The Design of the Tax System

33
© 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning, all rights reserved C H A P T E R The Design of the Tax System Economics P R I N C I P L E S O F N. Gregory Mankiw Chapter 12

description

Chapter 12. The Design of the Tax System. E conomics. P R I N C I P L E S O F. N. Gregory Mankiw. Introduction. One of the Ten Principles from Chapter 1: A government can sometimes improve market outcomes. Providing public goods Regulating use of common resources - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Design of the Tax System

Page 1: The Design of the Tax System

The Design of the Tax System

EconomicsP R I N C I P L E S O F

N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter 12

Page 2: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 2

Introduction One of the Ten Principles from Chapter 1:

A government can sometimes improve market outcomes. Providing public goods Regulating use of common resources Remedying the effects of externalities

To perform its many functions, the government raises revenue through taxation.

Lessons about taxes from earlier chapters: A tax on a good reduces the market quantity The burden of a tax is shared between buyers and sellers)

(impact of elasticity) A tax causes a deadweight loss.

Page 3: The Design of the Tax System

Our Role in Funding the Government

We authorize the government, through the Constitution and elected officials, to raise money through taxes. Must originate in the House (Ways and Means) House-Senate-President

Taxation is the primary way that the government collects money.

Without revenue, or income from taxes, government would not be able to provide goods and services.

Page 4: The Design of the Tax System

Power and Limits of TaxationThe Power to Tax

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to tax.

The Sixteenth Amendment (introduced 1909, ratified 1913) gives Congress the power to levy an income tax.

Great Depression Social Security Act (1935) and the

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Administrative agency of the Dept.

of Treasury Headquarters in DC, 7 regional

offices Main functions are to collect

income taxes and enforce tax laws WWII

Limits on the Power to Tax1. The purpose of

the tax must be for “the common defense and general welfare.”

2. Federal taxes must be the same in every state.

3. The government may not tax exports.

Page 5: The Design of the Tax System

Types of Taxes Individual Income Taxes Social Security Taxes

This program is funded by the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). Most of the FICA taxes you pay go to Social Security, or Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI)

Medicare Taxes Medicare is a national health insurance program that helps pay for

health care for people over 65 and for people with certain disabilities. Medicare is also funded by FICA taxes.

Unemployment Taxes Unemployment taxes are collected by both federal and state

governments. Other Taxes

Excise Taxes Estate Taxes Gift Taxes Import Taxes

Page 6: The Design of the Tax System

How the Money Comes In: Revenue

Total Revenue: $2.57 Trillion

14%4% 3%

45%

34%

Individual Income Taxes Social Insurance Payroll TaxesCorporate Income Taxes Excise TaxesOther Taxes

Page 7: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 7

Receipts of the U.S. Federal Govt, 2007

Tax Amount (billions)

Amount per person

Percent of receipts

Individual income taxes $ 1164 $3,482 45.3%

Social insurance taxes 870 2,795 33.9

Corporate income taxes 370 1,180 14.4

Other 165 572 6.4

Total $2,568 $8,030 100.0%

Page 8: The Design of the Tax System

Tax Structures Proportional Taxes

A proportional tax is a tax for which the percentage of income paid in taxes remains the same for all income levels.

Progressive Taxes A progressive tax is a tax for which the percent of

income paid in taxes increases as income increases.

Regressive Taxes A regressive tax is a tax for which the percentage of

income paid in taxes decreases as income increases.

Page 9: The Design of the Tax System

What is a “good” tax? Simplicity

Tax laws should be simple and easily understood. Economy

Government administrators should be able to collect taxes without spending too much time or money.

Certainty It should be clear to the taxpayer when the tax is

due, how much is due, and how it should be paid. Equity

The tax system should be fair, so that no one bears too much or too little of the tax burden.

Page 10: The Design of the Tax System

Spending CategoriesMandatory Spending Money that lawmakers are

required by law to spend Interest payments on the

national debt “Entitlement” programs

(Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid)

Makes up almost 2/3 of federal budget

Problem because Congress and the President cannot control much of spending.

Discretionary SpendingMoney that government planners can choose how to spend.

Defense EducationTrainingEnvironmental cleanupNational parks and monumentsScientific research

Page 12: The Design of the Tax System
Page 14: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 14

U.S. Tax Revenue (% of GDP)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000State and local Federal

Page 15: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 15

Total Governme

nt Revenue (% of GDP)

Sweden 50%France 45United Kingdom 37Germany 36Canada 36Russia 32Brazil 30United States 28Japan 27Mexico 20Chile 19China 15India 14

Page 16: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 16

Receipts of State & Local Govts, 2007

Tax Amount (billions)

Amount per person

Percent of receipts

Sales taxes $305.1 $1,010 24.1%

Property taxes 401.3 1,329 31.7

Individual income taxes 291.7 966 23.0

Corporate income taxes 58.0 192 4.6

Other 211.7 701 16.7

Total $1,268 $4,197 100.0%

Page 17: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 17

Taxes and Efficiency One tax system is more efficient than another

if it raises the same amount of revenue at a smaller cost to taxpayers.

