The Five Key Elements of Organisational Resilience
Transcript of The Five Key Elements of Organisational Resilience
-
8/7/2019 The Five Key Elements of Organisational Resilience
1/7
Organisational Resilience Pty Ltd: 85 Guthrie Street, Osborne Park, Western Australia. 6017+61-(0)8-9446-2099
The Five Key Elements of
Organisational Resilience
-
8/7/2019 The Five Key Elements of Organisational Resilience
2/7
www.organisationalresilience.com.au
Organisational Resilience Pty Ltd: 85 Guthrie Street, Osborne Park, Western Australia. 6017+61-(0)8-9446-2099
Thank you for requesting our whitepaper. We hope you will find it both interesting and useful.
Section One
Section one discusses the role of resilience, and why it is becoming an important part of everyday business.
Section Two
Section two looks at the five key elements of organisational resilience which can be used to deliver improved
bottom line business results.
Section Three
Section three looks at integrated approaches delivering improved business performance and creates competitive
advantages.
-
8/7/2019 The Five Key Elements of Organisational Resilience
3/7
www.organisationalresilience.com.au
Organisational Resilience Pty Ltd: 85 Guthrie Street, Osborne Park, Western Australia. 6017+61-(0)8-9446-2099
Section One - The role ofresilience, and why it is becoming an
important part of everyday business.
This section discusses resilience in business today
and why it is becoming part of everyday business
life. Since 2009 Organisational Resilience Pty Ltd
has focussed exclusively on advising companies,
Government agencies and other organisations on
developing their resilience capacities.
Whilst risk management is not new, many
organisations find it difficult to achieve the ultimate
outcome Resilience.
Conducting risk and vulnerability assessments and
more importantly, using the data generated to
deliver meaningful outcomes that improve the
bottom-line results to an organisation remains the
holy grail. For many companies, risk
management is a requirement of regulation of some
type or another. Whilst this is a sound reason for
undertaking risk management activities in a
structured and formalised way, often businesses donot realise the ultimate value due to an absence of
courage and innovation by management.
Linking risk management to the business planning
and strategy framework is a key to delivering
business objectives, and creating a resilient
organisation, that gains competitive advantage by
developing adaptive capabilities.
Companies listed on the stock exchanges acrossthe globe now have obligations to identify and
manage risks on an ongoing basis.
In Australia Principle 7 of the Australian Stock
Exchanges Principles of Good Corporate
Governance and Best Practise Recommendation
states: A Company should Recognise and
Manage Risk: Establish a Sound System of Risk
Oversight and Management and Internal
Control.
In the United Kingdom: Guidance for Directors on
the Combined Code (1999) is also called The
Turnbull Report.
In The USA in response to the collapse of Enron,
Worldcom, and other corporations, the U.S.
Congress passed the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002.
Whilst in Singapore laws such as the Companies
Act and the Securities and Futures Act, as well as
stock exchange regulations, make some corporate
governance disclosures mandatory.
The general duty of care requirements under the
Occupational Health and Safety legislation acrossthe globe has now placed greater responsibilities
and liabilities on managers and directors to ensure
work place conditions and work practices do not
endanger the lives of workers, whether they are
employees or contractors.
Organisations that build risk management into their
business as usual operations will inevitably find
improved business outcomes as a result of
developing a risk aware culture within the
organisation. When risks are identified and
assessed against business objectives, a clearer
picture is generated as to what events may occur
that will prevent or disrupt the organisations from
achieving its corporate and operational objectives.
These outcomes are becoming more commonly
known as organisational resilience.
All directors need to exercise a general duty of care
and in the case of publicly listed companies this is a
responsibility of fulfilling company listing obligations.More importantly the coupling of statutory
requirements for risk management with a desire for
business improvement, should deliver the best
results for an organisation.
