The Dividend Controversy
description
Transcript of The Dividend Controversy
![Page 1: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Dividend Controversy
Should firms pay high dividends?
![Page 2: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Trap question one:
An investor buys a share. It never pays a dividend. Is it valueless?
![Page 3: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
No.
The investor resells it before any dividends are paid.
The buyer gets dividends.
![Page 4: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Trap question two:
A firm never pays dividends to any investor and is never expected to do so.
Is it valueless?
![Page 5: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
No. Think of any small start-up.
The typical start-up firm is bought by another.
Its investors get cash or shares in the acquiring firm.
![Page 6: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Dividend policy alternatives:
Either high dividends now, low later, or Low now, high later.
![Page 7: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Dividend policy is irrelevant!
The firm has done all projects with NPV > 0.
It has some cash. What are the alternatives?
![Page 8: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Separation theorem interpreted for dividends (Figure 18.4)
C1
C0
s lo p e = - (1 + r)
L o w -d iv id e n d fir m
H ig h -d iv id e n dfirm
w
F u tu rere tu rno r
d iv id e n d n o
![Page 9: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Homemade dividends
Investors who want higher dividends sell some shares to get cash.
Those who want lower dividends use high dividends to buy more shares.
![Page 10: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Example of partial tax sheltering by capital gains
Alternative one: dividend of $10,000. Pay taxes on all of it. Compare to capital gains of the same
amount.
![Page 11: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Tax shield continued, homemade dividend
Alternative two: capital gains of $10,000.
Sell stock worth $10,000. The stock was bought when the price
was half the current price. Realized capital gains = $5,000 Pay taxes on $5,000.
![Page 12: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Some tax-class clienteles prefer dividend income
because they have tax exemptions, e.g.,
non-profit institutions, pension funds, corporations etc.
![Page 13: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Some tax-class clienteles prefer capital gains
because they can't shelter dividends from taxes,
but they can shelter capital gains. High income investors, for instance.
![Page 14: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Implications of clienteles
Some cash flows in the high-dividend channel.
Some in the low-dividend channel. Like the Miller channels model.
![Page 15: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Dividend equilibrium
$ of operatingcash flows
HiDivvalueper $1
LoDivvalueper $1
mq ili riuo iv
EL
mEquilibriuHiD iv
u bD
V*=1/Rh V*=1/RL
...
![Page 16: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Value is invariant to dividend policy.
In equilibrium i.e., almost all the time
![Page 17: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Out of equilibrium
i.e., after tax law changes, firms can increase value by
appropriately changing their dividend policy.
![Page 18: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Example of disequilibrium
Suppose that the capital gains tax rate is lowered.
LoDiv cash flows are more valuable. Demand for LoDiv cash flows
increases.
![Page 19: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Cut in capital gains tax rates
$ of operatingcash flows inthe economy
HiDivvalue
LoDivvalue
Increased valueof old equity
More LoDivfirms
![Page 20: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Real-world evidence
for not changing dividend policy and for existence of tax-class clienteles.
![Page 21: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Evidence
Actual dividends are highly smoothed Earnings fluctuate much more. Smooth means constant or increasing
at a constant rate. Smooth means pleasing to the tax-
class clientele that holds the shares.
![Page 22: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
A problem for the low-dividend firm
The firm has a quantity of spare cash after all NPV>0 projects are done.
![Page 23: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Dilemma
Pay dividends: Shareholders pay extra taxes.
Invest in financial markets: Firm becomes a mutual fund.
![Page 24: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Solution: use the cash to buy stock
Investors who sell are those who want cash.
Stock price is unaffected ... because the value of the firm falls by the value of the repurchased shares.
![Page 25: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The IRS understands this game.
Stock buyback for tax avoidance is illegal.
Therefore...
![Page 26: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Excuses, excuses
always another reason for a stock buyback,
usually ... our shares are a good investment
or...we disburse cash to prevent takeover.
![Page 27: The Dividend Controversy](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081604/568167a1550346895ddcecad/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Summary
Dividend policy is like capital structure. It probably doesn’t matter. If it does, it matters because of taxes,
and even that is temporary. In equilibrium, firms cannot increase
value by changing capital structure or dividend policy