The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Flavio Coturni Head of Unit - Agricultural Trade Policy...
-
Upload
lisbeth-davies -
Category
Documents
-
view
233 -
download
1
Transcript of The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Flavio Coturni Head of Unit - Agricultural Trade Policy...
The EU The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)
Flavio Coturni Head of Unit - Agricultural Trade Policy AnalysisDG for Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentEuropean Commission
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 2
Overview
The CAP: a continued reform process
The cumulated effects of the various reforms
What about the future?
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 3
Main drivers of reform
Reduce surplus production Control expenditure Maintain rural population Address societal concerns (food safety,
environment, animal welfare) Enhance market orientation Improve competition on the world market
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 4
MacSharry Reform, 1992Objectives:
o Improve competitivenesso Stabilise markets, income and expenditureo Diversify productiono Protect the environnement
Measures taken:Price cutsCompulsory set-aside - Full compensation for loss of incomeAccompanying measures (agri- environment programmes,
afforestation, early retirement, diversification)
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 5
Agenda 2000
Objectives:o Improve competitiveness o Rural Development Policyo Facilitate the enlargement of the EU
Measures taken: Further price cuts (beef -20%, cereals -15%) Partial compensations = direct payments A comprehensive RD policy Ceiling on agricultural expenditure
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 6
DegressivityModulation
Strengthening the 2nd pillar
Adjustment of intervention levels
Decoupling of direct payments
Consolidation of the CAP within strict limits of financial discipline
Better balance of support
Enforcing standards (environment, food
safety, animal welfare)
Improving the transfer- efficiency of direct
payments
Reinforcing farmers’ market orientation and
entrepreneurial role
Cross-compliance
CAP Reform 2003 - Objectives and measures
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 7
CAP Reform 2003: Complementary Reforms 2004
Cotton, hops, tobacco, and olive oil
Continues the approach of reducing support prices by replacing them with decoupled direct payments.
CAP Reform 2003: Complementary Reforms 2005
Sugar
Price cut (white sugar -36% over 4 years), partial compensation through decoupled payments (64% of the price cut).
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 8
CAP Reform 2003: Complementary Reforms
2007
Fruits and Vegetables
Integration of F&V into the Single Payment Scheme, wide range of tools for crisis management for Producer Organisations, promotion of consumption.
CAP Reform 2003: Complementary Reforms
2007 Wine
Phasing-out expensive market intervention measures and allowing the budget to be used for more positive, proactive measures which will boost the competitiveness of European wines.
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 9
CAP Health Check, 2008 Simplifies and better targets direct support to
farmers: more flexibility for MS to re-orientate direct support, assistance to sectors with special problems (Art. 68);
Responds to market opportunities and price crises by removing supply controls: (phasing out milk quotas, abolition of set-aside, market management tools are streamlined and updated);
Strengthen Rural Development to respond to new challenges: increase of modulation by 5% between 2009-2013 for climate change, renewable energy, water management, biodiversity, innovation
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 10
A consistent reform process… Reform orientation reflects policy objectives
– to be competitive in world markets and simultaneously meet the highest environmental, food safety , quality and animal welfare standards within dynamic sustainable rural economies
Decisions of reform reflect clear political choice
– continue support for EU agriculture (the “not if but how” question)
– in a manner that meets citizen, taxpayer and consumer needs and expectations and that is the less trade-distorting
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 11
…built on sound preliminary analysis
Impact assessment allows to identify the problem, to define the objectives, to develop policy options and to analyse their economic, social and environmental impacts
It ensures collegiality within the Commission (inter-service steering group) and consultation of affected stakeholders
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 12
The effects
80% of the expenditure is now paid directly to farmers Farmers are now encouraged to produce in response
to market incentives, not in response to support incentives
Farmers are sanctioned if they do not respect strict standards regarding food safety, plant and animal health, environment, animal welfare (cross-compliance)
Pillar 2 enhances the development of rural areas
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 13
The paths of CAP reforms and expenditure…
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
19
80
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
% GDPbillion €
0,0%
0,1%
0,2%
0,3%
0,4%
0,5%
0,6%
0,7%
Export subsidies Market support Direct aidsDecoupled payments Rural development % of EU GDP
EU-10 EU-12 EU-15 EU-25 EU-27
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 14
CAP budget cost trend
0
10
20
30
40
1993 2000 2010
billion €
Market measures Area/animal payments (coupled payments)
Single Farm Payment (decoupled payments)
EU-12 EU-15 EU-27
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 15
WTO boxes (bn €)
0
10.000
20.000
30.000
40.000
50.000
60.000
70.000
80.000
90.000
1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07e
2007/08
green
blue
amber
AMS Ceiling
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 16
Reductions in EU price support Reductions in EU price support ...
