The dti Division: International Trade and Economic...
Transcript of The dti Division: International Trade and Economic...
![Page 1: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
University of Cape Town, Kramer Law Building, Middle Campus
Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701 South Africa Tel : +27 21 650-2317. Fax : +27 21 650-5660
[email protected] www.ip-unit.org
ThedtiDivision:InternationalTradeandEconomicDevelopmentipframework@thedti.gov.za
Comments on the dti’s Intellectual Property Consultative Framework, 2016
CapeTown,30September2016Dearsir/madam:Several members of UCT’s IP Unit (faculty of law), including the undersigned, have beeninstrumentalincreatingadetailledsubmissionbyacademics,experts,scholarsandpro-accessadvocatesconcerningthedti’sIntellectualPropertyConsultativeFramework.This letteristoconfirmthattheIPUnitfullysupportsthissubmissionbyacademics,experts,scholarsandpro-accessadvocates,asattachedtothisletter.Wethankyoufortheopportunityto share our views on the IP Consultative Framework and are available to elaborate on thesubmissionifrequired.Yourssincerely,
Dr.TobiasSchonwetterDirector:IntellectualPropertyUnitUniversityofCapeTown
TheUniversityofCapeTown’sIntellectualProperty(IP)UnitstrivestoaddanAfricanvoicetotheglobaldebateonIP-relatedissues.OurfocusisonexaminingthelinkbetweenIP,innovation,developmentandpublicpolicy.WeaimatcreatingaleadingIPprogrammeinAfricathattranslatescuttingedgeresearch
intoexcellentteachingandincreasesthenumberofhighly-skilledAfricanIPexperts.Importantissuesrangefromthewayinwhichweaccessandshareknowledgetostrategieshowtocommercialiseinventionsand
avoidmisappropriation.IPisakeydeterminantofhumandevelopment,economicgrowthandcompetitiveness;andIPrulesimpactonvariouspublicpolicyareasincludinghealth,researchand
development,bio-diversity,cleantechnologies,foodsecurity,andeducation.
![Page 2: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTELLECTUALPROPERTYCONSULTATIVEFRAMEWORK(DepartmentofTrade&Industry,SouthAfrica)
SUBMISSIONBYACADEMICS,EXPERTS,SCHOLARSANDPRO-ACCESSADVOCATES
30September2016
Authors:
ProfessorYousufVawdaUniversityofKwaZulu-Natal
ProfessorBrookBakerNortheasternUniversity,USA&UniversityofKwaZulu-Natal
MrAndrewRensDukeUniversity,USA&UniversityofCapeTown
DrTobiasSchonwetterUniversityofCapeTown
ProfessorCarolineNcubeUniversityofCapeTown
MrAchalPrabhalaFellow,ShuttleworthFoundation
Co-submitters
ProfessorDavidMcQuoid-Mason;EmeritusProfessorHoosen“Jerry’CoovadiaMsPriyaPraveshSingh;MsSheetalSoni;MsDevinaPerumal;MsLindiweMaqutu;MsDevBellengere;MrMaropengMpya;MsSuhayfaBhamjee;MrSimphiwe;MsWilleneHolness:MrZwelethuSibiya;MrsClydeniaStevensandMrAndyGray(alloftheUniversityofKwaZulu-Natal).
ProfessorLeslieLondon;DrLee-AnnTong;MrThapeloSegodi;MrDesmondOriakhogba;MrMbuleloNcolosi;MrBramvanWiele;(UniversityofCapeTown).
MrLloydLotz(UniversityofZululand).
JudgeThumbaPillay(RetiredJusticeoftheHighCourt,KZN).
DrThrenesanNaidoo(SpecialistForensicPathologist,Durban).
ProfessorNicoSteytler;MsJadeKouletakis(UniversityoftheWesternCape).
ProfessorLoniasNdlovu(UniversityofVenda).
DrFranziskaSucker(UniversityoftheWitwatersrand).
ProfessorAdebamboAdewopo(NigerianInstituteofAdvancedLegalStudies).
MsHelenChumaOkoro(NigerianInstituteofAdvancedLegalStudies&UniversityofCapeTown)
![Page 3: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2
ProfessorSeanFlynn(AmericanUniversityWashingtonCollegeofLaw).
ProfessorAmyKapczynski(YaleSchoolofLaw).
MrRichardElliott(CanadianHIV/AIDSLegalNetwork).
ProfessorSrividyaRagavan(TexasA&MSchoolofLaw,USA).
DrGrahamDutfield(UniversityofLeeds,UK).
MrMattKavanagh(UniversityofPennsylvania).
DrVCVivekanandan(NalsarUniversityofLaw,India&UniversityofBuffalo,USA).
ProfessorJeremydeBeer;MsMeikaEllis(UniversityofOttawa,Canada).
ProfessorSunitaTripathy(OPJindalGlobalUniversity,India).
DrOluseyeJegede(AfricanInstituteforSciencePolicy&Innovation,Nigeria).
ProfessorNaglaRizk(AmericanUniversityCairo,Egypt).
ProfessorIkechiMgbeoji(OsgoodeHallLawSchoolToronto,Canada).
DrTeshWDagne(ThompsonRiversUniversity,Canada).
MrJamesKamau(KenyaTreatmentAccessMovement).
MsFelicitaHikuam(AIDSandRightsAllianceforSouthernAfrica).
MsPrimahKwagala(CentreforHealth,HumanRights&Development).
MrMosesMulumba;MrDavidKabanda(AdvocatesoftheHighCourtofUganda).
Fix the Patent Laws Coalition (incorporating the following organisations: Advocates for BreastCancer;AmaBeleBelles'ProjectFlamingo;BreastCourse4Nurses;BreastHealthFoundation;Can-Sir;Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA); Cape Mental Health (CMH); Childhood CancerFoundationofSouthAfrica(CHOC);DiabetesSA;DoctorswithoutBorders(MSF);EpilepsySA;HospicePalliative Care Association (HPCA); Igazi Foundation; Look Good Feel Better; Marie Stopes SouthAfrica; National Council Against Smoking; Oncology Nursing Association of SA; Pancreatic CancerNetworkofSA;PeopleLivingWithCancer(PLWC);PinkTrees;ReachforRecovery;SchizophreniaandBipolar Disorders Alliance (SABDA); SECTION27; South African Depression and Anxiety Group(SADAG); South African Federation of Mental Health (SAFMH); South African Non-CommunicableDiseases Alliance (SANCDAlliance); Stop Stock Outs Project (SSP); The Sunflower Fund; TreatmentActionCampaign;VredeFoundation;andWingsofHope).
Thisdocumentissubmittedbyagroupofexperts,scholarsandaccessadvocatesworkinginthevariousareasof intellectualpropertylawandpolicy,basedatoraffiliatedwithSouthAfricanuniversitiesandotherinstitutions,includingnon-governmentalorganisations.Itdoes not purport to speak for all experts, scholars and advocates, nor does it reflect the positions of our respective institutions. Thecontributorsandsupportersarecommittedtoapro-publicpolicyperspectiveonintellectualpropertymatters,andmanyhaveregularlycontributedtothediscourseonimprovingaccesstopublichealth,knowledgeandothertechnologies.
![Page 4: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
3
Introduction
TheDepartment of Trade and Industry’s (thedti) Intellectual Property Consultative Framework(theFramework)identifiestheintersectionbetweenintellectualproperty(IP)andpublichealthasapriorityarea that requires immediatedomestic review.Thus, the focusof thissubmission isonthispriorityarea.
IncraftinganIPpolicyframeworkaffecting,amongotherthings,medicaltechnologies,policyandlawmakersmust address the tension that exists between the protection of IP rights and humanrights–therightsofthepublictohaveaccesstomedicinesandotherhealthtechnologiesnecessaryfortheirwell-being.Iftherehadbeenanydoubtabouthowtoresolvethistension,thentheissuemust surely have been settledwith the release of theReport of theUN Secretary-General’sHighLevelPanelonAccess toMedicineson14September2016 (thePanelReport).ThePanelReportstates:
“Humanrightsarefundamental,universalentitlementsthatpeopleinherentlyacquirebyvirtueoftheir birth. In comparison, intellectual property rights are 'one policy tool among many forencouraging innovationandtechnologicalresearchanddevelopment.' Intellectualpropertyrightsare temporary, revocable, transferable privileges granted by states and can be suspended orrevokedundercertainconditionslaidoutintheTRIPSAgreementwhenitisintheinterestofthestateorsociety.”
YettheprimacyoftherighttohealthisnotobviousfromareadingoftheDepartmentofTradeandIndustry’s IP Consultative Framework (the Framework). The Framework recognises the‘intersection between IP and public health’ and proposes to prioritise public healthmeasures inimplementing the policy. While we welcome this statement of intent and several of the dti’spositive proposals, it is disconcerting that the Framework fails to reference the human rightsparadigminitsapproachtopolicy-making.Thisisakeythemewhichrecursinoursubmission.
TheFrameworkextolsIPrightsprotectionasakeydriverofinnovation,buttheevidenceforthatpropositionislessconvincing.InadditiontotheconsiderablescholarlyliteraturesuggestingathinconnectionbetweenIPandinnovation,theexperienceofIndia,andtheproposedpoliciesofBrazil,suggest that stringent patent standards better serve the pursuit of innovation than weakerstandards, such as they exist in theUS andEU.While the latter standards have led to a crisis inpharmaceutical innovation and in pricing of new medicines, rendering essential medicinesinaccessible, more stringent patent standards have the potential to rescue pharmaceuticalinnovation, as well as increase access to medicines. In this regard the Panel Report states inRecommendation2.6.1(a)
“WTO Members must make full use of the policy space available in Article 27 of the TRIPSAgreementbyadoptingandapplyingrigorousdefinitionsofinventionandpatentabilitythatcurtailtheevergreeningtoensurethatpatentsareonlyawardedwhengenuineinnovationhasoccurred.”
In addressing the requirement that countries adopt stringent patent standards, thePanelReportdeliberated on the existing model for financing research and development (R&D) into healthtechnologiesnamely,rewardinginnovativeactivitywithpatentmonopolies,andconcludedthat ithasproducedimpedimentstoaccessandinnovation:
![Page 5: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
4
“it also has created important tensions because of high prices, and fuelled policy incoherenciesthroughtheapplicationofexclusivity-drivenbusinessmodels.Becausethissystemispredicatedontheabilitytogenerateprofit,governmentsandthebiomedicalindustryhaveoftenfailedtodelivernew health technologies for diseases that do not, and cannot, promise high returns—those thatmostlyafflictthepoorregardlessofwheretheymaylive.”
Ingeneral,well-designedIPpoliciesandlegislationcanbeausefulbutimperfectpolicyinstrumentin promoting innovation, technology transfer, R&D, industrial development and -more broadly -economicgrowth,butonlyifanti-competitiverisksareavoidedandifIPstandards,exceptionsandexemptionsallowformutualbenefitsofIPrightsholdersandusersinthepublicinterest.
The correct framing of a well-tailored IP policy does not relate to innovation and developmentobjectives only, as is acknowledged in the Framework. The Constitution and South Africa’saccession to various international and regional human rights conventions impose human rightsobligations on the state, including the right to access health care and the corresponding right ofaccess to essential medicines. In addition, South Africa’s population is entitled, under relevanthuman rights norms, to share in the benefits of scientific advancement. These human rightsprinciplesoughttohavebeendirectlyaddressedintheFramework.
ItwouldbeappropriatethatthedevelopmentofIPpolicybeginswithreferencetotheBillofRights,themostrelevantandurgentofwhicharetherighttoaccesshealthcare,includingmedicines,therighttoeducation,includingtherighttoeducationalmaterials,andtherighttojustadministrativeaction.
Thisframingmustinformtheobjectivesofthepolicywhich,wesuggest,shouldseekto:engendertheethosoftheConstitution,mostparticularlyhumanrightsobligationspertainingtohealth;strikeabalancebetween the creators and theusersof IP and thepublic at large; stimulate innovation,including incremental innovation and adaption appropriate to national needs; promote publichealth and the right to health and of access tomedicinesmore broadly; and promote access toknowledge.
