The Design of Light Weight Automotive Brake Pedal

26
Coventry University Faculty of Engineering and Computing - MSc Dissertation in Manufacturing Systems Engineering 'The Design of Light Weight Automotive Brake Pedal' Submitted By: Nurfaizey A. Hamid Project Supervisors: Dr. Gumail Singh Assc. Prof. Ir. Mustafar Abdul Kadir Dr. Janatul Islah Mohammad 10th September 2007

description

Advanced material selection of a brake pedal.

Transcript of The Design of Light Weight Automotive Brake Pedal

  • Coventry University Faculty of Engineering and

    Computing

    - MSc Dissertation in

    Manufacturing Systems Engineering

    'The Design of Light Weight

    Automotive Brake Pedal'

    Submitted By: Nurfaizey A. Hamid

    Project Supervisors: Dr. Gumail Singh Assc. Prof. Ir. Mustafar Abdul Kadir Dr. Janatul Islah Mohammad

    10th September 2007

  • ABSTRACT

    In recent years, people concerns on emissions are growing. As vehicles are one of

    the contributors, some governments had introduced legislations pertaining to the matter.

    Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) for example was introduced by the National

    Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of the United States in order to

    encourage car manufacturers to improve their product's efficiency, thus reducing

    emissions. Higher efficiency means less fuel consumption without compromising

    vehicles' performance. One of the solutions is to design the vehicles using smaller engine

    and light weight design. Conventional heavy materials can be replaced with new

    advanced materials to reduce weight.

    This dissertation is concerned with the design of light weight automotive brake

    pedal. Later we will be looking at how a new material can be selected as replacement for

    conventional material. Material selection will be carried out systematically using CES

    Edupack to search for potential materials. Material properties and manufacturing process

    are the two factors which will be considered during material selection process.

    An actual steel brake pedal sample from a passenger car will be used as example.

    The component will be measured using coordinate measuring machine before a 3D model

    can be generated using Solidworks. A new brake pedal will be designed using alternative

    material. Both current and new design of brake pedal will be analysed using ABAQUS.

    Linear static stress analysis will be performed to study the behaviour of the component

    when subjected to extreme foot load. Based on analysis results, a polymer based

    composite material was found as a suitable material to produce light weight brake pedal.

  • CHAPTER I

    INTRODUCTION

    1.1 History of Automotive Brake System

    In the early days, wagons and other animal drawn vehicles relied on the animal's

    power to both accelerate and decelerate the vehicle. Eventually there was the

    development of basic supplemental braking system consisting of a hand lever to push a

    wooden fiiction pad directly against the metal tread of the wheels. Over the years, as the

    level of transportation technology has increased the braking system used to slow down

    vehicles has also been improved.

    In 1902 in New York, Ransom E. Olds had invented a brake system known as

    external brake. It used a single flexible stainless-steel band, wrapped around a drum on

    the rear axle. When the brake pedal was applied, the band contracted to grip the drum.

    Although it ground down solid rubber tires pretty quickly, the tire brake was popular on

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHTAUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    carriages and many early autos. By 1904, practically all car makers were building cars

    with an external brake on each rear wheel [I].

    However, the external brake demonstrated some serious flaws in everyday use.

    On hills, for example, the brake unwrapped and gave way rapidly. Another drawback to

    the external brake was it had no protection from dirt so its bands and drums quickly wore.

    A brake job every 200 to 300 miles was considered normal. The problems associated

    with the external brake were overcome by the internal brake or drum brake as it is now

    known. And, since brake parts were inside drums and protected from dirt, drivers could

    go over 1,000 miles between brakes overhauls [l].

    Since those days, drum brakes became all-dominant in the United States. In

    Europe, particularly in Great Britain, it had to share the stage with disc brakes. The first

    record of the disc brake was in 1902 in England where Dr. F.W. Lanchester patented a

    design for a disc brake. However, these early disc brakes were not as effective at stopping

    as the contemporary drum brakes of that time. Its major problem was noise. Metal-to-

    metal contact between his copper linings and the metal disc caused an intense screech

    that sent chills through anyone within earshot. The problem was solved in 1907 when

    Herbert Frood, another Englishman, came up with the idea of lining pads with asbestos.

