The Korean Experience with Technical and Vocational Education Chong Jae Lee Seoul National...
-
Upload
aubrey-pitts -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
3
Transcript of The Korean Experience with Technical and Vocational Education Chong Jae Lee Seoul National...
2007-10-2622
Contents
Ⅰ. IntroductionⅠ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Development Stages of Korean EducationⅡ. Development Stages of Korean Education
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and ApproachesⅢ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
Ⅳ. How Education contributes to Economic growth?Ⅳ. How Education contributes to Economic growth?
VI. Relevance of TVE at Upper Secondary education VI. Relevance of TVE at Upper Secondary education
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training ► Evolution ► Finance ► Evaluation
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training ► Evolution ► Finance ► Evaluation
2007-10-2633
Ⅰ. Introduction
PurposesPurposes
– Identify Korean approaches to Expanding Access to Education and education’s contribution to the successful economic growth in Korea
– Overview Korean experiences with Technical and Vocational Education (TVE): Relevance of TVE and Emerging Challenges to TVE
– Highlight key lessons learned from Korean Experiences to the three policy questions
2007-10-2644
Ⅱ. Development Stages of Korean Education
Four stagesFour stages::
1) Economical Development Phases - 1945~1960 : Economic disruption and recovery - 1961~1979 : Export-oriented, high growth strategy under
the Park’s regime - 1980~1997 : Structural adjustment and stabilized growth - 1998~Present : Transition into knowledge-based society
2) Stages of Educational Development - 1948~1960 : Educational reconstruction - 1961~1980 : Educational Expansion and Economic Growth - 1981~1997 : Exploration for the Qualitative Improvement of Education - 1998~Present :Restructuring Period
2007-10-2655
Ⅱ. Development Stages of Korean Education
Modern Korean education begins in 1945Modern Korean education begins in 1945
The situation since 1945
– Korea was liberated from Japanese colonial rule with the end of the World War Ⅱ
– Divided into two countries: South and North Korea
– US Army’s “Military Government” in South Korea(1945-1948)
– Republic of Korea was founded in 1948:
Ideological struggle and political instability
- Korean War(1950-1953): 80% school buildings destroyed
- Shortage of everything except students (P.H. Cooms)
2007-10-2666
Ⅱ. Development Stages of Korean Education
Major Economic Indicators Major Economic Indicators
284.416,656.4806,62222,85647,2792005
172.311,129.6578,66521,15645,9852000
65.06,077.4186,69118,08543,3901990
17.51,705.638,77513,68337,4071980
0.84257.62,7649,61731,4351970
-80.0243-24,9891960
----25,1201945
Exports( billion $)
Per CapitaGDP($)
GDP(billion won)
Employees(1000
persons)
Population(1000
persons)
* Population of 1945 is 1944’s. data.
2007-10-2677
Social, Economic index of The Economic Growth Period
70.317.512.210,84190.02000
54.527.617.96,14784.01990
43.422.534.01,64557.21980
35.314.350.425441.11970
38.912.348.88228.0(1960)1961
ServicesMining &
ManufacturingAgriculture
Industrial Origin of GDP(%)
PerCapitaGNP($)
City PopulationRate to Total(%)
Source: National Statistical Office (http://www.nso.go.kr)
Ⅱ. Development Stages of Korean Education
73.418.67.916,29190.82005
2007-10-2688
Net Changes in No. StudentsNet Changes in No. Students(Unit: 1,000 Persons)(Unit: 1,000 Persons)
-80+185-308+150+32000
~2005
+647+2,762+374-611-1,6381980
~2000
+5,915+501+1,424+1,943+2,0371960
~1980
+3,067+96-+449+2,2471945
~1960
TotalTertiaryHigh
SchoolMiddleSchool
ElementarySchool
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
2007-10-2699
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
<Figure 1> Changes of The Number of Students
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
1948 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
year
N' of students
Elementary Middle High Tertiary Total
Elementary Education
Completed
Expansion Period of
Secondary Education
Expansion Period of
Tertiary Education
2007-10-261010
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
1948 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Year
No. of Students
Elementary Middle High Tertiary Total
Educational Expansion
Period
Quality
Improvement
Restructuring
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
2007-10-261111
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
