The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department
-
Upload
wallace-barrett -
Category
Documents
-
view
59 -
download
11
description
Transcript of The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department
The Islamic University of GazaFaculty of Engineering
Civil Engineering Department
Numerical Analysis
ECIV 3306
Chapter 5Bracketing Methods
PART II ROOTS OF EQUATIONS
Study Objectives for Part Two
ROOTS OF EQUATIONS
• Root of an equation: is the value of the equation variable which make the equations = 0.0
• But
aacbbxcbxax
240
22
?0sin?02345
xxxxfexdxcxbxax
ROOTS OF EQUATIONS
• Non-computer methods:- Closed form solution (not always available)- Graphical solution (inaccurate)
• Numerical systematic methods suitable for computers
Graphical Solution
roots
• The roots exist where f(x) crosses the x-axis.
f(x)
xf(x)=0 f(x)=0
• Plot the function f(x)
Graphical Solution: Example
• The parachutist velocity is • What is the drag coefficient c needed to reach a velocity of
40 m/s if m=68.1 kg, t =10 s, g= 9.8 m/s2
)(t
mc
e1c
mgv
40)1(38.667)(
)1()(
146843.0
c
tmc
ec
cf
vec
mgcf
Check: F (14.75) = 0.059 ~ 0.0
v (c=14.75) = 40.06 ~ 40 m/s
Numerical Systematic Methods I. Bracketing Methods
f(x)
x
roots
f(xl)=+ve
f(xu)=+ve
xl xu
No roots or even number of roots
f(x)
x
roots
f(xl)=+ve
f(xu)=-vexl xu
Odd number of roots
Bracketing Methods (cont.)
• Two initial guesses (xl and xu) are required for the
root which bracket the root (s).
• If one root of a real and continuous function, f(x)=0,
is bounded by values xl , xu then f(xl).f(xu) <0.
(The function changes sign on opposite sides of the root)
Special Cases
Effect of computer scale resolution
Bracketing Methods 1. Bisection Method
• Generally, if f(x) is real and continuous in the interval xl to xu
and f (xl).f(xu)<0, then there is at least one real root between
xl and xu to this function.
• The interval at which the function changes sign is located.
Then the interval is divided in half with the root lies in the
midpoint of the subinterval. This process is repeated to
obtained refined estimates.
f(x)
xxuxl
f(xu)
f(xu)
xr1
f(x)
xxuxl
f(xu)
xr2
xr = ( xl + xu )/2
f(xu)
f(xr1)
f(xr2)
(f(xl).f(xr)<0): xu = xr
xr = ( xl + xu )/2
Step 1: Choose lower xl and upper xu
guesses for the root such that:
f(xl).f(xu)<0Step 2: The root estimate is:
xr = ( xl + xu )/2
Step 3: Subdivide the interval according to:
– If (f(xl).f(xr)<0) the root lies in the lower subinterval; xu = xr and go to step 2.
– If (f(xl).f(xr)>0) the root lies in the upper subinterval; xl = xr and go to step 2.
– If (f(xl).f(xr)=0) the root is xr and stop
Bisection Method - Termination Criteria
• For the Bisection Method a > t
• The computation is terminated when a becomes less than a certain criterion (a < s)
%100
:
true
eapproximattruet X
XXErrorrelaiveTrue
1
:
100%
100% (Bisection)
n nr r
a nr
u la
u l
Approximate relative Error
X XX
X XX X
Bisection method: Example
• The parachutist velocity is
• What is the drag coefficient c needed to reach a velocity of 40
m/s if m = 68.1 kg, t = 10 s, g= 9.8 m/s2
f(c)
c
)(t
mc
e1c
mgv
40e1c
38667cf
ve1c
mgcf
c1468430
tmc
)(.)(
)()(
.
f(x)
x1612 -2.269
6.067
14
f(x)
x14 16-0.425 -2.269
1.569
1.569
(f(12).f(14)>0): xl = 14
1. Assume xl =12 and xu=16
f(xl)=6.067 and f(xu)=-2.269
2. The root: xr=(xl+xu)/2= 14
3. Check f(12).f(14) = 6.067•1.569=9.517 >0; the root lies between 14 and 16.
4. Set xl = 14 and xu=16, thus the new root xr=(14+ 16)/2= 15
5. Check f(14).f(15) = 1.569•-0.425= -0.666 <0; the root lies bet. 14 and 15.
6. Set xl = 14 and xu=15, thus the new root xr=(14+ 15)/2= 14.5
and so on…...15
Iter. Xl Xu Xr a% t%1 12 16 14 5.279 --2 14 16 15 6.667 1.4873 14 15 14.5 3.448 1.8964 14.5 15 14.75 1.695 1.2045 14.75 15 14.875 0.84 0.6416 14.74 14.875 14.813 0.422 0.291
• In the previous example, if the stopping criterion is t = 0.5%; what is the root?
