The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University...
-
Upload
noah-harper -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
2
Transcript of The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University...
![Page 1: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Klaas Enno Stephan
Wellcome Trust Centre for NeuroimagingUniversity College London
With many thanks to my colleagues in the FIL methods group, particularly Stefan Kiebel, for useful slides
SPM Course, ICNMay 2008
![Page 2: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview of SPM
RealignmentRealignment SmoothingSmoothing
NormalisationNormalisation
General linear modelGeneral linear model
Statistical parametric map (SPM)Statistical parametric map (SPM)Image time-seriesImage time-series
Parameter estimatesParameter estimates
Design matrixDesign matrix
TemplateTemplate
KernelKernel
Gaussian Gaussian field theoryfield theory
p <0.05p <0.05
StatisticalStatisticalinferenceinference
![Page 3: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Passive word listeningversus rest
Passive word listeningversus rest7 cycles of rest and listening
7 cycles of rest and listening
Blocks of 6 scanswith 7 sec TR
Blocks of 6 scanswith 7 sec TR
Question: Is there a change in the BOLD response between listening and rest?
Question: Is there a change in the BOLD response between listening and rest?
Stimulus function
Stimulus function
One sessionOne session
A very simple fMRI experiment
![Page 4: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
stimulus function
1. Decompose data into effects and error
2. Form statistic using estimates of effects and error
1. Decompose data into effects and error
2. Form statistic using estimates of effects and error
Make inferences about effects of interest
Make inferences about effects of interest
Why?
How?
data linearmodellinearmodel
effects estimateeffects
estimate
error estimate
error estimate
statistic
statistic
Modelling the measured data
![Page 5: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Time
BOLD signalTim
e
single voxel
time series
single voxel
time series
Voxel-wise time series analysis
modelspecificati
on
modelspecificati
onparameterestimationparameterestimation
hypothesishypothesis
statisticstatistic
SPMSPM
![Page 6: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
BOLD signal
Tim
e =1 2+ +
err
or
x1 x2 e
Single voxel regression model
exxy 2211
![Page 7: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Mass-univariate analysis: voxel-wise GLM
=
e+yy X
N
1
N N
1 1p
p
Model is specified by1. Design matrix X2. Assumptions about
e
Model is specified by1. Design matrix X2. Assumptions about
e
N: number of scansp: number of regressors
N: number of scansp: number of regressors
eXy eXy
The design matrix embodies all available knowledge about experimentally controlled
factors and potential confounds.
),0(~ 2INe ),0(~ 2INe
![Page 8: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
GLM assumes Gaussian “spherical” (i.i.d.) errors
sphericity = iid:error covariance is scalar multiple of identity matrix:Cov(e) = 2I
sphericity = iid:error covariance is scalar multiple of identity matrix:Cov(e) = 2I
10
01)(eCov
10
04)(eCov
21
12)(eCov
Examples for non-sphericity:
non-identity
non-identitynon-independence
![Page 9: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Parameter estimation
eXy
= +
e
2
1
Least squares parameter estimate(assuming iid error)
Least squares parameter estimate(assuming iid error)
yXXX TT 1)(ˆ Estimate
parameters such that
N
tte
1
2minimal
y X
![Page 10: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
y
e
Design space defined by X
x1
x2
A geometric perspective
PIR
Rye
eXy
ˆ Xy
yXXX TT 1)(ˆ
TT XXXXP
Pyy1)(
ˆ
![Page 11: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What are the problems of this model?
1. BOLD responses have a delayed and dispersed form.
HRF
2. The BOLD signal includes substantial amounts of low-frequency noise.
3. The data are serially correlated (temporally autocorrelated) this violates the assumptions of the noise model in the GLM
![Page 12: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
t
dtgftgf0
)()()(
The response of a linear time-invariant (LTI) system is the convolution of the input with the system's response to an impulse (delta function).
