The Experimental Challenge
description
Transcript of The Experimental Challenge
![Page 1: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Axel Drees
The Experimental ChallengeSTAR ONE central Au+Au
collision at RHIC
production of MANY secondary particles
PHENIX
![Page 2: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Axel Drees
“hard” probes J/, (->e+e, ) and jetsvery rare, created “early” before QGP formation, penetrate hot and
dense matter, sensitive to deconfinement • color screening in partonic phase J/suppression• energy loss in dense colored matter jet quenching, absorption
electro-magnetic radiation , e+e,
rare, emitted “any time”; reach detector unperturbed by strong final state interaction
• black body radiation initial temperature• in-medium properties of mesons chiral
symmetry restoration
hadrons , K, p frequent, produced “late” when particles stop
to interact• energy density• thermal equilibrium and collective
behavior• strangeness equilibration
Schematic View of a Heavy Ion Collision
several 1000 particles produced in central collision
b ~ 0
projectile target
p
p
cc
J
ee
![Page 3: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Axel Drees
Space-time Evolution of Collisions
e
space
time
Hard Scattering
AuAu
Exp
ansi
on
Hadronization
Freeze-out
jet J/
QGPThermaliztion
e+e-p K
![Page 4: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Axel Drees
100% 0 %
Participants
Spectators
Spectators
Collisions are not all the same
Small impact parameter (b~0)
High energy density Large volume
Large number of produced particles
Measured as: Fraction of cross section
“centrality” Number of participants Number of nucleon-nucleon
collisions
Impact parameter
b
![Page 5: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Axel Drees
Experimental Determination of Geometry
5% Central
Paddles/BBCZDC ZDC
Au Au
Paddles/BBC Central
Multiplicity Detectors
Paddle signal (a.u.)
STAR
![Page 6: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Axel Drees
Experimental Program
AGS at BNL Si- and Au-beams 2 to 14.6 AGeV ~ 10 large experiments
hadronic observables all experiments SPS at CERN
S- and Pb-beams 40 to 200 AGeV 15 large experiments
charmonium NA30-NA50, NA60 (3rd generation
experiment)electromagnetic probes WA80-98, HELIOS, CERES, NA60hadronic observables all other experiments
Fixed target experiments with ion beams at two accelerators during past 20 years
experimental programs basically completed
Latest results (in particular NA60) presented at Quark Matter 2008!
![Page 7: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Axel Drees
Experimental Program
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at BNL
Started operation in with 100 GeV beams in 2000 now in 8th year of operationAu-Au, Cu-Cu, at different energies p-p (polarized beams)d-Au
2 large experimentsPHENIXSTAR
2 experiments completedBrahmsPHOBOS
Large Hadron Collider at CERN
begins operation in 2008, first physics in 2009 One dedicated heavy ion experiment ALICE HEP experiments ATLAS & CMS with heavy ion programs
New generation of experiments at Ion Colliders
focus on PHENIX results
![Page 8: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Axel Drees
Center of Mass energy measured as nucleon-nucleon equivalent
Fixed target
Examples AGS Au beam of E = 11 GeV s = 4.7 GeVSPS Pb beam of E = 160 GeV s = 17.4 GeV
Collider
Examples RHIC Au beam of E = 100 GeV s = 200 GeVLHC Pb beam of E= 2750 GeV s = 5.5 TeV
Center of Mass Energy
i.e. use nucleon mass mu ~ 939 MeV/c2
E, mu
mu 2 2 2s m Em E
E,m E,m 2s E
Highest energy densities created at colliders
Center of mass energy closely related to achievable energy density
![Page 9: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Axel Drees
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
RHIC
STARPHENIX
PHOBOSBRAHMS
![Page 10: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Axel Drees
Accelerator Complex at BNL
Two concentric rings6 interaction regions3.8 km long1740 super conducting magnets
RHIC blue and yellow rings
booster
injector
![Page 11: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Axel Drees
RHIC Universal QCD Laboratory
Design Performance Au + Au p + p (polarized)
Max snn 200 GeV 500 GeV
L [cm-2 s -1 ] 8 x 1026 1.4 x 1031