OurapproachisthustoengagewiththeFrameworkinasympatheticandconstructiveyetcriticalmanner.InthefollowingsubmissionwemakecommentsontheprovisionsoftheFrameworkand,whereappropriate,offerrecommendations.
Insum,werecommendthat:
• TheGovernmentshouldsetstrictguidelinesandtimeframesforthefinalisationofpolicyinthisareaandthedraftingofrelevantimplementinglegislation.
• In themeantime, thedti should initiate regulatory and sub-regulatory reforms, includingpharmaceuticalpatentexaminationguidelines,thatwouldclarifyandtightenpatentabilitycriteria for pharmaceuticals, and allow for immediate patent examination in this area ofvitalnationalinterest.
• Theimplementationofasubstantivesearchandexaminationsystemshouldbeprioritised,andtherelevantlegislationpromulgatedtofacilitatesubstantiveexaminationbeyondmereformalities. Clarifying this issue would, for example, allow the dti to take forwardexaminationofpharmaceuticalandotherhealthtechnology-relatedpatentsasamatterofurgency,especiallyasithasalreadyhiredandistrainingacadreofpatentexaminers.
• Legislationshouldbewrittenincorporatingallpublichealthflexibilities,including:
![Page 6: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
5
• The immediate amendment/repeal of Patent Regulations 40 and 41, in order tofacilitate substantive examination of patent applications and to fully complywiththeintentofsection34ofthePatentsAct;
• The introductionofexaminationguidelines linked tostrictpatentability standardswithproscriptiononminormodificationstoorvariationsofknownsubstances,newuseandnewformulationpatentstopreventever-greening;
• Full disclosure in patent applications including their foreign status and, whenavailable, the InternationalNon-proprietaryname(INN)ofpharmaceutical-relatedpatents;
• Pre- and post-grant opposition procedures, accessible to all interested parties(widelydefined);
• Parallelimportationunderanexplicitinternationalexhaustionregime;• Expansive compulsory licensing and government use provisions, including
simplified procedures, expanded (including public health) grounds for grant, andremunerationguidelinesforlowpercentageroyalties;
• Compulsorylicencestoremedyanti-competitiveconduct;• Extensive early working exceptions, as well as other exceptions for educational,
scientificandresearchpurposes;and• Exclusion of diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical methods; plants, animals and
geneticmaterial.Wesubmit that thesemeasuresareall compliantwith theTRIPSAgreementand, further,havelongbeenproposedbyvariousinternationalexpertpanels,includingthemostrecentUNSecretary-General’sHighLevelPanel.TheprocessofreformingSouthAfrica’sIPlawshasbeenaninordinatelylongone.Giventhecriticalpublichealthandpublicinterestissuesatstake,wecannotover-emphasisetheneedtomovewithutmosturgencytofinalisethepolicy.The remainder of this document provides detailed comments for many of the sectionscontainedintheIPConsultativeFrameworkdocument.Wewillbeavailabletoelaborateonoursubmissionifrequired.
![Page 7: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
6
IntellectualPropertyConsultativeFramework–Section-by-SectionReview 1.Purpose......................................................................................................................................................................................7
2.Strategy..................................................................................................................................................................................11
3.Inter-MinisterialCommittee(IMC)onIP................................................................................................................13
4.Immediateissues...............................................................................................................................................................14
4.1Immediatedomesticreview..................................................................................................................................14
4.1.1Localmanufactureandexportinlinewithindustrialpolicy..........................................................16
4.1.2SubstantiveSearchandExamination........................................................................................................18
4.1.3PatentOpposition..............................................................................................................................................21
4.1.4PatentabilityCriteria........................................................................................................................................21
4.1.5DisclosureRequirements...............................................................................................................................22
4.1.6ParallelImportation.........................................................................................................................................23
4.1.7Exceptions.............................................................................................................................................................24
4.1.8VoluntaryLicenses............................................................................................................................................25
4.1.9CompulsoryLicenses.......................................................................................................................................25
4.1.9.1Judicialprocess..........................................................................................................................................27
4.1.9.2Adequateremuneration.........................................................................................................................28
4.1.9.3Governmentuse.........................................................................................................................................28
4.1.9.4Compulsorylicensesforexport..........................................................................................................29
4.1.9.5Compulsorylicensestoremedyanti-competitivepractices..................................................29
4.1.10IPandCompetition....................................................................................................................................30
4.2Internationalbestpractice–aBRICSperspective.......................................................................................33
4.3Internationalcommitments...................................................................................................................................34
4.3.1GeographicalIndications(GIs)....................................................................................................................38
5.In-BuiltAgenda...................................................................................................................................................................39
5.1Mediumterm................................................................................................................................................................39
5.2Monitoringandevaluation.....................................................................................................................................43
![Page 8: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
7
1.Purpose Ourcomments
i.TheNationalDevelopmentPlan(NDP)callsforgreateremphasisoninnovation,improvedproductivity,moreintensivepursuitofaknowledgeeconomyandbetterexploitationofcomparativeandcompetitiveadvantages.Intellectualproperty(IP)isanimportantpolicyinstrumentinpromotinginnovation,technologytransfer,researchanddevelopment(R&D),industrialdevelopmentandmorebroadly–economicgrowth.
IPisonepolicyinstrument,amongothers,topromoteeconomicandsocialdevelopment.EvidenceconcerningtheimpactsofIPoninnovationandmoreparticularlyontechnologytransfer,R&Dinvestments,andindustrialdevelopmentandeconomicgrowthiscontested,especiallyinlowandmiddleincomecountries.
Well-designedIPpoliciesandlegislationcanbeausefulbutstillimperfectpolicyinstrumentinpromotinginnovation,technologytransfer,researchanddevelopment(R&D),industrialdevelopmentandmorebroadly-economicgrowth,butonlyifanti-competitiverisksareavoidedandifIPstandards,exceptionsandexemptionsallowformutualbenefitsofusersinthepublicinterest.
Innovationisaworthygoal,andakeyaspectoftheeconomicgrowthstrategiesofothercomparabledevelopingcountries.Inthisregard,inadditiontotheconsiderablescholarlyliteraturesuggestingathinconnectionbetweenIPandinnovation,itshouldbenotedthattheexperienceofIndia,andtheproposedpoliciesofBrazil,suggestthathigher,morestringentpatentstandards(suchastheyexistinIndia,andareproposedinBrazil)betterservethepursuitofinnovationoverlower,weakerstandards,suchastheyexistintheUSandEU.Whilethelatterstandardshaveledtoacrisisinpharmaceuticalinnovation,renderingessentialmedicinesinaccessible,higher,morerigorouspatentstandardshavethepotentialtorescuepharmaceuticalinnovation,aswellasincreaseaccesstomedicines.
Thecurrentformulationplacesanover-emphasisoneconomicconsiderations(suchascompetitiveadvantages)oversocialimperatives(accesstoknowledge-basedgoods).
ItisalsodisconcertingthattheconceptofhumanrightsisnotmentionedonceintheFramework,whichisindicativeoftheconceptualdivideinseekingabalancebetweenIPprotectionandhumanrights.
ii.Government’sexperiencetodatehasshownthatIPisavast,interdisciplinaryfieldthatimplicatesabroadrangeofgovernmentdepartmentsandagencies.Therefore,itisimpossibleforoneMinistry,absentextensiveinter-
Inter-governmentalandstakeholderconsultationisimportant,butSouthAfrica’sIPpoliciesconcerningpharmaceuticalpatentshavebeenunderreviewforalongtimeandreformsareurgentlyneeded.TheGovernmentofSouthAfricashouldsetstrictguidelinesandtimelinesforthefinalisationofpolicyinthisareaandthedraftingofrelevantimplementinglegislation.Inthemeantime,thedtishouldinitiateregulatoryandsub-regulatoryreforms,including
![Page 9: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
8
governmentalconsultationandcollaborationtopresentabroadlyrepresentativegovernmentalperspective.ThesamecanbesaidofthenumeroussectorsofsocietythatareaffectedbyIP.
pharmaceuticalpatentexaminationguidelines,thatwouldclarifyandtightenpatentabilitycriteriaforpharmaceuticals,andallowforimmediatepatentexaminationinthisareaofvitalnationalinterest.
iii.ThepurposeofthisdocumentisnottoprescribeSouthAfrica’sIPpolicyposition,buttoputforwardtheperspectiveofthedtiinaconsultativeinstrumenttofacilitatewhatwillbecontinuousengagementwithgovernmentalpartnersandsocietyatlarge.ThisinourviewisthebestwaytorendertheformulationofSouthAfrica’sIPpolicyajointprojectthatadoptsacoordinatedapproach.
Thisframingthatsuggestsaprotractedadditionalperiodofconsultationwithgovernmentpartnersandotherstakeholdersthatcouldunreasonablydelayneededreforms.Injustthepastfiveyears,itislikelythatSouthAfricahasgrantedover10,000pharmaceuticalpatents,manyofwhichwouldhavebeenrejectedevenintheUSandEurope.
iv.Theextentofpublicengagement;theinternalcapacityofgovernmentsonIPmatters;andthedegreeofgovernmentco-ordinationarekeyfactorsinnationalIPpolicyformulationandlawreform.thedtiaimstoensurethatthedevelopmentofSouthAfrica’sIPpolicytakesintoaccountthesefundamentalprinciples.TheIPConsultativeFrameworkwillserveasatoolinpursuingthisapproach.
Therehasalreadybeenanintensemulti-yearperiodofpublicengagementonthepharmaceuticalpatent-relatedaspectofSouthAfrica’semergentIPpolicy.AlthoughthisConsultativeFrameworkisperhapsausefulstepinfinalisingtheconsultativeprocess,dtiandotherrelevantministriesmustpromptlyfinaliseactualpolicyandthenproceedexpeditiouslytoacceleratetheresultinglegalreformsrequired.
Indoingso,thepolicyneedstofocusnotonlyonsubjectiveissuessuchascapacityconstraints,butalsoanelaborationoftheexternalcontextsuchasthedevelopmentalchallengesfacingSouthAfricathatneedtodriveIPreform,namelytheproblemsofthelackofaccesstomedicines,educationalmaterialsandotherpublicgoods.
v.SouthAfricarequiresacoordinatedandbalancedapproachtoIPthatprovideseffectiveprotectionofIPrights(IPRs)andrespondstoSouthAfrica’suniqueinnovationanddevelopmentdynamics.SouthAfrica’sIPPolicymustengendertheethosoftheConstitutionandcomplementthecountry’sindustrialpolicyandbroadersocio-economicdevelopmentobjectives.Hence,theIPPolicy
Thecorrectframingforawell-tailoredIPpolicydoesnotrelatetoinnovationanddevelopmentobjectivesonly,asisacknowledgedelsewhereinthisframework.TheSouthAfricanConstitutionandSouthAfrica’saccessiontovariousinternationalandregionalhumanrightsconventionsimposeshumanrightsobligationsonthecountry,includingtherighttoaccesshealthcareandthecorrespondingrightofaccesstoessentialmedicines.Inaddition,SouthAfrica’spopulationisentitled,underrelevanthumanrightsnorms,toshareinthebenefitsofscientificadvancement.Thesehumanrightsprinciplesshouldbedirectlyaddressedinthisprovision.
![Page 10: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
9
mustbeinformedinteraliabytheConstitution,NDP,theNationalIndustrialPolicyFramework(NIPF)andthevariousiterationsoftheIndustrialPolicyActionPlan(IPAP).Itshouldalsobealignedtothecountry’sobjectivesofpromotinglocalmanufacturing,competitivenessandtransformationofindustryinSouthAfrica.
vi.Increasingly,IPisdiscussedinvariousinternationalforumssuchastheWorldIntellectualPropertyOrganization(WIPO),TheWorldTradeOrganization(WTO),theGroupofTwenty(G20),theOrganizationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD)andinengagementswithtradepartners.ThisrequiresacoordinatedSouthAfricanapproachtoIPmattersinformedbySouthAfrica’sdevelopmentimperatives.
