The good, the bad, and the ugly of multiple data sources Barbara J. McMorris, PhD ONRS Seminar May...
-
Upload
dustin-matthews -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of The good, the bad, and the ugly of multiple data sources Barbara J. McMorris, PhD ONRS Seminar May...
The good, the bad, and the ugly The good, the bad, and the ugly of multiple data sourcesof multiple data sources
Barbara J. McMorris, PhDBarbara J. McMorris, PhDONRS Seminar May 19, 2011ONRS Seminar May 19, 2011
UMN School of NursingUMN School of Nursing
Types of Types of TriangulationTriangulation
MethodologicalMethodological
AnalysisAnalysis
InterdisciplinaryInterdisciplinary
InvestigatorInvestigator
DataData
Why is Data Triangulation Why is Data Triangulation Important?Important?
Better research study & results
Reviewers getting savvier; asking for multiple sources of data
More “tools” for your
research tool box
Study 1: Administrative Claims Data + Self Reports
Rhinitis Study GoalsRhinitis Study Goals
Assess burden of allergic and non allergic Assess burden of allergic and non allergic rhinitis rhinitis – What is the cost and utilization impact of What is the cost and utilization impact of
treatment for rhinitis? treatment for rhinitis?
Evaluate providers’ perceptions of rhinitis Evaluate providers’ perceptions of rhinitis burden on patients and severity of burden on patients and severity of symptomssymptoms
Rhinitis Survey Data AnalysisRhinitis Survey Data Analysis
63
63
40
79
75
59
0 50 100
Rhinitis Tximproves QOL
Patients' symptseverity extrmly
impt
AR & NAR nottreated/managed
the same
Allergy Specialist
No AllergySpecialist
% Agree/Strongly Agree
Rhinitis Claims Data AnalysisRhinitis Claims Data Analysis
Count of and Costs of Health Care Services Utilized during 1 Yr Follow-up
Mean (SD)
Mild Patients
(N = 5,670)
ModeratePatients
(N = 22,216)
SeverePatients
(N = 7,217)
Total(N=35,103)
Number of Rhinitis-Related ER Visits
0.03 (0.75) 0.05 (0.89) 0.04 (0.69) 0.05 (0.83)
Number of Rhinitis-Related Office Visits
5.61 (10.1) 8.12( 11.69) 9.39 (12.85) 7.98 (11.75)
Number of Rhinitis-Related Specialist Office Visits
3.08 (8.50) 5.65 (10.43) 7.22 (11.79) 5.56 (10.52)
Total Rhinitis-Related Medical Cost
$358 (725) $514 (919) $556 (952) $497 (900)
Total Rhinitis-Related Pharmacy Costs
$364 (417) $435 (474) $440 (478) $424 (467)
Reflection: “good-bad”Reflection: “good-bad”
Known sampling frame Known sampling frame
““Clean” processed dataClean” processed data
Timing of data collection differentTiming of data collection different– Lag in health care claims being loadedLag in health care claims being loaded– Physical report of severityPhysical report of severity
Low response rateLow response rate
Results used in marketing
http://www.gsk.com/media/pressreleases/http://www.gsk.com/media/pressreleases/2007/2007_10_19_GSK1134.htm2007/2007_10_19_GSK1134.htm
Study 2: Self Reports + Provider Care Flow Sheets
RA Infusion Study GoalsRA Infusion Study Goals
Describe patient-reported outcomes due to Describe patient-reported outcomes due to bDMARD infusions: bDMARD infusions: – satisfactionsatisfaction– lost productivity lost productivity – pain/discomfortpain/discomfort
Quantify the amount of time providers spend for Quantify the amount of time providers spend for initiating infusions (3 types)initiating infusions (3 types)
Describe provider satisfaction with infusionsDescribe provider satisfaction with infusions
Data SourcesData Sources
Health care claims databaseHealth care claims database
Provider surveyProvider survey
Patient Survey Patient Survey
Case Report Form Case Report Form
Infusion Care Flow SheetInfusion Care Flow Sheet
RA Infusion ResultsRA Infusion Results
Patient and Provider time associated with infusions
Means & %’s
Infusion 1(N = 102)
Infusion 2(N = 74)
Infusion 3(N = 29)
Total patient time away from work/home (min.)
172.6 267.9 446.9
% patients able to return to work 45% 17% 29%
% had friend/family member miss work
31% 24% 43%
Total provider labor time (min.) 86.7 128.2 237.9
Reflection: “good”Reflection: “good”
Good example of triangulation Good example of triangulation
Comprehensive picture of “burden” Comprehensive picture of “burden”
Small sample sizeSmall sample size
Results used in marketing
http://www.orencia.com/rheumatoid-arthritihttp://www.orencia.com/rheumatoid-arthritis-medication/orencia-infusion.aspxs-medication/orencia-infusion.aspx
Study 3: Self Reports + Process Data + Official Records
Broadway HS Study GoalsBroadway HS Study Goals
Provide a descriptive profile of pregnant Provide a descriptive profile of pregnant and parenting teen girls and parenting teen girls
Compare outcomes for Broadway and Compare outcomes for Broadway and comparison girls:comparison girls:
progress toward graduationprogress toward graduationdelaying a repeat birthdelaying a repeat birth keeping children fully immunizedkeeping children fully immunized
Data SourcesData Sources
Girls’ self reports on pre/post surveysGirls’ self reports on pre/post surveys
Case manager reports of timeCase manager reports of time
Official RecordsOfficial Records
–Program Program
–School districtSchool district
–CountyCounty
Evaluation ResultsEvaluation Results
%
County DataCounty Data
MFIP and Other AssistanceBroadwayStudents(N = 158)
ComparisonGroup
(N = 97)
Ave counted months of MFIP 9.7 10.76
Ave used months of MFIP 25.8 26.9
2 or more children 27% 27%
Used emergency assistance 47% 41%
Case closed due to sanction limit 9% 13%
Reflection: kinda “ugly”Reflection: kinda “ugly”
Using survey created/revised by othersUsing survey created/revised by others
Linking datasets – what is the link?Linking datasets – what is the link?
Consent to access official records?Consent to access official records?
What were the data collected for? What were the data collected for? – Who entered the data?Who entered the data?
Budget enough time & money for both Budget enough time & money for both data management & analysis?data management & analysis?
Final Cautions about Final Cautions about Data TriangulationData Triangulation
Need well-defined goals (no “fishing”)Need well-defined goals (no “fishing”)
Costly both in time and $$$Costly both in time and $$$
May not solve bias/error issues May not solve bias/error issues
Replication is difficultReplication is difficult
Know your “official” records sources and Know your “official” records sources and their limitationstheir limitations
Do you have “permission” to link data Do you have “permission” to link data sets? sets?
““triangulation state of mind”*triangulation state of mind”*
““If you If you self consciouslyself consciously set out to collect set out to collect and double-check findings using multiple and double-check findings using multiple sources and modes of evidence, the sources and modes of evidence, the verification process will largely be built into verification process will largely be built into the data-gathering process, and little more the data-gathering process, and little more need be done than to report on one’s need be done than to report on one’s procedures.”procedures.”
*Miles & Huberman (1984: *Miles & Huberman (1984: p.235)p.235)
Thank you!Thank you!
Useful citations:Begley, CM. (1996). Using triangulation in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24:122-128.
Thurmond, VA. (2001). The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 22(3): 253-258.