The Drivers of

17
The Drivers of Value Creation in Reinsurance

Transcript of The Drivers of

Page 1: The Drivers of

The Drivers of Value Creation in Reinsurance

Page 2: The Drivers of

Reinsurers have outperformed because of cyclical multiple improvement

3.8

6.6

7.1

3.7

ReinsuranceGlobal sector2

0.8

P&C

5.0

6.4

2.1

0.3

Multiline

–6.6

9.4

L&H

14.6

9.58.8

6.5

Cash flow contribution3

Growth in tangible equity5.5

–1.9

4.6

8.2

Contribution to average annual TSR, 2015–2019 (%)1

TSR drivers

Sources: S&P Capital IQ; Refinitiv; BCG ValueScience Center.Note: Components of TSR are multiplicative but converted and shown here as additive with remainders assigned to the multiple change field. Aggregation based on market cap weights at the start of the year. TSR calculated in each company's reporting currency. 1 TSRs run from December 31, 2014, to December 31, 2019. 2 Total industry sample = 96, omitting brokers and companies with negative tangible book value. 3 Includes dividend contribution and share count change.

Price/TBV change0.9

Page 3: The Drivers of

In the long run, growth drives TSR for top performers sectorwide

Percentage-point contribution to average annual TSR, 2015-20191

Top quartile, reinsurance (n=3)2 Top quartile, total industry sample (n=24)2

Sources: S&P Capital IQ; Refinitiv; BCG ValueScience Center. Note: Components of TSR are multiplicative but converted and shown here as additive with remainders assigned to the multiple change field. Aggregation based on market cap weights at the start of the year. TSR calculated in each company's reporting currency. 1TSRs run from December 31, 2014, to December 31, 2019. 2Total industry sample = 96, omitting brokers and companies with negative tangible book value. 3 Includes dividend contribution and share count change.

Growth intangible equity

Price/TBVchange

9.0

5-yearTSR

Cash flowcontribution3

9.0

2.0 20.0

Price/TBVchange

Growth intangible equity

Cash flowcontribution3

5-yearTSR

13.4

4.62.0 20.0

Page 4: The Drivers of

Sources: S&P Capital IQ; BCG ValueScience Center. Note: TSRs run from December 31, 2014, through December 31, 2019. Dividend contribution to cash return includes investment of dividends and special dividends, compounded daily. Components of TSR are multiplicative but converted and shown here as additive with remainders assigned to the margin and multiple change fields.

The performance of the largest listed global reinsurers varies widely

Average TSR by driver, 2014–2019 (%)

5 69

49 7 5 5

9

36

10

1213

96

76 4

7

78

7

114

–4

3

1515

–2

16

P/B multiple

6

1

2

2

13

17

–2

24

2

–17

Cash return

15 13

-

–1–8

12 11

–2

12

Book value growth

Total TSR

ArchCapital

HannoverRe

RenaissanceRe

RGA #12MunichRe

Weightedaverage

#6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11

Page 5: The Drivers of

Sources: S&P Capital IQ; BCG analysis and estimates.1 Compounded annual growth rate of book value per share plus dividend per share, 2015–2019, excluding other comprehensive income.

Growth must be profitable, but few reinsurers operate above their cost of equity

02

46

8

1012

1416

1820

2224

26

–5 0 5 10 15 20 25

Aver

age

retu

rn o

n eq

uity

, 201

5–20

19 (%

)

Median: 10.8

Median: 10.2RGA

Munich ReRen Re

Arch Capital

Cost of equity

Book value CAGR, 2015–20191 (%)

Hannover Re

Page 6: The Drivers of

Source: BCG analysis.1Operating profit before tax divided by tangible book value of equity allocated to each segment; average of median RoTEs, 2015–2019.

On average, reinsurers also have lower RoTEs than primary insurers

Top quartile Bottom quartile Median

40

0

2022

L&H insurance

14

32

P&C insurance

19

1113

9

P&C reinsurance

17

9

4

15

8

L&H reinsurance

Aver

age

retu

rn o

n ta

ngib

le

equi

ty, 2

015–

2019

(%)1

8 ppspread

Top-quartile reinsurers deliverattractive RoTEs

4 ppspread

Page 7: The Drivers of

Source: BCG insurance RoE benchmarking database. Note: Apparent numerical discrepancies are due to rounding. 1P&C share of centrally allocated buckets (e.g., group functions, noncore business, and eliminations).

Here’s why: the underlying factors driving reinsurers’ RoTE reveal low underwriting margins and high capital intensity in P&C reinsurance

P&CreinsuranceRoTE

9%

UnderwritingRoTE

Groupcontribution1

InvestmentRoTE

100% minuscombined ratio

Investment income/financial assets

Financial assets/TBV

TBV/netearned premium

1%

–1%

8%

1%

105%

2.8%

317%

Loss ratio

Expense ratio 32%

66%

Page 8: The Drivers of

Source: BCG insurance RoE benchmarking database.Note: Any apparent discrepancies in totals are due to rounding. Market data as of August 31, 2020.1P&C share of centrally allocated buckets (e.g., group functions, noncore business, and eliminations).