Development Approach to Korean Education
: Major Policies: Open door policy
– Six-year Compulsory Education plan (1954-1959)
– Open Door Policy to Secondary Education Abolition of Entrance Exam to Middle School (1968) High School Equalization Policy (1974)
- Abolish entrance exam and replace it with random
assignment
– Open Door Policy to Higher Education July 30 Educational Reform (1980)
2007-10-261212
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
Low Cost Approach (LCA)
– Lowering educational standards (Large class, Double shift classroom, Low level of teacher’s salary) to accommodate more students at given resources Constraints
– Application of LCA: - Expanding Primary compulsory education (1954-1959)
- Expanding Lower Secondary Education(1968) - Expanding Access to Tertiary Education (1980)
2007-10-261313
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
Six-year compulsory education planSix-year compulsory education plan(1954-1959)(1954-1959)
Outcome– Universalization of primary education
Emerging Problem– Successive strong demand for middle school – Resulted in the ‘exam hell’ in elementary school to
prepare entrance examination to selective middle schools
year 1951 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959
Enrollment Rate 69.8 82.5 89.5 89.9 91.1 92.5 96.4
2007-10-261414
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
Egalitarian approachEgalitarian approach
- Abolition of Entrance Exam to Lower and Upper Secondary
Education and admission by “assignment system” in 1968
and 1974
- Providing Equal chance of being admitted to Middle school
and High school
- Lowering educational standards: class size from 60 to 70
- Providing Equal school conditions
- Gradual extension of free compulsory education to middle
school from rural areas in 1984 to all area in 2004
- Priority given to “Region, Low SES, Students at Risk”
2007-10-261515
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
Quantitative expansion of Secondary EducationQuantitative expansion of Secondary Education
School Enrollment Rate:
Source: KEDI, Statistical Yearbook of Education 2004
61.790.191.997.72004
50.289.495.097.22000
22.979.491.6100.51990
11.148.873.397.71980
9.229.353.397.01970
6.420.032.295.31960
---69.81951
TertiaryHigh
SchoolMiddle School
Primary School
2007-10-261616
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
Qualitative Improvement of Education by School Level
15.131.019.335.325.131.82005
19.842.520.138.028.735.82000
21.747.924.848.228.236.41995
24.652.825.450.235.641.41990
30.956.940.061.738.344.71985
32.859.445.165.647.551.51980
31.458.643.264.551.856.71975
29.758.142.362.156.962.11970
30.257.039.460.762.465.41965
27.355.840.560.160.062.91962
StudentsPer
Teacher
Students
Per Class
StudentsPer
Teacher
Students
Per Class
StudentsPer
Teacher
StudentsPer
Class
HighMiddleElementary
Source : The Statistical Yearbook of Korean Education.
2007-10-261717
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
Years of achieving Universal Enrollment
(Enrollment Rate 90%, Entering Rate to Upper Education 90%)
1995High > Ter-(b)2000Tertiary(b)
1997 High > Ter-(a)2005Tertiary(a)
1985Middle > High1999High
1979Ele- > Middle1990Middle
1957Elementary
Entering rate to upper school90% year
Enrollment Ratio90% year
* Tertiary(a), High > Tertiary(a) : Enrollment/Entering upper class ratio 60%. Tertiary(b), High > Tertiary(b) : Enrollment/Entering upper class ratio 50%.
2007-10-261818
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
Key factors contributing to Expansion of Access toKey factors contributing to Expansion of Access to
EducationEducation
- Universal enrollment of Elementary Education
- Low cost approach
- Egalitarian approach
- Roles of private schools in expanding access
- Sequential expansion with Bottom-Up approach
- Gov’t budget support for Elementary-Secondary
Education by Law (12.98% of Domestic tax)
- Parent’s strong support to Education
- High level of Economic growth
2007-10-261919
Ⅲ. The Expansion of Educational Opportunities and Approaches
Quantitative expansion of Secondary EducationQuantitative expansion of Secondary Education
Distribution of Educational Attainment of Population over 25 years old(%)
year 1970 1980 1990 2000
Primary Graduate and Below 73 55 33 23
Middle School Graduate 12 18 19 13
High School Graduate 10 19 34 40
Jr College Graduate 1 1 2 8
University Graduate and over 4 7 12 16
2007-10-262020
Ⅳ. How education contributes to economic growth?How education contributes to economic growth?
