The Evolving Health Care Landscape and Move Toward ...
Transcript of The Evolving Health Care Landscape and Move Toward ...
Welcome to today’s webinar
The Evolving Health Care Landscape and Move Toward Accountable Care
GE Healthcare11/19/2013
©2013 General Electric Company – All rights reserved.
This does not constitute a representation or warranty or documentation regarding the product or service featured. All illustrations are provided as fictional examples only. Your product features and configuration may be different than those shown. Information contained herein is proprietary to GE. No part of this publication may be reproduced for any purpose without written permission of GE.
DESCRIPTIONS OF FUTURE FUNCTIONALITY REFLECT CURRENT PRODUCT DIRECTION, ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE A COMMITMENT TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC FUNCTIONALITY. TIMING AND AVAILABILITY REMAIN AT GE’S DISCRETION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND APPLICABLE REGULATORY CLEARANCE.
* GE, the GE Monogram, Centricity and imagination at work are trademarks of General Electric Company.
General Electric Company, by and through its GE Healthcare division.
GE Healthcare11/19/2013
Portions of this presentation and the content herein are the opinions and experiences, and represent the views, of the specific authors and presenters and are not statements of advice, opinion or information of GE Healthcare. These portions of the presentation have not been prepared, screened, approved, reviewed or endorsed by GE Healthcare.
GE Healthcare11/19/2013
Today’s speakers
Wayne SensorSr. AdvisorLeavitt Partners
Michael MastSenior Marketing ManagerGE Healthcare
The Evolving Health Care Landscape and Move Toward Accountable Care
Wayne A. Sensor, Sr. AdvisorNovember 19, 2013
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 7
Our Health Care Story
Structure
• The burden of entitlement compassion versus economic dispassion will
enact pressure
• The U.S. health care system will be forced to change due to burdensome
pressure
• Various modes of payment and models of care are emerging to contain
cost and provide value
• The pace of health care system change will depend upon market
pressures and enabling forces
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 8
The Compounding of Compassion
Structure
Medicare
Medicaid
SS Insurance
Unemployment
AFDC
1935Roosevelt
2010Obama
ACA
1965Johnson
1974Nixon
SSI
1997Clinton
CHIP
TANF
2006Bush
Medicare (Part D)
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 9
Staggering Medicaid Spending Growth
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 10
Pressure to Change
1. Federal• Medicare Trust Fund depletion• Sustainable Growth Rate problems
2. State• Medicaid growth, crowding out other
programs• Program Integrity Efforts
3. Commercial• ACA Implementation Implications• Transparency
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 11
Broken System, New Models
Structure
Hospital Acquired Conditions
Page 12
Health Systems and Physicians Collaborate
Payers Evolve
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Providers are evolving
• Provider consolidation
• The Cleveland Clinic and hospital chain Community Health Systems Inc. purchased Akron General Health System in August, 2013
• Payer competition increasing from Integrated delivery systems
• Geisinger is planning on creating a private exchange
• Providers creating insurance plans
• Catholic Health Partners announced it will acquire Kaiser Permanente Ohio (5/13)
• National insurers are acquiring physician groups and enabling them
• Humana purchased Metropolitan Health Networks in Dec. 2012
Source: Company websites and news releases
Providers Collaborate and Evolve
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Physician Practices Evolve
Outcomes
Processes
Structures
Current State Future State
• Lack of familiarity with or acceptance of ACOs and Patient-centered Medical Homes
• Emerging consolidation / integration of physician groups
• Emerging use of disease management / utilization mgmt
• Health plans experimenting with cost / quality controls over physicians / hospitals
• Increased physician-hospital integration
• Increased use of mid-level professionals in primary care
• Increased EHR adoption by physicians
• Increased connectivity with patients using online and mobile technologies
2-5 years
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
