The Hegre Group – a complex stratigraphic interval: Example ......The Hegre Group – a complex...

18
The Hegre Group – a complex stratigraphic interval: Example from the Greater Sleipner Area Anna Kulikova, Andreas Rittersbacher, Silvan Hoth, James Elgenes, Signe Ottesen and Annika Therese Ulfsdotter Heggheim 20 June 20 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

Transcript of The Hegre Group – a complex stratigraphic interval: Example ......The Hegre Group – a complex...

  • The Hegre Group – a complex stratigraphic interval: Example from the Greater Sleipner AreaAnna Kulikova, Andreas Rittersbacher, Silvan Hoth, James Elgenes, Signe Ottesen and Annika Therese Ulfsdotter Heggheim

    20 June 20Classification: Open

    © Statoil ASA

  • Stratigraphy challenge

    20 June 20172 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Salt tectonics

    Permian fault blocks (Signe Ottesen, 2001) Top Zechstein -Top Sleipner Fm thickness map

    15 km

    15 km

    20 June 20173 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Objectives of the study• Enhance the understanding of the deposition of a Triassic reservoir in

    the Sleipner Area

    • Enhance the decision making for potential Triassic exploration projects

    Location and stratigraphy of the Sleipner Area

    20 June 20174 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Facies from core: Proximal-medial part of a fluvial system

    Cross bedding

    Rip-up clasts

    Erosional bases

    Amalgamated channel fill deposits and paleosols

    Paleosols with caliche

    Cross bedding

    Channel fill deposits

    20 June 20175 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Facies from core: Distal alluvial plain

    • A lot of mica –ponding, low energy

    Terminal splay/ lake deltaAlluvial plain / ephemeral lake

    • Gradationalboundaries

    • Unconfined flow

    Similar to examples of Smith Bank in UK sector (McKie, 2014)

    • Parallel lamination

    • Wave ripple & horizontallamination

    • Roots, burrows

    • Mudcracks and rip-up clasts

    • Quiet setting

    20 June 20176 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Facies modelDistal dry alluvial plain, terminal splays, lakes

    • Unconfined flows from terminal splays

    • Standing bodies of water - ephemeral lakes / ponds

    • Aeolian?

    Proximal to medial part of a fluvial system

    • Channelized flow, maximum reworking

    • Amalgamated sandstones, floodplain is

    reworked and transported downstream

    Cain & Mountney, 2009

    20 June 20177 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Transport direction

    Likely towards East / Southeast

    Possible source from the Utsira High

    Paleogeography is taken from McKie (2012) Figure 19a. Sediment dispersal is taken from McKie and Williams (2009). Active faults are taken from the Millennium Atlas (2003)

    20 June 20178 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Intra Triassic lithological packages

    • Heterogeneous

    • Sandy

    • Transitional

    • Fine-grained (Smith Bank)

    • Lack of biostratigraphic data

    • Lithostratigraphic correlation

    20 June 20179 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Combinations that occur at Sleipner Eastrare

    Uncertainand rare

    GRP1_3

    P1_2

    P1a/P1 P1

    P1a

    P1_3

    P1_2

    P1

    P1a

    P1_2

    P1

    P1a P1a

    • If succession of identified packages is depositional and correct:

    • Progradation of fluvial system has occurred

    • Erosion could be an important factor in preservation of sandstones of the upper packages

    • As packages are similar and thick –the fluvial system covered a large area and was flowing without restrictions.

    rare

    • Heterogeneous

    • Sandy

    • Transitional

    • Fine-grained (Smith Bank)

    20 June 201710 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Accommodation vs Sediment supply

    Sandy amalagmated package

    Transitional package

    Fine grained package

    • Progradation of the fluvial system• Decrease in subsidence rate or

    increase in sediment supply or a combination of both

    • NOTE that lateral change in facies could occur due to proximal to distal variations