Inaddition,theUnitedNationsSecretary-General’sHighLevelPanelonAccesstoMedicineshasjustaddressedindetailthepolicyincoherencebetweenIPandtrade,humanrights,andpublichealth.Furthermore,SouthAfricaispartytovariousunderstandingswithregionalpartners,includingSADCandtheAfricanUnionwhich,amongothermatters,directlyaddressobligationstoactonpublichealthcrises,includingHIV,tuberculosis,andmalaria,andtheneedtoutilisealllegallypermissiblepublichealthflexibilitiesundertheWTOAgreementonTradeRelatedAspectsofIntellectualPropertyRightsandtheDohaDeclarationontheTRIPSAgreementandPublicHealth.
RegardmustalsobehadtotheReportoftheSpecialRapporteurinthefieldofculturalrights:Patentpolicyandtherighttoscienceandculture(OfficeoftheHighCommissionerforHumanRights(OHCHR).HumanRightsCouncil70thSession,4August2015,UNGeneralAssembly,NewYork).
OthermajorforaofdiscussionaroundIPRsarebilateralandregionaltradenegotiations,wheredevelopingandleastdevelopedcountriesareoftencoercedintoagreeingtoTRIPS-plusstandardsofIPRprotection.Inthiscontext,thestatementsunderInternationalcommitments(4.3ix)oftheFrameworkarewelcomed.
vii.TheSouthAfricanConstitutionguaranteestherighttopropertyandthatnolawmaypermitarbitrarydeprivationofproperty.IntermsoftheConstitution,propertyisnotlimitedtolandandwouldbyimplicationincludeIP.ThisinterpretationisconsistentwithConstitutionalCourt
ItisappropriatethatthedevelopmentofIPpolicybeginswithreferencetotherelevantrightsintheBillofRights,themostrelevantandurgentofwhicharetherighttoaccesshealthcare,includingmedicines,therighttoeducation,includingtherighttoeducationalmaterials,andtherighttojustadministrativeaction.
TheassertionthattheSouthAfricanConstitutionunambiguouslyguaranteespropertyrightswithrespecttointellectualpropertyisinaccurate.Section25,whichdealswithproperty,statesthatno-onemaybearbitrarilydeprived
![Page 11: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
10
jurisprudence.Inaddition,theConstitutionprovidesabalancedapproachtopropertyrightsbyalsotakingintoaccountpublicinterest.Inthisregard,publicinterestincludesthenation'scommitmenttobringaboutreformsthatpromoteequitableaccess.AbalancedapproachwillbetakeninthedevelopmentoftheIPpolicyinlinewiththeConstitution.
ofpropertyordeprivedofpropertywithoutcompensation.Thisisnotequivalenttoaconstitutionalrighttopropertysuchasisfoundintheconstitutionsofsomecountries.InCertificationoftheConstitutionoftheRepublicofSouthAfrica,1996(CCT23/96)[1996]ZACC26http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/1996/26.html,theConstitutionalCourtconsideredtheclaimthatIPrightsarea“universallyacceptedfundamentalright,freedomandcivilliberty”,andconcludedthatsuchaninterpretation“cannotbecharacterisedasatrendwhichisuniversallyaccepted”.
WhileitisaccuratetosaythattheConstitutionrequiresabalancedapproachtowhatisproperlyconsideredpropertybytakingintoaccountpublicinterest,theConstitution’shumanrightsobligationsactuallyrequiretheGovernmentofSouthAfricatoprioritisetherighttohealthasaprimaryobjective.
DespiteUNorganssuchastheCommitteeonEconomicSocial&CulturalRightsreportingthatArt15oftheInternationalCovenantonEconomicSocialandCulturalRights(ICESCR)shouldalwaysbeinterpretedtoprioritisehumanrightsoverpropertyrights,SouthAfricancourtshaveroutinelydeferredtoIPRsingrantinginterdictsagainstallegedinfringersofpatentsbeforeafullhearingonrevocationproceedings-seePfizervCipla(2005)ZACCP;AventisvCipla(2012)ZASCA.
ThusitisimperativethattheIPpolicyprovideclarityonthegovernment’spositiononthisissue.
viii.Asstatedinparagraph7oftheAfricanGroup’sproposalfortheestablishmentofaDevelopmentAgendaforWIPO:
“IPisjustonemechanismamongmanyforbringingaboutdevelopment.ItshouldbeusedtosupportandenhancethelegitimateeconomicaspirationsofalldevelopingcountriesincludingLDCs,especiallyinthedevelopmentoftheirproductiveforces,comprisingofbothhumanandnaturalresources.IPshouldtherefore,becomplementaryandnotdetrimentaltoindividualnationaleffortsatdevelopment,bybecomingaveritabletoolfor
TheassertionthatIPRprotectionenableseconomicgrowthisoverstatedandnotsupportedbyevidence.ResearchindicatesthatincreasedIPprotectionappearstohavelittleeffectinthedevelopingcountrycontext,andthatdomesticinnovationacceleratesincountrieswithhigherlevelsofeconomicdevelopment,educationalattainmentandeconomicfreedom.Further,strengtheningpatentrightsresultsinanincreaseinfilingsfromforeignapplicants,withnoeffectonfilingsbylocalinventors.Finally,thecorrelationbetweenstrongIPprotectionandforeigndirectinvestmentisyettobeestablished.
![Page 12: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
11
economicgrowth”.
ix.ThisdocumentraisesdiscussionpointsandproposesawayforwardforSouthAfricatoensureadevelopment-orientedIPpolicywhichiscognizantoftheinternational,regionalanddomesticcontext.Assuch,itproceedsfromthebasisthattheIPpolicyshouldadvancethefollowingobjectives:
a.EngendertheethosoftheConstitution.
b.Alignthecountry’sIPregimetoitsNDPandindustrialpolicy.
c.Developaco-ordinatedintergovernmentalapproachtoIP.
d.StrikeabalancebetweenthecreatorsandusersofIP.
e.Stimulateinnovation.
f.Facilitatethedevelopmentofkeyindustrieswhilestrikingabalancewiththepublicinterest.
g.Contributetotheattractionofforeigndirectinvestmentandtechnologytransfer.
h.AdoptacoordinatedapproachtoIPinsub-regional,regionalandinternationalforums.
i.Promotepublichealth.
Thisisanimportantandconstructivesection,buttherighttohealthandofaccesstoessentialmedicinesneedsgreaterspecificationandprioritisation,especiallysincethisconsultativedocumentisfocusedonpharmaceuticalpatents.Thestatedobjectivesshouldberevisedasfollows:
a.EngendertheethosoftheConstitution,mostparticularlyhumanrightsobligationspertainingtohealth.
d.StrikeabalancebetweenthecreatorsandtheusersofIPandthepublicatlarge.
e.Stimulateinnovation,includingincrementalandadaptionappropriatetonationalneeds.
i.Promotepublichealthandtherighttohealthandofaccesstomedicinesmorebroadly.
and
j.promoteaccesstoknowledge.
2.Strategy Ourcomments
i.TheIPpolicyiseagerlyawaitedinviewoftheimportantissuesandintereststhatitwillaffect.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
![Page 13: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
12
Hence,thereisaneedtoassurethepublicthatgovernmentrecognizestheurgencyandimportanceofreforminkeyareas.Ontheotherhand,urgencycannotbeareasontosacrificetherequisitedepthofanalysisinwhatarehighlytechnical,importantandcontentiousissues.
ii.Asameansofstrikingabalancebetweentheneedforurgentactioninsomeareasandfurtherindepthstudyinothers,itissuggestedthattheissuesbecategorizedasimmediate,mediumtermandmonitoringandevaluation.
Thephasedapproachissupported.Inaddition,thereisaneedtodefinemoreclearlykeyprocessessuchas:
• Theimmediateamendment/repealofPatentRegulations40and41,inordertofacilitatesubstantiveexaminationofpatentapplications;
Theintroductionofexaminationguidelineslinkedtostrictpatentabilitystandards.Suchchangeswouldensurefullcompliancewithsection34ofthePatentAct(theAct)whichprovides:‘TheregistrarshallexamineintheprescribedmannereveryapplicationforapatentandeverycompletespecificationaccompanyingsuchapplicationorlodgedatthepatentofficeinpursuanceofsuchapplicationandifitcomplieswiththerequirementsofthisAct,heshallacceptit’.
TheActrequiresmorethanmerecompliancewithformalities,andenvisagessubstantiveexaminationoftheapplicationaccordingtothepatentabilitycriterialistedinsection25(1).
iii.Theimmediateissueswillbeanalyzedandindepth,tangiblereformssuggestedinconsultationwithintergovernmentalpartnersandexternalstakeholders.Finitetimelineswouldbeattachedtothese.
Itispositivetosuggestfinitetimelinesforimmediateissues,suchaspharmaceuticalIPpolicy,butitshouldrequire“finiteandexpeditious”timelines.
Inadditiontotheprocessesmentionedunderourcommentsto(ii)above,stepsmustbetakentooperationaliseoppositionprocedures,permittedexceptionsandotherflexibilities.
iv.Themediumtermissuesformpartofthein-builtagenda.Thesearekeyareasthatrequirefurtherin-depthstudy.ThisshouldbedoneinaccordancewithinternationalbestpracticessuchasWIPOmethodologiesandinformedbydomesticpriorities.Moreflexibletimelineswould
ItiscontestablethatWIPOmethodologiesrepresentinternationalbestpractices.AsSouthAfricaandotherdevelopingcountriesfrequentlyassert,WIPO’sdevelopmentpoliciesarestillunderdevelopedandunder-implemented,andarenotproperlyreflectedinitstechnicalassistanceandguidancedocuments.Thisisparticularlytruewithrespecttopharmaceuticalsandaccessconcerns.
Inaddition,SAshouldlooktootherdevelopingcountryexemplarsindesigningitsregulatorysystem,suchas
![Page 14: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
13
applytothese.
Argentina,IndiaandBrazil.
v.ThemonitoringandevaluationofexistinginitiativeswouldbeundertakenwiththeviewtoundertakingimpactassessmentandalignmentwiththebroaderIPPolicywherenecessary.Flexibletimelineswouldbeapplicable.
Impactassessments,whetherofcurrentorfutureinitiatives,mustincludehumanrightsimpactassessmentsasrecommendedintheReportoftheSpecialRapporteurinthefieldofculturalrights:Patentpolicyandtherighttoscienceandculture,referredtoabove.
vi.Itisproposedthereforethatinlightoftheurgency,importance,highpublicprofileaswellasthestronginstitutionalcapacityandexperiencepossessedbygovernmentontheintersectionbetweenIPandpublichealthwhichcoversamongothersmedicines,vaccinesanddiagnostics,thisareatogetherwithitsmultiplicityofsub-issuesshouldbetheimmediatepriority.ItisalsoimportanttopursueareaswhereSouthAfricahasinternationalcommitmentssuchasgeographicalindications(GIs)tocomplywithandtakeadvantageofopportunitiescontainedininternationalagreements.
Itiscompletelyappropriatefordtitoidentifythisareaasoneofimmediatepriorityandurgency.
Theprioritisationofpublichealthandtheconstitutionalethos/humanrightsapproachtointerpretingIPissuesintheFrameworkiswelcomed.Thisprincipleshouldinformpolicy,implementationandultimatelyjudicialdecisions.
vii.Prioritizingtheseissuesaffordsanopportunitytoestablishpublicconfidenceintheprocessbeingundertakenbygovernment.Thiswillserveuswellgoingforwardaswepursuethebroaderin-builtagendaoncetheimmediateissueshavebeenaddressed.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
3.Inter-MinisterialCommittee(IMC)onIP Ourcomments
i.Giventhecrosscuttingnatureof ‘Inter-Ministerial’appearstobeusedinterchangeablywith
![Page 15: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
14
IP,ensuringinter-governmentalcoordinationiskey.WhilethedtimayleadonIP,onlyacollaborativeeffortcanharnessthecollectiveresourcesingovernmenttothebenefitofthepeopleofSouthAfrica
ii.ThecommitteemustbecomprisedofgovernmentofficialsresponsibleforimplementingprogramsthateitheraffectorareaffectedbyIP.
