The Impact of Affordable Housing
description
Transcript of The Impact of Affordable Housing
The Impact of Affordable Housing
The Lakewood Resource & Referral Center212 2nd Street Suite 204
Lakewood, NJ 08701
The Topics We’ll be covering.
Preventing Chronic Homelessness
Spurring Economic Growth
Why Address Prevention? Strategies to prevent new cases or “close the
front door” to homelessness are as important to ending homelessness as services to help those who are already homeless re-enter housing
The challenge is targeting efforts toward those who will become homeless without the preventive intervention
Why Focus on Mainstream Programs?
People who experience chronic homelessness are heavy users of expensive mainstream services
Levels of disability and poverty make them likely to be eligible for mainstream programs
Approaches that work for this subgroup may make mainstream services more accessible for others
Prevention of Chronic Homelessness
Involves identifying key individual- and system-level risk factors and targeting prevention efforts to specific subgroups
Risk Factors for Chronic HomelessnessIndividual Risk Factors Chronic health conditions, mental illness and/or substance use
disorders Limited or no social support networks Domestic violence and other victimization or trauma-related factors Family instability as a child (out-of-home placement, family
homelessness, incarceration of a parent) Combat experiences for veterans
System-Based Risk Factors Discharge from jail, prison, hospital, shelter, detox, residential
substance abuse treatment, and foster care Lack of permanent affordable housing Very low or no income
Key Prevention Strategies Development, implementation and monitoring/
enforcement of discharge policies that prevent homelessness (zero-tolerance policies)
Access to supportive services coupled with housing
Pilot programs for ex-offenders (in-reach, housing assistance, post-release support services )
Creating/setting aside housing for people exiting mental health institutions, other at-risk populations (e.g., substance abusers)
The Role of Discharge Planning in Preventing Chronic Homelessness
Discharge planning, linked to affordable housing and aftercare, is a “promising practice” for the prevention of chronic homelessness—particularly for people with health and behavioral health disorders
Discharge from InstitutionsData from Massachusetts showed that people coming into shelters were well-known to the State’s mainstream systems
18-24 year olds aging out of State services
Ex-offenders released from State or county facilities with no place to go
People from detox at the beginning of their recovery
People with serious mental or physical illnesses released directly from a hospital
Best Practice Strategies Develop and implement system-wide policy
that prevent discharges to shelters or streets
Focus on the individual—use stays in hospitals and correctional facilities as opportunities to engage, assess, and plan
Ensure continuity of care when transitioning from one provider to another
Best Practice Strategies Employ “boundary spanners” who understand and can
cross agency lines
Help individuals access housingDevelop housing expertise within mainstream systemsProvide bridge subsidies and priority access to Section 8
Help individuals access servicesLink people to services or teams (ACT, CTI) that provide
or broker servicesHelp individuals gain access to benefits before they are
released
Best Practice Strategies Collaboration and partnerships
Get stakeholders to the tableFind champions, develop incentives, stress cost
savings
AccountabilityHold systems/providers accountable for outcomesEstablish indicators with realistic benchmarksIncorporate standards into contracts
Best Practice Examples…Transition Specialists/Boundary Spanners
New York State’s Office of Mental Health funds pre-release coordinators and a transition case management team to provide services to inmates with mental illnesses released from State prisons. Services include:“In-reach” visitsLinking to community housing and treatment
providersCoordination with Division of Parole
King Co. Seattle’s mental health and addiction services division funds 4 liaisons to work with staff and patients at the State hospital to facilitate transition planning
Best Practice Examples…Accessing Housing Options
Hawaii’s Mental Health Division provides temporary rent subsidies to homeless patients being discharged. Section 8 rules revised to give preference to people who are homeless or receiving bridge subsidies
Kentucky made persons being discharged from State hospitals a priority population for Section 8
New York State’s Office of Mental Health has mandated that individuals at high risk for homelessness receive priority for housing, case management, and Assertive Community Treatment
Best Practice Examples…Continuity of Care and Service Access
Critical Time Intervention and Short-term ACT Services are evidence-based practices for people who have experienced chronic homelessness
Provide intensive clinical services for 6-12 months during and following transition from shelters, hospitals, or jails
Proven effective in maintaining residential stability and linkage to mainstream treatment and other support services after intervention is scaled back or withdrawn
Best Practice Examples…Collaboration and Partnerships
Maryland Mental Hygiene Administration funds transition planning services for incarcerated individuals with serious mental illnesses and co-occurring disorders who are homeless
Seed money is provided to 23 jurisdictions that have developed interagency advisory boards and agreements specifying services community agencies will provide to ensure successful re-entry
Best Practice Examples…Accountability
New Hampshire banned discharges to shelters in a new hospital discharge planning policy
Massachusetts mainstream systems (corrections, mental health, etc.) evaluate contractors on performance measures where homelessness is a negative outcome and housing is a positive outcome. Outcomes are tied to incentives and disincentives in each system
City of Philadelphia and Massachusetts are reducing shelter beds by providing incentives for providers to provide prevention services and supports in housing. Shelter providers are penalized if a former client reappears in the shelter system
Best Practice Examples…Youth in Transition The Federally-funded Independent Living Program for
youth transitioning from foster care allows up to 30% of funds to be used toward housing for youth until they reach the age of 21
Illinois’ Department of Youth and Families’ Youth Housing Assistance Program provides housing advocacy and cash assistance to youth aging out of foster care. Housing advocates throughout the State assist with locating affordable housing and accessing social services. Grants to cover start-up costs (e.g., security deposits) and partial housing subsidies are available
Best Practice Examples…Re-Entry for Ex-Offenders
States and localities are collaborating with criminal justice re-entry initiatives to provide housing and post-release support services
Blended funds to create and provide new housing for formerly incarcerated persons
Re-allocation of Criminal Justice/Corrections capital funding to housing agency
Provision of Corrections/Parole funds to subsidize supportive housing for former inmates
Cross-training for improved discharge planning
Best Practice Examples…Post-Detox/Pre-Recovery Support Massachusetts’ Bureau of Substance Abuse Services
(BSAS) supports two programs to prevent homelessness and relapse for individuals leaving detoxification without a recovery home bed or other housing in place. Both provide services and transitional housing for an average of 30 days
Housing is Critical “…the greatest challenge is not in the discharge planning
process itself, which involves assessing individuals and linking them to services, but in the development of sufficient housing & services…” (SAMHSA Expert Panel Meeting Summary)
Providing housing subsidies that target those with worst case housing needs (e.g., people who experience chronic homelessness) is probably warranted
Studies have shown for more disabled populations (people with mental illnesses and/or substance use disorders) access to permanent housing with supportive services is effective
Spurring Growth
Bringing Inflated Housing Costs Down Limiting the Average Monthly Housing expense Facilitating Growth in Consumer Demand
Spurring Growth
Brings Down Cost of Living Lowers Sustainable Salary Levels Lowers Business’ Operating Costs Provides Competitive Pricing Ability Facilitates Better Client Satisfaction
Thank You
Q&A