The top five P&C reinsurers outperform mainly on investment RoTE

20

Hannover Re

37

IRB

21

SCOR China Re Munich Re

2015

IRB Hannover Re

0

SCOR Munich ReChina Re

–1

–6

00

Munich ReIRB Hannover Re SCOR China Re

5

19

5

–1 –1

Average underwriting RoTE, 2015–2019 (%)

Average group contribution, 2015–2019 (%)1

China Re

17

IRB

14

!Hannover Re SCOR

24

Munich Re

2116

Average investment RoTE, 2015–2019 (%)

Average RoTE, 2015–2019 (%)

Page 9: The Drivers of

Source: BCG insurance RoE benchmarking database.Note: Any apparent discrepancies in totals are due to rounding.1L&H share of centrally allocated buckets (e.g., group functions, noncore business, and eliminations).

Similarly, the top L&H reinsurers rely heavily on investment income

141516

China Re SCOR RGA

China Re-19

SCOR RGA

3

–2

Average underwriting RoTE, 2015–2019 (%)

8

China Re RGASCOR

0 0

Average group contribution, 2015–2019 (%)1

China Re !RGASCOR

1911

25Average investment RoTE, 2015–2019 (%)

Average return on tangible equity, 2015–2019 (%)

Page 10: The Drivers of

Sources: S&P Capital IQ; BCG analysis and estimates.Note: Market data as of August 31, 2020.

Investors are clearly worried about the long-term impact of COVID-19: reinsurers’ multiples have fallen to near 2010 levels, with wide disparities

0.9 0.9 0.9

1.11.0

1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2

1.4

1.0

20162010 20172011 20152012 2013 2014 2018 2019 August2020

–4–7

–16–18

–23–26

–30–32

–40–43

Average P/B multiple of the top ten reinsurers (%) Year-to-date drop in P/B multiple ofthe top ten reinsurers (%)

Page 11: The Drivers of

Successful reinsurers use human creativity and machine-generated insights to understand market dynamics and make informed decisions

Understand and predictScenario analysis driven by advanced analytics

Decide and select• Control risk aggregation• Portfolio adjustments• Capital allocation• Repricing and cost cutting

Manage the exposure• Political actions furthering claims inflation• Silent or “unknown” coverages: business interruption losses could erode reinsurers' capital • Liability aggregation risk: with COVID litigation in early stages, now is the time to understand the aggregate exposure from accelerated social inflation

Manage the cycle• Risk and pricing uncertainty remains high• Accelerated decline in demand in many lines, such as aviation and energy, as well as in the life savings business

Manage the capital• Lower for longer yields• Credit crisis still looming• Stress on capital• Cost pressure, old ways of addressing issues

Source: BCG analysis.

Page 12: The Drivers of

Leverage tech to improve human instincts and generate superior recommendations for business decisions based on data and insights

The bionic reinsurer augments human expertise and creativity with machine-generated insights…

Augmented insights generation

Adaptive processes and data management

Enriched recommendation and decisions

Generate faster, broader, and deeper analyses by combining human and tech expertise; free up time and resources to focus human capabilities on high-value-added activities

Technology supports the human in work, processes, and data management, ensuring that the optimal process is carried out for each person in different situations

Source: BCG analysis.

Page 13: The Drivers of

…and unlocks tremendous value

+5 pp Loss ratio

improvement

–3 pp Expense ratio

decrease

2xFaster

quote-to-bind

+5 ppHigher hit

ratio

+5%–10% Gross written

premium uplift

Source: BCG analysis.

Page 14: The Drivers of

Opportunities for bionic transformation span the value chain

DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS

Bionicdistribution

Ensure adequate matching of

submissions with risk appetite; drive

seamless and fast processes with brokers though enhanced data exchange and tools for

better positioning

New business models and services

Enhance risk management

propositions and extend reach both internally

and externally with new product and service

offerings to distributors and end clients

Augmented underwriting

Leverage data to improve quality and

consistency of underwriting decisions

Smart portfolio steering

Improve transparency and consistency in

planning and monitoring the portfolio and manage exposure

actively

Advanced claims handling

Speed up the claims handling process;

increase value; reduce costs with AI fraud

detection and claim handling tools

Source: BCG analysis.

Page 15: The Drivers of

Tech and algorithms are not enough 70% of the value comes from transforming processes and people Algorithms

• Quality of the modeling

70%

Process, people, and culture• Quality and availability of data • Embed model in business processes • Changing the way people work

Technologies• Data platforms • Visualization tools

20%

10%

Source: BCG analysis.

Page 16: The Drivers of

Source: BCG analysis.

The bionic operating model requires new types of talent

Underwriters who understand the value of the new bionic model

People who understand the value of data so that they use it

People who can further the science

Digital talent (data scientists, UX and UI talent) and 21st century skills (learning agility, creativity)

Incentive systems aligned with new vision and goals

People who don’t react to a portfolio but want to be increasingly proactive

People who think beyond their area of expertise

People who can transform a bionic advantage into an offering (e.g., by turning an improved claims process into an offering)

$

$

$

Page 17: The Drivers of

Getting a bionic transformation right means balancing many different decisions

SET PURPOSE AND VISION HUMAN TECHNOLOGY OUTCOMES

How do we do the change management?

Do we have the right talent?

Where should we start?

What budget do we need? What is the optimal

handoff point?

Do we need a full new IT stack?

Do I do it all by myself?

How can we leverage what we've done before?

Do we need to do it all at once?

Can we do baby steps?

How soon will we see improvements?

Source: BCG analysis.