The Intrigues and Delights of Kleinian and Quasi … › DarkHeart › quasif ›...
Transcript of The Intrigues and Delights of Kleinian and Quasi … › DarkHeart › quasif ›...
The Intrigues and Delights of Kleinian and Quasi-Fuchsian Limit Sets
CHRIS KING Preprint published 2019 Math Intelligencer https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-018-09856-6
Introduction:Myresearchindynamicalsystemshasinexorablyledmefromthebetter-knownfractaldynamicsofJuliaandMandelbrotsets,includingthoseoftheRiemannZetafunction1,tothemoreelusiveformsofKleinianlimitsets.Juliasetsandtheiruniversalatlases,Mandelbrotsets,havebecomeubiquitousfeaturesofthemathematicalimagination,demonstratingthepowerofcomputeralgorithmstogenerate,inscintillatingdetail,visualizationsofcomplexdynamicalsystems,complementingtheorywithvividcounter-examples.HoweverGastonJulia’soriginalexplorationstookplaceabstractly,longbeforetheexplosionofcomputingtechnology,soitwasimpossibletoappreciatetheirfractalformsanditwasonlyafterBeniotMandelbrotpopularizedthesetthatnowbearshisnamethatthesignificanceofJulia’sworkagainbecamerecognized.Itisahistoricalirony,verypertinenttothisarticle,thattheMandelbrotsetwasactuallydiscoveredbyRobertBrooksandPeterMatelski2aspartofastudyofKleiniangroups.ItwasonlybecauseMandelbrotwasafellowatIBMthathehadthecomputingresourcestodepictthesetinhighresolution,asauniversalmulti-fractalatlas.Juliasetsandaregeneratedbyiteratingacomplexpolynomial,rationalorotheranalyticfunction,suchasexponentialandharmonicfunctions.Foranon-linearfunction,exemplifiedbythequadraticiteration z→ fc (z) = z
2 + c ,successiveiterationseitherfollowanorderedpattern,tendingtoapoint,orperiodicattractor,orinacomplementarysetofcases,behavechaotically,displayingthebutterflyeffectandotherfeaturesofclassicalchaos.TheJuliasetisthesetofcomplexvaluesonwhichtheiterationischaoticandthecomplementaryset,whereitisordered,isnamedaftertheJuliaset’sco-discovererPierreFatou.TheMandelbrotsetM,fig1(h),becomesanatlasofalltheJuliasets ,bystartingfromthecriticalpoint: z0 : f '(z0 ) = 0 (thelastpointtoescapetoinfinity)andapplyingtheiterationforeverycomplexc-value.Inafascinatingdemonstrationofalgorithmictopology,if c ∈M thefractalJuliaset Jc ofcistopologicallyconnected,otherwiseitformsafractaldust,orCantorset,withthemostornateandchallengingexampleslyingverycloseto,oron,theboundaryofM.Alongsideimagesontheinternetofcomplexfractals,youwillalsofindamoreesotericclassof
fractalsetsthatoftenlooklikemedievalarborealtapestries,andgovariouslybythenamesofKleinianandquasi-Fuchsianlimitsets,buttheprogramsthatgeneratethemaremuchmoredifficulttofind–tosuchanextentthatIresolvedtogenerateaccessiblemulti-platformversionsinthepublicdomaintoenableanyonetoexplorethem.Tomakethesefascinatingsystemsfreelyaccessibleandtoaidfurtherresearch,Ihavethusdevelopedaninteractivewebsite:KleinianandQuasi-FuchsianLimitSets:AnOpenSourceToolbox,3withfreelyavailablecross-platformsoftware,includingaMatlabtoolboxandagenericCscript,ahundredtimesfaster,thatwillcompileandgenerateimagesonanyGCC-compatibleoperatingsystem,aswellasaMacOSviewingapp,enablingfulldynamicalexplorationofthelimitsetsatwill.Theselimitsetsalsohaveanintriguinghistory,whichIwillsketchonlybriefly,asitiselucidatedindefinitiveandengagingdetailinIndra’sPearls:TheVisionofFelixKlein4.Interspersedbelowareshortreferences(e.g.IP1)soonecanrefertoanexpandeddiscussionofeachtopicbybrowsingthebook.
