QuickTime™ e undecompressore TIFF (Non compresso)sono necessari per visualizzare quest'immagine.

The experience of an Evaluator within the VII FP

Valter Sergo

CENMAT, centro di eccellenza per i nanomateriali eSuperfici nanostrutturate, Università di Trieste

Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste(sergo@units.it)

Seminar on writing (and managing) a research projectSchool od Doctorate in NanotechnologyTrieste, October 16th 2009

Remote at stage 1, repeated for GO proposal on site in stage 2

1) S/T excellencea)Soundness of concept and quality of objectivesb)Progress beyond the state-of-artc)Quality and effectiveness of the S/T methodology and associated work plan

2) Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the managementa) appropriateness of the management structure and proceduresb) quality and relevant experience of the individual partecipantsc) Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance)d) Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (budget, staff, equipment)

3) Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project resultsa) Contribution at the EU/international level, to the expected impacts listed in the work programme under relevant topic/activityb) Appropriateness of measures for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and management of intellectual property

At stage 2, beside the previous points, also “the quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management” is evaluated

NOTE: you can pass each treshold and still fail!!!!

Final remarks• -be highly competent in at least one field but do not be

afraid to evaluate proposals not exactly in your field;• -be ready to change views (the Consensus phase can be

painful if you are too rigid!);• -try to be very effective in English: you must not only

understand it but must be capable of convincing others, if necessary.

• -Don’t take it lightheartedly: the work of a lot of people and a lot of money will be affected by your decisions.