The costs to taxpayers include: the tax payment itself deadweight losses administrative burden

Page 18: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 18

Deadweight Losses One of the Ten Principles:

People respond to incentives. Taxes distort incentives, cause people to allocate

resources according to tax incentives rather than true costs and benefits.

The result: a deadweight loss. The fall in taxpayers’ well-being exceeds the revenue the government collects.

Page 19: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 19

Income vs. Consumption Tax The income tax reduces the incentive to save:

If income tax rate = 25%, 8% interest rate = 6% after-tax interest rate.

The lost income compounds over time.

Some economists advocate taxing consumption instead of income. Would restore incentive to save. Better for individuals’ retirement income security

and long-run economic growth.

Page 20: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 20

Income vs. Consumption Tax Consumption tax-like provisions in the U.S. tax

code include Individual Retirement Accounts, 401(k) plans. People can put a limited amount of saving into

such accounts. The funds are not taxed until withdrawn at

retirement.

Page 21: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 21

Administrative Burden Includes the time and money people spend to

comply with tax laws Encourages the expenditure of resources on

legal tax avoidance e.g., hiring accountants to exploit “loopholes”

to reduce one’s tax burden

Is a type of deadweight loss Could be reduced if the tax code were simplified

but would require removing loopholes

Page 22: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 22

Marginal vs. Average Tax Rates

Average tax rate total taxes paid divided by total income measures the sacrifice a taxpayer makes

Marginal tax rate the extra taxes paid on an additional dollar of

income measures the incentive effects of taxes

on work effort, saving, etc.

Page 23: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 23

Marginal tax rateAverage tax rateIncome

0%10%$40,000

0%20%$20,000

A lump-sum tax is the same for every person Example: lump-sum tax = $4000/person

Lump-Sum Taxes

Page 24: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 24

A lump-sum tax is the most efficient tax: Causes no deadweight loss

Does not distort incentives. Minimal administrative burden

No need to hire accountants, keep track of receipts, etc.

Yet, perceived as unfair: In dollar terms, the poor pay as much as the rich. Relative to income, the poor pay much more than

the rich.

Lump-Sum Taxes

Page 25: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 25

Taxes and Equity Another goal of tax policy:

equity – distributing the burden of taxes “fairly.” Agreeing on what is “fair” is much harder than

agreeing on what is “efficient.” Yet, there are several principles people apply

to evaluate the equity of a tax system.

Page 26: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 26

The Benefits Principle Benefits principle: the idea that people should

pay taxes based on the benefits they receive from govt services

Tries to make public goods similar to private goods – the more you use, the more you pay

Example: Gasoline taxes Amount of tax paid is related to

how much a person uses public roads

Page 27: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 27

The Ability-To-Pay Principle Ability-to-pay principle: the idea that taxes

should be levied on a person according to how well that person can shoulder the burden

Suggests that all taxpayers should make an “equal sacrifice”

Recognizes that the magnitude of the sacrifice depends not just on the tax payment, but on the person’s income and other circumstances a $10,000 tax bill is a bigger sacrifice for a

poor person than a rich person

Page 28: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 28

Three Tax Systems Proportional tax:

Taxpayers pay the same fraction of income, regardless of income

Regressive tax: High-income taxpayers pay a smaller fraction of their income than low-income taxpayers

Progressive tax: High-income taxpayers pay a larger fraction of their income than low-income taxpayers

Page 29: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 29

200,000

100,000

$50,000

% of incometax% of

incometax% of incometaxincome

3060,000

2525,000

20%$10,000

Progressive

2550,000

2525,000

25%$12,500

Proportional

2040,000

2525,000

30%$15,000

Regressive

Examples of the Three Tax Systems

Page 30: The Design of the Tax System

THE DESIGN OF THE TAX SYSTEM 30

U.S. Federal Income Tax Rates: 2007

On taxable income…

the tax rate is…

0 – $7,825 10%

7,825 – 31,850 15%

31,850 – 77,100 25%

77,100 – 160,850 28%

160,850 – 349,700 33%

Over $349,700 35%

The U.S. has a progressive income tax.

Page 31: The Design of the Tax System

CHAPTER SUMMARY

In the U.S., the most important federal revenue sources are the personal income tax, social insurance payroll taxes, and the corporate income tax. The most important state and local taxes are the sales tax and property tax.

The efficiency of a tax system refers to the costs it imposes on taxpayers beyond their tax payments. One cost is the deadweight loss caused by the distortion of incentives from taxes. Another is the administrative burden of complying with tax laws.

31

Page 32: The Design of the Tax System

CHAPTER SUMMARY

The equity of a tax system refers to its fairness. The benefits principle suggests that it is fair for people to be taxed based on the amount of government benefits they receive. The ability-to-pay principle suggests that it is fair for people to pay taxes based on their ability to handle the burden.

The U.S. has a progressive tax system, in which high income taxpayers face a higher average tax rate than low income taxpayers.

32

Page 33: The Design of the Tax System

CHAPTER SUMMARY

When evaluating the equity of a tax system, it is important to consider tax incidence, as the distribution of tax burdens is not the same as the distribution of tax bills.

Policymakers often face a tradeoff between the goals of efficiency and equity in the tax system. Much of the debate over tax policy arises because people give different weights to these two goals.

33