality
insurance products and
services for corporations
and individuals Qatar
Chedid RE
Services a growing
demand for a reliable,
innovative and
professional reinsurance
broker in the MENA
UAE,
Cyprus,
KSA,
Lebanon
Chedid &
Associates
Offers a full range of
General Insurance and
Employee Benefits
products
Qatar,
UAE,
KSA
Source: Company Website
Bank Audi H1 2015 Financial Highlights ($B)
15-Jun 14-Dec % change
Customers
Deposits 36.17 35.82 0.80%
Loans and
Facilities to
Customers
17.03 17.17 -0.79%
Total Assets 42.31 14.96 0.83%
Shareholders’
Equity 3.13 3.35 -6.55%
Net Profit*
($M) 202.09 189.72 6.52%
*From June
2014 to June
2015
Source: Bank Audi
EuroMena Fund Sold its Share in Chedid Capital
Holding
On the 21st of July 2015, the EuroMena Fund announced that it has
withdrawn from regional insurance Chedid Capital Holding (CCH),
the prior month, by selling its share in the company to Saudi Al
Rashed Group’s affiliate company, Rimco. In 2008, the Fund
invested $6M in CCH. The stake was sold at $14.4M, a 2.4 price
multiple.
CCH manages insurance and reinsurance companies in 9 countries
across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. It has extended its
scope to more than 35 countries over 3 continents. With the
support of the EuroMena Fund, CCH has effectively set up 8
subsidiaries covering international markets including Sub-Saharan
Africa.
The EuroMena Fund Management Team plans to exit, by 2016, the
software development, agro-business, and packaging and paper
production industries, where the team respectively funds ITWorx,
Wadi Holding, and Wataniya.
The EuroMena Fund Management Team has raised above $300M
from major investors and closed more than 20 investments and
divestments.
Bank Audi Consolidated Profits Rose by 6.52% to
$202.09M in H1 2015
Bank Audi group recorded profits of $202.09M in H1 2015, a 6.52%
increase from June 2014, according to their unaudited financial
statements. This mainly came on the back of the respective
increases of 16.53% and 9.34% in net interest income and net fee
and commission income to $456M and $126M, respectively. In its
press release, Bank Audi stated that 48% of its profits were from
entities outside Lebanon.
As for total assets, they grew from the beginning of the year by
0.83% to $42.31B although loans and facilities to customers
dropped by 0.79% year-to-date (y-t-d) to $17.03B, of which 66%
from entities outside Lebanon.
On the liabilities side, customers’ deposits ticked up by 0.80% y-t-d
to $36.17B while total shareholders’ equity registered a y-t-d fall of
6.55% to $3.13B. Worth mentioning, according to the press release,
the Bank’s capital adequacy ratio stood at 12.8% as per Basel III and
primary liquidity to customer’ deposits ratio was at 45.5%. The
Bank’s Return on Average common equity (ROCE) reached 13.8%.
The Lebanon Brief Page 12 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
FOCUS IN BRIEF
International Monetary Fund’s Article IV Consultation for Lebanon – 2015
In July 2015, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) released its Article IV consultation for Lebanon in which it discusses the
current context, highlights challenges and priorities and, issues recommendations for the future. The following lines sum up
the IMF’s views.
Lebanon: Host to a Large Number of Refugees
For the fifth year now, the Syrian conflict is still playing a major part in determining the short -term and long-term outlook in
Lebanon. The spillovers of the Syrian crisis are both substantial and multi-faceted. According to the United Nations High
Commission for Refugees, the number of Syrian refugees surpassed 1.4 million in January 2015 and by adding the already -
registered 0.4 million Palestinians in Lebanon, the total number of refugees would surpass one third of the Lebanese
population.
Multi -D imensional Syrian Spi l lovers
The Syrian spillovers have added pressure on several fronts in Lebanon. The World Bank estimates the direct fiscal impact
of the crisis over the period 2012-2014 at $2.6B and estimates the cost of restoring public-service provision to pre-crisis
levels at $2.5B. The inflow of Syrian refugees not only strained already-weak public finances but also added pressure on the
country’s infrastructure and social fabric. According to the IMF, the Syrian crisis caused the Lebanese poverty rate to rise by
4 percentage points to 32%, led to a 50% growth in the workforce compared to 2011 and widened the income gap as
Syrian refugees accept lower wages than Lebanese workers.