Fig1:JuliasetsandKleinianlimitsets(a-c)aretwo
classesofcomplexfractals,theformerbeingthesetonwhichanon-linearfunction,ischaotic,andthelatterthelimitsetoftwointeractingMöbiustransformations.JustasJuliasets(g)havetheMandelbrotset(h),asatlas,limitsetswithTb=2,asinfig3havetheMaskitslice(f)asatlas,
withthecriticalstatesontheupperboundary.Inthisfield,weagainwitnessanevolution,whereresearchanddiscoveryhasatfirstbeendrivenby
Jc
abstracttheoreticaladvances,whicharethenfollowedbytheemergenceofinnovativecomputationalapproachesthatyieldcriticalexamplesdisplayingtherichnessandvarietythatgivesthetheoryitsfullvalidation.ThefieldofKleiniangroupswasfoundedbyFelixKleinandHenriPoincaré,thespecialcaseofSchottkygroupshavingbeenelucidatedafewyearsearlierbyFriedrichSchottky.Theensuingstory,asdepictedinIndra’sPearlsbeginswithavisittoHarvardbyBenoitMandelbrotthatleadstoDavidMumfordsettingupacomputationallaboratorytoexplore“somesuggestive19thcenturyfiguresofreflectedcircleswhichhadfascinatedFelixKlein”.CarolineSeriesalongwithDavidWright,assistedbyCurtMullenwhohadheldsummerpositionsatIBM,andothercollaboratorssuchasLindaKeen,thenbegantoinvestigatecomputationalexplorationoftheselimitsets.InDavidWright'swords:"Taketwoverysimpletransformationsoftheplaneandapplyallpossiblecombinationsofthesetransformationstoapointintheplane.Whatdoestheresultingcollectionofpointslooklike?"Indra’sPearlscontinuesthishumanandmathematicaljourneyinelegantdetail,notingthecontributionsofmanyresearchers,includingBernardMaskitandTroelsJørgensentotheunfoldingexplorationofthearea.AMathematicalNexus:BycontrastwithJuliasets,Kleinianlimitsetsarealgebraic‘attractors’generatedbytheinteractionoftwoMöbiusmapsa,bandtheirinversesA=a-1,B=b-1.MöbiusmapsIP62arefractionallineartransformationsoperatingontheRiemannsphereR,fig2(a),representedbycomplexmatrices.Compositionofmapsisthusequivalenttomatrixmultiplication:
z→ a(z) = pz+ qrz+ s
≈p qr s
⎡
⎣⎢⎢
⎤
⎦⎥⎥
z1
⎡
⎣⎢
⎤
⎦⎥ :ps–qr=1(1).
Möbiustransformationscanbeelliptic,parabolic,hyperbolic,orloxodromica,intermsoftheirtraceTr(a)=p+s,ascomplexgeneralizationsofthetranslations,rotationsandscalingsofaffinemapsoftheEuclideanplane.TheymapcirclestocirclesonR,countinglinesinthecomplexplaneasgreatcirclesonR.Möbiusmapsarethussimplerinnaturethananalyticfunctionsandarelinearandinvertible,soasingleMobiusmapwillnotgenerateaninterestingfractal.However,whentwoormoreMöbiusmapsinteract,theiterationsofpointsinR,aParabolicmapshaveTr2(a)=4andactliketranslations, withonefixedpointonR,ellipticmapshave0<Tr2(a)<4andbehavelikerotationsonR,hyperbolicandloxodromicmapshaverealandcomplexvalueslyingoutsidethesevaluesonCandbehavelike(spirally)expandingandcontractingversionsofscalingsonR.