    The new material was quickly adopted by car manufacturers on both drum and disc

    brakes. Asbestos linings also outlasted other friction materials by a wide margin up to

    10,000-mile [I].

    As roads improved and cars began to be driven at high speeds, engineers

    recognized the need for even better braking system. In 1918, a young inventor named

    Malcolm Lougheed (or Lockheed) applied hydraulics to braking. He used cylinders and

    tubes to transmit fluid pressure against brake shoes, pushing the shoes against the drums.

    In 1921, the first passenger car the Model 'A' Duesenberg was equipped with four-wheel

    hydraulic brakes [I]. The basic braking system we have today is based on this technology.

    The modern automotive brake system today is the result of improvement for over 100

  • C

    . - .c) 1 0 ; cd 0

    C,

    cd S

    (id 0

    % b > !i 0 S cn

    .r(

    00

    C

    s 2 P

    C

    .3

    3 @

    G a, a g . r

    (

    C,

    t a 0 8

  • Typical Disk Brake Typical Drum Brake

    Front Brakes I I

    - .

    Rear Brakes

    V

    Brake Lines

    Typical Automotive Braking System

    Figure 2 - Typical Brake System [5]

    There are three subsystems in automotive brake system:

    a) Leverage system

    b) Hydraulic system

    c) Friction

    In an emergency stop, the forces that have to be applied to the brake shoes in

    order to produce the maximum deceleration are very large. Approximating to the weight

    of the vehicle, and to enable the driver to produce these forces with an effort which

    cannot exceed 700 N and which is normally kept down to about one-third of that amount,

    the brake system must be able to provide a considerable leverage [2]. The force

    multiplication processes take place in two areas; leverage system and hydraulic system.

    1.3.1 Leverage System

    Leverage system is a foot pedal mechanism which is designed in such a way that

    it can multiply the force from driver's foot several times before it is transmitted to the

  • 1.3.2 Hydraulic System

    Hydraulic system consists of a master cylinder, brake lines and braking unit at

    each wheel. Figure 5 shows hydraulic system and a typical master cylinder in automotive

    brake system. Due to the fact that fluid cannot be compressed, the force transmitted from

    the foot pedal can be manipulated for an even greater force and then transferred to the

    braking unit at each wheel. Figure 6 explains this process. To determine the

    multiplication factor in Figure 6, start by looking at the size of the pistons. Assume that

    the piston on the left is 2 inches (5.08 cm) in diameter (1-inch 12.54 cm radius), while the

    piston on the right is 6 inches (1 5.24 cm) in diameter (3-inch I 7.62 cm radius). The area

    of the two pistons is 71 * 3. Therefore piston on the right is nine times larger than the piston on the left [6]. This means that if 100 lbs force is applied to the left-hand piston, a

    900 lbs force will come out on the right-hand piston.

    U

    Typical Master Cylinder

    Figure 5 - Hydraulic system and a typical master cylinder [5]

  • inches

    Figure 6

    Force inches

    I I - I I I I 2 1 1 in. I I I 6 in. I I i

    - Force multiplication in hydraulic system [6]

    1.3.3 Friction

    Friction happens when force from the brake fluid press the brake pads or friction

    linings against the rotor or drum. Friction also happens between tires and road surface.

    Friction is a measure of how hard it is to slide one object over another [6] . The coefficient

    of friction is the ratio of the limiting friction to the normal reaction between the sliding

    surfaces. It is constant for a given pair of surfaces.

    Coefficient of fiction = Friction force I Normal load

    Friction force (F) = p. Normal load (N)

    The friction force is proportional to normal load. Therefore, the heavier the

    vehicle, the greater force is needed to decelerate the vehicle. This concept applies to the

    brake system where the more force applied at the brake pads or linings, the greater the

    friction force or braking force generated.