Problem 1: Shape of BOLD responseSolution: Convolution model
hemodynamic response function (HRF)
expected BOLD response = input function impulse response function (HRF)
![Page 13: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Convolution model of the BOLD response
Convolve stimulus function with a canonical hemodynamic response function (HRF):
HRF
t
dtgftgf0
)()()(
![Page 14: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Problem 2: Low-frequency noise Solution: High pass filtering
SeSXSy
discrete cosine transform (DCT)
set
discrete cosine transform (DCT)
set
S = residual forming matrix of DCT set
![Page 15: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
High pass filtering: example
blue = data
black = mean + low-frequency drift
green = predicted response, taking into account low-frequency drift
red = predicted response, NOT taking into account low-frequency drift
![Page 16: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
withwithttt aee 1 ),0(~ 2 Nt
1st order autoregressive process: AR(1)
)(eCovautocovariance
function
N
N
Problem 3: Serial correlations
![Page 17: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Dealing with serial correlations
• Pre-colouring: impose some known autocorrelation structure on the data (filtering with matrix W) and use Satterthwaite correction for df’s.
• Pre-whitening:
1. Use an enhanced noise model with hyperparameters for multiple error covariance components.
2. Use estimated autocorrelation to specify filter matrix W for whitening the data.
WeWXWy WeWXWy
![Page 18: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
How do we define W?
• Enhanced noise model
• Remember how Gaussiansare transformed linearly
• Choose W such that error covariance becomes spherical
• Conclusion: W is a function of V so how do we estimate V?
WeWXWy WeWXWy
),0(~ 2VNe
),(~
),,(~22
2
aaNy
axyNx
2/1
2
22 ),0(~
VW
IVW
VWNWe
![Page 19: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Multiple covariance components
),0(~ 2VNe
iiQV
eCovV
)(
= 1 + 2
Q1 Q2
Estimation of hyperparameters with ReML (restricted maximum likelihood).
V
enhanced noise model
![Page 20: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Contrasts &statistical parametric
maps
Q: activation during listening ?
Q: activation during listening ?
c = 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Null hypothesis:Null hypothesis: 01
)ˆ(
ˆ
T
T
cStd
ct
X
![Page 21: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
WeWXWy
c = +1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0c = +1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
)ˆ(ˆ
ˆ
T
T
cdtS
ct
cWXWXccdtSTTT )()(ˆ)ˆ(ˆ 2
)(
ˆˆ
2
2
Rtr
WXWy
ReML-estimate
ReML-estimate
WyWX )()(2
2/1
eCovV
VW
)(WXWXIR
VX
t-statistic based on ML estimates
![Page 22: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• head movements
• arterial pulsations
• breathing
• eye blinks
• adaptation affects, fatigue, fluctuations in concentration, etc.
Physiological confounds
![Page 23: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
x1
x2x2*
y
Correlated and orthogonal regressors
When x2 is orthogonalized with regard to x1, only the parameter estimate for x1 changes, not that for x2!
Correlated regressors = explained variance is shared between regressors
121
2211
exxy
1;1 *21
*2
*211
exxy
![Page 24: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Outlook: further challenges
• correction for multiple comparisons
• variability in the HRF across voxels
• slice timing
• limitations of frequentist statistics Bayesian analyses
• GLM ignores interactions among voxels models of effective connectivity
![Page 25: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Correction for multiple comparisons
• Mass-univariate approach: We apply the GLM to each of a huge number of voxels (usually > 100,000).
• Threshold of p<0.05 more than 5000 voxels significant by chance!
• Massive problem with multiple comparisons!
• Solution: Gaussian random field theory
![Page 26: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Variability in the HRF
• HRF varies substantially across voxels and subjects
• For example, latency can differ by ± 1 second
• Solution: use multiple basis functions
• See talk on event-related fMRI
![Page 27: The General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to my colleagues in.](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102900/5515da80550346cf6f8b4a4a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Summary
• Mass-univariate approach: same GLM for each voxel
• GLM includes all known experimental effects and confounds
• Convolution with a canonical HRF
• High-pass filtering to account for low-frequency drifts
• Estimation of multiple variance components (e.g. to account for serial correlations)
• Parametric statistics