-
8/7/2019 The Five Key Elements of Organisational Resilience
4/7
www.organisationalresilience.com.au
Organisational Resilience Pty Ltd: 85 Guthrie Street, Osborne Park, Western Australia. 6017+61-(0)8-9446-2099
Section Two Five KeyElements of Organisational Resilience
Organisational Culture
The organisation selects, motivates,
educates and supports people who have
the requisite skills to flourish in ambiguous
and uncertain environments - enabling
people to respond quickly, decisively and
effectively to unforeseen andunpredictable forces
The organisations workforce impassioned
by a strong sense of leadership
The organisation maintains a resilient
culture and values that builds a sense of
purpose, empowerment, trust and
accountability
The organisation has transparent support
functions to minimise emotional trauma
Interdependencies
The organisation maintains strong, broad
connection networks
The design and architecture of the
organisation is approached systematically,
and not in a piecemeal way
The organisations sound business and
technical architecture, ensures clear
thinking about function, and effective
organisational designThe organisation communication structure
is open and non hierarchical
Situational Awareness
The organisation is in tune with the
environment
The organisation faces down reality
The organisation understands risk and
potential disruptions (both positive and
negative)
Vulnerability ManagementThe organisation develops robust
processes for identifying and analysingvulnerabilities
The organisation has well developed
planning strategies
The organisation demands comprehensive
participation in stress testing and
exercises
The organisation has a clear
understanding of the capability and
capacity of its internal resources
The organisation has a clear
understanding of capability, capacity and
availability of external resources
The organisation promotes and
understands the criticality of
organisational connectivity as a key
performance enabler
The organisation promotes business wide
staff engagement and involvement
Adaptive CapacitiesThe organisation learns and adapts to newrisk environments, both sudden and
evolving
The organisation builds in flexibility,
redundancy and options
The organisation encourages innovation
and experimentation
The organisation operates without
boundaries and encourages distributed
settings that diffuse and disperseenterprise assets and operations
The organisation has the ability to not only
bounce back but to also bounce forward
with speed, grace, determination and
precision
The organisation has the ability to
recognise and react nimbly to
opportunities as they arise
-
8/7/2019 The Five Key Elements of Organisational Resilience
5/7
www.organisationalresilience.com.au
Organisational Resilience Pty Ltd: 85 Guthrie Street, Osborne Park, Western Australia. 6017+61-(0)8-9446-2099
Section Three Integratedapproaches deliver improved business
performance and creates competitive
advantages
The world is evolving at an ever increasing rate;
some people even believe that the advances in
knowledge and technology are making modern
society untouchable by disruptive events. This
belief is challenged by Debora MacKenzie, of the
New Scientist, who wrote As the networks that
connect us become ever more intricate and finely
tuned, modern civilisation is becoming increasinglyvulnerable 1. Mackenzie suggested that once
society develops beyond a certain level of
complexity it becomes increasingly fragile, where a
minor disturbance may bring everything crashing
down 2. In his book The Collapse of Complex
Societies, Joseph Tainter discusses a possible
cause of this being diminishing returns a situation
where an ever-increasing level of effort and
complexity is required to support the necessary
returns. As returns diminish and complexityincreases, society will inevitably reach a point
where complexity will outweigh the return, resulting
in the balance of societal resilience being
unfavourable.
Resilience is not a plan, or a checklist. The capacity
of resilience is found in an organisations culture,
attitudes and values. As Dr Erica Seville, of the
University of Canterbury, said, Resilience is not
something you do, it is something you are. Hencewe need to look beyond the tactical elements of
resilience. We need to look at those elements which
are non tangible, those elements which make a
truly resilient organisation.
Leading organisations are putting plans in place to
manage outcomes, rather than specific scenarios
and are creating a capabilities-based approach. An
organisation may not be able to anticipate every
scenario, but it may create response capabilities
that will be resilient no matter what the cause of
disruption. To have organisational resilience the
organisation needs to:
anticipate and understand emerging
threats;
understand the impact of threats on the
business, supply chain, the community in
which they operate and upon employees
lives;
develop and maintain supportive
partnerships with critical stakeholders in
their supply chain, sector and community;
respond to and recover from disruptions as
a unified whole of organisation team;
adapt to disruptions and react flexibly to
restore routine functions and strengthen
the organisation;
ensure staff members are willing and able
to support the organisation to achieve
objectives in times of adversity;
leadership must have clear direction while
enabling devolved problem solving.
