The Effects of Feedback on Targeting with Multiple Moving Targets David Mould and Carl Gutwin.
-
Upload
charla-copeland -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of The Effects of Feedback on Targeting with Multiple Moving Targets David Mould and Carl Gutwin.
The Effects of Feedback The Effects of Feedback on Targeting with on Targeting with
Multiple Moving TargetsMultiple Moving Targets
David Mould and Carl GutwinDavid Mould and Carl Gutwin
OverviewOverview
► Introduction / MotivationIntroduction / Motivation►Research QuestionResearch Question►Experimental DesignExperimental Design►ResultsResults►ConclusionsConclusions
TargetingTargeting
►The user sees a target (a window, a The user sees a target (a window, a menu item), moves the cursor to it, menu item), moves the cursor to it, and selects itand selects it
►An extremely common task in modern An extremely common task in modern mouse-based user interfacesmouse-based user interfaces
Targeting is easyTargeting is easy
► In typical applications, targets are In typical applications, targets are highly visible and stationary.highly visible and stationary.
►Feedback has been suggested as a Feedback has been suggested as a method of improving targeting method of improving targeting performance – but Akamatsu et al. ran performance – but Akamatsu et al. ran a study finding that feedback doesn't a study finding that feedback doesn't help under these conditionshelp under these conditions
Virtual World applicationsVirtual World applications
Xu, Stewart, and FiumeGI 2002
Computer Game applicationsComputer Game applications
Warcraft 3 (Blizzard Entertainment)
Targeting can be hardTargeting can be hard
► In other applications, targeting can be more In other applications, targeting can be more difficult:difficult:
► targets might movetargets might move► in a cluttered environment, targets might be in a cluttered environment, targets might be
hidden or the user might be distractedhidden or the user might be distracted
► Does feedback improve targeting when the Does feedback improve targeting when the task is more difficult?task is more difficult?
► (It can, per Fraser & Gutwin – is this the kind (It can, per Fraser & Gutwin – is this the kind of task where feedback will help?)of task where feedback will help?)
The Role of FeedbackThe Role of Feedback
►Feedback is used in many applications Feedback is used in many applications where targeting might seem difficult.where targeting might seem difficult.
►Games use sevral kinds of visual Games use sevral kinds of visual feedback:feedback:
► highlighting the targethighlighting the target► haloing the targethaloing the target► writing text in a sidebarwriting text in a sidebar► many othersmany others
Our study: Does feedback Our study: Does feedback help?help?
►Maybe feedback helps in difficult Maybe feedback helps in difficult tasks.tasks.
►Pilot: a few graduate students Pilot: a few graduate students performed targeting tasks with moving performed targeting tasks with moving targets and cluttertargets and clutter
►Pilot results: no effect on completion Pilot results: no effect on completion time, maybe some effect on error ratetime, maybe some effect on error rate
Targeting EnvironmentTargeting Environment
ConditionsConditions
►Different conditions: speed, occluder Different conditions: speed, occluder count, feedback conditioncount, feedback condition
►Each participant saw all conditionsEach participant saw all conditions
►Feedback condition order varied, but Feedback condition order varied, but other conditions were fixed in order of other conditions were fixed in order of increasing difficultyincreasing difficulty
Speed conditionSpeed condition
►Three different speeds: "slow", Three different speeds: "slow", "medium", "fast""medium", "fast"
►Slow: 45 pixels/second (~1.3 cm/s)Slow: 45 pixels/second (~1.3 cm/s)►Medium: 220 pixels/second (~6.4 cm/s)Medium: 220 pixels/second (~6.4 cm/s)►Fast: 400 pixels/second (~11.7 cm/s)Fast: 400 pixels/second (~11.7 cm/s)
►Entire window: 600 pixels across, square.Entire window: 600 pixels across, square.
Occluder count conditionOccluder count condition
►We varied the number of occluders:We varied the number of occluders:►None (no occluders)None (no occluders)►Few (22 occluders)Few (22 occluders)►Medium (44 occluders)Medium (44 occluders)►Many (88 occluders)Many (88 occluders)
►We always showed the home base as We always showed the home base as well.well.