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHTAUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    1.4 The Project Objectives

    Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) was introduced by the National

    Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of the United States in order to

    encourage car manufacturers to improve their product's efficiency, thus reducing

    emissions. CAFE is the sales weighted average fuel economy, expressed in miles per

    gallon (mpg), of a manufacturer's fleet of passenger cars or light trucks with a gross

    vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 8,500 lbs (3,855 kg) or less, manufactured for sale in

    the United States [lo]. According to [9], the trend toward lightweight materials continues

    to grow each day. Whether it is for the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)

    standards in the automotive industry or just an OEM's drive to improve product

    performance by increasing efficiency though weight reduction [9].

    This project is concerned with the design of light-weight automotive brake pedal.

    Most of the cars today have pedals that are made of steel. In some performance cars,

    aluminium has been used to replace steel due to its higher strength to weight ratio. In this

    project, we will be looking at a polymer-based material as the replacement material for

    steel. A product sample from an average production car will be used as reference. The

    main advantages of using this material are light-weight and ease of manufacture.

    However, there are few problems that need to be considered such as limitation in material

    properties, reliability and cost.

    The aim of this project is to come out with a successful design of light-weight

    automotive brake pedal using polymer-based material with acceptable level of

    performance. In achieving this aim, project objectives are set as below:

    To understand the working principles, components, standards and theories

    through a literature study.

    To analyse current design and its material properties.

    To select an alternative materials using a systematic selection method.

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHT AUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    To develop and analyse new component design using CAD and CAE applications.

    To clearly justify the results and conclusions.

    Knowledge gained from this project is to be able to understand the steps needed to

    design new brake pedal with new material from systematic material selection. The use of

    CAD and CAE for design and analysis will help to minimise design time.

    1.5 Current Developments in Brake Pedal Design

    Efficiency of a car can be improved through weight reduction. In this perspective,

    manufacturers are searching out opportunities to replace conventional materials with new

    and lighter materials without compromising its mechanical and physical properties. An

    example of reducing weight through new material application can be seen in the

    manufacturing of Chevrolet Corvette. The Chevrolet Corvette is the sport car range that

    has been manufactured by Chevrolet since 1953. It has been proclaimed to be the

    "America's Sports Car" [l 11. The recent model Chevrolet Corvette C6 is shown in Figure

    Figure 7 - Chevrolet Corvette C6 [8]

    Chevrolet will take another step forward through the next generation of Chevrolet

    Corvette C7 which will be launched in 2010. It was reported by [9], the conventional

    brake pedal which was made of steel will be replaced with B356 aluminium. To solve

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHT AUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    structural and mechanical property concerns, modified alloy chemistries and heat

    treatment cycles were used with permanent mould casting to achieve the mechanical

    properties of 35 ksi tensile strength, 25 ksi yield strength and 7% elongation [9]. Another

    advantage other than light weight is the exceptional appearance which is important as it is

    a visible component. Secondary cosmetic process such as spray painting will be no longer

    required.

    Figure 8 - Aluminium cast brake pedal to be used by the next generation Corvette C7 [9]

    It is reported in [12] titled 'Concurrent design and manufacturing process of

    automotive composite components' which had used concurrent engineering in the

    development of polymeric based composite automotive clutch pedal. The research

    objective was to demonstrate the use of Computer Aided Design (CAD) and Computer

    Aided Engineering (CAE) to help designers in the design process. The chosen product

    was a cable operated automotive clutch pedal which was converted from conventional

    material to polymer based composite. Several engineering computer applications were

    used from conceptual design until prototyping such Pro Engineer, LUSAS, Mould Flow

    Analysis, and Stereolithography (SLA) and 3D Printer for rapid prototyping.

  • There were two conceptual designs considered; the 'T' profile and the 'I' profile.

    Highlighted by [12] that based on analysis, the 'T' profile design was stiffer compared to

    the 'I' profile. The analysis was done using LUSAS finite element analysis software.

    Another interesting finding was the addition of ribs to the design to improve stiffness and

    rigidity. The use of ribs enables designers to compensate the effect of reducing section

    thickness to improve design efficiency. However, S.M. Sapuan [12] did not discuss the

    overall performance of the new component in comparison with the original component.

