The experience of pain

20
THE EXPERIENCE OF PAIN A Question of Perception

description

A brief slideshow on pain, including a fascinating example of extreme perceived pain in the absence of tissue damage.

Transcript of The experience of pain

Page 1: The experience of pain

THE EXPERIENCE OF PAINA Question of Perception

Page 2: The experience of pain

A FAMILIAR EXPERIENCE Pain is often experienced in connection

with some form of physical trauma. As we grow up, this association is

frequently reinforced. For centuries, it was assumed that only

tissue damage triggered pain.

Page 3: The experience of pain

NOTABLE EXCEPTIONS Medical doctors and nurses frequently

noticed that soldiers injured in battle often felt little or no pain until later.

And sometimes, pain and other sensations could still be felt in limbs that had been lost.

These and other phenomena cast doubt on the old explanations for pain.

Page 4: The experience of pain

DEFINITIONS In the 20th century, scientists and

clinicians studying pain from different perspectives developed a taxonomy for discussing pain and various manifestations/experiences of it.

The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) defines pain as…

Page 5: The experience of pain

PAIN (FULL DEFINITION)An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or

potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage.

Note: The inability to communicate verbally does not negate the possibility that an individual is experiencing pain and is in need of appropriate pain-relieving treatment. Pain is always subjective. Each individual learns the application of the word through experiences related to injury in early life. Biologists recognize that those stimuli which cause pain are liable to damage tissue. Accordingly, pain is that experience we associate with actual or potential tissue damage. It is unquestionably a sensation in a part or parts of the body, but it is also always unpleasant and therefore also an emotional experience. Experiences which resemble pain but are not unpleasant, e.g., pricking, should not be called pain. Unpleasant abnormal experiences (dysesthesias) may also be pain but are not necessarily so because, subjectively, they may not have the usual sensory qualities of pain. Many people report pain in the absence of tissue damage or any likely pathophysiological cause; usually this happens for psychological reasons. There is usually no way to distinguish their experience from that due to tissue damage if we take the subjective report. If they regard their experience as pain, and if they report it in the same ways as pain caused by tissue damage, it should be accepted as pain. This definition avoids tying pain to the stimulus. Activity induced in the nociceptor and nociceptive pathways by a noxious stimulus is not pain, which is always a psychological state, even though we may well appreciate that pain most often has a proximate physical cause.

~ International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Taxonomy

Page 6: The experience of pain

PAIN (SUMMARIZED DEFINITION)An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience

associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage.

Key Points Pain is always subjective. Pain is always an emotional experience. Pain is often reported in the absence of tissue damage or any likely

pathophysiological cause, usually for psychological reasons. If reported in the same ways as pain caused by tissue damage, it should be accepted as

pain. Activity induced in the nociceptor and nociceptive pathways by a noxious stimulus is not

pain, which is always a psychological state, even though we may well appreciate that pain most often has a proximate physical cause.~ derived from IASP Taxonomy

Page 7: The experience of pain

A PERCEIVED PAIN EXPERIENCE

Despite no tissue damage, the patient experienced extreme pain and had to be sedated.

Case report from the British Medical Journal (BMJ), 1995.

BMJ 1995;310:70

A builder aged 29 came to the accident and emergency department having jumped down on to a 15 cm nail. As the smallest movement of the nail was painful he was sedated with fentanyl and midazolam. The nail was then pulled out from below. When his boot was removed a miraculous cure appeared to have taken place. Despite entering proximal to the steel toecap the nail had penetrated between the toes: the foot was entirely uninjured.

- J P FISHER, senior house officer, D T HASSAN, senior registrar, N O'CONNOR, registrar, accident and emergency department, Leicester Royal Infirmary.

Page 8: The experience of pain

HOW DID THIS PATIENT FEEL PAIN?

Despite no tissue damage, the patient experienced extreme pain and had to be sedated.

Case report from the British Medical Journal (BMJ), 1995.

BMJ 1995;310:70

We need to look at how the brain perceives and interprets sensory input.

Page 9: The experience of pain

THE NEUROMATRIX THEORY OF PAIN

Inputs include biological, psychological, and social factors.

Outputs include all aspects of how we experience and respond to the world.

Many different forms of inputs affect how the brain interprets incoming sensory data to create our experience(s) of reality.

