The French Lunar-Laser Ranging Station An Update ------- … · 2002. 10. 30. · Presented by...
Transcript of The French Lunar-Laser Ranging Station An Update ------- … · 2002. 10. 30. · Presented by...
-
The French Lunar-Laser Ranging Station
An Update-------
Presented by G.Vigouroux
-
Lageos 6000km
Glonass 19000km
Etalons à 19000km
GPS 20000km
Targets ranged withthe Grasse LLR system
LUNA 17 et 21
Apollo 11
LRE 250 to 36198 km
380 000 km
Grasse LLR system
-
SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES
For the Moon
• Geophysics
• Selenophysics
• Celestial mechanics
• Rotation of the Earth and Moon
• Precession and nutation
• Terrestrial and celestial reference frames
• Test of gravitation theories
For the distant satellites
• Orbitography
• Geodynamics
• Positioning
• Comparison of tracking techniques
• Terrestrial reference frames
13th Workshop
Washington, Oct.2002
-
Raw data productionon the Moon
13th Workshop
Washington, Oct.2002
-
13th Workshop
Washington, Oct.2002
It is possible by using an additional amplifier and double-frequency. This would permit toimprove the number of returns from the Moon without increasing the noise.
It is possible to increase
the energy of our laser
Mirror
Pockell cell
κ/4PolarizingPrism
Y.A.G. Rod of
Spatial filter
Electro opticalmodulator
Fabry-Perrot
Oscillator
Slicer Faraday isolator
κ/4Ampli. A’3 Harmonic
Generator D’
κ/2κ/4
Ampli. A3 Harmonic
Generator D
Ampli. A1Ampli. A2κ/2
Only one pulse400mJ
400mJ
200mJ
200mJ
400mJ
200mJ
200mJ
I.R. Polarizing Plate Green polarizing plate
Spatial
Filter
Green polarizing plate
Dichroic mirror
Dichroic mirror
-
13th Workshop
Washington, Oct.2002 Technical improvements for highaltitude satellites
• We use another laser with a semi-train and a 20 ps pulse width. It permits to
increase the precision on high-altitude satellites.
•For the satellites, we have implemented, on the return path, a wedge plate to
correct the angle, between the emission and reception axis, due to the velocity
aberration. The first tests will begin soon. It should permit to decrease the noise and
reduce the scattering of the transit time between the center and the edge of the
detection diode.
• We have just started, for the high-altitude satellites, the automation of the
observations.
• A major maintenance on the steering of the dome has been carried out in 2002 to
replace the worn-out main rail.
-
13th Workshop
Washington, Oct.2002 A quality assessment
• Objective: Evaluate the performances of the Grasse LLR system and try tounderstand their variations. It seems possible from nights where the number ofnormal points is superior to 6 , on Apollo XV.
•Method : We use the same method showed in 12th WS Matera. We add a thirddegree polynomial fit on residues and compute the Normal Points rms. Weanalysed 101 nights between Oct.1998 and Dec.2000.
•Results : The internal consistency per night is excellent, varying between 1 to 15mm, with no obvious correlation with the lunar libration, the number of normalpoints over each night, the pressure, the signal/noise ratio or the number of returns.
0
5
10
15
20
0 0.1 0.2 0.3ns
mm
Scattering of panel
0
5
10
15
20
5 15 25Number of NP
mm
0
5
10
15
20
860 865 870 875 880 885
mm
Pressure (mb)
-
13th Workshop
Washington, Oct.2002 A quality assessment (ctd)
ratio signal / noise
0
5
10
15
20
1.5 5 8.5
m m
mean nomber of returns
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200 250
m m
• If the signal/noise ratio is > 6, the RMS. of the Normal Points is less than 15 mm.If the mean number of returns by serials in the night is larger than 100, the RMSgoes down below 10 mm.
• The sources of these variations are not properly indentified : noise, insufficientnumber of echoes, etc... and variation of the atmospheric properties ?
-
13th Workshop
Washington, Oct.2002 CONCLUSION
Internal consistency per night
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
No
mb
er o
f n
igh
ts
• For 20% of nights, the internal consistency is lower than 5 mm and for 50% falls between 5 and 10 mm.
•Interestingly the internalconsistency on GPS 35 and 36(with similar signature : panel of reflectors ) varies between 0.4 mm and 4mm, butwith a laser 20ps. It seems that it is a link with the windspeed.
• We hope in a near future, thanks to the doubling of the laser energy, to increase thenumber of returns and the signal / noise ratio, therefore the precision.