The Framing Challenge

71
The Framing Challenge Trish Hennessy Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives www.policyalternatives.ca

description

The Framing Challenge. Trish Hennessy Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives www.policyalternatives.ca. Why can’t progressives connect?. Neurological science findings. Reason vs. emotion – which one wins?. Research on emotions. Thinking = processed feelings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Framing Challenge

Page 1: The Framing Challenge

The Framing ChallengeTrish Hennessy

Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives

www.policyalternatives.ca

Page 2: The Framing Challenge

Why can’t progressives connect?

Page 3: The Framing Challenge

Neurological science findings

Reason vs. emotion – which one wins?

Page 4: The Framing Challenge
Page 5: The Framing Challenge
Page 6: The Framing Challenge
Page 7: The Framing Challenge
Page 8: The Framing Challenge
Page 9: The Framing Challenge
Page 10: The Framing Challenge
Page 11: The Framing Challenge
Page 12: The Framing Challenge
Page 13: The Framing Challenge
Page 14: The Framing Challenge
Page 15: The Framing Challenge
Page 16: The Framing Challenge
Page 17: The Framing Challenge

Research on emotionsThinking = processed feelings

Emotions affect decision-making

Important finding for framing

Page 18: The Framing Challenge

How framing worksEvery word and idea exists within a

frame. Surface frames touch surface emotionsDeep frames tap into deeply-held values, principles, beliefs--morality.

-- George LakoffRockridge Institute

Page 19: The Framing Challenge

It’s not about spinSpin taps into surface frames

Not enough to use better wordsNeed to re-hardwire how we think

Page 20: The Framing Challenge

It’s not about ‘the’ issue

Federal poll post-sponsorship scandal

Page 21: The Framing Challenge

It’s not about ‘the’ issue

Federal poll post-sponsorship scandal Stop laundry list approach

Page 22: The Framing Challenge

It’s not about ‘the’ issue

Federal poll post-sponsorship scandal Stop laundry list approach People vote based on values,

connection, authenticity, trust, identity

Page 23: The Framing Challenge

It’s not about ‘the’ issue

Federal poll post-sponsorship scandal Stop laundry list approach People vote based on values,

connection, authenticity, trust, identity

They rarely vote for a single issue

Page 24: The Framing Challenge

It’s about values…and Conservatives are better at messages that tap into their values

than progressives are.

Page 25: The Framing Challenge

Conservative frame

Father knows best

Page 26: The Framing Challenge

Conservative frame

Page 27: The Framing Challenge

Progressive frame

Nurturant parent family

Page 28: The Framing Challenge

The power of repetitionRepetition tricks the brain into

believing myths and false statements are true-- Norbert SchwarzUniversity of Michigan

Page 29: The Framing Challenge

Staying out of their frame

Negating the frame reinforces the frame-- George Lakoff Don’t think of an elephant

Page 30: The Framing Challenge

Putting it to the test

Case study: Income inquality

RichPoor

Middle class

Page 31: The Framing Challenge

The rich are like cartoon characters

Page 32: The Framing Challenge
Page 33: The Framing Challenge
Page 34: The Framing Challenge
Page 35: The Framing Challenge
Page 36: The Framing Challenge
Page 37: The Framing Challenge
Page 38: The Framing Challenge
Page 39: The Framing Challenge
Page 40: The Framing Challenge
Page 41: The Framing Challenge
Page 42: The Framing Challenge

What Canadians think

Canada is a middle class nation Middle class is as much a state of mind

as it is an income category Middle class is the holy grail Aspirational notion

Page 43: The Framing Challenge

Summary of focus groups

Sketchy, stereotypical view of rich/poor

Gaze is on the middle class Middle class proxy for the good life Sense of middle class struggle, worry No anger toward rich Some anger toward poor

Page 44: The Framing Challenge

Othering Middle class rationality helps them

disengage Talking about people they don’t know A spectator sport (explains online

newspaper comments)

Page 45: The Framing Challenge

Empathy blocks/myths Family influence (children learn to be poor) Vicious cycle (poverty a way of life, a choice) Bad decisions, (too many kids, big TVs) Lack of work ethic, education Stubborn myth: Some people choose to be

poor & won’t be helped Can never eliminate poverty

Page 46: The Framing Challenge

Conservative frame dominates

Poor people need ‘tough love’

We need rich people to succeed

Reward the winners, punish the losers

Page 47: The Framing Challenge

Growing gap reframeThe rich and the rest of us

The majority vs. the elite few

We put the promise of prosperity on trial

Page 48: The Framing Challenge
Page 49: The Framing Challenge

Use of repetitionOur message box:

The rich are getting richer

The middle is being squeezed

The poor are getting left behind

Page 50: The Framing Challenge

Use of emotion & factFocus group gut check:

What would it be like to live on $23,000 or less (poorest 20%)

Page 51: The Framing Challenge

Holding the lens on worry

Struggle helps middle disconnect with poverty

Affirming the struggle, and showing commonalities, helps tap social responsibility

Solution: We’re in it together

Page 52: The Framing Challenge

Triggering moral outrage

Highlight contrast between rich/poor (CEO and the teller inspiration); show

absurdities

Page 53: The Framing Challenge

Pride

Canadians don’t like that poverty exists in Canada and, within limits,

they support moves to reduce it

Page 54: The Framing Challenge

Best defense a good offense

It’s time to move away from critique and move towards change that feels

do-able.

Page 55: The Framing Challenge

Make the case for change

Hold lens on what and why before solutions

Page 56: The Framing Challenge

Avoid impossibility theorems(or try to)

Solutions are brief, focused, pragmaticExample: complexity of poverty

Page 57: The Framing Challenge

The quiet limits of facts

We use big numbers to shock but know numbers alone don’t move people

Page 58: The Framing Challenge

A serious challenge

Trust issues with government

Page 59: The Framing Challenge

Another serious challenge

People are disengaged, ill informed

Page 60: The Framing Challenge
Page 61: The Framing Challenge

Second federal budget poll slide (60%)

Page 62: The Framing Challenge

Second federal budget poll slide (60%)

Page 63: The Framing Challenge

Second federal budget poll slide (60%)

Page 64: The Framing Challenge
Page 65: The Framing Challenge
Page 66: The Framing Challenge
Page 67: The Framing Challenge

The apathy trapCanadians think they want rational,

reasoned political leadership but respond emotionally

“Conservative fear frame” keeps getting tapped

Page 68: The Framing Challenge

http://www.conferenceboard.ca/HCP/Details/society/voter-turnout.aspx

Page 69: The Framing Challenge

Get excited about your democracy

“I Am Canadian” ad writer: 30% of the people are with you 30% are against you 20% are in the middle – the deciders

Page 70: The Framing Challenge

Show, don’t tell

Human stories that tap into emotions, values

Page 71: The Framing Challenge

Emotions, message

The ball’s in your court