The Costs of Ecoflation

download The Costs of Ecoflation

of 4

Transcript of The Costs of Ecoflation

  • 8/14/2019 The Costs of Ecoflation

    1/4

    New government

    policies and grow-

    ing constraints on

    natural resources

    will orce compa-

    nies to acknowledge

    the environment as

    one o the core costs

    o doing business.

    The Costs o EcolationPreparing business or a changing environment

    The worlds natural resources are under

    pressure. Human consumption has

    compromised, diminished or destroyed

    ecosystems, rising temperatures are

    threatening plant and animal species,

    and reshwater use in many areas ar

    exceeds the long-term supply. Climate

    change and growing populations are

    leading to roiled markets and new

    government regulations. Global busi-nesses are already dealing with the

    consequences.

    A new study by A.T. Kearney

    and the World Resources Institute

    (WRI) indicates that these environ-

    mental trends and their consequences

    could have even wider ramications

    or businesses in the coming years.

    According to the study, Rattling

    Supply Chains: The Eect o Envi-ronmental Trends on the Fast Moving

    Consumer Goods Industry, busi-

    nesses in the ast-moving consumer

    goods (FMCG) industry could see

    earnings all by 13 to 31 percent by

    2013 and 19 percent to 47 percent in

    earnings in 2018 i they do not imple-

    ment sustainable strategies through-

    out their supply chains.

    Sustainability initiatives will cost

    more in the near term, as businesses

    transorm their processes to meet new

    requirements, but in the long run the

    investment will be worth itpoten-

    tially even crucial to survival. Tech-

    nological advances, increased e-ciency and better-allocated resources

    will not only allow companies to pro-

    tect the environment but will also

    help them reduce costs and limit their

    exposure to increasingly scarce natu-

    ral resources.

    These trends present an unprece-

    dented challenge or businesses, which

    must remain protable while also pro-

    tecting the ragile environment uponwhich they depend. Our ndings sug-

    gest that the winners in this new world

    order will be those rms that under-

    stand the consequences and transorm

    their business models to meet environ-

    mental needs.

    Soaring prices or commodities rom 2006 to 2008 brought renewed

    attention to the scarcity o natural resources and the economic impact

    o these shortages. In Rattling Supply Chains, a new study rom

    A.T. Kearney and the World Resources Institute that examines the

    eects o environmental change on business, research indicates that

    ailure to adjust to changing conditions could cost companies up to

    47 percent in earnings over the next 10 years. Companies must adapt

    to this changing environmentwhich we call Ecofationand make

    it an integral part o their business.

  • 8/14/2019 The Costs of Ecoflation

    2/4

    FMCGs and EcofationIn Rattling Supply Chains, WRI and

    A.T. Kearney investigate the impact o

    Ecofation. Ecofation is a uture sce-

    nario that combines existing economic

    orecastsgovernment estimates on

    population, consumption and gross

    domestic product, which we call the

    base caseand adds in projectedenvironmental trends and potential

    public policy responses. It then mea-

    sures their combined eects on the

    FMCG industry, including producers

    o ood, beverages and various house-

    hold items.

    Ecofation describes how our

    major policy and environmental issues

    play out over the next 10 years in a

    hypothetical, yet distinctly possibleuture.

    Climate change policy. The United

    States implements a comprehensive

    climate-change policy, which spurs

    international cooperation and results

    in a global price or greenhouse-

    gas emissions.

    Water scarcity. Climate change

    causes more drought and water scar-

    city throughout major agriculturalregions and leads to increased pro-

    duction costs and declining yields.

    Deforestation. Consumer products

    companies in the United States and

    the European Union voluntarily

    agree to source all wood and ber

    rom sustainability-certied orests,

    and to increase the use o recycled

    ber or all paper packaging and

    products. Biofuels. Major biouel-producing

    countries retreat rom existing man-

    dates and apply sustainability require-

    ments to all relevant government

    policies.