underthetwotransformationsandtheirinverses,tendasymptoticallytowardsasetwhichisconservedunderthetransformations,oftenacomplexfractal,calledthelimitsetofthegroup.Whenthetwotransformationsactingtogetherformcertainclassesofgroup,includingKleinian,quasi-FuchsianandSchottkygroups,theirlimitsetsadoptformswithintriguingmathematicalproperties.Becausetheyformaninterfacebetweenwidelydifferentmathematicalareas,theirdynamicsdrawtogetherdiversefields,fromgrouptheory,throughtopology,Riemannsurfacesandhyperbolicgeometry,tochaosandfractalanalysis,perhapsmoresothananyrelatedarea.Dependingontheparticulargroup,itsactionbmaytransformthetopologyoftheRiemannsphereintothatofanotherkindoftopologicalsurface,suchasatwo-handledtorus,sometimeswithpinchedhandles,fig2(e-g).AKleiniangroupisadiscretecsubgroupof2x2complexmatricesofdeterminant1moduloitscenter-thesetofelementsthatcommutewitheveryelementofthegroup.ASchottkygroupIP96isaspecialformofKleiniangroup,consistingoftwo(ormore)ofMöbiusmapsaandbonR,eachofwhichmapstheinsideofonecircleContotheoutsideoftheotherD.Ifthetwopairsofcirclesareentirelydisjointasinfig2(b),thegroupactioninducesatopologicaltransformationofR,generatingamulti-handledtorusasinfig2(e).Aquasi-FuchsiangroupIP161isaKleiniangroupwhoselimitsetiscontainedinaninvariantJordancurve,ortopologicalcircle,sotheirlimitsetsarefractalcircles.Theunderlyingspacesofquasi-FuchsianandotherKleiniangroups,suchasthatoftheApolloniangasketfig2(d),canbedefinedbypinchingthetopologyasinfig2(f,g),sothatthelimitsetbecomesafractaltilingbycirclesasinfig3(a).Thegroupinteractions,whendiscrete,inducetilingsinthecomplexplane,whichalsoillustratetransformationsofhyperbolicgeometryd.bThisnewtopologyarisesfromthequotientofthecomplementofthelimitsetundertheactionofthegroup.cAdiscretegroupisagroupoftransformationsofanunderlyingspacepossessingthediscretetopology,wherethereisacollectionofopensetsinwhicheachopensetcorrespondstojustoneelementofthegroup.Discretegroupsthusappearnaturallyasthesymmetriesofdiscretestructures,suchastilingsofaspace.dThegroupofallMöbiustransformationsisisomorphictotheorientation-preservingisometriesofhyperbolic3-space,andhencegroupactionsofsuchtransformationscangeneratehyperbolictilings,suchasthoseofMauriceEscher’s“AngelsandDemons”,representingthemodulargroup,aswellasthelimitsetsdepictedinfig3.
Astheparametersofthesemapsvary,thelimitsetsapproachaboundaryinparameterspace,wherethelimitsetcanbecomearationalcirclepacking,asinfig3(a-c)orirrationallydegenerate(f,g),formingaspace-filingfractal,beyondwhichtheprocessdescendsintochaoticdynamicsfig6(d),asthegroupsbecomenon-discreteandtheirorbitsbecomeentangled.LiketheMandelbrotset,forcertainclassesoflimitset,onecangenerateanatlas,calledtheMaskitslice,fig1(f),whoseupperboundarycontainstheselimitingcases.AninsightfulwaytoportraytheiractionsistodeterminewhattheMöbiustransformationsdotokeycirclesinvolvedinthedefinitionsofaandb.AgoodstartingpointiswithpairsofSchottkymaps.Ifallthecirclesaredisjoint,whenthecirclesaretransformedbybothmaps,theirimagesformacascadeofcircles,whichtendinlimittothetotally-disconnectedfractaldustofaCantorset,fig2(b).Astheparametersp,q,r,andsofeacharevaried,sothatcirclepairscometogetherandtouch,asin(c),theCantorsettransformsintoacircularlimitset.
Fig2:(a)TheRiemannsphere–thecomplexplaneclosedbyasinglepointatinfinity.(b)SchottkymapsformingCantordust.(c)Touchingcirclesformingacircularlimitset.(d,g)Fourcircles,alltouching,forminganApolloniangasket.(e)SchottkymapsperformasurgeryofRtoformadoublehandledtorus.(f)Ifthecommutatorisparabolic,
asinquasi-Fuchsianlimitsets,whichformafractaltopologicalcircle,orJordancurve,whosecomplements,quotientbythegroupintoapairofRiemannsurfaces,thedoubletorusbecomespinched.(g)Whenoneorbothofaandb,ortheirwords,arealsoparabolic,asinthegasket,(d)andthoseinfig3,one,ortwofurtherpinchesoccur.Thereisanalternativeway,independentlyofSchottkygroups,touniquelydefinethematricesviatheirtracesTa,Tb,whereTa=p+s,asin(1),ifwefocusonmapswherethecommutatoraba–1b–1isparabolic,withatraceof–2.Astracesarepreservedunderconjugacyofmappingsb=cac-1,wecansimplifythediscussiontoconjugacyclasses,reducingthenumberoffreevariablesinthetwomatricestoauniquesolution.This,process,affectionatelyknowninIndra’sPearlsas‘Grandma’srecipe’IP227,enablesustoexplorenewclassesoflimitset,asillustratedinfig2(d)forthe