Interaction rates 1.4 x 103 s -1 3 x 105 s -1
Accelerate and collide ions
from A = 1 to ~ 200
(protons polarized)
pp, pA, AA, AB
![Page 12: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Axel Drees
> 600 members 52 institutions:
![Page 13: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Axel Drees
STAR
Silicon Vertex Tracker
Central Trigger Barrel / TOF
FTPC
Time Projection Chamber
Barrel EM Calorimeter
Vertex Position Detectors
Endcap Calorimeter
Magnet
Coils
TPC Endcap & MWPC
RICH
FTPC
![Page 14: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Axel Drees
PHENIX Physics Capabilities
2 central arms: electrons, photons, hadrons
charmonium J/, ’ ee
vector meson ee high pT
direct photons open charm hadron physics
2 muon arms: muons “onium” J/, ’, vector meson open charm
combined central and muon arms: charm production DD e
global detectors
forward energy and multiplicity event characterization
designed to measure rare probes: + high rate capability & granularity+ good mass resolution and particle ID- limited acceptanceAu-Au & p-p spin
![Page 15: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Axel Drees
Central Magnet
East Carriage
West Carriage
Ring Imaging CerenkovDrift Chamber
PHENIX Central
![Page 16: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Axel Drees
23 USA 11 Japan 6 Korea 5 France 3 China 3 Czech R. 6 Russia 3 Hungary 1 Brazil 2 India 1 Germany 1 Sweden 1 Israel 1 Finland
~ 500 members from 64 institutions:
![Page 17: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Axel Drees
West Arm tracking:
DC,PC1, PC2, PC3 electron ID:
RICH, EMCalTOF, Aerogel
photons:EMCal
East Arm tracking:
DC, PC1, TEC, PC3 electron & hadron ID:
RICH,TEC/TRD, TOF, EMC
photons:EMCal
PHENIX Setup as used in 2008
South & North Arm tracking:
MuTr muon ID:
MuID
Other Detectors Vertex & centrality:
ZDC, BBC,RxNP, MPC
![Page 18: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Axel Drees
Use transverse energy production: “Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: The central rapidity region”,
J.D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D27, 140 (1983).
Assumes~ longitudinal expansion ~ boost invariance “central rapidity plateau” Then
0
0 .2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
1
1 .2
1 .4
1 .6
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
y
dy
dn
Estimating the Initial Energy Density
2 2 2
1~ ~T T TE dE dE dE
V R dz R dy R dy
Radius of nucleus R~ 6.5 fm
dz dy
Element of longitudinally expanding reaction volume:
2R
is formation time ~ 1fm
![Page 19: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Axel Drees
Initial Energy Density at RHIC“Bjorken estimate” relates ET to energy density:
central 2%
PHENIX130 GeV
02j
TB
1 1 d
c dy
E
R
Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 52301 (2001)
2%
26T39
y 0
dE578 GeV 1.19 0.01
dy
initial energy density (formation time 0=1 fm):
RHIC Au-Au i ~ 4.6 GeV/fm3 15 GeV/fm3
SPS Pb-Pb i ~ 3.0 GeV/fm3
Increase by ~1.15 from 130 GeV to 200 GeV
more realistic formation time ~0.3 fm at RHIC
~30 times normal nuclear density~1.5 to 2 times higher than at SPS (s = 17 GeV)
![Page 20: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Axel Drees
one particle ratio (e.g. p/p) determines B/T
a second ratio (e.g. /p) then determines T predict all other hadron abundances and ratios
Thermal yields hadron species abundances in hadrochemical equilibrium
Final State Hadrochemistry
spin isospindegeneracy
temperature atchemical freezeout
baryochemicalpotential
final state: hadron gas close to phase boundary
1
1
2 /3
3
22
Tmp
hhBh
e
pdVgN
lesantipartic and
,.......,,,,,,,,,, DdpKKh
![Page 21: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Axel Drees
Kinematic Variables for Particle Production 4-vector of particle
More practical variables:
transverse momentum Lorentz invariant
related transverse mass
Rapidity Lorentz transformation:
related pseudo rapidity
22
cosT
T T
p p
m m p
1ln
2
ln tan2
L
L
E py
E p
p m y
0 90
lab cms beam
ocms cms
y y y
y
mass m (or velocity)momentum p
polar angleazimuth
beam axis
measure:
p and not Lorentz invariant!!
![Page 22: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Axel Drees
Basic Cross Sections
Inclusive particle production of particle species a (e.g. ,K,p etc.)