‘inter-governmental’(thelatterisamisnomerhere,asitusuallymeansbetweengovernments).
ThiscommitteemustbepromptlyconvenedanditmustfinalisetherelevantIPpolicyframeworkconcerningpharmaceuticalsandotherhealthtechnologiesasamatterofurgency.
Itiscrucialthatthiscommitteecompriseshigh-leveldecision-makersforthesakeofexpeditionandprogress.
iii.Intheimmediateterm,theIMCwouldserveasaconsultativeforumaimedatachievingacoordinatedapproachtotheIPpolicyformulationprocess.Thisfunctionwouldcontinueaswepursuethebroaderin–builtagenda.Thereafter,thecommitteewouldensureimplementationoftheIPpolicyingovernmentprograms.
Thisconsultativeforumshouldbeabletoreadilyfeeditsinputsincabinetdecision-makingprocesses,fortablingofdraftlegislationandregulations.
iv.AnotherkeyfunctionthatthecommitteewouldserveistoensureaconsistentandcoherentgovernmentapproachtomultilateralIPforums.Toachievethisend,theIMCshouldworkcloselywithgovernmentofficialsrepresentingSouthAfricaatmultilateralforumstoensureharmonizednegotiatingpositions.
ConsistencyisbestachievediftheIMCisahigh-levelorganwhichpromotescoherenceinpolicyandnegotiationsatinternationalandregionallevels.
4.Immediateissues
4.1Immediatedomesticreview Ourcomments
i.TheSouthAfricangovernmenthasaproudhistoryofrobustlyengagingwithissuesthatconcern
Thisisanimportantpoint.SouthAfricaneedstocontinueand,infact,escalateitsroleinthisregard.
![Page 16: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
15
theintersectionbetweenIPandpublichealth.Indeedthegovernment’sstanceinPMAvthePresidentoftheRepublicofSouthAfricawasakeyfactorleadingtoglobaldialoguearoundthepotentiallynegativeimpactofIPRsonpublichealth,culminatingintheDohaDeclarationonTRIPSandPublicHealth.
ii.SouthAfricahasbeenakeyplayerintheglobalrecognitionthatthedutyowedbyStatestosafeguardpublichealthisnotinconsistentwiththeirconcomitantresponsibilitytohonorinternationaltreatyobligations.Tellingly,paragraph4oftheDohaDeclarationonTRIPSandPublicHealthstatesasfollows:
“WeagreethattheTRIPSAgreementdoesnotandshouldnotpreventmembersfromtakingmeasurestoprotectpublichealth.Accordingly,whilereiteratingourcommitmenttotheTRIPSAgreement,weaffirmthattheAgreementcanandshouldbeinterpretedandimplementedinamannersupportiveofWTOmembers'righttoprotectpublichealthand,inparticular,topromoteaccesstomedicinesforall.”
Thisisanimportantpoint.SouthAfricaneedstocontinueand,infact,escalateitsroleinthisregard.
iii.Havingsaidthis,theSouthAfricangovernmenthastodatenotmadefulluseoftheflexibilitywithininternationallawthroughthepursuitofappropriatepolicyandlegislation.ThisisdespiteaConstitutionalimperativetoincreaseaccesstomedicinesasacomponentoftheState’sobligationtotakereasonablemeasurestowardtherealizationoftherighttohealthcareservices.
ItisextremelyimportantthattheGovernmentacknowledgesthatithasnotmadefulluseofallowableflexibilitiesininternationallawandthatithasaConstitutionalimperativetoincrease,indeedtoprioritise,accesstomedicines.InthisregarditisalsoimportanttonotethattheUNSecretaryGeneral’sHighLevelPanelFinalReportonAccesstoMedicinesstatesthatcountriesmustadoptstringentstandardsofpatentabilityandthattheyshouldadoptallotherTRIPS-compliantflexibilities.
Thepolicyshouldrequire,amongothers:• Strictpatentingstandardswithproscriptiononnew
![Page 17: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
16
Indeed,thisConstitutionalimperativeisreflectedingovernmentpoliciessuchastheNDPandtheNationalDrugPolicyforSouthAfrica.ItisaptthattheIPPolicyshouldsupporttheseinstruments.
useandnewformulationpatentstopreventever-greening;
• Fulldisclosureinpatentapplications;• Pre-andpost-grantoppositionprocedures;• Parallelimportationunderanexplicitinternationalexhaustionregime;
• Expansivecompulsorylicensingandgovernmentuseprovisions(simplifiedprocedures,expandedgroundsforgrant,remunerationguidelineswithlowpercentageroyalties);
• Compulsorylicencesforanti-competitiveconduct;• Extensiveearlyworkingexceptions,aswellasotherexceptionsforeducational,scientificandresearchpurposes;and
• Exclusionofdiagnostic,therapeuticandsurgicalmethods;plants,animalsandgeneticmaterial.
iv.Whatfollowsisadiscussionofkeyareasidentifiedbythedtiasdomainswhereamoreequitablebalancecouldbestruckbetweenprivateandpublicinterest.Thepurposeofhighlightingtheseissuesistogarnertheviewsofgovernmentalpartnersonhowbesttoachieveanappropriatebalance.TheaimistoensurethatSouthAfricaprotectsIPRsandatthesametimeachievesitsobjectivesofpromotingnationaldevelopmentimperativeswhichincludeamongothersboostinglocalmanufacturing,innovationandensuringequitableaccesstomedicines.Thiswillrequiredevelopmentofanappropriateframeworkforgrantingpatents.Anumberofinterventionsasoutlinedbelowwillbeexplored.
Itisappropriatethatthedtishouldseektheinputofotherrelevantgovernmentalpartners,butitisvitalthatthedtishoulddomoretoassertitsopiniononsomeofthekeypolicyissuesidentified,mostespeciallypatentabilitycriteria.Theprocessrisksbeingfurtherdelayedifthedti,thedepartmentwiththemostexpertise,doesnotarticulateclearpositionsoncertaincontestedissuesandindicateitspreferredpolicyapproachasaguidetoothergovernmentpartners’deliberations.
4.1.1Localmanufactureandexportinlinewithindustrialpolicy Ourcomments
i.ThePharmaceuticalsindustryisoneoftheprioritysectors
Industrialpolicyisanimportantdevelopmentgoal,tobecloselyalignedwithotherequally,ifnotmore,important
![Page 18: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
17
identifiedbyIPAP.ThecontributionofmanufacturinginthisindustrytoSouthAfrica’sGDPhasdeclinedfrom1.6-1.1%overthepast6years.Havingsaidthis,thesectorprovidesdirectemploymenttoapproximately10,000peopleandthedownstreamsegmentprovidesapproximately25,000jobs.
goalssuchastherealisationoftheuniversalrighttohealththroughenablingaccesstocheapergenericmedicines.
SouthAfricacurrentlysourcesapproximately38%ofitssupplyfromoriginatorcompanies(MNCs),andapproximately58%fromgenericfirms(predominantlylocal).InIndia,theBRICScountrywhereaccesstomedicinesisarguablyatthehighestlevel,supplyfromMNCsaccountsforapproximately20%ofthemarket,asagainstapproximately80%whichissuppliedbygenericcompanies,predominantlylocalindustry.GivenSouthAfrica’srelativelydevelopedgenericdrugindustry,thiswouldsuggestthatanysoundindustrialpolicystrategyonIPshouldseektogrowthebaseoftheSouthAfricandomesticgenericdrugindustry,thusboostinglocalproduction,skills,andemployment.
ii.Thelocalpharmaceuticalmarket(atwo-tierpharmaceuticalmarket,dividedintothepublicandprivatemarket)isthelargestinSub-SaharanAfricaandworthatotalestimatedR40billion.AccordingtotheNationalAssociation,thecountryspent8.7%
ofitsGDPonhealthcarein2014passingthe5%recommendedbyWHO.
Itisalsoatwo-tiermarketintermsofproduction,asstatedabove,with58%ofthemarketheldbyMNCsandabout38%ofthemarketheldbySouthAfricangenericdrugcompanies.
iii.Despitethesefigures,theSouthAfricanpharmaceuticalssectorisstillrelativelysmallbyinternationalstandards,constitutingamere0.4%and1%oftheglobalmarketbyvalueandvolumerespectively.ThereistremendouspotentialforthissectortogrowandcontributefurtherjobstotheSouthAfricaneconomy.
SouthAfricacancertainlylearnfromtheexperienceofIndia,thedevelopingcountrywhichhasmostsuccessfullycreatedandmaintainedapharmaceuticalindustry,whichitdidsobyinstitutinghighstandardsforpatentability,pre-andpost-grantoppositionandotherpro-accessprovisions.
iv.GrowthofthedomesticpharmaceuticalindustrywillcontributetosustainabilityofsupplyandallowthecountrytofulfillkeyhealthobjectivesoftheNationalDrugPolicy,inparticular,toensuretheavailabilityand
Growingalocallyowned,domesticpharmaceuticalindustrywillnotonlycontributetothehealthandwellbeingofSouthAfricansbyincreasingaccesstomedicines,butalsotopromotingthelocaleconomy,intermsofemploymentandcontributiontotheGDP,anddevelopmentofskills.
![Page 19: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
18
accessibilityofessentialdrugs.Itisestimatedthat65%ofdomesticdemandismetbyimportsandthatmedicalproductsarethe5thlargestcontributortoSouthAfrica’stradedeficit.Whileimportsareanimportantsourceofmedicines,increasingdomesticcapacitybypromotingbeneficiationandlocalizationwillensuresecurityofsupply,giveninteraliathatthecountry’suniquediseaseburdennecessitatesdrugsformulatedusingspecificactivepharmaceuticalingredients(APIs)ofwhichglobalsupplyislimited.
v.ProjectKetlaphelaisagovernmentdriveninitiativeaimedatestablishingafullyintegratedpharmaceuticalcompany.TheentitywillengageinthemanufactureofAPIsandintheshort-mediumterm,tabletformulationtargetingtheburdenofdiseasesinitiallyforSouthAfricaandsubsequentlyexpandingintotheSouthernAfricanDevelopmentCommunity(SADC).Thiswillbekeytoincreasingthedomesticcomponentofthesupplyofgenericantiretrovirals(ARVs)andimprovingsecurityofsupplybothdomesticallyandsub-regionally.SouthAfrica’sIPregimeshouldcomplementthecountry’sindustrialdevelopmentambitionsastheypertaintokeysectorssuchaspharmaceuticals.
SouthAfricanremainsarelativelysmallmarket,andtheroutetodevelopingtheindustryliesinbecomingasuppliertootherdevelopingcountries,particularlyinSouthernAfrica.Thefutureofthedomesticindustrydoesnotrequirepatentmonopolies,butthefreedomtomakemedicinesthatcanbeexportedtoleastdevelopedcountriesanddevelopingcountries,asaffirmedintheDohaDeclaration.
ManyaccesstomedicineseffortsrelyonSouthAfrica’scapacitytosupplythesouthernAfricanregionandbeyond.ThelicencesnegotiatedwithMNCsaftertheTACCompetitionCommissioncasesintheperiod2002-2004haveappliedtoallSADCcountries.
WhileProjectKetlaphelaisanimportantinitiative,inadditiontheenablingframeworktoaccesscheapergenericmedicinesfrommultipleproducersshouldimmediatelybeputinplace.
