The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June...

17
The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007

Transcript of The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June...

Page 1: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion

Don Royce

Statistics Canada

June 2007

Page 2: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Outline

Basic issues in the use of tax data

A short history of the use of tax data in business surveys at Statistics Canada

Future challenges

Page 3: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Uses of tax data (Brackstone 1987)

Direct tabulation

Indirect estimation

Survey frames and sample design

Survey evaluation

Page 4: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Issues in using tax data (ibid)

CoverageContentConcepts/definitionsSmall domain estimates/samplingQuality controlCostFrequencyTimelinessStabilityRespondent burden

Page 5: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

A short history of tax data usage at Statistics Canada

Pre-1985:Tax data used to build sample frames (no centralized Business Register)Trade statistics based on administrative dataTax data program based on capturing two-phase samples of paper forms

1985 - 1988: The Business Survey Redesign Project (BSRP)Creation of centralized Business Register (BR) based on profiling, payroll deduction data and annual income tax dataRedesign of annual and sub-annual surveys Enhanced use of tax data by survey programs – but still based on paper forms

Page 6: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

A short history (cont’d)

1991 - 1993: Two new data sourcesFederal government introduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST) - a form of VATTwo new variables available from payroll data -facilitated the redesign of the monthly Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours

1997 – the Big Bang:Project to Improve Provincial Economic Statistics (PIPES) to allocate new Harmonized Sales TaxInfusion of $42M in new fundsProvincial dimension implied additional response burden, so enhanced use of tax data became crucial

Page 7: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

A short history (cont’d)

1997 – the Big Bang (cont’d):Introduction of a single Business Number (BN) by Canada Revenue Agency

Introduction of mandatory filing in a standard format (GIFI) for corporations

Introduction of North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)

Conversion of the BR to a BN basis, coded to NAICS

Creation of a new Tax Data Division (TDD)

Completion of many of the goals of the BSRP

Page 8: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Today: Infrastructure

Most business surveys use the Business Register as their frameUnified Enterprise Survey collects annual statisticsCommon “Chart of Accounts” connecting annual income tax data, survey data and SNA conceptsA wide range of data (GST, payroll deduction, annual tax data) is available in (mostly) electronic form and linkable via the BNTax data are obtained and processed by TDD on an increasingly timely basis

Page 9: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Today: Uses

GST data replace significant portions of existing sub-annual samples for simple units (with ratio adjustment for delayed reporting) Annual tax data replace significant portions of annual samples of simple units (straight substitution)Payroll deduction data in combination with survey data produce estimates of average weekly earnings, etc.Tax data are used exclusively for very small “Take-None” unitsTax data are used for editing and imputation of survey dataExtensive use of tax data by the System of National Accounts (e.g., benchmarking of labour income)

Page 10: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Future challenges

Moving from retrofitting existing samples to an integrated survey/tax data design

Increasing the use of tax data for complex businesses

Use of tax data for specialized populations

Measuring data quality

Modeling/imputation – how much is too much?

Page 11: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Moving to an integrated survey / tax data design

Current approach (mostly) is to replace survey data with tax data for existing samples of simple units

Can we use tax data for the entire universe, in combination with a small sample survey to adjust for differences?

Much more data to process, change of culture for subject matter analysts

Page 12: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Tax data for complex businesses

Complex structures must often be broken down into their components, e.g., industry, province

Tax data are often only available for legal entities, not operational units

How well can we allocate tax data to industry and province levels?

Page 13: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Specialized populations

Canada Revenue Agency creates numerous files which we have not yet fully explored, for example:

Files covering the non-profit sector

Files covering trusts

Audit files, which may be useful for measuring the underground economy

Work is just beginning on this

Page 14: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Measuring Quality

Need to recognize the particular characteristics of administrative data, for example:

Methods for calculating response rates for surveys combining survey and tax data

Methods for measuring the variance due to imputation

Methods that take into account the use of modeling

Difficult or impossible to follow up respondents to validate administrative data

Page 15: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Modeling and imputation - how much is too much?

Modeling is used in calendarization, estimation, imputation, allocation of tax data to adjust for various deficiencies (e.g., timeliness, coverage issues)We often conduct studies, conclude that the results are not much different, then assume that modeling is okay – different paradigm than survey samplingWe need to make sure that assumptions are explicit, the models are robust, and that they are checked on a regular basis

Page 16: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Conclusion

Tremendous progress in using tax data in business surveys in the past 20 years

The need to use tax data will increase as pressures to reduce costs and response burden continue

Many exciting methodological challenges ahead

Page 17: The Future of Administrative Data ICES III End Panel Discussion Don Royce Statistics Canada June 2007.

Pour plus d’information, veuillez contacter

For more Information please contact

Visit our web site atwww.statcan.ca

[email protected]