Humanitarian Support for Lebanon: Insufficient and Facing Shortfal ls
$1B of humanitarian assistance1 were disbursed in each of the years 2013 and 2014, substantial but insufficient sums. The
World Food Program’s card voucher hands out a $30 voucher per month for 883,000 refugees and covered 40% of eligible
refugees in 2014 compared to 28% in 2013. However, pressure is rising which led the WFP to temporarily suspend its
program in December 2014 and to now often hand out assistance of less than $20 per month per refugee.
In 2014, the government cooperated with the UNDP in a plan targeting both refugees and vulnerable Lebanese. The project
dubbed the Lebanon Crisis Response Plan (LCRP) is a 2 - year stabilization and development plan that targets 1.5M
refugees and 1.9M vulnerable Lebanese, with one third of the project aimed at addressing Lebanese stabilization and
development needs. Out of the $2.14B for the project, only $400M has been made available.
1
Amount encompasses assistance given directly to refugees as well as to agencies working with refugees
The Lebanon Brief Page 13 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
Humanitarian Contributions for Lebanon, in mil l ions of USD
Source: IMF, UNDP
Lebanon Lacks a Crisis -Response Strategy
So far Lebanon has not established a clear strategy to deal with the heavy influx of Syrian refugees. However, the IMF notes
that the authorities adopted a policy paper in 2014 pledging to “reduce the number of individuals in Lebanon registered as
displaced, to address local security concerns and to share the burden of the crisis by expanding the humanitarian response
to include local communities and infrastructure.”
In line with this policy paper, the number of Syrian refugees steadied in 2014 due, in part to tighter border control. The
registration of new refugees is now down to around 10,000 per month compared to around 30,000 per month prior to
October 2014.
Pol itical Inertia is Crippling Decision Making
Lebanon has been unable to elect a President since May 2014. The Parliament can still legislate in the absence of a
President if a unanimous agreement is reached. However, that agreement is tough to reach amidst the current political
tensions. Even the legitimacy of the Parliament is under scrutiny after its term was extended for the second time to June
2017.
Economic Growth Witnessed a Significant Slump
Lebanon’s GDP growth slumped from 2011 onwards and now falls short of its potential. GDP growth rate fell from a high of
8% in 2010 to less than 1% in 2011 and then eventually inched up to 2% in 2014 and is likely to remain at that level for
2015. Since core sectors of the Lebanese economy such as tourism, real estate and construction, have taken a hard hit and
are unlikely to recover soon. Lebanon’s GDP growth will probably not return to the potential 4% before 2019. Inflation also
declined in 2014 as the prices of oil dropped but the IMF estimates inflation to return to about 3% by 2015.
Exceptional Factors Led to Short -Term Improvements on Several Fronts
Despite the morose economic background, incomes and consumption received a boost from lower oil prices. According to
the IMF, the sensitivity of local fuel prices to global oil prices is relatively high in Lebanon2
and that boosted incomes.
Moreover, remittance inflows which mainly come from Gulf-Cooperation Countries remained and are likely to remain stable
despite the volatility in oil prices, especially since GCC countries have large buffers against low energy prices.
2 After the slump in global oil prices, retail fuel prices in Lebanon declined by about 30% in 2014. Amongst regional peers, Lebanon
showed the largest pass-through from falling oil prices.
44
161
1,039 972
2011 2012 2013 2014
The Lebanon Brief Page 14 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
One off measures also allowed Lebanon to have a better fiscal positioning in 2014. The treasury benefitted from
exceptionally large telecom transfers, the non-implementation of the salary increase for public sector employees, the under
spending on capital projects and the flat social and current spending. These factors allowed for an unexpected primary
surplus representing 2½ % of GDP.
This exceptional, one-off set of circumstances cannot spare Lebanon the effort of fiscal reform. The IMF believes that if
these one-off factors will not be repeated, the primary balance will deteriorate to record a deficit of 1¼ of GDP in 2015 and
the debt burden will remain extremely high by international standards. The combination of slowing growth and the potential
rise in global interest rates will put upward pressure on public debt. Without fiscal adjustment, interest payments will surge
to 12% of GDP or around 40% of total spending and will therefore reduce much-needed spending on social and structural
reforms.
Fiscal Adjustment through Fairer F iscal Pol icies
According to the IMF, Lebanon’s tax capacity remains under-utilized. Efforts to better oversee the collection of VAT refund
claims was commended by the IMF but it believes that more can be done. The Fund called for an increase in the VAT rate
by one percentage point to 11%.