    Banham & Mountney, 2013

    20 June 201711 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Evidence of erosion at the top of Triassic succession• Assuming that succession of lithological packages

    is depositional and correct

    • Different uppermost packages are missing in a number of the wells

    • Unconformities have been observed at the top Triassic from dipmeter data

    • Unconformities are also observed on seismic data

    mis

    sing

    Dip

    met

    er d

    ata

    mis

    sing

    Dip

    met

    erda

    ta

    • Heterogeneous

    • Sandy

    • Transitional

    • Fine-grained

    20 June 201712 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • 1

    Correlation and seismic section lines

    5 km

    20 June 201713 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • trans

    het/sandy

    fine

    trans

    Well Correlation Line 1

    On flanks ofan elevated pod

    On top of the pod

    1 2

    3

    • Sandy/heterogeneous

    • Transitional

    • Fine-grainedfines

    4 5 6

    20 June 201714 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Both wells drilled on flanks encountered

    Skagerrak sandstones

    Smith Bank

    Older Skagerrakinterval is preserved

    Jurassic Wedge, Active faultingLittle effect of

    Jurassic erosion

    Seismic section Line 1

    BCUSkaggerakBase CoalSmith Bank (modelled)

    • Sandy Skagerrak package is missing on top of the mini-basins and present on the flanks

    • Faulting played a role as well

    Skagerrak

    2.5 km

    1

    2 34 6

    No Skagerrak

    Partly preservedSkagerraksuccession

    20 June 201715 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Salt sediment interaction model

    Sleipner Field example

    2 3 4

    SkagerrakSkagerrak

    SALT

    Smith Bank

    1. Smith Bank – increased thickness in salt mini-basins2. Deposition of Skagerrak across the area with potential

    depocentres or differential preservation above salt crestal collapse structures

    3. Aalenian unconformity (Jurassic erosion) – partly or fully removes Skagerrak sandstone package

    6 or 11

    4 326 or 11

    Model modified from McKie, 2014

    20 June 201719 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • Conclusions for the Sleipner Area

    • Skagerrak fluvial system was active across the whole area and progradedtowards SE during formation of crestal collapse structures

    • Erosion removed parts of Skagerrak deposits from tops of the inverted salt mini-basins

    • Skagerrak sandstone is mainly preserved on the flanks of the inverted salt mini-basins and in the depocentres between the mini-basins, and partly on the top of the mini-basins

    • Salt - sediment interaction models by McKie (2012, 2014) allow for the welland seismic observations made in the Sleipner Area

    • Correlation of lithostratigraphic packages in absence of biostratigraphic data seems to be plausible, but uncertainty on the chronostratigraphy remains

    • Hegre Gp is complex stratigraphic interval affected by a combination offluvial system dynamics, salt movements and Jurassic erosion

    20 June 201720 Classification: Open © Statoil ASA

  • This presentation, including the contents and arrangement of the contents of each individual page or the collection of the pages, are owned by Statoil. Copyright to all material including, but not limited to, written material, photographs, drawings, images, tables and data remains the property of Statoil. All rights reserved. Any other kind of use, reproduction, translation, adaption, arrangement, any other alteration, distribution or storage of this presentation, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Statoil is prohibited. The information contained in this presentation may not be accurate, up to date or applicable to the circumstances of any particular case, despite our efforts. Statoil cannot accept any liability for any inaccuracies or omissions.

    Presentation title

    The Hegre Group – a complex stratigraphic interval: Example from the Greater Sleipner Area

    Presenters name/title, etcAnna [email protected]

    www.statoil.com

    © Statoil ASA

    Questions?

    The Hegre Group – a complex stratigraphic interval: Example from the Greater Sleipner AreaStratigraphy challengeSalt tectonicsObjectives of the studyFacies from core: Proximal-medial part of a fluvial systemFacies from core: Distal alluvial plainFacies modelTransport directionIntra Triassic lithological packagesCombinations that occur at Sleipner EastAccommodation vs Sediment supplyEvidence of erosion at the top of Triassic successionCorrelation and seismic section linesSlide Number 14Slide Number 15Salt sediment interaction modelConclusions for the Sleipner AreaSlide Number 21