    1.6 Report Structtire

    4 Chapter5 Ulapter 6 w e r 7

    NEW DESIGN AND ANALYSIS DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    Figure 9 - Report Structure

    Chapter I lNTROWCTlON

    Chapter 1 is the introduction chapter. A brief literature review on brake system

    has been carried out focusing on history, hndamental theory and brake subsystems. The

    project objectives and current developments in brake pedal design had also been

    discussed.

    h - 3 MEASUREMENT. GEOMETRY GENERATION AND ANALYSIS OF CURRENT COMPONENT

    Chapter 2 explained about the current steel brake pedal with an actual brake pedal

    used as example. The material properties and manufacturing process of the current brake

    pedal will be discussed in detail.

    - Chapter4 NEW WTERIAL SELECTION I

    Chapter 3 is about measurement, geometry generation and finite element analysis

    of current brake pedal. Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) will be used for

    measurement, ~ o l i d ~ o r k s ' 2003 for geometry generation and ABAQUS for finite

    element analysis.

    Chapter 2 CURRENT COMPONENT \

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHTAUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    also the mounting place of hydraulic master cylinder (not shown in figure) of the brake

    system and brake light switch. The spring is used to retain brake pedal assembly at its

    original position. When the brake pedal is depress, the spring will provides slight load to

    the brake pedal. When brake pedal is released, it will move back to its original position.

    Bolt and nut, pivot shaft and plastic bearings anchored the brake pedal assembly to the

    bracket. Grease was applied at this area to minimise friction.

    Figure 10 - Proton Wira (known as Persona in the UK) [14]

    J

    Figure 1 1 - Proton Wira brake pedal assembly

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHTAUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    Figure 14 - Brake light switch mounting area

    Figure 15 - Location of spring

    The size of the brake pedal assembly is about 370 mm x 148 mm with overall

    weight of 944.4 grams. Brake pedal assembly consists of three components; brake pedal,

    rubber foot pad and switch contact pad. The main body of brake pedal is made of steel

    plate with thickness 6 mm. It consists of three subcomponents joint by welding. The

    welding areas are shown in Figure 17. Rubber foot pad is used to prevent foot slip while

    switch contact pad is used to absorb noise as the result of contact between pedal and

    brake light switch.

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHTAUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    Figure 16 - Brake pedal asse&bly: (a) Brake pedal (b) Rubber foot pad (c) Switch

    contact pad

    Figure 17 - Three areas of welding

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT W?ZIGHTAUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    2.3 Material Properties

    A good design should always accompanied with the correct choice of material.

    Selecting the wrong material will result in higher product cost, poor product performance

    or even product failure. It was stated by [15] that normally the choice of material is

    dictated by the design, but sometimes the other way around. Since the number of

    engineering materials is large at an estimated over 120,000 materials are available, the

    material selection process can be a difficult task without guidance. Ashby [IS] also

    explained that a method of screening those materials is by understanding the design

    requirements for a component by an analysis of function, constraints, objectives and free

    variables. Table 1 explains what those criteria are while Table 2 shows the design

    requirements for a brake pedal.

    Table 1 - Function, constraints, objectives and free variables [15]

    Table 2 - Design requirements for a brake pedal

    Function

    Constraints

    Objective

    Free variables

    What does component do?

    What non-negotiable conditions must be met?

    What negotiable but desirable conditions.. ..?

    What is to be maximised or minimized?

    What parameters of the problem is the designer free to change?

    Function

    Constraints

    Objective

    Free variables

    Brake pedal (load transfer)

    No failure, meaning able to withstand load

    High Young's modulus

    Good tensile strength

    Low material cost

    Choice of material

    Choice of design

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHT AUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    Table 3 - Material properties of Low Carbon Steel AISI 101 0 [18]

    Maximum -

    Properties

    General:

    I Density I *7800 I 7900 Minimum

    I Fe (Iron) I *99.13 I 99.62

    Price

    Composition:

    C (Carbon)

    Mn (Manganese)

    P (Phosphorus)

    *0.25

    Units

    ___I 0.45

    S (Sulphur)

