The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit...

15
THE DYNAMIC NATURE OF VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE-RELATED RISKS AND CHANGE: THE IQALUIT LAND USE MONITORING PROJECT Dr James D. Ford, Graham McDowell, Jamal Shirley www.jamesford.ca

description

Presentation by Dr. James for given to the IPY 2012 conference in Montreal on April 24, 2012

Transcript of The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit...

Page 1: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

THE DYNAMIC NATURE OF VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE-RELATED RISKS AND CHANGE: THE IQALUIT LAND USE MONITORING PROJECT

Dr James D. Ford, Graham McDowell, Jamal Shirley www.jamesford.ca

Page 2: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Background

¨  Key theme in scholarship: CC and subsistence hunting ¨  Baseline understanding

¤  Widespread evidence of CC and impacts (safety, food security, culture) ¤  Vulnerability / resilience mediated by socio-economic factors

¨  Deficiencies in understanding (see Ford & Pearce 2012, The Canadian Geographer) ¤  Static understanding yet vulnerability dynamic (e.g. adaptive learning,

feedback, thresholds) ¤  Nature of climate - impact links not fully understood

¨  Methodological limitations ¤  Retrospective study design (recall bias, seasonal influences) ¤  Absence of longitudinal studies, reliance of limited field seasons

2

Page 3: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project (ILMP)

¨  Obtain real-time longitudinal data on Inuit-environment interactions to understand how climate risks are experienced and managed

3

Page 4: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

GPS Tracking 4

¨  2 full-time hunters equipped with GPS ¨  2007 – ongoing

Page 5: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Regular interviews 5

¨  >100 post hunt interviews ¨  Examine GPS data, review land use, dangers

encountered, coping mechanisms employed etc.

Page 6: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Accompanied hunting trips 6

¨  Team members go hunting during all seasons

Page 7: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Instrumental data

¨  Use of local weather station data and CIS ice charts

7

Page 8: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Results: Land-use 8

¨  2008-2010: >21,000km travel ¤  70% by snowmobile,

average trip107km ¤  30% boat, average

trip 99km

Ford et al (in review, AAAG)

Page 9: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Results: Changing env. conditions 9

¨  1982-2010 ¤ 50 days later

freeze up ¤ 70 days more

open water ¤ Declining wind

predominance

¨  Hunting team ¤  Ice instability ¤ 2010/11

extremes

Ford et al (in review, AAAG)

Page 10: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Results: Access constraints & opportunities

10

¨  Trail network “choke points”

¨  2010/11 many hunting areas inaccessible

Ford et al (in review, AAAG)

Page 11: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Results: Terrestrial adaptation 11

¨  Caribou in Amadjuak Lake region in Nov-Jan ¤ Sustainability:

hunting pressure, CC, & caribou

¤ Land hazards ( snow, river freeze up (e.g. 2008))

Ford et al (in review, AAAG)

Page 12: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Results: General observations (1) 12

¨  Co-occurence of climatic extremes problematic ¤ e.g. Nov-Dec 2010: late freeze-up, 38 days lost to high

winds, Amadjuak Lake trail impassible till Dec

¨  High adaptability: flexibility, TK

¨  Hunting team are keystone individuals ¤ Broad importance for Iqaluit

¨  Importance of income: damaged equipment replaced, extra distance costs incurred (e.g. vs Igloolik)

Page 13: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Results: General observations (2) 13

¨  Potential for ‘trajectories of maladaptation’ (Fazey et al 2011) ¤ Short-term adaptability may result in long term

vulnerability ¤ Donwstream effects: displacing impacts to future ¤ Overspecialized adaptations susceptible to a new

stressor (e.g. caribou)

Page 14: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Conclusion 14

¨  Analyzed 2008-2010 data (see Ford et al., in review, Annals Assoc. of American Geographers)

¨  Future ¤ Focus on 2010/11 ¤ Continued monitoring ¤ Aim: 10 years

Page 15: The Dynamic Nature of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-Related Risks and Change: The Iqaluit Land Use Monitoring Project

Thank You 15

Thank You

Acknowledgments: Josh Atagoyuk, Levi Pisuktie, Udlu Pisuktie, Tristan Pearce, Bill Gough, Rick Siewierski, Sara Statham, Frank Duerden, Mike Pitre, ArcticNet, SSHRC, NRI, IPY