Cooperative Correspondence relation between economy and education
- Developing Infra-Structure of Human Resource - High economic growth to support educational expansion
Korean education developed infrastructure of human capacity and significantly contributed to economic take-off in 1960's
Human Resource Development in advanced to the manpower requirement
2007-10-262121
Educational Expansion Educational Expansion
Development of HRD conditions precedent to economic growth
Harbison & Myers's observation of Korean case of Human Resources development for a country with per capita GNP $380, when its per capita GNP was $ 107.
Per Capita GDP
Enrollment rate of
Secondary Education
KOREA
$ 107 $ 380Low Cost ApproachLow Cost Approach
Ⅳ. How education contributes to economic How education contributes to economic growth?growth?
2007-10-262222
Sequential Bottom-up approach
Sequential expansion of access to education from Elementary, Secondary and Higher Education precedent to the manpower needs for Economic development
– Elementary Ed. → Labor Intensive light Secondary Ed. Manufacturing (1960s)– Vocational-Technical → Capital Intensive High schools Heavy-Chemical Industry (1970s → 1980s)– Expansion → Electronics, High-tech of Higher Education Knowledge Industry (1980s → Present)
Ⅳ. How education contributes to economic growth?How education contributes to economic growth?
2007-10-262323
Expand and upgrade Technical and Vocational
Education
Expand and upgrade Technical and Vocational Education and Training Infrastructure to develop technical manpower
– 1960’s : Vocational High school Jr Technical Colleges Technical Universities
– 1970’s : Science Education– Use of External Loans (IDA, IBRD etc)
Ⅳ. How education contributes to economic growth?How education contributes to economic growth?
2007-10-262424
Economy’s support to educational developmentEconomy’s support to educational development
The Law of ‘Grants for Elementary-Secondary Education’ are enacted. This is the return from Economic Growth to Education Sector
– 12.98% of Domestic Tax
– Salaries for elementary school teachers legally secured
Ⅳ. How education contributes to economic growth?How education contributes to economic growth?
2007-10-262525
TVET System
– Vocational-Technical High Schools
– Jr Technical Colleges (2-3 years)
– Universities
– Open Technical Colleges for Employed
– Public Job-training centers under Ministry of Labor
– Private Technical training industries (Nurse-aid, etc)
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-262626
Evolution of TVE in 1960~1980: Education for Economic Growth Period
- Policy priority given to TVET during implementation of Economic development plans since 1962 - Expansion of Vocational High Schools: 1962~1980
· Enrollment increase· Curriculum development (1963)· Increase Investment and use loan programs (ICA, IDA, ADB, World Bank)
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-262727
Enrollment of Technical-Vocational High schools - 1970- 1980’s 45% in High school enrollment - decreased from 45%(1980) to 27.7% (2006)
Years General High School Vocational High School
1970 320,000(53.3) 280,000(46.7)
1980 930,000(55.0) 760,000(45.0)
1990 1,470,000(64.5) 810,000(35.5)
2000 1,320,000(63.8) 750,000(36.2)
2006 1,280,000(72.3) 490,000(27.7)
<Number of Students by School Track>
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-262828
School conditions of Vocational High schools compared to General High schools
- less students per teacher
- less students per class
Years
General High School Vocational High School
No. of Schools
No. of students
per teacher
No. of Students per class
No. of Schools
No. of students
per teacher
No. of students per class
1970 408 32.0 62.1 481 27.5 56.1
1980 748 33.9 59.9 605 32.6 59.6
1990 1,096 25.4 53.6 587 23.4 51.5
2000 1,193 20.9 44.1 764 18.2 40.3
2005 1,382 15.9 33.9 713 13.5 30.0
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-262929
Employment rate of vocational high school graduates decreased from 76.6% (1990) to 25.9%(2006)
69% of the graduates entered to tertiary education(2006)