4.1.2SubstantiveSearchandExamination Ourcomments
i.ItisamatterofmuchdebatethatSouthAfricadoesnotconduct
Thedepositorysystemisarelicofthecolonialera,duringwhichthecolonieswereexpectedtograntblanketapproval
![Page 20: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
19
substantivesearchandexamination(SSE)priortothegrantofpatents.Section34ofthePatentsAct57of1978(PatentsAct)readtogetherwithRegulations40and41ofthePatentRegulations,1978(PatentRegulations)havetheeffectthattheCompaniesandIntellectualPropertyCommission(CIPC)onlyconductsexaminationinrelationtotheformalitiesoftheapplication.Hence,SouthAfricaemploysasocalleddepositorysystem.ThemajorbenefitofthedepositorysystemisthatitplacesthecostofsubstantiveexaminationonpartiesthataredirectlyinterestedinthepatentintheeventthatthegrantofapatentischallengedattheleveloftheCommissionerofPatents.ThisallowstheStatetoallocatescarcetechnicalskillstowardinfrastructuredevelopmentandotherkeydevelopmentalareas.Despitethisbenefit,therearemajordrawbacksforboththeproducersandusersofIPresultingfromthedepositorysystemthatrenderitcrucialtoworktowardtheadoptionofSSE.
ofallIPRsgrantedinthemetropolis.Thissystemdisservedthecoloniesinthepast,andcontinuestodosoasdevelopingandleastdevelopedcountriesstruggletocatchuptechnologically.Indiaservesasagoodexampleofthebenefitsoffully-capacitatedpatent-examiningoffice.
Itisextremelyimportantthatthissectionprioritisestheimplementationofasubstantivesearchandexaminationsystem.Itisperhapsimportanttoclarify,however,thattherelevantlegislationactuallyallowsforsubstantiveexaminationbeyondmereformalities.Clarifyingthisissuewould,forexample,allowthedtitotakeforwardexaminationofpharmaceuticalandothermedicaltechnologyrelatedpatentsasamatterofurgency,especiallyasithasalreadyhiredandistrainingarelevantcadre.
Themajorbeneficiariesofthedepositorysystemarepatentapplicantsandtheirlawyers,notthepublicwhichhastocontendwithunwarranted(pharmaceutical)patents,longundeservedpatentterms,anddelayedaccesstocheaperdrugs.
Regulations40and41undulycircumscribedtheexaminationfunctionpermittedbysection34,andmustberepealed.
ii.Theunderlyingpolicyrationaleofpatentsistoserveasanincentivetostimulateinnovation.InadoptingSSE,thechallengewillbetoensurethatpatentabilitycriteriaareobservedwhileatthesametimeavoidingbacklogs.ThiswillrequirejudiciousandefficientuseoflimitedStateresources.Severalmodelsarebeingconsidered,includingtheintroductionofonlinepatentsearchesandsubstantiveexaminationthatcombinespartialrecognitionofsearchesandexaminationreportsconductedin
ItisappropriatetorecognisethatSouthAfricaisfreetoprioritiseSSEinthepharmaceuticalsectorandalsothatitscapacityinthisareaisweakatpresent.However,SouthAfricashouldexercisegreatcautioninrelying,evenpartially,onexaminationsconductedbyforeignoffices,especiallyforeignofficesthathaveadoptedlowerstandardsofpatentability(novelty,inventivestep,industrialapplicability,anddisclosure)thanSouthAfrica.Forexample,manycountries,includingtheUnitedStates,countriesinEurope,andJapanapplyrelativelylaxstandardsthatallowpatentingofminormodifications/variationsofknownsubstances,newpharmaceuticalformulations/dosages,andnewusesofmedicines.OneofthemainobjectivesofSouthAfricanpatentlawreformandSSEshouldbetoweedoutundeservingsecondarypatentsinordertopreventthe
![Page 21: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
20
foreignoffices,withfullsubstantiveexaminationincertainfieldspursuanttothecountry’sdevelopmentandpublicinterestconsiderations.Whichevermodelisadopted,therollingoutofSSEmustbedoneinamannerconsistentwiththenondiscriminationrequirementsinArticle27.1oftheTRIPSAgreement.
evergreeningofperiodsofpatentexclusivity.Ontheotherhand,Indiaprovidesamodelprovisiononeliminatingevergreening.
TheadoptionofSSEwillalsobringthepatentsystemintoalignmentwiththeconstitutionalimperativeinsection33offairadministrativeaction,andwilladditionallyneedtoexpandthepresentnarrowstandingrules,inlinewithsection38oftheConstitution,toincludeawidedefinitionofan‘interestedparty’toanyproceedings.
iii.Fundamentally,adoptingaSSEapproachwhichtakesintoconsiderationanation’scapacityconstraintsandlegitimatepublichealthinterestbyprioritizingcertainsectorswouldnotconflictwiththeTRIPSAgreement.TheinterpretationofArticle27.1oftheTRIPSAgreementmustbeconductedinaccordancewiththeViennaConventionontheLawoftheTreaties.ThesaidArticleofTRIPSonlyreferstodiscriminationinrespectofthreehypotheses(theplaceofinvention,thefieldoftechnologyandwhetherproductsareimportedorlocallyproduced)andonlyinrelationtotheavailabilityand'patentrightsenjoyable'.Therefore,thatprovisioncouldnotbethebasisforacomplaintwheretheexaminationofpatents(ahypothesisnotcoveredinArticle27.1)isintroducedforaparticularfieldoftechnologiessincethepatentswouldstillbeavailableandthescopeandcontentofthepatentrightswouldnotbeaffected.
ThiscleararticulationofTRIPScomplianceiscorrectanditishighlyappropriatetoemphasisethis,givenunwarrantedclaimsofdiscriminationraisedbyindustrystakeholdersinthepast.
iv.WeareconsciousthattheimplementationofSSElikeanynewadministrativeproceduremayhaveteethingproblems.Forthisreason,CIPCisconsidering
Guardingagainstbacklogsisimportantbutitisevenmoreimportantthatonlyworthypatentsbegrantedunderstringentpatentabilitycriteria.Someforeignofficesthatare“highlyefficient”enforcelaxerstandardsthanthosethatSouthAfricashouldadopt.Therefore,SouthAfrica
![Page 22: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
21
enteringintooutsourcingarrangementswithcertainpatentofficesthatareknowntobehighlyefficient.Thiswouldbeacontingencyagainsttheaccumulationofinordinatebacklogs.
shouldconsiderreferencetoorpartialrelianceonexaminationsincountrieswithmorestringentstandardssuchasIndiaandArgentina,andshouldconsiderhavingexaminerstrainedbythesepatentoffices,aswellasbyNGOsofferingtechnicalexpertise.
4.1.3PatentOpposition Ourcomments
i.AffordingthirdpartiesanopportunitytobringtheirresourcestobearandpresentrelevantinformationtopatentexaminersinanoppositionprocesscanaugmentthecapacityofCIPCtoconductSSE.
Thisisakeyprincipleofatransparentexaminationsystem.
Thepolicyshouldspelloutthepre-andpost-grantoppositionprocedures,withwidelocusstandirules,andadequateopportunityforthepublictomakeinputs.
ii.Revocationproceedingsentailtheprohibitivecostsandrisksoflitigation.SouthAfricashouldconsiderthemostefficientwaysofutilizingoppositionproceduresinlinewithinternationalbestpracticeandpursuanttostakeholderinput.
Thedtishouldarticulateamorecompletesetofrecommendationsthanthis.Oppositionproceduresshouldbeeasytouse,beexpeditious,shouldallowforboththeintroductionofevidenceandargument,andadverserulingsagainstoppositionsshouldbeappealable.
4.1.4PatentabilityCriteria Ourcomments
i.Article1oftheTRIPSAgreementreadwithArticles7and8giveWTOmemberstheflexibilitytoimplementandinterprettheTRIPSpatentabilityrequirementsinamannerconsistentwithinteralia,theirpublichealthconcerns.TheabsenceofSSEinSouthAfricarendersgovernmentunabletousethisflexibilityinthegrantof
PreviousiterationsofIPpolicycontainedstronglanguageregardingtheproscriptiononevergreening.Thestrictcriteriaforpatentabilityshouldbespeltoutindetail,assuggestedbelow.
![Page 23: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
22
patents.
ii.InternationalbestpracticefromabroadrangeofsourcesshouldbeconsideredinordertodevelopanappropriateapproachforSouthAfrica.
Thisisaninadequatearticulationofthepolicyissuesatstakeintermsofpatentabilitycriteriaandthedti’spreferencesconcerningpolicychoicesthatshouldbemade.Thisissueisoneofthemostimportantpolicyreformsunderconsideration,secondonlytoSSE.SouthAfricahasanopportunitytoadoptstringentpatentabilitycriteriaanddisclosurerequirementsandmustdosotofulfilitsconstitutionalandhumanrightsobligations.
Laxstandardsallowpatentingofminormodifications/variationsofknownsubstances,ofnewpharmaceuticalformulations/dosages,andofnewusesofmedicines.Laxstandardscanalsocreatebarrierstoincrementalinnovationsandneededadaptationstomedicaltechnologies.LaxstandardsallowadditionalpatentbarriersandlongerperiodsofexclusivitythatwillinterferewithSouthAfrica’sgoalofdevelopingitslocalproductioncapacity.Therefore,aprimaryobjectiveofSouthAfricanpatentlawreformandSSEshouldbetoadoptstringentstandardsofpatentability(novelty,inventivestep,andindustrialapplicability)toweedoutundeservingsecondarypatentsinordertopreventtheevergreeningofperiodsofpatentexclusivity.Inparticular,SouthAfricashouldconsiderdisallowanceofso-calledMarkushclaimsandrepeateduseofdivisionalpatents.
4.1.5DisclosureRequirements Ourcomments
i.IntermsofArticle29ofTRIPS,membersshallrequirethatanapplicantforapatentshalldisclosetheinventioninamannersufficientlyclearandcompletefortheinventiontobecarriedoutbyapersonskilledintheart.ThispolicyinstrumentcanbeusedtoaugmentthecapacityofCIPCtoconductSSEinatimelyfashion.Moreover,itcanbeusedtofacilitatetechnologytransferwhichisofkeyimportanceifSouthAfricaistoreapthebenefitsofIPandisaccordinglyoneofthekey
Inadditiontorequiringfulldisclosureofallknownmethodsofworkingthepatent,includingidentificationofthebestknownmethod,andillustratingorexemplifyingtheinvention,SouthAfricacouldandshouldrequiredisclosureofpatentstatusinothercountries.Further,SouthAfricacouldandshouldrequiredisclosureoftheinternationalnonproprietaryname(INN)ofpharmaceutical-relatedpatentseitheratthetimeofapplicationorthereafterwhenanINNhasbeenassigned.
![Page 24: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
23
objectivesoftheTRIPSAgreement.
ii.TheuseofdisclosurerequirementsinamannerthatutilisestheflexibilityintheTRIPSAgreementshouldbeconsidered.
Theneedtousealllegally-permissibleandavailableflexibilitieshaslongbeenaccepted.Thepolicyneednotgobackto‘shouldbeconsidered’(hereandunderfollowingprovisions).TheUNHighLevelPanelstatesunequivocallythatallTRIPSflexibilitiesmustbeadopted.
4.1.6ParallelImportation Ourcomments
i.Article6readtogetherwithfootnote6totheTRIPSAgreementgivesmemberstheflexibilitytodeterminetheirownregimesfortheexhaustionofIPRs.
Thisisindeedthecase.
ii.InSouthAfrica,parallelimportationisgovernedby1997amendmentstotheMedicinesandRelatedSubstancesAct101of1965(MedicinesAct),whichlegislationisadministeredbytheDepartmentofHealth(DOH).TherelevantprovisionappliesnotwithstandinganyrightsconferredintermsofthePatentsAct.ThiswouldsuggestthatthelackofutilizationofthisprovisiondoesnotrelatedirectlytoIPRs.Havingsaidthis,explicitlyincorporatingtotalinternationalexhaustionintothePatentsActwouldclarifymatters.
ThisFrameworkshouldacknowledgethatthecurrentregulatoryregimeconcerningparallelimportationisnotworkingandproposereformsforaneffectivescheme.Forexample,aspectsofregulation7ofGeneralRegulations,2003imposeunrealisticstricturesforthisflexibilitytobeeffective.ThdtishouldnegotiatewiththeDepartmentofHealthtorepealthese,whileretainingsection15C(b)oftheMedicinesActasaprovisionenablingparallelimportation.
