The Judge

3
March 2015 Legal Ethics THE JUDGE A Reaction Paper Platitudes are now perceived, often dismissed, as dsfunctional voca!ular ta sewn from threads of aged precepts which, "ust li#e an acclaimed anti$ue, although cultural value, neither retain an practical use nor operative application% & disag 'ne such phrase that appears to e(emplif a lac# of original thought, and et wisdom, is this truism ) *+ou are free to choose, !ut ou are not free from the con our choice% -his aphorism is germane to the core human comple(es enshrined in the movie . /udge , where the main protagonist, an# Palmer, a successful et an unethical defe upon the death of his mother, was compelled to return home and deal with his estran eginning with an# s arrival on his shunned hometown, a series of atrocious circumstances immediatel stormed in on him% And one of the most arduous tas#s he n deal with was his father, /udge /oseph Palmer, a principled moralist and the princi hit and run incident that happened on the night when an# s mother was !uried% an !asis of his !rothers re$uest and personal conviction, chose to defend his father trial despite the friction !etween them !rought upon ! their unmista#a!l issues% -he main Legal and Ethical issue that struc# me the most was /udge /oseph Pal resolve to uphold the a!solute truth, regarding the supervening events after his wi even with the imminent threat of his own incarceration% 3rom an idealistic point of pro!a!l the !est ethical wa to go, !ut pragmaticall spea#ing and in preservation, it is evidentl not the !est logical solution% /udge /oseph Palmer s portion of his life in the sphere of active legal practice, with decades of e(peri it is $uite astonishing how he neither mustered an courage to even tr to circumve demonstrated an hint of wanting to find a legal loophole where he can s$uee4e in a freedom% Even with the !elligerent earnestness and aggressive petition of Attorne an a counsel and son, for /udge /oseph Palmer to a!stain in ta#ing himself to the stan into open material information that will imperil his position, failed% uch is the willpower of -he /udge to maintain fairness, stand ! "ustice, ch is right and hold on to nothing !ut the -R6- % uch is the grit of -he /udge to adhere to his morals even how imprudent and it ma appear to this era of self)indulgence, self)centeredness and self)worship% uch is the courage of -he /udge to face danger in the face, to personif the vindication through "ustice, fairness, e$ualit and -R6- % uch is the pursuit for a lasting positive legac of -he /udge that he chose, means of deceit, living free and fancil, to !e imprisoned as a conse$uence of trut veracit%

description

Reaction Paper

Transcript of The Judge

March 2015Legal EthicsTHE JUDGEA Reaction PaperPlatitudes are now perceived, often dismissed, as dysfunctional vocabulary tapestries sewn from threads of aged precepts which, just like any acclaimed antique, although of great cultural value, neither retain any practical use nor operative application. I disagree.One such phrase that appears to exemplify a lack of original thought, and yet abounds in wisdom, is this truism - You are free to choose, but you are not free from the consequences of your choice. This aphorism is germane to the core human complexes enshrined in the movie The Judge, where the main protagonist, Hank Palmer, a successful yet an unethical defense attorney, upon the death of his mother, was compelled to return home and deal with his estranged family. Beginning with Hanks arrival on his shunned hometown, a series of atrocious circumstances immediately stormed in on him. And one of the most arduous tasks he needed to deal with was his father, Judge Joseph Palmer, a principled moralist and the principal suspect in a hit and run incident that happened on the night when Hanks mother was buried. Hank, on the basis of his brothers request and personal conviction, chose to defend his father in his murder trial despite the friction between them brought upon by their unmistakably rough unsettled issues.The main Legal and Ethical issue that struck me the most was Judge Joseph Palmers resolve to uphold the absolute truth, regarding the supervening events after his wifes burial, even with the imminent threat of his own incarceration. From an idealistic point of view, this is probably the best ethical way to go, but pragmatically speaking and in the interest of self-preservation, it is evidently not the best logical solution. Judge Joseph Palmer spent the better portion of his life in the sphere of active legal practice, with decades of experience under his belt, it is quite astonishing how he neither mustered any courage to even try to circumvent the law nor demonstrated any hint of wanting to find a legal loophole where he can squeeze in and escape to freedom.Even with the belligerent earnestness and aggressive petition of Attorney Hank Palmer, as a counsel and son, for Judge Joseph Palmer to abstain in taking himself to the stand and bring out into open material information that will imperil his position, failed. Such is the willpower of The Judge to maintain fairness, stand by justice, champion what is right and hold on to nothing but the TRUTH. Such is the grit of The Judge to adhere to his morals even how imprudent and unpopular it may appear to this era of self-indulgence, self-centeredness and self-worship.Such is the courage of The Judge to face danger in the face, to personify the power of vindication through justice, fairness, equality and TRUTH. Such is the pursuit for a lasting positive legacy of The Judge that he chose, rather than, by means of deceit, living free and fancily, to be imprisoned as a consequence of truthfulness and veracity.