Apolloniangasket,whichcanalsoberepresentedvia4circles,allofwhichtouch,asshowninblack.TheasymmetricnatureofthetwomatrixmappingsgeneratedbyGrandma’srecipecanbeseeninfig1(b,d),wherebotharecolouredbythefirstiterate.Althoughthecommutatorisparabolic(resultinginthesinglepinchweseeinfig2(f),thegeneratorsa,andbcanbeloxodromic,andcantendtoparabolicaswell,withthetransitionfromthequasi-Fuchsiansetoffig1(b)whereTa=Tb=2.2totheApolloniangasketfig3(a),whereTa=Tb=2,resultinginthetwofurtherpinchesinfig2(g)andineachoftheexamplesinfig3,wherebisparabolicwithTb=2.Becausethelimitsetistheplacewhereallpointsareasymptoticallymappedunderinteractionofthetransformationsandtheirinverses,onecansimplypickeachpointontheplaneandrepeatedlymapitbyarandomsequenceofthetwotransformationsandtheirinversesandthesepointswillbecomeasymptoticallydrawntothelimitset.Thetroublewiththisprocessisthat,althoughitcancrudelyportrayanylimitset,includingchaotic,non-discreteexamples,theasymptoticiteratesaredistributedexponentiallyunevenly,sothatsomepartsofthelimitsetarevirtuallynevervisitedandthelimitsetisincompletelyandonlyveryapproximatelyportrayed,asinfig6(d).Bycontrastwiththenon-linearfunctionsofJuliasets,wheredepictionalgorithms,suchasmodifiedinverseiterationfig1(g)anddistanceestimation,dependonanalyticfeatures,suchasderivativesandpotentialfunctions,anaccuratedescriptionofKleiniangrouplimitsetsrequirestakingfullstrategicadvantageoftheunderlyingalgebraicpropertiesofthegrouptransformations.DescendingtheSpiralLabyrinth:Thedepth-firstsearchalgorithmIP141todepictthelimitsetsisingeniousandextremelyelegant.Theaimistotraversethealgebraicspaceofallwordcombinationsofthegeneratorsa,b,a-1,b-1inawaywhichdrawsacontinuouspiecewiselinearapproximationtothefractalofanydesiredresolution.Todothis,wegenerateacorkscrewmaze,wherewetraversedeeperanddeeperlayersofthesearchtree,turningrightateachdescentandthenentereachtunnelsuccessively,movinganticlockwisearoundthegenerators,andretreatingwhenwereachtheinverseofthemapweenteredby,afterthreeleftturns,sincethemapanditsinversecancel.Ateachnodeweretainarecordofourjourneydown,ourAriadne’sthread,bymultiplyingthesuccessivematricesaswedescend,andmakeacriticaltest:Theparaboliccommutatorhasasinglefixedpoint,whichrepresentsaninfinitelimitofcyclicrepeatsofthegenerators.Ifweapplythecomposedorbitmatrixtothefixedpointofthe
clockwisecommutatoranddothesamefortheanti-clockwisecommutator’sfixedpointandthesetwoarewithinanepsilonthreshold,thismeansgoingthe‘oppositeway’aroundthelocalfractalleavesuswithinresolution,sowedrawalinebetweenthetwoandterminatethedescent,retreatingandturningintovacanttunnelsandexploringthem,untilwefindourselvesbackattherootofthetree.Usingthefixedpointshastheeffectofproducingatheoreticallyinfiniteorbitoftransformationsthatcancarryustoanypartofthelimitset,andbecausewearetraversinggeneratorspacesystematically,wewilltraversepartsofthelimitsetthatarevisitedexponentiallyrarelyinarandomprocess.NavigatingtheMaskitSlice:IfwefocusonlimitsetswherebisparabolicwithTb=2,andonlyTavaries,thisgivesusacomplexparameterplanecalledtheMaskitsliceIP287,fig1(f),forminganatlasoflimitsets,justastheMandelbrotsetdoesforJuliasets,sowecanexploreandclassifytheirproperties.Todefinelocationsontheslice,weneedtobeabletodeterminethetracesTathatcorrespondtorationalcasesinvolvingfractionalmotion.Keytothisarethegeneratorwordsformedbythemaps.Forexample3/10infig3(c)hasaparabolicgeneratorworda3Ba4Ba3Bsymbolicallyexpressingthe3/10ratio.Forgeneralfractionalvaluesp/rwecandeterminethetracesrecursivelyfromtwokeyrelations–extendedMarkovandGrandfatherIP192:(a)Taba-1b-1=T2a+T2B+T2aB–Ta.TB.TaB–2and(b)Tmn=Tm.Tn–Tm-1n.