Parallelimportationisalsogovernedbysection45(2)ofthePatentsAct(asamendedin2002),andisadministeredbythedti.
Thisprovisionshouldbeclarifiedtopermitparallelimportationundertheinternationalexhaustionregime,andincludebothbrandedandgenericproducts(asisthecaseinKenya).
Thereshouldbeproperalignmentoftheseparallelimportationprovisionsemanatingfromtherespectivedepartments.
iii.CommunicationandinformationsharingbetweenthedtiandDOHwouldbeimportantinaddressinganyantagonismbetweenrelevantprovisions,particularlyasDOHworkstowardimplementationoftherecently
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
![Page 25: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
24
proposedamendmentstotheMedicinesAct.
4.1.7Exceptions Ourcomments
i.AsameansofstrikingabalancebetweentherightsofcreatorsandusersofIPRs,Article30oftheTRIPSAgreementallowsmemberstoprovidelimitedexceptionstopatentrights.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
ii.SouthAfricaincorporatedtheearlyworking/“Bolar”exceptionina2002amendmenttothePatentsAct.Thisisanimportanttooltoassistgenericproducerstoenterthemarketassoonaspossibleoncethepatentee’sexclusiverightscease.
Thisisinfactthecase.
iii.thedtishouldengagetheDOH,genericproducersandotherrelevantstakeholderstoascertaintheeffectivenessofthisprovision.FurtherexceptionscouldbeconsideredifitisdeemedthattheycouldcontributetothefurtheranceoftheobjectivesoftheIPpolicytothebenefitofSouthAfrica.TheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)forinstancehasrecommendedthatmemberStatesshouldconsider,whereappropriate,useofa“researchexception”toaddresspublichealthneedsindevelopingcountriesconsistentwithTRIPS.
Article30oftheTRIPSAgreementpermitsaresearchexceptionallowingbothcommercialandnon-commercialresearchonandwiththepatentproductorprocess.Inaddition,itallowsaneducationaluseexception,aprioruseexception,andanindividualformulationuseexception.
‘Otherrelevantstakeholders’shouldbeexplicitlydefinedtoincludecivilsocietyorganisationsrepresentingpeoplewhoneedaccesstomedicines,patientgroupsandpersonsrepresentingthepublicinterest.
![Page 26: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
25
4.1.8VoluntaryLicenses Ourcomments
AvoluntarylicensecangenerallybedescribedasanagreementbetweenanIPRholderandanotherparty.IntheSouthAfricanpublichealthcontext,theotherpartyhastendedtobeagenericproducer.VoluntarylicensinghascontributedtogenericcompetitionparticularlywhereARVsusedinthetreatmentofHIV/AIDSareconcerned.Havingsaidthis,voluntarylicensesmaynotalwaysprovidetherequisitelevelofaccessinotherdiseaseareas.Hence,governmentrequiresamixofpolicyoptionsforinstanceswherevoluntarymechanismsproveinadequate.
Thegovernmentcanalsoregulatevoluntarylicenseswithrespecttocompetitionobjectivesandconcernsandshoulddoso.
Inparticular,anti-competitivepracticesinvoluntarylicensingmustbeavoidedby,forexample,requiringopenlicencestomultiplesuppliers,sothatvoluntarylicencesdonotbecomethevehicleforprotectingexclusivemarketsforlicenceholders,thusdefeatingtheaimofincreasingaccesstomedicines.
Additionally,theFrameworkshouldaddresstheissueofmarketsegmentation,fromtheperspectiveofenhancingaccess.
4.1.9CompulsoryLicenses Ourcomments
i.ThispolicyinstrumentisregardedasoneofthemostimportanttoolstoensurethatIPRsdonotundulyrestrictaccesstoessentialinnovations.Itsuseinthecontextoftheintersectionbetweenpatentsandpublichealthhasprovokedentirelibrariesofacademicwork,volumesofpolicydiscourseandsomeofthemostintensetreatynegotiationsofourtime.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
ii.TheTRIPSAgreementsetsconditionsfortheuseofcompulsorylicenses.Providedthatthesearecompliedwith,itisnowamatterofcoursethatStateshavetherighttodeterminethegroundsuponwhichtheyissuecompulsory
ThissectionshouldstatethatSouthAfrica’scurrentlawdoesnotmakefulluseofthisflexibilitytodescribepermissiblegroundsforcompulsoryandgovernmentuselicenses.
Inaddition,consistentwiththecommitmenttoforegroundpublichealth,thevariousgroundsforcompulsorylicences
![Page 27: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
26
licenses.
andgovernmentusebasedonpublichealthandaccessconsiderationsshouldbespeltout.Suchgroundsinclude:inadequatesupplytothemarket;desiretomakefixed-dosecombinationsofmedicinesownedbydifferentrightholders;desiretoallowcommercialisationofafollow-on,dependentpatentthatistechnologicallyimportant;desiretohavemultiplesourcesofsupplytopreventshortfallsofstock;anddesiretopromotelocalproductionwheretherehavebeenfailuresintechnologytransferfromrightholders.
iii.VoluntarylicensingarrangementssuchastheMedicinesPatentPool(MPP)arecrucialtotheSouthAfricangovernment’seffortstoprovideaccesstoaffordablemedicinesandwewillcontinuetoengageinthem.Havingsaidthis,inordertopromotesustainabilityofsupply,itisimportanttoensurethataworkablecompulsorylicensingsystemisinplacetoincreaseaffordabilityandrestrainanti-competitivepracticeswheretheneedarises.
Thisisveryimportanttoemphasise,especiallybecauseMPPlicensesareonlyinplacewithrespecttoHIVandHCVatpresent.
iv.ItisimportanttoacknowledgethatIPRscannotbeseenasthesoleimpedimenttoeffectiveutilizationofcompulsorylicensingasapolicyinstrument.SouthAfricaisyettoissueacompulsorylicensedespitethePatentsActprovidingforit.Thecurrenttenderingsystemisoneexampleofanon-IPrelatedimpedimenttotheuseofcompulsorylicensing.Measurestofacilitatecontractsthatallowtenderrecipientstomaximizeeconomiesofscaleshouldbeconsidered.Inthisregard,theWHOhasrecommendedthatcountriesshouldmonitorcarefullysupplyanddistributionchainsandprocurementpracticestominimizecoststhatcouldadverselyinfluencethepriceof
ItisnotaccuratetosaythatIPRsactasimpedimentstoeffectiveutilisationofcompulsorylicensing.Instead,thelegalFrameworkforcompulsorylicenceapplicationsisneedlesslyrestrictiveandneedstobereformed.
Indianlegislationprovidesformandatoryexportlicensesaddressingrequestsfromcountrieswithinsufficientmanufacturingcapacity.
![Page 28: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
27
theseproductsanddevices.
v.Inaddition,itisimportanttoensurethatthecompulsorylicensingprocedureprovidedinourlegislationdoesnotresultinunnecessarydelaysorundueobstacles.Variousmeansofstreamliningthecompulsorylicensingprocessesshouldbeconsideredinaccordancewithinternationalbestpracticeandinconsultationwithstakeholders.ThefollowingobservationspertainingtothePatentsActwarrantconsideration:
Inadditiontostreamlining,attentionneedstobepaidtoexpandingthegroundsforcompulsorylicensesalongthelinessuggestedunder(ii)above.
4.1.9.1Judicialprocess Ourcomments
i.AllapplicationsforcompulsorylicensesinSouthAfricaaresubjecttoajudicialprocessbeforetheCommissionerofPatents.Thegrantofacompulsorylicenseisthereforesubjecttothetimeframesandexpensesthatapplytolitigation.ThiscanbeexacerbatedandaccessfurtherdelayedintheeventthatthedecisionoftheCommissionertograntalicenseisappealed.
Thisisakeyimpedimenttotheuseofcompulsorylicences.
ii.TheTRIPSAgreementdoesnotrequirethegrantofcompulsorylicensestobemadesubjecttoajudicialprocess.Amorestreamlinedandaccessibleadministrativeprocessshouldbeconsidered.
Thelawshouldbeamendedtosetupanadministrativetribunalofappropriatelyqualifiedpersonswithsoundunderstandingofbothourconstitutionalethosandthetechnicalaspects,toconsidercompulsorylicenceapplications.
![Page 29: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
28
4.1.9.2Adequateremuneration Ourcomments
i.OneoftheTRIPSconditionsforthegrantofcompulsorylicensesisthattheIPRholdermustbepaidanadequateremuneration.ThePatentsActdoesnotcontainguidelinesonhowtoascertainwhatwouldconstituteadequateremunerationotherthanprovidinganon-exhaustivelistoffactorsthatmayberelevant.Theprovisionofguidelinescanassistpartiestoachievetimelyconclusionofthevoluntarylicensenegotiationsthataremandatoryincertaincases.Thiswouldpreventunduedelayinthevoluntarylicensenegotiationprocess.OneprecedentistheCanadaAccesstoMedicinesRegime(CAMR).
Thisisanecessaryandimportantmeasuretobeadopted.
ii.Guidelinesfordeterminingadequateremunerationshouldbeexploredasameanstostreamlinethecompulsorylicensingprocess.
Clearguidelinesneedtobedevelopedand,inparticular,shouldrequirelowpercentageroyaltypaymentsinordernottonullifytheprice-correctingeffectsofthelicence.
4.1.9.3Governmentuse Ourcomments
i.TheTRIPSAgreementexplicitlystatesthatpublicnon-commercialuseofpatentedsubjectmatterisnotsubjecttotherequirementofnegotiatingwithanIPRholder.TheSouthAfricanPatentsActgoesbeyondwhatisprovidedforinTRIPSbyrequiringMinistersofStatetoenterintosuchnegotiationsbeforeanapplicationtotheCommissionerofPatentscanbemade.
Thisisanunnecessarybarrierwhichmustbecorrected.
![Page 30: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
29
ii.Theinclusionofthisrequirementmaycauseunwarranteddelaysandshouldbereviewed.
dtishouldrecommendthattherequirementofnegotiationsbedropped.
4.1.9.4Compulsorylicensesforexport Ourcomments
Intermsofcompulsorylicensingforexport,SouthAfricaplayedanimportantroleinraisingtheprofileoftheIPandpublicheathdebateattheWTOandhasjoinedthegrowingbodyofWTOmembersthathaveadoptedtheParagraph6mechanismthroughratification.Theparagraph6mechanismhashoweverbeenthesubjectofvariouscriticisms.TheSouthAfricangovernmentiscognizantofthestatedlimitationsandwillengagestakeholderstofindwaysofensuringthatourimplementationisassimplifiedaspossible.Inaddition,wewillengageconstructivelywithintheWTOstructurestofindwaysofstreamliningtheParagraph6mechanism.
IftheParagraph6optionistobeeffective,itshouldberevisedinordertoenableaswiftandexpedientexportofpharmaceuticalproductsproducedundercompulsorylicence.(asindicatedinthePanelReport).
4.1.9.5Compulsorylicensestoremedyanti-competitivepractices Ourcomments
i.Article31(k)allowsmemberstousecompulsorylicensingasaremedytoanticompetitivepractices.SuchlicensescanbeissuedwithoutcomplyingwithanumberofTRIPSconditions,mostnotably:priornegotiationwithpatentholders,beinglimitedtothepurposeforwhichitwasauthorized,andtherequirementof
Itisnotcorrectthatcompliancewiththerequirementthat‘theauthorisationbelimitedtothepurposeforwhichitwasgranted’isdispensedwithunderthisArticle.Rather,theArticlerequiresthatacompetentauthoritymayrefuseterminationofsuchauthorisationiftheconditionswhichgaverisetotheauthorisationinthefirstplacearelikelytorecur.
![Page 31: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
30
beingpredominantlyfordomesticuse.
ii.Asmentionedabove,thelicensingprovisionsinthePatentsActdonottakefulladvantageofTRIPSflexibilities.ThejudicialprocessprovidedbythePatentsActisingeneral,morecumbersomethanrequiredinTRIPS.ThisisparticularlytrueofArticle31(k).