Page 10: The experience of pain

BIOLOGICAL FACTORS IN PAIN Nociceptive input

is transmitted to brain via peripheral nerves and the spinothalamic tract.

Other forms of sensorimotor input are received and processed by various parts of the brain to create a mental image of where pain occurs.

Page 11: The experience of pain

Figure 1 Schematic drawing of the pathways between the substantia nigra and pain-processing areas

Wasner, G. & Deuschl, G. (2012) Pains in Parkinson disease—many syndromes under one umbrella

Nat. Rev. Neurol. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.54

Efferent pathways from the substantia nigra project to pain-processing areas (red boxes), as indicated by black arrows. Together with further pain-processing areas (yellow boxes), these brain structures form a network that is essential for transmission of nociceptive input and central pain processing, as indicated by red dotted lines. Sensory cortices (S1 and S2) are suggested to be involved in the descriptive component of pain, whereas the anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices seem to be essential for the affective dimension of pain. Abbreviations: S1, primary sensory cortex; S2, secondary sensory cortex.

NEUROBIOLOGY OF PAIN

Page 12: The experience of pain

PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF PAIN Conscious

cognition, including thoughts and feelings

Unconscious (conditioned) responses to various stimuli

Unconscious stimuli without a conditioned response Context provided by psychological

and social factors play an important role in determining how biological factors are interpreted.

Page 13: The experience of pain

PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF PAIN The frontal

cortex and temporal lobes are of primary importance in determining the psychosocial context.

Context provided by psychological and social factors play an important role in determining how biological factors are interpreted.

Page 14: The experience of pain

HOW DID THIS PATIENT FEEL PAIN?

Despite no tissue damage, the patient experienced extreme pain and had to be sedated.

Case report from the British Medical Journal (BMJ), 1995.

BMJ 1995;310:70

The patient would have…

Felt the sensations of landing and possibly of having an object penetrate his boot

Heard the sound of his landing

Seen a huge nail through his boot

Seen and heard the reactions of his coworkers

Page 15: The experience of pain

HOW DID THIS PATIENT FEEL PAIN?

Despite no tissue damage, the patient experienced extreme pain and had to be sedated.

Case report from the British Medical Journal (BMJ), 1995.

BMJ 1995;310:70

The patient would have…

Expected that a nail penetrating his boot would probably penetrate his foot

Perceived that his foot had been punctured by the nail

Had both conditioned and unconditioned negative responses to being punctured by a sharp object

Page 16: The experience of pain

HOW DID THIS PATIENT FEEL PAIN?

Despite no tissue damage, the patient experienced extreme pain and had to be sedated.

Case report from the British Medical Journal (BMJ), 1995.

BMJ 1995;310:70

This patient perceived an experience of what seemed to have happened, and responded to that

His pain was created by his brain, despite the lack of any nociceptive input from his peripheral nerves

Page 17: The experience of pain

HOW DID THIS PATIENT FEEL PAIN? This patient

perceived an experience of what seemed to have happened, and responded to that, even though it was not real

His discomfort was generated solely from psychosocial factors, yet was as intense as if his foot had actually been punctured

Page 18: The experience of pain

A FASCINATING ORGAN Understanding the Brain: The

Neurobiology of Everyday Life with Peggy Mason, Ph.D. is a great Coursera class

The course provides a foundation for understanding the roles and relationships of the various parts of the nervous system in relation to itself, to other organs/systems, and the world around us.

Though pain was not addressed in detail, the course material covered sensorimotor inputs, perception, memory, and cognition, which are essential for analyzing the biological and psychosocial elements of pain.

Page 19: The experience of pain

FOR MORE INFORMATION ON PAIN Video “Why Things Hurt” – Lorimer Mosely, http://

youtu.be/gwd-wLdIHjs Book Explain Pain by David Butler and Lorimer Mosely,

from http://NOIgroup.com Paper “Pain” by Ronald Melzack and Joel Katz, http://

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcs.1201/full Commentary on “Pain” paper by Diane Jacobs, PT, http://

humanantigravitysuit.blogspot.com/2013/05/melzacks-and-katz-new-paper-pain-part-1.html

Paper “Getting the pain you expect: mechanisms of placebo, nocebo and reappraisal effects in humans” by Irene Tracey, http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v16/n11/full/nm.2229.html

Page 20: The experience of pain

CONTACT For more information about this

slideshow, contact Jason Erickson via [email protected]