Bisection method: Example
Bisection method
Flow Chart –BisectionStart
Input: xl , xu , s, maxi
f(xl). f(xu)<0
i=0a=1.1s
False
whilea> s & i <maxi
21
u rr
x xx
i i
False
Stop
Print: xr , f(xr ) ,a , i
xu+xl =0
100%u la
u l
x xx x
True
Test=f(xl). f(xr)
a=0.0Test=0
xu=xrTest<0
xl=xr
True
True
False
Bracketing Methods 2. False-position Method
• The bisection method divides the interval xl to xu in half not accounting for the magnitudes of f(xl) and f(xu). For example if f(xl) is closer to zero than f(xu), then it is more likely that the root will be closer to f(xl).
• False position method is an alternative approach where f(xl) and f(xu) are joined by a straight line; the intersection of which with the x-axis represents and improved estimate of the root.
2. False-position Method
• False position method is an alternative approach where f(xl) and f(xu) are joined by a straight line; the intersection of which with the x-axis represents and improved estimate of the root.
f(x)
xxuxl
f(xu)
f(xl)
xr
f(xr)
)()())((
)()(
ul
uluur
ur
u
lr
l
xfxfxxxfxx
xxxf
xxxf
False-position Method -Procedure
Step 1: Choose lower xl and upper xu guesses for the root
such that: f(xl).f(xu)<0
Step 2: The root estimate is:
Step 3: Subdivide the interval according to:– If (f(xl).f(xr)<0) the root lies in the lower subinterval;
xu = xr and go to step 2.
– If (f(xl).f(xr)>0) the root lies in the upper subinterval; xl = xr and go to step 2.
– If (f(xl).f(xr)=0) the root is xr and stop
)()())((
ul
uluur xfxf
xxxfxx
False-position Method -Procedure
False position method: Example
• The parachutist velocity is
• What is the drag coefficient c needed to reach a
velocity of 40 m/s if m =68.1 kg, t =10 s, g= 9.8 m/s2
f(c)
c
)(t
mc
e1c
mgv
40)1(38.667)(
)1()(
146843.0
c
tmc
ec
cf
vec
mgcf
f(x)
x1612
-2.269
6.067
14.91
False position method: Example1. Assume xl = 12 and xu=16
f(xl)= 6.067 and f(xu)= -2.269
2. The root: xr=14.9113
f(12) . f(14.9113) = -1.5426 < 0;
3. The root lies bet. 12 and 14.9113.
4. Assume xl = 12 and xu=14.9113, f(xl)=6.067 and f(xu)=-
0.2543
5. The new root xr= 14.7942
6. This has an approximate error of 0.79%
False position method: Example
Flow Chart –False PositionStart
Input: xl , x0 , s, maxi
f(xl). f(xu)<0
i=0a=1.1s
False
whilea> s & i <maxi
( )( )( ) ( )
1
u l ur u
l u
f x x xx x
f x f xi i
False
Stop
Print: xr , f(xr ) ,a , i
i=1 or
xr=0
0 100%r ra
r
x xx
True
Test=f(xl). f(xr)
a=0.0Test=0
xu=xr
xr0=xr
Test<0
xl=xr
xr0=xr
True
True
False
False Position Method-Example 2
False Position Method - Example 2
Pitfalls of the False Position Method
• Although a method such as false position is often superior to bisection, there are some cases (when function has significant curvature that violate this general conclusion.
• In such cases, the approximate error might be misleading and the results should always be checked by substituting the root estimate into the original equation and determining whether the result is close to zero.
• major weakness of the false-position method: its one sidedness That is, as iterations are proceeding, one of the bracketing points will tend stay fixed which lead to poor convergence.
Modified Fixed Position
• One way to mitigate the "one-sided" nature of false position is to make the algorithm detect when one of the bounds is stuck. If this occur, the function value at the stagnant bound is divided in half. This is thought to fasten the convergence.