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
iii.Amorestreamlinedadministrativeprocessfortheissuanceofcompulsorylicensesshouldbeconsidered.Inaddition,itissuggestedthatguidancebeintroducedastowhichpracticeswouldbeconsideredanti-competitive.ThiscouldbedonebywayofanamendmenttothePatentsAct,alternativelyguidelinescouldbeissued.Eitherroutemustbepursuedinconsultationwithrelevantgovernmentinstitutionsandstakeholders.
Thisisaveryconstructiveideathatshouldbetakenforward.
Note,however,thatArticle44oftheTRIPSAgreementprovidesforjudiciallysanctionedcompulsorylicensesandSouthAfricashouldconsideradoptionofthesame.
4.1.10IPandCompetition Ourcomments
i.Intheory,thedevelopmentofnewmedicinesinvolveshighcostsandrisks,andforthisreasonIPprotectionisconsideredaninstrumentthatallowsinnovatorstorecoupinvestment.WithoutadequateIPprotection,thetheoryposits,theseinvestmentssimplywouldnotbemade.Currently,aglobaldebate,ledbytheWHO,isunderwayaroundincentivemodelsinthecontextofmedicines.
SouthAfricanhasaprogressivecompetitionframework,whichhasbeenutilisedwithsomesuccess,toenhanceaccesstomedicines(asalludedtointhe2TACcasesmentionedabove).InseekingabalancebetweenIPandcompetitioninterests,theCompetitionCommissionofSouthAfricasuggeststhatpotentialconflictsbetweenintellectualpropertyrightsandcompetitionmandatesshouldberesolvedaccordingtotheextenttowhichthe“long-termpro-competitivebenefits”ofapracticeoutweighits“short-term‘anti-competitive’effects.”Whilethegeneralprinciplehasbeenarticulated,
![Page 32: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
31
therearenospecificguidelinesontheapplicationoftheCompetitionAct,2008toIP,noristhereanexpressprovisionfortheissuanceofacompulsorylicenceinthecaseofafindingofanti-competitiveconductbyIPrightsholders.Forfurtheranalysisandrecommendationsonthistopic,seehttp://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/hiv-aids/using-competition-law-to-promote-access-to-medicine.
ii.Competitionregulationhasaroleinensuringthatpatentsarenotusedasplatformsforillegitimatelyextendingthemarketpower.Marketsformanypharmaceuticalsareinelastic.Furthermore,thereareaspectsoftheSouthAfricanmarketsforpharmaceuticalsthatincreasetheopportunitiesforanti-competitivepracticessuchastheirsmallandconcentratednature.Finally,itshouldbenotedthatfromapublicinterestperspective,purchasersofessentialmedicinesarenotordinaryconsumersinthattheirdemandisinelastic.Thereisgreatpublicinterestinensuringaccesstomedicines.TheSouthAfricancompetitionlawwasdevelopedasatransformationaldeviceintheearlydaysofpost-apartheidSouthAfrica.Itshouldthereforebeabletoaccommodatethesespecialfeaturesofmedicineconsumers.
See comments under 4.1.10 i. above.
iii.InaddressingtheinterfacebetweenIPandcompetition,theTRIPSAgreementgivesmembersscopetousecompetitionpolicyasaninstrumenttofacilitateaccesstomedicines.Article8onitsown,andinparticular,readthroughtheinterpretivelensoftheDohaDeclarationonTRIPSandPublicHealthempowersWTOmemberstotakemeasuresaimedatrestraininganti-competitive
TheprovisionsoftheCompetitionAct,alsoadministeredbythedti,shouldbealignedwiththeproposednewPatentsAct,andfurtherrefinedtoeliminatemonopolisticpracticessuchasthosesometimesconductedbytheinnovatorpharmaceuticalindustry.
![Page 33: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
32
practices.
iv.Article31(k)ofTRIPSconcernscompulsorylicensestoremedyanti-competitivepracticeswhileArticle40empowersmemberstoprohibitanti-competitivelicensingpracticesandprovidesalargedegreeofdiscretionindefiningtheprohibitedpractices.
See comments under 4.1.10 i. above.
v.TheCompetitionAct89of1998(CompetitionAct)andthePatentsActcanbeusedtoactionthecompetitionrelatedTRIPSflexibilitiesandadvanceconsumerwelfare.
Chapter2oftheCompetitionActandvariouslicensingprovisionsinthePatentsActaremostpertinent.
See comments under 4.1.10 i. above.
vi.Chapter2oftheCompetitionActcoverspracticessuchashorizontalrestrictions,verticalrestrictionsandabuseofdominance.
See comments under 4.1.10 i. above.
vii.ThefamousHazelTaucase,whichwasspearheadedbycivilsociety,isapertinentmatter.AlthoughitwasresolvedbeforetheTribunalcouldconsiderthesubstantivemerits;thecasewasawatershedasitclarifiedthatcompetitionlawisanimportantinstrumenttoachieveanappropriatebalancebetweentheinterestsofthecreatorsandusersofIP.
See comments under 4.1.10 i. above.
viii.FewpartieshavesoughttousetheprovisionsoftheCompetitionActtoalleviateadverseimpactsofexclusiveIPRsonconsumerwelfareandbyextension,public
See comments under 4.1.10 i. above.
![Page 34: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
33
health.OnefactoristherelativesmallnessoftheSouthAfricanpharmaceuticalmarket.Thisservesasadisincentivetogenericcompaniesincurringthecostoflitigation.Anotherfactoristhehighlytechnicalnatureoftherequisiteanalysis.Interestedpartiesarelikelytofacesuchdifficultiesgoingforwardgiventhecomplexityofthelegalandeconomicconsiderationsinvolvedaswellastherelativedearthofjurisprudentialsuccor.
ix.GuidelinesonIPandcompetitioncouldbedevelopedinlinewithinternationalbestpracticeandinconsultationwithrelevantgovernmentdepartmentsandstakeholders.
See comments under 4.1.10 i. above.
4.2Internationalbestpractice–aBRICSperspective
Ourcomments
i.Indevelopingtheappropriateapproachtotheissuesraisedabove(4.1)dueregardwillbegiventointernationalbestpractice,includingtheexperienceofcountriesinsimilarlevelsofdevelopmentsuchasBRICS.ItwillbeimportanttostudyhowthesecountrieshaveutilizedtheTRIPSflexibilitiestorespondtotheirspecificneeds.
WithintheBRICScontext,BrazilandIndiaarethemostobviouscomparators.Together,India,SouthAfricaandBrazilformtheclosestcomparisongroupwithinBRICS–allthreecountriesarediverse,multi-ethnic,relativelynewdemocracies,withstrongemergingeconomiesandsimilarincomedisparitiesandpublichealthconcerns.
Indiainstitutedacomprehensivepatentreformin2005(ThePatentsAmendmentAct2005),themainfeaturesofwhichare
(a)highstandardsofpatentabilitytoboostbothinnovationinthepharmaceuticalindustryaswellasfacilitateaccesstomedicines,
(b)dueprocessforpre-andpost-grantopposition,
(c)awidevarietyofmeasures,includingcompulsorylicensingprovisions,toensurecompliancebythe
![Page 35: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
34
pharmaceuticalindustrywithconstitutionalrightsandsocietalconcerns.
Thoughunusualandboldattheoutset,Indianpatentlawhassincebeenvalidatedthroughnumerousjudicialoutcomes,andisnowuniversallyregardedascompatiblewiththeWTO’straderules,especiallyTRIPs.
In2013,abillwasintroducedinBrazil'sHouseofRepresentatives,namely,PL5.402/2013,whichsoughtextensivereformtothecountry'sIndustrialPropertyLaw.ThebillfollowedanexhaustiveanddetailedreportfromtheCenterforStrategicStudies&Debates,releasedintheBrazilianChamberofDeputies,entitled"Brazil'sPatentReform:InnovationTowardsNationalCompetitiveness,"andsubsequentlyreceivedsupportfromtheSubcommitteefortheIndustrialHealthComplex(CIS)oftheHouseofRepresentatives.A2014report.PL5.402/2013andsupplementallegislativeproposalsconcernedwithexpandingaccesstomedicines,togetherpresentastrong,evidence-basedrationaleforutilisingTRIPsflexibilities,andcloselyfollowthemodeloftheIndianlawasamendedin2005.
ii.TheSouthAfricangovernmentthroughthedtiinparticularparticipatesintherecentlyestablishedBRICSIPRCooperationMechanism(IPRCM).ThesaidinstitutionwillserveasanimportantinformationsharingforumthatcanaugmentthecollectiveinformationandhumancapitalresourcesofpolicymakersandimplementationagenciesinBRICScountriesaswellasdeepenmutualcooperation.
TheBRICSIPRCMshouldbeusedtonegotiatetrainingandtechnologicaltransferagreementswiththosepartnerswhohaveadoptedmeasurestoimproveaccesstomedicinesaselaboratedabove.
iii.Havingsaidthis,SouthAfrica’suniquedynamicsmustinformtheapproachtothecountry’sIPpolicy.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
4.3Internationalcommitments Ourcomments
i.SouthAfricaispartytothefollowingmultilateraltreatiesin
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
![Page 36: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
35
IP:
BerneConventionfortheProtectionofLiteraryandArtisticWorks(BerneConvention),sinceOctober1928;
ParisConventionfortheProtectionofIndustrialProperty(ParisConvention),sinceDecember1947;
WIPOConvention,sinceMarch1975;
TRIPSAgreement,sinceJanuary1995;
BudapestTreaty(DepositofMicro-organisms),sinceDecember1997;
PatentCooperationTreaty(PCT),sinceMarch1999.
ii.WiththeexceptionofTRIPSthesetreatiesarealladministeredbyWIPOwhiletheWTOadministeredTRIPSincorporatesthesubstantiveprovisionsoftheParisandBerneConventions.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
iii.SouthAfricahasbeenpartytotheTRIPSAgreementsinceinceptionandisanactive,influentialparticipantintheTRIPSCouncil.TRIPShasbecomeafundamentalaspectoftheinternationalIPregimeandSouthAfricahasplayedanimportantroleinsafeguardingtheflexibilitiesavailabletomembers.Havingadoptedthe2030AgendaforSustainableDevelopment,andinparticular,SustainableDevelopmentGoal3,itisincumbentonSouthAfricatocontinueplayingthisrole.
SouthAfrica’sadvocacyroleshouldnowbetranslatedintoconcreteactions,suchasdomesticatingallavailableflexibilities.
![Page 37: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
36
iv.WIPOmembershaveconcludednumeroustreatiestowhichSouthAfricaisnotparty.Itisimportantforcountriestosafeguardtheirpolicyspaceandnotassumeobligationsthatwouldnotbeinthenationalinterest.Ontheotherhand,treatiesareaimedatdealingwithimportantglobalchallengesthatcannotbeaddressedthroughdomesticinstrumentsduetotheirextra-territorialnature.Inaddition,certaintreatiescanassistcountriestoadvancetheiroffensiveintereststherebyincreasinggrossnationalincome(GNI).
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
v.InlightoftheprincipalsestablishedintheIPpolicy,SouthAfricashouldanalyzeWIPOtreatiestowhichwearenotpartyinordertodeterminewhethertheypresentopportunitiesthatcouldbenefitthecountrywhichwearecurrentlynotutilizing.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
vi.AsidefromtheabovementionedIPtreaties,SouthAfricaispartytoseveralotherinternationalarrangementsthatareimplicatedbyIPsuchasWHO.Thatorganization’sConstitutionstatesthat“theobjectiveofWHOshallbetheattainmentbyallpeoplesofthehighestpossiblelevelofhealth”.Togiveeffecttothismandate,WHOplaysastrategicandcentralroleintherelationshipbetweenpublichealth,innovationandIP.