    Si (Silicon)

    Mechanical:

    Young's Modulus

    Compressive Strength

    Tensile Strength

    Poisson's Ratio

    GPa I

    2.4 Manufacturing Process

    Note: Value marked * are estimates

    *O

    0

    *205

    *255

    3 10

    0.285

    Steel brake pedals are manufactured using press forming. Press forming covers a

    range of sheet forming processes performed by means of a die and press. Processes used

    include blanking, shearing, drawing, bending, forming, coining and swaging. These

    processes may be performed consecutively to form complex shapes. However, all shapes

    produced by this process have a uniform cross-sectional thickness. Tools are dedicated

    and, therefore, tooling costs are high. Only materials available in sheet form can be

    stamped and the thickness is limited to available sheet size 1181. More detail information

    on press forming is attached in Appendix 2.

    0.05

    0.05

    215

    315

    430

    0.295

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHT AUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    Deep drawing Blanking

    Die Blank

    Bending Stretching

    Figure 19 - Process schematic of press forming [18]

    The overview of current component as well as the material properties and

    manufacturing process had been explained earlier in this chapter. In the next chapter, the

    current component will be measured to get the actual dimensions. These data will be used

    to generate the 3D model for stress analysis. The analysis will simulates the component's

    behaviour when it is subjected to load exerted by the driver's foot.

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHT AUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    CHAPTER 3

    MEASUREMENT, GEOMETRY GENERATION AND ANALYSIS OF CURRENT

    COMPONENT

    3.1 A Brief History of Finite Element Method

    This section presents a brief history of the Finite Element Method (FEM).

    Although 'finite element' terminology was first used in 1960 by R.W. Clough in a paper

    on plane elasticity problems [19], the ideas were dated back much further. A. Hrennikoff

    in 1941 and D. McHenry in 1943 used a latticed of line elements for the solution of

    stresses in continuous solids. Meanwhile R. Courant in 1943 had proposed setting up the

    solution of stresses in a variational form. He used piecewise interpolation functions over

    triangular sub-regions making up the whole region as a method to obtain approximate

    numerical solutions [20]. Since then more and more researchers involved in FEM. Table

    4 summarizes the important findings made by early researchers.

  • THE DESIGN OF LIGHT WEIGHT AUTOMOTIVE BRAKE PEDAL

    Table 4 - Brief History of Finite Element Method [20]

    Name of researchers

    A. Hremikoff and

    D. McHenry

    R. Courant

    S. Levy

    J.H. Argyris and S.

    Kelsey

    M.J. Turner

    R.W. Clough

    M.J. Turner

    R.J. Melosh

    R.H. Gallagher

    R.H. Gallagher and

    J. Padlog

    P.E. Grafton and

    D.R. Strome

    Martin, Gallagher,

    Melosh and Argyris

    R.W. Clough, Y.

    Rashid, E.L. Wilson

    J.S. Archer

    O.C. Zienkiewicz

    B.A Szabo and Lee

    T. Belytschko

    Year

    1941-1943

    1943

    1947-1 953

    1954

    1956

    1960

    , 1960

    1961

    1962

    1963

    1963

    1961-1964

    1965

    1965

    1968

    1969

    1976

    Findings

    Latticed of line elements for the solution of stresses

    in continuous solids

    Interpolation functions over triangular sub-regions as

    a method to obtain approximate numerical solutions

    Force method and displacement method

    Matrix structural analysis using energy principles

    Direct stzfiess method for obtaining total structure

    stifiess matrix

    Introduction ofJinite element using both triangular

    and rectangular elements for plane stress analysis

    Large deflections and thermal analysis

    Flat rectangular-plate bending-element stiffness

    matrix

    Material nonlinearities

    Introduction of buckling problems

    Curved-shell bending-element stiffness matrix for

    axisymmetric shells and pressure vessels

    Extension of the FEM to three-dimensional

    problems

    Special case of axisymmetric solids

    Dynamic analysis in consistent-mass matrix

    Visco-elasticity problems

    Weighted residual methods

    Large-displacement nonlinear dynamic behaviour