IDNs Look to Manage Population Health
N E T W O R K P A R T N E R S
Employers Preferred Specialists
IntegratedDeliveryNetworks
• Gainshare• Capitation• Full Global
Risk
Can assume
riskInvest heavy
In technology
• Clinical decision support• Predictive modeling• Prospective
budgets/resource planning
Data Analytics
• Coordinated care across settings
• Clinical and managerial coordination
• Care teams
Care Coordination:
“HIMSS rates Kaiser hospitals at the highest stage on their Analytics scale. Kaiser hospitals make up one third of the 98 hospitals in the most sophisticated stage.” -HIMSS, 2012
Source: BCBSA
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
ACO Benchmarks
Vertical Integration
Provider Market Trends
Legislation/Regulation
Employer & Consumer
Movements
Enabling Technology
Drivers of Vertical Integration
Population Based
PaymentsFee for Service
P4PValue Based
Purchasing
Episode Based
Payments
Level of financial risk borne by provider
Level of financial risk borne by payer
Projected evolution of risk-based provider entities
Source: BCBSA
Providers Integrate Vertically
Capitation
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Payers are partnering
• Healthagen enables providers to assume risk and manage costs
• Engaging in strategic partnerships and forming collaborative care entities
• Forming collaborative accountable care (CAC) relationships
• Plans to form 100 CAC relationships by 2014
• ACO contracts are expected to total $50 billion by the end of 2017
• Optum’s strategic acquisitions across 30 states facilitates provider partnerships
• Emphasizing provider acquisition with goal of lowering costs 15%
• Investing $300-400 million to acquire MSOs and physician groups
Source: Company websites and news releases
Payers Partner
Page 18
The Movement Towards Accountable Care
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 19
LP Definition: Accountable Care
• Bear financial risk for the measured health of a population• Align incentives to encourage the production of high quality health outcomes
• Oversee the provision of clinical care• Coordinate the provision of care across the continuum of health services• Invest in and learn to use appropriate IT to manage population health
• Improve the individual experience of care• Improve population health• Reduce the cost of health care for populations
Processes
Outcomes
StructurePrepared for Walgreens Proprietary and Confidential
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 20
Types of ACOs
Payer-Provider Collaboration• Provider partners are diverse• Payer-involvement varies from
o TPA/MSOo First-payer status (temporary
exclusivity)o True collaborative partner
Single-Provider ACO• Tends to be original entity (Billings Clinic,
Sharp Healthcare)• More likely to be looking to develop in-
house competency (unless existing)• Decision making mechanism is less likely to
see change*
*LP has noticed a general trend within ACOs to create more collaborative governing bodies. Much of this stems from organizationsseeking physician buy-in and using leadership positions to create opportunities for physician contribution.
Insurer-Led ACO• More likely to be a physician group
(physician problems)• Insurer likely to retain formulary decisions
Multiple-Provider ACO• High likelihood of separate governing
structures (unless M/A in the works)• Decisions may be joint but purchases are
along original lines (hospital/physician group)
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 21
Payment Arrangements
• 212 of the 220 MSSP ACOs are shared savings only (no downside risk)
• Commercial contracts are mostly upside only• Timeline is usually 3 years for the transition to actual risk bearing
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 22
Bundled Payments
A single, comprehensive payment that
covers all of the services involved in the
patient’s care over a defined period of time
Essential attributes for bundling payments include:
o Administrative capacity to collect and dispense income in a transparent manner as well as determine what patients’ continuing care needs may be
o Ability to effectively work with other care providers to hold them accountable for high quality and efficient care delivery
o Information technology systems to track and manage processes
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 23
Bundled Payments: Success Factors / Challenges
Commitment from top leaders
Open mind to new ideas
Adequate resources:
Program design, administration,
provider contracting
Success Factors
Challenges• A lack of leadership
commitment, adequate resources, and an open mind
• Data deficits
• Lack of engagement in local efforts by national plans
Source: Healthcare Incentives Improvement Institute
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 24
Commercial Bundled Payment ActivityCommercial Payer Service Line Location
Aetna, CIGNA, BCBS Orthopedics Irvine, CA
BCBS of Idaho Obstetrics Idaho
BCBS of Minnesota Orthopedics Bloomington, MN
Anthem BCBS Orthopedics Appleton, WI
Anthem BCBS of MO Orthopedics St. Louis, MO
BCBS of Tennessee Orthopedics Memphis, TN; Nashville, TN; Knoxville, TN
BCBS of North Carolina Orthopedics Gastonia, NC
BCBS of North Carolina Knee replacement Durham, NC
BCBS of South Carolina Cardiovascular Columbia, NC
BCBS of Western NY Cardiovascular Buffalo, NY
Connecticare Orthopedics Hartford, CT
Florida Blue Orthopedics Jacksonville, FL
Humana Radiation therapy services Ft. Myers, FL
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Prostate Cancer Miami, FLSource: The Advisory Board, Commercial Bundled Payment Adoption Tracker
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 25
Employer Bundled Payment Activity
Source: The Advisory Board, Commercial Bundled Payment Adoption Tracker
Employer Service Line Location
Wal-Mart Cardiovascular / Spine Seattle, WA; Scottsdale, AZ; Temple, TX; Springfield, MO; Rochester, MN; Cleveland, OH; Danville, PA; Jacksonville, FL
Kroger Co Orthopedics Irvine, CA
South Dakota State Employee Health Plan
Outpatient back procedures
Rapid City, SD
Boeing Cardiovascular Chicago, IL
Lowes Cardiovascular Cleveland, OH
Pepsi Co Cardiovascular Baltimore, MD
Local employers Cardiovascular Charlotte, NC
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 26
CMS Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative
PPACA called for a pilot program by 2013: In early 2013, CMS rolled out 4 models with more than 500 organizations selected to participate.
Retrospective Acute Care Hospital Stay
Only
Includes an episode of care focused on the acute care inpatient hospitalization
Participants agree to provide a standard
discount to Medicare from the usual Part A hospital
inpatient payments
Retrospective Acute Care Hospital Stay
plus Post-Acute Care
The episode of care will include the inpatient stay
and all related services during the episode
Involves a retrospective bundled payment
arrangement where actual expenditures are reconciled against a target price for an
episode of care
Retrospective Post-Acute Care Only
The episode of care is triggered by a hospital stay and begins at the onset of post-acute care services
Involves a retrospective bundled payment
arrangement where actual expenditures are reconciled against a target price for an
episode of care
Acute Care Hospital Stay Only
Involves a prospective bundled payment
arrangement where a lump sum payment is made to a
provider for the entire episode of care
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 27
CMS Demonstration Sites
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
The BPCI program is CMS’s largest accountable care initiative, due in part to the ability of post-acute providers to apply independently.
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 28
Top 10 Clinical Bundles for Billing
Source: The Advisory Board
43%
44%
46%
47%
47%
48%
49%
51%
58%
78%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Double replacement of the lower extremity
Revision of the hip or knee
Cardiac defibrillator
Simple pneumonia and respiratory infections
Cardiac valve
Percutaneous coronary intervention
COPD, bronchitis/asthma
Coronary artery bypass graft
Congestive heart failure
Major joint replacement of lower extremity
Medical bundle
Surgical bundle
Percentage of model 2-4 applicants selecting condition
Most participants are bundling across multiple service lines, with more than 1/3 of providers in Models 2-4 selecting all 48 of the possible bundles.
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 29
Projected Changes in Payment Models
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 30
ACO Growth (overall)
Leavitt Partners Center for Accountable Care Intelligence 2013
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 31
ACO Sponsoring Entities
Community-Based Organizations
Hospital Systems
Physician Groups
Insurers
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 32
Where are They Forming?