Identity of vocational high schools questioned
Years Employment rate(%)1 Entering rate(%)2
1970 50.2 9.6
1980 51.1 11.4
1990 76.6 8.3
2000 51.4 42.0
2006 25.9 68.6
1. Number of employees/graduates 2. Number of entering to tertiary ed/graduates
<Vocational High School Employment and Entering rate to HE>
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-263030
The enrollment of Junior Colleges and College of technology increased since 1990’s
- more students entered to Jr colleges
< Number of Schools and Students in Vocational High School, Junior Colleges & U. Of Technology>
Years Vocational High Junior Colleges U. of Technology
N. of Schools
N. Of Students
N. Of Schools
N. Of Students
N. Of Schools
N. Of Students
1970 481 275,015 65 30,000 - -
1980 606 764,187 128 170,000 - -
1990 587 810,651 117 320,000 6 520,000
2000 764 746,986 159 920,000 19 171,000
2005 713 503,104 152 820,000 18 189,000
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-263131
Identity of Technical-Vocational High Schools questioned : 1990’s
- Demand shift from TV high school to Jr Technical college
- Weak Incentive system of semi-skilled job (Pay, promotions, working conditions)
- Less opportunities for occupational growth, Life-long learning and HRD
- Directions for development of VH, not clear - Students preference higher education to
vocational high school
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-263232
Policy mistakes for Technical-Vocational
High Schools in 1990’s
- ‘Structural adjustment policy’ of TV high schools to increase the number of students in vocational high school from 32%(1990) to 50% failed
- Introduce ‘2+1’ system to provide one-year practice on the Job for Technical High School students. No merit point.· The outcomes depend upon the quality of on the Job practice
- New Developments
· Specialized vocational schools emerged (animation, cartoons, design, computer networking, etc)
· Establish KRIVET: Korean Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-263333
Shift of emphasis to Science-Technical Education: 1980’s~2000
Priority shifted from TVET toward Science-Technical Education as Korean Economy focus New Technology Industry
– Support Science education in Elementary & Secondary
– Human Resource Development in Science-Tech with BK project (HRD support program at Graduate level)
– Research Support
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-263434
Financing Technical and Vocational High School - Education budget in Government budget - 18~22 % - 2000’s 20.2%
(Unit: 1 billion won, %)
20.1
20.4
22.3
18.9
17.6
B/A (%)
29,127144,8082006
19,17293,9372000
5,06222,6891990
1,0995,8041980
784461970
MOE Budget(B)2)
Government Budget(A)1)구분
3.6
3.3
2.7
2.8
2.8
B / GDP (%)
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-263535
Government allocated less than 2% of Government budget for Technical and Vocational education in 1990’s.
The share of vocational High schools in TVE budget decreased from 40%(1996) to 18.4% (2000)
YearsVocational High
S.Junior College U. of Technology Total
1996 99,320(40.2) 94,614(38.3) 52,966(21.5) 246,900
1997 126,100(33.5) 148,700(39.5) 101,300(26.9) 376,100
1998 120,465(34.4) 165,964(47.4) 63,921(18.2) 350,350
1999 70,127(21.6) 192,036(59.1) 62,444(19.3) 324,607
2000 55,633(18.4) 187,115(61.7) 60,281(19.9) 303,029
(Unit: 1 million won, %)
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-263636
Student pay 32.4% of the cost in Vocational high school - In Public schools 21.4% - Private schools 46.9% Student pay more of the cost in General High schools
2000
Expenditure in won(A)
Tuition in won (B)
B/A(%)
Expenditure
in $(C)
C /Per CapitaGDP
General High School 2,428,000 1,106,000 45.5 2,149 19.8
Public 2,740,000 858,000 31.3 2,425 22.4
Private 2,194,000 1,292,000 58.9 1,941 17.9
Vocational High School 2,611,000 846,000 32.4 2,311 21.3
Public 3,035,000 650,000 21.4 2,686 24.8
Private 2,204,000 1,035,000 47.0 1,950 18.0
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-263737
Share of Government’s support in the expenditures of Vocational High schools in 2000.