Fig3:(a)Apolloniangasketfraction0/1Ta=2,shadedtohighlightseparatecomponentsinthemapping,(b)the1/15limitsetwiththe15stepsoftheparabolicword
a15Binred.Intriguingly,as1/n–>0thelimitsetsdonottendinlimittothegasket,althoughtheirtracesandmatricesdo,astheycontainanadditionalfourfold
symmetry.(c)The3/10setcolouredbythelastiterate.(d)Afreediscretegroup.(e)Singly-degenerateLRsetof
theGoldenmean.(f)L10Rspiraldegeneracy.
WecanusetheserelationstosuccessivelymovedowntheFareytreeoffractionsIP291,seefig1(e),becauseneighboursonthetreehavegeneratorwordscombiningviaFareymediantswp+q/r+s=wp/rwq/s,andsothegrandfatheridentityimpliesTwp+q/r+s=Twp/rTwq/s–Twp–q/r–sbecause,in
thelastterm,thecombinedwordm-1nhasneatlycancellinggeneratorsinthemiddle.SinceTaba-1b-1=–2in(a),forp/r,thisreducestosolvinganr-thdegreepolynomial.Ifweplotallthepolynomialsolutionstothep/rlimitsets,forr≤nwehavetheMaskitsliceIP287,fig1(f),whoseupperboundarycontainseachofthep/rtracevaluesasfractalcusps.Aboveandontheboundaryarediscretegroups,whichgeneratefractaltilingsofthecomplementinR,whilevalueswithinthesliceproducenon-freegroupsorchaoticnon-discretesets,whichcangenrallybeportrayedstochastically,fig6(d),butnotbydepth-firstsearch.TherationalcuspsIP273provideintriguingexamplesofcirclepackingswithdeeplinkstohyperbolicgeometry.However,irrationallydegeneratespace-fillinglimitsetsremainedenigmatic,untilakeyexampletracevaluewasfoundIP314,namedafterTroelsJørgensen,whopositedtheexistenceofsuchlimitsets5.Thesolutioniscompletelynatural–theGoldenmeanlimitoftheFibonaccifractionsarisingfromarepeatedLRmoveontheFareytreeresultinginthelimitsetoffig3(e).WecanapproachsuchvaluesbyuseofNewton’smethodtosolvetheequationsoftheascendingfractions.Thisleadsontofurthercases,suchasspiraldegeneracyIP320,wherewerepeatatentoonesetofmoves,L10R,upthelefthandslopeoftheMaskitsliceupperboundary,andintoaspiralingsequenceofeversmallercuspsintheslice,givingrisetothelimitsetoffig3(f).Sinceirrationalnumbersareuncountable,suchlimitsetsaretheoverwhelmingmajorityofcases,althoughhardertoaccess.DoubledegeneracyattheEdgeofChaos:Theaboveexamplesaresinglydegenerate,becauseonlyhalftheregionisengulfed,andthequestionarises,isitpossibletofindapairoftracesgeneratingalimitsetwhichisentirelyspace-filling,permeatingthecomplexplanewithafractaldimensionof2?ThisquestbecameamathematicalepiphanyIP331.ItispossibletogeneratealimitsetconjugatetoTroels’exampleinthefollowingway.TomakeaLRjourneydowntheFareytreetoahigherFibonaccifraction,suchas987/1597,aboutthemiddle,wefind21/34and13/21.ItturnsoutthatthewordsintermsofaandBforthesestepsalsoformgeneratorswhichcanbeusedinreversetodefineaandB.IfweapplyGrandma’salgorithmtotheirtracescalculatedbymatrixmultiplicationoftheaandBwords,wegetanotherlimitsetconjugatetotheoriginal,asinfig4(a).ThereasoningthatthesetwomidpointtraceswereverysimilarledtotheideathatadoublydegeneratelimitsetcorrespondingtotheGoldenmeanmightarisefromsimplyapplyingendlessLRFareymoves
(a,B)→L(a,aB)→
R(a2B,aB) ,whichleavethe
generatorsunchanged:(a,B)=(a2B,aB),givingtwoequationswhich,combinedwithGrandfatherandMarkovleadstotheconjugatetracesolutions(3±31/2i)/2,asshowninfig4(b).