Increasing Occluder CountIncreasing Occluder Count
Feedback conditionFeedback condition
►All feedback was visualAll feedback was visual
►Three feedback conditions:Three feedback conditions:►NoneNone►Target-only (target lit on mouse-over)Target-only (target lit on mouse-over)►All objects (all objects lit on mouse-All objects (all objects lit on mouse-
over)over)
Summary of conditionsSummary of conditions
►All participants exposed to all All participants exposed to all conditions: all combinations of 3x4x3 conditions: all combinations of 3x4x3 factorsfactors
►Feedback type was fully Feedback type was fully counterbalanced, while occluder count counterbalanced, while occluder count and speed were presented in and speed were presented in increasing order of difficultyincreasing order of difficulty
Experimental procedureExperimental procedure
►Six groups, for six different feedback Six groups, for six different feedback ordersorders
►Eighteen participants in totalEighteen participants in total►Participants were asked to click as quickly Participants were asked to click as quickly
and accurately as possibleand accurately as possible►After a short learning period, participants After a short learning period, participants
completed 16 targeting tasks in each of completed 16 targeting tasks in each of 36 condition combinations36 condition combinations
►Following the study, participants Following the study, participants completed a questionnairecompleted a questionnaire
ResultsResults
►TimingTiming►Error rateError rate►Target occlusion at moment of Target occlusion at moment of
selectionselection►PreferencesPreferences
Results (timing)Results (timing)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 22 44 66 88
Number of objects
Co
mp
letio
n ti
me
pe
r ta
rge
t (se
c)
none
target
all
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 22 44 66 88
Number of objectsC
om
ple
tion
tim
e p
er
targ
et (
sec)
s low
medium
fast
feedback had no effect on timing completion time became longerwith higher speeds and with moreoccluders
Results (error rate)Results (error rate)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
none target all
Feedback type
Err
ors
per
targ
et
Overall error rate went down with increasing feedback
Results (error rate)Results (error rate)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0 100 200 300 400 500
Object velocity (pixels/sec)
Err
ors
pe
r ta
rge
t
none
target
all0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0 22 44 66 88
Number of objectsE
rro
rs p
er
targ
et
none
target
all
errors were reduced withmore feedback
errors increased with speed errors increased with occluder count
Results (occlusion)Results (occlusion)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 22 44 66 88
Number of objects
Perc
ent
occlu
sio
n o
f ta
rget
none
target
all
Average target occlusion increasedwith occluder count
Results (preferences)Results (preferences)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Fastest Most Accurate OverallPreference
Which interface was...
Num
ber
of
part
icip
ants
No feedback
Target only
All objects
Everyone liked target-only feedback best
Results SummaryResults Summary
►Both completion time and errors Both completion time and errors increase with occluder count and with increase with occluder count and with speedspeed
►Target feedback had no effect on Target feedback had no effect on completion timecompletion time
►Target feedback reduced error ratesTarget feedback reduced error rates►All-object feedback helped more than All-object feedback helped more than
target-only feedbacktarget-only feedback►Users preferred target-only feedbackUsers preferred target-only feedback
Possible Explanations -- timePossible Explanations -- time
►We know that increased target speed We know that increased target speed increases targeting difficulty increases targeting difficulty (Jagacinski et al. 1980)(Jagacinski et al. 1980)
►Not surprised to find that increasing Not surprised to find that increasing occluder count increases targeting occluder count increases targeting difficultydifficulty
Possible Explanations -- errorPossible Explanations -- error
► Increase in error rate with speed: Increase in error rate with speed: targets can escapetargets can escape
► Increase with occluder count: Increase with occluder count: occluders more likely to intercept a occluders more likely to intercept a clickclick
►Feedback reducing error rate: signal Feedback reducing error rate: signal whether or not a click will succeedwhether or not a click will succeed
►All-object feedback: a strong signalAll-object feedback: a strong signal
Possible explanations -- Possible explanations -- preferencepreference
►Users liked target-only feedback the bestUsers liked target-only feedback the best►Six of eighteen participants complained Six of eighteen participants complained
of distraction in all-object feedbackof distraction in all-object feedback
►Target-only feedback only positiveTarget-only feedback only positive►All-object feedback highlights mistakesAll-object feedback highlights mistakes►Positive advice welcome, but all advice Positive advice welcome, but all advice
usefuluseful
ImplicationsImplications
►Despite user's preferences, we cannot Despite user's preferences, we cannot provide target-only feedback in a real provide target-only feedback in a real applicationapplication
►But, all-object feedback is good too: it But, all-object feedback is good too: it does not reduce completion time, and does not reduce completion time, and it does reduce error rateit does reduce error rate
Future WorkFuture Work
►A less intrusive all-object feedback?A less intrusive all-object feedback?►By what mechanism was error By what mechanism was error
reduced?reduced?►Traditionally, feedback helps only the Traditionally, feedback helps only the
final stage of tracking. Can we devise final stage of tracking. Can we devise feedback which is helpful at earlier feedback which is helpful at earlier stages?stages?
Questions?Questions?