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 33
Pioneer ACO Developments
Financial Results• $140 million in total savings
o $76million in shared savings will be returned to the 13 Pioneerso $33million in net savings for Medicare Trust Funds
• 12 did not achieve significant savings; 2 cost Medicare more and will owe $4 million back
• 18 achieved some cost savings, but only 13 saved enough to share savings with Medicare
Quality results• All improved quality and rated highly on patient satisfaction scores• 25/32 Pioneers lowered risk-adjusted readmission rates compared with FFS
Departures & Transitions• 7 Pioneer ACOs are leaving to the lower-risk MSSP• 2 Pioneer ACOs are leaving the CMS ACO programs altogether
• Presbyterian New Mexico & Plus! ACO (North Texas Specialty Physicians)*
Page 34
Trends and Financial Impact
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 35
Major Mergers/Acquisitions
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 36
Merger & Acquisition Trends Across Health Care
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 37
Provider Financial Trends: Changing Payers
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 38
Provider Financial Trends
Trendso Progressive decrease in
uncompensated care from 2014-2016 (including charity care)
o Decrease in Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) funding
o Medicare/Medicaid rates likely to moderate
o Slight erosion in employer sponsored insurance plans
o Compression of commercial rates in certain markets
o Increase in risk-based payment
Implicationso Greater consolidationo Increased rate of accountable
care capability developmento Cost-shifting to employer-
sponsored insurance
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 39
Utilization Changes on Horizon
FactorsNew Userso 7 million people will enroll
through the 2014 exchangeso Or 8.5 million, or moreo Or fewer
o Some Medicaid expansion
New Dynamicso Unclear Health IQ levels for new
commercial/Medicaid populations
o More efficient inpatient care driving greater outpatient volumes
Implicationso Higher Emergency
Department/Urgent Care utilization
o Pent-up demand could increase medical price inflation
o Workforce challenges
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 40
Hypothetical Financial Impact
Johns Hopkins Income Statement
Page 41
The Question of When
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 42
The transition may not happen over night…
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 43
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 44
©2012 LEAVITT PARTNERS
Page 45
…but will happen sooner than anticipated.
Unlock the performance of your revenue cycle
GE Healthcare11/19/2013
Strengthen financial performanceImprove your ability to optimize net collections to help navigate falling reimbursement
GE Healthcare has been in the business of helping customers accelerate revenue reimbursement and improve profitability for 40 years. Centricity Business delivers flexible revenue cycle management solutions that integrate billing activities across the acute care and ambulatory settings. We’ve helped customers reduce A/R days up to 58% and increase net collections.
Your need Our solution
Centricity Business
Source: GE Healthcare customer metric data
GE Healthcare11/19/2013
Your need Our solution
Centricity Business
Improve workflow efficiency & revenue cycle integrityCreate efficiencies that reduce costs to collect and improve performance
Our solutions enable automated, exception-based workflows that help you enhance staff productivity up to 50%, accelerate revenue cycles and generate cleaner claims that can help drive eligible billing collection rates above 90%.
Source: GE Healthcare customer metric data
GE Healthcare11/19/2013
Your need Our solution
Centricity Business
Prepare for change amidst uncertaintyMust adjust business strategy to adapt to changing healthcare reform requirements
Centricity Business can help customers address emerging reimbursement models – shared savings, capitation, and bundled payments, ICD-10 – while helping to drive down A/R and cost to collect
Source: GE Healthcare customer metric data
GE Healthcare11/19/2013
Faculty Practice Solutions Center2012 Top Performing Organizations7 out of the top 10 best performing organizations are Centricity Business customers:
1. University of Pittsburg Medical Center2. Duke Medicine3. The Emory Clinic4. University of Minnesota Physicians5. University of Massachusetts Medical Group6. University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation7. The Medical College of Wisconsin8. Fletcher Allen Health Care – University of Vermont9. Vanderbilt Medical Group10. University of Missouri Health Care – University
Physicians
Source: Faculty Practice Solutions Center; Billing Office Survey FY2012 Results
GE Healthcare11/19/2013
Services
Connectivity
RiskManagement
PatientAccess
IntegratedEDI
Mobile
CentricityBusiness
Enterprise Revenue Cycle Solution
High-performingDrives financial results through increased efficiency from scheduling through collections
Enterprise-readyIs reform-ready from ambulatory to hospital