    We applied these scenarios to the

    price implications or eight important

    commoditiesoil, natural gas, elec-

    tricity, cereals and grains, soy, sugar,

    palm oil and timber. We selected these

    resources because they represent large

    expenses or FMCG rms, are used

    throughout the supply chain, are at

    risk or price volatility, are infuencedby policy changes, and are vulnerable

    to water scarcity and other environ-

    mental actors.

    We then examined the eects

    these commodity prices have on the

    earnings o a set o FMCG companies.

    This industry was selected because

    o its size ($1 trillion), susceptibility

    to environmental pressures, exposure

    to a wide range o commodities andamiliarity to a wide audience.

    The FindingsBased on our ndings, we estimate

    a sharp reduction in earnings or

    FMCG companies that do not devel-

    op strategies to mitigate the risks posed

    by environmental pressures13 to

    31 percent decreases in earnings beore

    interest and taxes (EBIT) by 2013,

    and 19 to 47 percent EBIT decreases

    by 2018 i costs cannot be passed on

    to consumers.

    The study broke down the Ecofa-tion price orecasts or the eight com-

    modities. Following are the ndings.

    Energy (oil, natural gas and

    electricity). I the United States and

    other major economies implement

    new public policies, including caps

    and taxes on carbon emissions and

    mandates on eciency, inrastructure

    and alternative uels, it will lead to

    increased prices or energy comparedwith the base case projections. Climate

    change will cause increasing short-

    term disruptions and price spikes, and

    water scarcity will aect existing

    hydroelectric power plants. Biouel

    policies could drive prices either posi-

    tively or negatively: Increased biouel

    consumption would lower the demand

    and price or oil and gas, but a roll-

    back o biouel mandates would bringprices back up. In all, by 2018, Eco-

    fation is expected to bring sharply

    higher energy costs compared with

    the base case: increases o 22 percent

    or oil, 40 percent or natural gas and

    45 percent or electricity.

    Cereals, grains and soy. Rising

    oil prices rom government-enorced

    carbon ees would increase transport

    costs and drive the demand or biou-els, raising these crops prices in com-

    parison with the base case. At the same

    time, a discontinuation o existing

    biouel policies would lower demand

    and prices. Climate change and water

    Leaders in this new

    landscape will be

    companies that

    make environmental

    sustainability one o

    their core business

    principles.

  • 8/14/2019 The Costs of Ecoflation

    3/4

    scarcity could have an impact on pro-

    duction o crops, although soy, wheat

    and corn are not heavily irrigated and

    need less water than other crops. Soy-

    bean elds have prolierated in Brazil,

    and a strengthening o deorestation

    policies there would raise prices or soy.

    Grains and cereals are expected to be

    13 percent higher than existing 2018price orecasts, while soy is expected to

    be 3 percent more expensive.

    Sugar. Like other crops, new car-

    bon policies would have an eect

    on transport costs and the demand or

    ethanol, and hence, sugarcane prices

    would go up. Water scarcity issues are

    not expected to aect sugar prices,

    as Brazil is not at high risk or water

    shortages. Sugar production may beless exposed to climate change, because

    sugar beets, grown in northern coun-

    tries, can be substituted or sugarcane.

    Palm oil. Palm oil is widely used

    in ood and personal care products

    and, increasingly, as biodiesel, which

    would mean a rise in demand (and

    prices) i carbon policies are imple-

    mented. Because it is grown almost

    exclusively in Malaysia and Indonesia,palm oil prices would be susceptible to

    localized foods, droughts and res

    caused by climate change, as well as to

    any local changes in deorestation pol-

    icy. Its use as a biouel is increasing,

    but that demand may go down because

    o concerns about deorestation.