Fig4:(a)LimitsetconjugatetotheGoldenmeanlimitset.(b)Thedoublydegeneratespace-fillinglimitsetoffractaldimension2,colouredbythethirditeratetohighlightthefractallineconnectingcentres.(c)Figure8knot,whose3Dcomplementisgluedfromhyperbolic3-spaceby(b).
Anintriguingfeatureisthat,inadditiontoa,b,thereisathirdinducedparabolicsymmetryc,becausethe(LR)∞movemustarisefromaMöbiusmapconjugatingthelimitsettoitself,whichhasthesamefixedpointastheparaboliccommutator,andconjugateswithit,althoughperformingadistinct'translation'flippingthesetsboundingthejaggedlineconnectingthecentres.RobertRiley6hasshownthatthe3transformationsresultinagluingof3Dhyperbolicspace,viathegroup’sdiscrete3D‘tiling’,tobecomethe3-spherewiththefigure8knot(fig4inset)removedIP388.
Fig5:The‘HolyGrail’–doublespiraldegeneracy,with
thetracesreversedinthesecondimage.Theconvergencetospace-fillingisveryslowandthefullresolutionimagetook29hoursingenericCandwouldhavetaken112daysininterpretedMatlabcode.Althoughthetracesarenolongerconjugates,thesetsareclearlydegenerateonbothcomplementcomponentsinthesamewayasinfig4.
Tounravelthespirallydegeneratecase,Iexaminedtherecursiverelationsfromtheendless(L10R)∞moveandfoundtheycouldbeexploitedtoproduceapairoftracesbysolvingasystemof11equations:Ta=1.936872603726+0.021074052017i,andTb=1.878060670271–1.955723310188i.WhentheseareinputintotheDFSalgorithm,wehavethedoublespiraldegeneracyshowninfig5.TheBondageofRelationships:ThereisafurtherenchantingcollectionoflimitsetsIP353,wherethegroupisnon–freeandhasacommutatorthat
squarestotheidentity–(aba–1b–1)2=I.Thiscausesthetracetobe0,butanextendedgrandma’salgorithmIP261applies,therecursiverelations(a)and(b)canbesolvedtogiveapolynomial,andthelimitsetscanbedepictedbyDFS,aslongasgeneratorwordsthatshort-circuittotheidentityaretreatedasdead-ends.Thisrequiresanautomaticgroup–involvingalook-uptable(automaton)whereallthegrowingwordstringsthatcouldendinashort-circuit,aswedescendthesearchtree,areaccounted,byiterativelycomposingtheirstatesandexitingwhenadeathstateisreached.Infig6(a-c),arethreesuchlimitsets,withthe“inner”regionshighlightedinyellowtodistinguishthemfromthecomplementarywhiteregions,fromwhichtheyareisolatedbythelimitset.
Fig6:Non-freelimitsets,(a)Ta(1/60)Tb=2,(b)aquasi-Fuchsian“dragon”(c)L10Rspirallydegenerate.(d):A
successionofnon-freeandnon-discretechaoticlimitsetswhereTa=Tb=2underavaryingcommutatortrace,
usingthestochasticalgorithm.FallingintotheChaoticAbyss:Onecanalsofreelyexplorethewilderlimitsets,usingthestochasticalgorithm,whichrecursivelymapschosenpoints,suchasMöbiustransformationfixedpoints,usingarandomsequenceofthefourgenerators.Thiscanvisualizelimitsetsinlowerfidelitywithoutanyrestriction,includingnon-free,andnon-discretechaoticsystems,asillustratedinfig6(d).References:1ChrisKing2011FractalGeographyoftheRiemannZetaFunctionarXiv:1103.5274.2RobertBrooksandPeterMatelski,Thedynamicsof2-generatorsubgroupsofPSL(2,C),inIrwinKra,ed.1981RiemannSurfacesandRelatedTopics:Proceedingsofthe1978StonyBrookConference,PrincetonUniversity.3ChrisKing2018KleinianandQuasi-FuchsianLimitSets:AnOpenSourceToolboxhttp://dhushara.com/quasi/4DavidMumford,CarolineSeriesandDavidWright2002Indra’sPearls:TheVisionofFelixKleinCambridgeISBN978-0-521-35253-6.5TroelsJorgensen1977Compact3-ManifoldsofConstantNegativeCurvatureFiberingOvertheCircleAnn.Math.Ser2,106(1)61-72.6RobertRiley2013ApersonalaccountofthediscoveryofhyperbolicstructuresonsomeknotcomplementsExpo.Math.31104-115doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2013.01.003.