Total
Expenditure(million $)
Govt.(%)
Students(%)
Others(%)
Expenditure per Student($)
GDP per
Capita($)
Vocational High School
1,726 65.1 32.4 2.6 2,301
10,841
Public 984 77.9 21.4 0.7 2,655
Private 742 48.1 46.9 5.0 1,947
Junior College 2,309 2.5 78.7 18.8 3,894
Public 31 64.7 31.6 3.7 1,239
Private 2,278 1.6 79.3 19.0 3,982
U. Of Technology
487 31.2 60.7 8.1 2,832
Public 217 60.5 33.8 5.7 2,655
Private 270 7.8 82.2 10.0 3,009
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-263838
Evaluation Remarks on TV High school in Korea
Technical-Vocational High Schools
– Remarkable contribution in 1960’s-1970’s– As Korean economy utilizes new technologies, TV high
schools face identity crisis
Jr. Technical Colleges and Science-Engineering programs of Universities play more important roles of HRD in 1980’s-2000
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-263939
New challenges and Perspectives emerged for HRD at Individual and Institutional level
– Individual level: developing core competence and job-related
capabilities HRD through Life-long learning Upgrade qualification & Certification Career-path development
– Institutional Level: Developing Relevance, Quality, Competitiveness of
the program Market control model: autonomy and market
evaluation Use Public Support in the Voucher Form
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-264040
New Policy tasks emerged
– Upgrade and transform vocational high schools into “Diversified-specialized Elite Vocational Schools”
– Strengthening functional relationship among general high schools, vocational high schools and Jr. Technical Colleges
– Develop “Private technical institutes” and OJT Centers in corporations as specialized technical institute
V. Evolution of Technical-Vocational Education & Training
2007-10-264141
VI .The relevance of TVE at Upper secondary education
Relevance of TVE: The most important dimension of TVERelevance of TVE: The most important dimension of TVE
Three factors related to the Relevance of TVEThree factors related to the Relevance of TVE
1) Market Demand: demands of graduates from the market ( ++ + ) 2) Supply side: capacities to develop
technical core competency( -- ) social capital ( ? ) self-directed learning capacities( ?? )
3) Relative Position of TVE lowered: As more high school graduate enter Tertiary education, As Economy developed,
Job training for lower sec graduates ( - ) TVE at Upper Sec Edu ( - )
2007-10-264242
Emerging Challenges to TVE at Upper Sec EducationEmerging Challenges to TVE at Upper Sec Education
(1) Demand change: As economy grow and develop, the demands of TVE and job competency are changing.
- demand of simple, low level, technical competency decreased - and demand of higher level, multi-tasking job competency increased.
(2) Quality Upgrade: Unless TVE at Upper Secondary Education upgrade its quality level, TVE at USE lose its relevance of TVE.
VI .The relevance of TVE at Upper secondary education
2007-10-264343
Upgrading the Quality of TVE at USEUpgrading the Quality of TVE at USE
(1) Horizontal Upgrading: Dual mode approach - Establish a few but “Specialized Intensive Elite” Technical and Vocational Schools. They should be Leading and Model TV High Schools
- Establish a “Generalized Technical and Vocational” Schools with Vocational Orientation and guidance. - General education - Objective: Minimize total training costs - Basic exercise and training at School - Intensive training at the Workplace with Government’s financial support. - 2 + 1 system (two years school education and one years practice in the workplace - “General TV Schools” provide the flexibility maintaing the balance between General and TV Schools.
VI .The relevance of TVE at Upper secondary education
2007-10-264444
(2) Vertical Upgrading: Relocating the Core TVE
function from Upper Sec Ed to “Junior Technical Colleges” (Polytechnic Institute)
(3) Making the relationship “closer” between TVE and Work places (Industry) to upgrade the relevance.
- demand orientation in Governance, Program, teacher
recruitment, and evaluation. - Government’s support to “the development of cooperative relation between school and Industry - implementation of the “customized programs”
VI .The relevance of TVE at Upper secondary education
2007-10-264545
Development of institutional infrastructure to support TVE.
- Developing the system of Qualification and License - Job-Information system (Work-net) - Expanding the opportunity to acquire
qualifications and Licenses.
Development of Life-long Learning system for Job Competency.
- National agenda for HRD
VI .The relevance of TVE at Upper secondary education