Invariant cross section
Typically measured as yield per event differentially in kinematic variable
And studied as function of centrality
Au Au a X
3 3 2
3 2T T T T
d d dEdp d dy p dp dy p dp
evt
and 1 1
Nevt T T
dN dN
N p dp dy
![Page 23: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Axel Drees
Chemical equilibrium may imply kinetic equilibrium first guess: a thermal Boltzmann source:
However, system of interacting particles expands into vacuum System reasonably well described by hydrodynamic evolution Collective behavior, radial and “elliptic” flow Use comparison of hydrodynamic calculation with data to infer input
parameters
3 3 cosh( )
3cosh( ) ~
~
T Tm y mET T T
T TT T
d N d NE Ee m y e m e
dp m dm d dy
Particle Spectra
![Page 24: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Axel Drees
mT1/m
T d
N/d
mT
light
heavyT
purely thermalsource
explosivesource
T,
mT1/m
T d
N/d
mT
light
heavy
mT = (pT2 + m2)½
different spectral shapes for particles of different mass strong collective radial flow
reasonable agreement with hydrodynamic prediction at RHIC
Tfo ~ 100 MeV <r> ~ 0.55 c
Full hydro calculation: Initial condition: eq ~ 0.6 fm, Ti ~ 350 MeV, ~ 20 GeV/fm3
RHIC Spectra - an Explosive Source
![Page 25: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Axel Drees
translates into momentum anisotropy in final state Fourier expansion
elliptic flow strength
Elliptic Flow → Early Thermalization initial state of non-central Au+Au collision
spatial asymmetry asymmetric pressure gradients
x
zNon-central Collisions
in-plane
out-of-plane
y
Au nucleus
Au nucleus
3 3
R30T T
2 cosnn
d N d NE v n
d p p d dp dy
2 Rcos 2v
shape “washes out” during expansion, i.e. elliptic flow is “self quenching” v2 reflects early interactions and pressure gradients
![Page 26: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Axel Drees
Hadron v2 and more Hydrodynamics observations at RHIC
v2 is large and for soft hadrons in reasonable agreement with ideal hydrodynamics (not true at lower energies)
mesons
baryons
Early thermalization in partonic phase
Hadronization (confinement) of constituent quarks!
PHENIX: nucl-ex/0608033
![Page 27: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Axel Drees
Key Experimental Probes of Quark Matter
Rutherford experiment atom discovery of nucleus
SLAC electron scattering e proton discovery of quarks
penetrating beam(jets or heavy particles)
absorption or scattering pattern
QGP
Nature provides penetrating beams or “hard probes”and the QGP in A-A collisions
Penetrating beams created by parton scattering before QGP is formed High transverse momentum particles jets Heavy particles open and hidden charm or bottom Calibrated probes calculable in pQCD
Probe QGP created in A-A collisions as transient state after ~ 1 fm
![Page 28: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Axel Drees
Hard Probes: Light quark/gluon jets Status
Calibrated probe Strongly modified in opaque medium
Jet quenchingReaction of medium to probe (2 particle corr. Mach cones,
etc)
AAAA
coll pp
YieldR
N Yield
hydrovacuum fragmentationreaction of medium
0-12%
STAR
trigger 2.5-4 GeV, partner 1.0-2.5 GeV
peripheral or pp central AuAu
Matter opaque to color charges Nothing comes out black hole
extreme density e ~ 20 GeV/fm3
Many open questions though!
![Page 29: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Axel Drees
I. Transverse Energy
central 2%
PHENIX130 GeV
Bjorken estimate: ~ 0.3 fm
Quark Matter Produced at RHIC
initial ~ 10-20 GeV/fm3
Initial conditions: therm ~ 0.6 -1.0 fm/c
~15-25 GeV/fm3
II. Flow → Hydrodynamics
Heavy ion collisions provide the laboratory to study high T QCD!
III. Jet Quenching
dNg/dy ~ 1100
![Page 30: The Experimental Challenge](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56814928550346895db65efd/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Axel Drees
Strongly coupled plasma < 1 fm Ti~300 MeV at energy density 5-25 GeV/fm3
“opaque black hole” thermal radiation jet quenching J/ suppression
system evolution expectations/observationscollision hard scattering jets, heavy flavor, photons
confinement at phase boundary TC ~ 170 MeV in chemical equilibrium relative hadron abundance
break down of chiral symmetry modification of meson properties
collective expansion of memory effect in hadron spectra fireball under pressure transverse flow <v/c> ~ 0.5
collective expansion of fireball under pressure
memory effect in hadron spectra elliptic flow
Quark Matter Formation in Heavy Ion Collisions
thermal freeze-out > 10 fm Tf = 100 MeV end of strong interactiontwo and one particle spectra
QGP