SouthAfricashouldgiveeffecttoitscommitments,especiallyundertheICESCR,intheformulationofitsIPpolicy.
vii.WHOhasbeenengagedineffortstoaddressidentifiedweaknessesintheglobalR&Dsystemwhichisreliantonmarketbasedincentivessuchaspatents.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
![Page 38: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
37
ThecurrentR&Dregimehasstimulatedsignificantinnovationsandwillcontinuetodosobutithasnotbeenabletoaddressissuessuchaslackofaffordability,limitedresearchwheremarketreturnsaresmalloruncertain(includingthe‘neglecteddiseases’thatpredominantlyaffecttheworld’spoorest),inefficientoverlapofresearchefforts,andoveruseofmedicinessuchasantibiotics.De-linkageofthemarketpricefromR&Dcosts,useofopenknowledgeinnovation,anduseoflicensingconditionstofavouraccess,areregardedascoreprinciplesformulatedbytheConsultativeExpertWorkingGrouponResearchandDevelopment:FinancingandCoordination(CEWG).Antimicrobialresistance(AMR)isconsideredaglobalpublichealththreat.Lackofnewtuberculosis(TB)medicinesisalsoapublichealthimperative.AnumberofstrategiestoaddressAMRhaverecentlybeenreported,theseincluderapiddiagnostictestsandR&DfornewantibioticsandantiTBmedicines.
viii.SouthAfricamustparticipateinR&DinitiativesandmultilateralIPforumsinacoordinatedfashionensuringthatthepositionsadoptedareconsistent.FormulatinggovernmentalpositionsundertheauspicesofanIMConIPwillensureacoordinatedapproach.
SouthAfrica’spolicyshouldcommittotheselaudableprinciplesproposedtoreducethecostsofmedicines,andshouldfurthercontributetothesustainabilityofalternativemodelsoffinancingR&Dformedicines.
ix.Intermsofregionalandbilateralarrangements,atrendhasemergedintermsofwhichstandardsofIPprotectionthatgobeyondwhatisrequiredbyTRIPS
ThisisanimportantprincipletoarticulateintheFrameworkandbeguidedbyintradenegotiations.
![Page 39: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
38
arebeingpromoted.SouthAfricaandotherdevelopingcountriesworkedextremelyhardatmultilateralleveltoensurethattheflexibilitieswithintheTRIPSAgreementwereunequivocallyrecognizedaslegitimatepolicytools,particularlyastheypertaintopublichealth.ItiscrucialthatwedonoterodethegainsmademultilaterallybyassumingTRIPSplusIPobligationsinbilateralandregionalengagements.
x.AnIMConIPshouldexamineanytreatiesundernegotiationwhichcontainIPprovisionstoensurethattheycomplywiththeprinciplesoftheIPPolicy.
4.3.1GeographicalIndications(GIs) Ourcomments
i.SouthAfricandoesnothaveastatutedealingspecificallywithGIs,andalsodoesnothaveasuigenerisregistrationsystemforGIsinrespectofallkindsofproducts,howeverthispositionmaychangegivencertainlegislativeinitiativesunderway.ThefollowingstatutescontainreferencestoGIsordealwithindicationsofthegeographicaloriginofgoodsorservices:
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
ii.TradeMarksActno.194of1993;AgriculturalProductsStandardsActno.119of1990;LiquorProductsAct60of1989;andMerchandiseMarksAct17of1941.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
iii.TheDepartmentofAgricultureForestryandFisheries(DAFF)has
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
![Page 40: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
39
publisheddraftregulationsonGIswhichwereopenforpubliccomment.Continuedinter-Ministerialengagementisencouraged.
iv.AtmultilaterallevelthereareseveraldevelopmentsthathaveabearingontheprotectionofGIs.TRIPSprovidesfortheprotectionofGIsthroughArticles22,23and24.AdebatewhichhasstalledatthispointishowMemberswillagreetosetupamultilateralsystemfornotificationandregistrationofwinesandspiritsGIs.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
v.SouthAfricahasagreedtoconcludeabilateralGIProtocolwiththeEUthatgoesbeyondwinesandspirits.This,however,doesnotchangeSouthAfrica’spositionattheWTOinrespectofthelimitedandnon-bindingnatureoftheestablishmentofaninternationalwinesandspiritsGIRegisterforinformationpurposesonly.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
vi.WIPO’sLisbonSystemfortheInternationalRegistrationofAppellationsofOriginoffersameansofobtainingprotectionforanappellationoforigininthecontractingpartiestotheLisbonAgreement.TheLisbonSystemshouldbeconsideredbyanIMConIP.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
5.In-BuiltAgenda
5.1Mediumterm Ourcomments
i.Thissectionproposessubstantiveissuesthatshouldbe
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
![Page 41: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
40
addressedoncepolicyformulationontheimmediateissueshasbeensecured.ItalsosetsoutrecentdevelopmentsintermsofinternationalbestpracticeinIPpolicyformulationandsuggestswaysinwhichSouthAfricacanimplementthese.
ii.OneofthekeyaspectsoftheWIPODevelopmentAgendawasforWIPOtoplaceagreateremphasisondemand-sidedevelopmentalconcernsofdevelopingmembersinitsprovisionoftechnicalassistance.ThisisaptlycapturedinRecommendation10whichmandatesWIPO:
“ToassistmemberStatestodevelopandimprovenationalintellectualpropertyinstitutionalcapacitythroughfurtherdevelopmentofinfrastructureandotherfacilitieswithaviewtomakingnationalintellectualpropertyinstitutionsmoreefficientandpromotefairbalancebetweenintellectualpropertyprotectionandthepublicinterest.Thistechnicalassistanceshouldalsobeextendedtosub-regionalandregionalorganizationsdealingwithintellectualproperty”.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
iii.Toimplementthisrecommendation,WIPOundertookseveralinitiativessuchastheformationoftheCommitteeonDevelopmentandIntellectualProperty(CIDP)andtheestablishmentofaprojectnamed:“ImprovementofNational,SubRegionalandRegionalIPInstitutionalandUserCapacity(DevelopmentAgendaProject
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
![Page 42: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
41
DA_10_05)”.
iv.DevelopmentAgendaProjectDA_10_05wasconductedfrom2009-2012andservedasapilotprojectwiththeaimofdevelopingtoolsforIPpolicyformulation.Algeria(whichjoinedtheprojectin2011)DominicanRepublic,Mongolia,Moldova,TanzaniaandMaliparticipated.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
v.TheprojectresultedinthesuccessfuldevelopmentandpublicationofacomprehensivemethodologytoolkitfortheformulationofNationalIPStrategies.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
vi.DevelopmentAgendaProjectDA_10_05andtheresultingtoolkitweresubjecttoanexternalreviewwhichfoundthemethodologytobesufficientlyconsultativeandresponsivetotheneedsofmemberStates.Thereviewalsofoundthatthetoolkitisbothreplicableandadaptable.Thisoutcomeissupportedbythetoolkit’susebyatleast10othercountries.Indeed,ofthe29countriesthathaverecentlyconcludedorareintheprocessofformulatingtheirIPpolicies,manyaredoingsowiththeassistanceofWIPO.
ThetoolkitshouldbecriticallyassessedinlightofSouthAfrica’sneedswithregardtoaccesstoessentialtechnologies,anditsconstitutionalobligations.
Inparticular,thetoolkitdevelopedforSouthAfricashouldincludehumanrightsimpactassessmentsofproposedintellectualpropertypolicyasrecommendedbytheReportoftheSpecialRapporteurinthefieldofculturalrights:Patentpolicyandtherighttoscienceandculture.
vii.WIPOtechnicalassistancehasinthepastbeencriticizedforplacingtoomuchemphasisoncompliancewithinternationalIPstandards,whichweregenerallyseenasfavoringmultinationalcorporationsfromdevelopedcountrieswithoutdueregardforademand-drivenapproachthattakesintoconsiderationthe
ThetechnicalassistanceprovidedbyWIPOisstilloftenperceivedtobepro-IPRsratherthanexpresslypro-accessinthepublicinterest.AnexampleistheRwandanIPlaw(whichithelpedcraft).Whilethislawexcludesthepatentingofpharmaceuticalsuntil2033byvirtueofitspositionasanLDC,theWIPOassistancehasalsopromotedundulystrictenforcementandothermeasures.
![Page 43: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
42
economicnuancesanddevelopmentobjectivesofcountriesreceivingthetechnicalassistance.Havingsaidthis,sincetheadoptionofthe45recommendationsofthedevelopmentagenda,WIPOhastakensignificantstepstoremedysuchconcernsanditsinputintotheformulationofnationalIPpoliciesindevelopingcountriesisevidenceofthisevolution.AstrongcaseinpointistheRwandaIPPolicyof2009whichislargelyregardedasaprogressiveandsoundinstrument.
viii.ItissuggestedthatSouthAfricafollowsanapproachthatisinlinewithWIPOestablishedmethodologiesbuttailoredtoSouthAfrica’sspecificdynamics.Here,abroadlyconstitutedIMConIPcouldworktogetherwiththeWIPOSecretariat.AsamemberofWIPO,thevastresourcesofthisinstitutionareavailabletoSouthAfricaandgovernmentwouldberemissinnotbringingthemtobear.
SAshouldadoptbestpracticesfromcountrieswhichhaveamorepro-accessorientation,suchasIndia,Brazil,Argentina;developitsIPpolicybasedonitsuniquecircumstances,andproactivelycontributetothedevelopmentofareformagendaatWIPOandotherfora.
Therearealsoothersourcesofspecialisedtechnicalassistanceonpro-developmentandbalancedIPpoliciesthatmightbeconsulted,includingSouthCentre,SARPAM,UNDP,andotherindependentIPexperts.
ix.ThefollowingsubstantiveissuesareproposedasworkingareasfortheIMCtodevelopincollaborationwithWIPOandotherexpertinstitutions:
IPRsinagriculture;
IPRsandbiotechnology/geneticresources;
IPRsandtheenvironment/climatechange/greentechnologies;
IPRsandtheinformalsector;
BrandingofSouthAfricangoodsandservices(collectivemarks,
Thislistshouldprioritisetheimperativesofadevelopmentalstate,andshouldswiftlyprogressfromtheimmediatetaskstoaddressthesecompellingandimportantmediumtermissues.
ItshouldalsoprioritiseHumanRightsinthecontextofIntellectualPropertyasthereisinadequateunderstandingoftheimportanceofhumanrightsforintellectualpropertypolicy.
![Page 44: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
43
certificationmarksandGIs);
SafeguardingSouthAfricanemblemsandnationalicons;
IPRsandthegovernment;
CommercializationofIPRs;
IPRsandlocalizationandbeneficiation;
Policymakingintheinternationalarena;
IPRawareness&capacitybuilding;and
Enforcement.
x.Thislistisindicativeandnotexhaustive.Itwillberefinedinaccordancewithintergovernmentalandstakeholderconsultations.
Weoffernocommentatthistime.
5.2Monitoringandevaluation Ourcomments
i.SeverallegislativeinitiativeshavecommencedorbeenconcludedpriortotheformulationoftheNationalIPPolicy.Indigenousknowledgeandcopyright-relatedissuesaremostpertinent.Itisproposedthereforethattheseconstitutetheissuesthatwillbesubjecttomonitoringandevaluation.Thisallowsthefinalizationofexistinginitiatives–towhichsignificantresourceshavealreadybeencommitted-whileensuringanopportunityforalignmentwiththebroaderIPPolicy.
Manyconcernshavebeenraisedabouttheexistinglegislativeinitiativesparticularlyaroundcopyrightandtraditionalknowledge.TheapproachproposedforthisFrameworkshouldbeusedtoreviewsuchinitiatives,andthedtishouldseekalignmentwiththebroaderpolicyobjectivesarticulatedhere,suchastheprimacyofhumanrightsoverIPprotection.
ii.Thefollowingthemesare
![Page 45: The dti Division: International Trade and Economic ...ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Submission... · 2 Professor Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law).Professor](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042320/5f0a20e97e708231d42a2674/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
44
coveredintheexistinginitiatives:
a.Copyrightandrelatedissues,including:
IP&creativeindustries,
accesstoknowledge–librariesandarchives/disabledpersons/copyright
exceptionsandlimitations/digitaltechnologies,
IPRsinthedigitalage);and
b.Traditionalknowledge(TK)