The French Lunar-Laser Ranging Station An Update ------- … · 2002. 10. 30. · Presented by...

9
The French Lunar-Laser Ranging Station An Update ------- Presented by G.Vigouroux

Transcript of The French Lunar-Laser Ranging Station An Update ------- … · 2002. 10. 30. · Presented by...

  • The French Lunar-Laser Ranging Station

    An Update-------

    Presented by G.Vigouroux

  • Lageos 6000km

    Glonass 19000km

    Etalons à 19000km

    GPS 20000km

    Targets ranged withthe Grasse LLR system

    LUNA 17 et 21

    Apollo 11

    LRE 250 to 36198 km

    380 000 km

    Grasse LLR system

  • SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES

    For the Moon

    • Geophysics

    • Selenophysics

    • Celestial mechanics

    • Rotation of the Earth and Moon

    • Precession and nutation

    • Terrestrial and celestial reference frames

    • Test of gravitation theories

    For the distant satellites

    • Orbitography

    • Geodynamics

    • Positioning

    • Comparison of tracking techniques

    • Terrestrial reference frames

    13th Workshop

    Washington, Oct.2002

  • Raw data productionon the Moon

    13th Workshop

    Washington, Oct.2002

  • 13th Workshop

    Washington, Oct.2002

    It is possible by using an additional amplifier and double-frequency. This would permit toimprove the number of returns from the Moon without increasing the noise.

    It is possible to increase

    the energy of our laser

    Mirror

    Pockell cell

    κ/4PolarizingPrism

    Y.A.G. Rod of

    Spatial filter

    Electro opticalmodulator

    Fabry-Perrot

    Oscillator

    Slicer Faraday isolator

    κ/4Ampli. A’3 Harmonic

    Generator D’

    κ/2κ/4

    Ampli. A3 Harmonic

    Generator D

    Ampli. A1Ampli. A2κ/2

    Only one pulse400mJ

    400mJ

    200mJ

    200mJ

    400mJ

    200mJ

    200mJ

    I.R. Polarizing Plate Green polarizing plate

    Spatial

    Filter

    Green polarizing plate

    Dichroic mirror

    Dichroic mirror

  • 13th Workshop

    Washington, Oct.2002 Technical improvements for highaltitude satellites

    • We use another laser with a semi-train and a 20 ps pulse width. It permits to

    increase the precision on high-altitude satellites.

    •For the satellites, we have implemented, on the return path, a wedge plate to

    correct the angle, between the emission and reception axis, due to the velocity

    aberration. The first tests will begin soon. It should permit to decrease the noise and

    reduce the scattering of the transit time between the center and the edge of the

    detection diode.

    • We have just started, for the high-altitude satellites, the automation of the

    observations.

    • A major maintenance on the steering of the dome has been carried out in 2002 to

    replace the worn-out main rail.

  • 13th Workshop

    Washington, Oct.2002 A quality assessment

    • Objective: Evaluate the performances of the Grasse LLR system and try tounderstand their variations. It seems possible from nights where the number ofnormal points is superior to 6 , on Apollo XV.

    •Method : We use the same method showed in 12th WS Matera. We add a thirddegree polynomial fit on residues and compute the Normal Points rms. Weanalysed 101 nights between Oct.1998 and Dec.2000.

    •Results : The internal consistency per night is excellent, varying between 1 to 15mm, with no obvious correlation with the lunar libration, the number of normalpoints over each night, the pressure, the signal/noise ratio or the number of returns.

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3ns

    mm

    Scattering of panel

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    5 15 25Number of NP

    mm

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    860 865 870 875 880 885

    mm

    Pressure (mb)

  • 13th Workshop

    Washington, Oct.2002 A quality assessment (ctd)

    ratio signal / noise

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    1.5 5 8.5

    m m

    mean nomber of returns

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    0 50 100 150 200 250

    m m

    • If the signal/noise ratio is > 6, the RMS. of the Normal Points is less than 15 mm.If the mean number of returns by serials in the night is larger than 100, the RMSgoes down below 10 mm.

    • The sources of these variations are not properly indentified : noise, insufficientnumber of echoes, etc... and variation of the atmospheric properties ?

  • 13th Workshop

    Washington, Oct.2002 CONCLUSION

    Internal consistency per night

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

    No

    mb

    er o

    f n

    igh

    ts

    • For 20% of nights, the internal consistency is lower than 5 mm and for 50% falls between 5 and 10 mm.

    •Interestingly the internalconsistency on GPS 35 and 36(with similar signature : panel of reflectors ) varies between 0.4 mm and 4mm, butwith a laser 20ps. It seems that it is a link with the windspeed.

    • We hope in a near future, thanks to the doubling of the laser energy, to increase thenumber of returns and the signal / noise ratio, therefore the precision.