The IMF believes that lower oil prices offer an opportunity for Lebanon to reform its fuel taxation. The IMF recommended
the removal of the VAT exemption on diesel introduced in 2012 and an increase in gasoline excises which were significantly
reduced in 2011. Not only will these measures increase government revenues but they will also promote a more conscious
use of fuel products which would then reduce congestion and pollution.
Currently, gasoline is subject to a 10% VAT tax and to low excises of less than 20 cents per liter. Green and red diesels for
transportation and heating are tax free and have never been subject to excises.
Amongst regional peers, Lebanon showed the largest pass-through from falling oil prices. After the slump in global oil
prices, retail fuel prices in Lebanon declined by about 30% in 2014. However, taxes on these now cheaper fuel products
were not amended and that is a missed opportunity for Lebanon’s treasury.
The low fuel taxes however generate revenues losses and are not fairly beneficial to all categories of the population. The
cost of the VAT exemption on diesel exceeds ½ percent of GDP. As for the subsidy, the poorest 20% of the population only
benefit from 6% while the richest 20% receive 55%.
Minor Positive Steps but No Major Structural Reforms
Unfortunately, no advancement was made on structural reforms. The reforms of the electricity sector and of the Lebanese
pension system have long been delayed. Moreover, Lebanon is also unable to make progress in terms of its oil and gas
wealth as the bidding process for exploration has been constantly postponed and as the Petroleum Tax Law is still awaiting
parliament approval.
On the upside, the IMF commended the Lebanese authorities for several undertaken steps. The first positive step is the
Ministry of Finance’s publication of a quarterly T-bill issuance calendar and of an updated public debt management strategy.
The parliament was also commended for the passing a law allowing for new Eurobonds issuances.
Persistence of the Banking Sector’s Resi l ience
Foreign exchange reserves and financial markets remained resilient. The IMF estimates Lebanon’s current account deficit at
a sizeable 25% of GDP in 2014. A large current account deficit might erode the country’s foreign reserves, which is even
more challenging given the Lebanese pound’s peg to the US dollar. Luckily, foreign inflows are still growing which has
allowed the central bank to stock up on an appropriate level of foreign reserves, which amounted to $38.86B at the end of
June 2015.
The Lebanese banking sector is another source of resilience for Lebanon. The banking sector’s aggregate assets exceed
350% of GDP, allowing it to be one of the largest in the world and in the MENA region in terms of share in GDP. Lebanese
banks pull their strength from a loyal depositor base, residents and non-residents alike. In turn, banks have channeled these
The Lebanon Brief Page 15 of 16
ISSUE 928; Week of 20-25 July, 2015
S A L
deposits back into the private sector and into the public sector. The conservative business model, the proper supervision
and the significant buffers are also core pillars for the Lebanese banking sector.
The IMF however highlights that the tight link between the sovereign and the banks is a double-edged sword. Although the
government is able to fund large budget and current account deficits due to Lebanese banks, this also means that a large
part of the macroeconomic stability is dependent on the banks’ ability to act as chief financiers for the government and
therefore attract foreign deposits.
The growth in loans to the non-financial private sector has outpaced the growth in nominal output, but no risk to overall
financial stability has been detected. The ratio of private sector to GDP grew from 86% to 91% over 2013-2014 partly on
account of the central bank’s stimulus packages of $3.4B. As a pre -emptive move, the Central Bank introduced new retail
loans regulation by lowering the loan-to-value ratios and debt-service to income ratios.
Conclusion
Lebanon is facing a challenging regional and local context that needs to be addressed through an appropriate policy mix
and structural reforms. Fiscal sustainability should be restored which would lighten the load placed on the Central Bank. In
fact, the Central Bank’s policy aims to build up foreign reserves to meet many targets since it has to maintain the peg of th e
Lebanese pound to the dollar, establish stimulus packages for the private sector and finance the government’s needs.
Structural reforms also need to be undertaken in order to promote inclusive growth, which is a growth that ensures rapid
and sustained poverty reduction.
The Lebanon Brief
Page 16 of 16
Your Investment Reference
S A L
Research Department:
Wael Khoury [email protected]
Lana Saadeh [email protected]
Riwa Daou [email protected]
Mirna Chami [email protected]
Marwan Mikhael [email protected]