    Timber. The production o pack-

    aging material is heavily dependent

    on energy prices, and would be vul-nerable to policy changes that aect

    the price. In act, while deorestation

    policies could become o increasing

    importance as more pulp is imported

    in coming years, ees on carbon are

    expected to have the greatest impact

    on timber prices. Climate change also

    has a price impact, as it has led to more

    orest res, pests and viruses, threaten-

    ing the timber supply in many parts o

    the world. Wood and paper products

    are expected to have 13 percent higher

    prices during Ecofation than in the

    base case.

    Four Steps to Environmental

    AwarenessAlthough the earnings risk is serious,it is also avoidable. Companies have

    the ability to nd solutions inde-

    pendently and collaboratively, and to

    transorm their operations to mitigate

    this risk and take advantage o growth

    opportunities. The ollowing are steps

    to take immediately to address the

    emerging environmental risks:

    Understand environmental im-pact and dependenciesby examining

    how environmental trends drive costs

    and, when possible, seeking more sus-

    tainable substitutes. For example, it

    takes more than 200 liters o water to

    grow the sugarcane to make one liter

    o soda. This is signicantly more than

    the 2.5 liters o water required to pro-

    duce a bottle o soda in a bottling

    plant. Companies that want to reduce

    their impact on the environment must

    rst understand the depth o their

    dependencies.

    Take inventory of current envi-ronmental initiatives throughout

    the value chain to see what your

    company, suppliers and partners are

    already doing. Previous A.T. Kearney

    surveys indicate that many companies

    do not have a central group to coordi-

    nate sustainability initiatives. Strong,

    companywide communication is need-

    ed to assess needs, discover gaps in

    the value chain and reduce the timeit takes to better meet changing

    requirements.

    Prioritize environmental issues

    and opportunitiesaccording to their

    potential impact on costs, revenues

    and reputation. This is where sustain-

    ability initiatives can oer cost-saving

    opportunities. For example, General

    Mills reduced its Hamburger Helper

    packaging by 20 percent, lowering thecost or materials and eliminating the

    need or 500 distribution trucks per

    year. ConAgra Foods incorporated

    recycled plastic in its rozen meal trays,

    removing 8 million pounds o plastic

    rom landlls.

    Chart a new courseby incorpo-

    rating sustainability principles into

    an action plan. Whether its a actory

    retrot to increase energy eciency,a packaging redesign to reduce costs

    or a product reormulation to decrease

    dependency on commodities, smart

    companies will incorporate sustain-

    ability as part o a clearly dened plan

    Although the

    earnings risk

    rom Ecofationis serious, it is

    also avoidable.

  • 8/14/2019 The Costs of Ecoflation

    4/4

    A.T. Kearney is a global strategic management consulting rm known or

    helping clients gain lasting results through a unique combination o strategic

    insight and collaborative working style. The rm was established in 1926

    to provide management advice concerning issues on the CEOs agenda.

    Today, we serve the largest global clients in all major industries. A.T. Kearneys

    oces are located in major business centers in 35 countries.

    A.T. Kearney, Inc.

    Marketing & Communications

    222 West Adams Street

    Chicago, Illinois 60606 U.S.A.

    1 312 648 0111

    email: [email protected]

    www.atkearney.com

    Copyright 2008, A.T. Kearney, Inc. All rights reserved. No part o this work may be reproduced in any orm without written permission rom the copyright holder.

    A.T. Kearney is a registered mark o A.T. Kearney, Inc. A.T. Kearney, Inc. is an equal opportunity employer. 7-08

    ounded on sound principles. The

    portolio should include short- and

    long-term strategies that can have

    a lasting impact.

    Winning in a ChangingLandscapeThe worlds dependence on natural

    resources is ragile. As the econo-mies o developing countries grow,

    worldwide consumption will increase

    and place greater demands on nite

    resources.

    Leaders in this new landscape

    will be companies that make environ-

    mental sustainability one o their core

    business principles. These companies

    will not only be able to anticipate the

    changes, but also to collaborate with

    suppliers and other stakeholders toaddress them.