Cumulative % reduction in price support
-75
-60
-45
-30
-15
0
Soft wheat Durumwheat
Beef Rice Butter SMPowder
Sugar
...bringing EU prices in line with world prices
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 17
EU public stocks
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Wheat Beef Butter
(as % of EU production)
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 18
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
EU-12 up to 1994 EU-15 up to 2004 EU-25 up to 2006, then EU-27
% E
AG
GF
an
d e
xp
ort
s
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
Bio
EU
R
Refunds Refunds/exports Refunds/expenditure pillar1
Export refunds, billion € and % of agricultural expenditure and exports
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 19
Passing the stress test… A sound policy in turbulent times…
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 20
Looking ahead: The CAP should… leave room for farmers to be as market-orientated as
possible; give farmers some kind of safety net; help farms to modernise; help to provide public goods; help to meet various challenges such as climate
change; help to compete in a changing international
environment.
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 21
The CAP beyond 2013 Institutional context
– New European Parliament and Commission– Lisbon Treaty– WTO– New financial perspectives
• New priorities for EU budget• Budget for CAP?
General economic context– Changing world Supply and Demand– The impact of the economic crisis– Oil price– Volatility, Food security, climate change
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 22
General context: The fundamentals
Growth in consumption is expected to relocate to the developing world.
Other than wheat and coarse grains, production increasingly shifts away from developed countries towards developing countries.
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 23
USA real GDP growth rates, year-on-year, %
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
OECD baseline Global Insight: latest projection (Oct 2009)
Source: OECD-FAO, HIS Global Insight
General context: the economic crisis
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 24
Oil price projections, USD/barrel
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
OECD Baseline (Brent crude) Global Insight: latest projection (Refiners' Imports Average, Oct 2009)Source: OECD-FAO, HIS Global Insight
General context: Oil price
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 25
US Wheat volatility has increased since 1980
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
en
t
Data source: CME Group
General context: Price volatility
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 26
…and in the EU too…
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
se
pt-
98
se
pt-
99
se
pt-
00
se
pt-
01
se
pt-
02
se
pt-
03
se
pt-
04
se
pt-
05
se
pt-
06
se
pt-
07
se
pt-
08
Pe
rce
nt
Data source: MILLING WHEAT #2: 1ST EXPIRATION FUTURE NEARBY - SETL - MARCHE A TERME INTERNATIONALE DE FRANCE (MATIF). In-house calculations.
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 27
US Wheat Historical Volatility, Futures Open Interest and VolumeMonthly
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
January 2000 January 2001 January 2002 January 2003 January 2004 January 2005 January 2006 January 2007 January 2008 January 2009
Vo
lati
lity
(%
)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Op
en
in
tere
st
an
d v
olu
me (
tho
usan
ds o
f co
ntr
acts
)Futures, open interest Futures, volume Wheat volatility
Data source: CME Group
General context: Speculation?
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 28
The CAP beyond 2013: Open questions1. Direct payments
– Income support vs. public goods
– Redistribution within and among Member States
2. Market mechanisms
– Safety net
– Other instruments3. Rural development
– Balance between competition, environmental and rural economy challenges
4. Financing
– Distribution between pillars and areas
– Co-financing
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 29
The CAP in one click
http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/index_en.htm
Minsk, Belarus 3 December 2009 3030
Thank you for your attention!