-
8/7/2019 The Five Key Elements of Organisational Resilience
6/7
www.organisationalresilience.com.au
Organisational Resilience Pty Ltd: 85 Guthrie Street, Osborne Park, Western Australia. 6017+61-(0)8-9446-2099
Case Study A fire that changedan industry
About 8 p.m. on March 17, 2000, a lightning boltstruck a high-voltage electricity line in New Mexico.
As power oscillated, a fire broke out in the Royal
Philips Electronics radio frequency chip
manufacturing plant in Albuquerque. Personnel
reacted quickly and extinguished the fire within ten
minutes, a setback, no doubt, but definitely not a
calamity.
In Albuquerque, Philips staff grappled with the
aftermath of the fire. They soon realised thatcleanup would take at least a week, which meant
that customers would be affected, at least
temporarily. Nokia and its archrival, Ericsson,
accounted for 40% of the plants shipments. Philips
management decided that their orders would be
filled first when the plant returned to normal.
Recognising that Philips had a problem that could
affect the production of several million mobile
phones, Nokia took three key steps:
A team of executives and engineers
focused on Philips, seeking a major role in
developing alternative plans and pressed
Nokias case with Philips executives.
Philips responded by rearranging its plans
in factories as far away as Eindhoven and
Shanghai.
A second cross-continental team
redesigned some chips so that they could
be produced in other Philips and non-Philips plants.
A third group worked to find alternative
manufacturers to reduce pressure on
Philips. Two suppliers responded within
five days.
At the end of March, Ericsson finally came to
appreciate the gravity of the problem. However, for
reasons unknown, it still did not act speedily.
Nokias initial assessment of the problem and its
rapid and effective response averted a catastrophic
event. In the third quarter of 2000, its profits rose
42% as it expanded its share of the global market to
30%. Its quarterly statements and annual report for2000 did not even mention the fire.
On July 20, 2000, Ericsson reported that the fire
and component shortages had caused a second-
quarter operating loss of $200 million in its mobile
phone division. Six months later, it reported
divisional annual losses of $1.68 billion, a 3% loss
of market share. It also announced the outsourcing
of cell phone manufacturing to Flextronics and the
elimination of several thousand jobs.
In April 2001, Ericsson signed a Memorandum of
Understanding to create Sony Ericsson; the
informal negotiations that led to this step had
started at the height of the crisis in July 2000, the
deal was finalised in October 2001. Ericssons
problems spread across the entire organisation and
it was not until 2004, that it turned the corner, but as
a much smaller company. Compared to 2000, its
revenues had fallen 52%, total assets about 30%,and number of employees 52%.
-
8/7/2019 The Five Key Elements of Organisational Resilience
7/7
www.organisationalresilience.com.au
Organisational Resilience Pty Ltd: 85 Guthrie Street, Osborne Park, Western Australia. 6017+61-(0)8-9446-2099
Conclusion
Resilient organisations are hardened to survivedisruptions of all kinds. They are more competitive
on a day-to-day basis and react to changing market
demand ahead of their competitors. They consider
disruptions to be opportunities rather than
problems. Resilient organisations bounce back
ahead of the competition, when large-scale
disruptions affect a whole industry or an entire
region, and win increased market share and
customer loyalty.
Organisational Resilience
Pty LtdAre independent risk and resilience advisors,
operating internationally, from our base in Australia
utilising networks across Asia, the United Kingdom
Europe, Africa and North America. We reinforce our
work through innovative utilisation of the latest
technology including teleconferences; email; online
client workspaces and data vaults. Our
embracement of technology in this way ensures we
can practically and cost effectively support our
clients globally although we operate from a base in
Australia.
Our team of professionals boast a multidisciplinary
range of skills and experiences encompassing the
diversity of the entire risk management
environment. With each of our team members
specialising in specific risk management disciplines,
our services deliver value through distinctly evident
outcomes.