The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target
description
Transcript of The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target
![Page 1: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Cost of Policy InactionThe case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target
Dr. Leon C. Braat
CBD COP 9 - Side Event - UNEP-FI and FFI - Bonn, May 29, 2008
![Page 2: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Cost of Policy Inaction
L. Braat & P. ten Brink (eds.)
with
J. Bakkes, K. Bolt, I. Braeuer, B. ten Brink, A. Chiabai, H. Ding, H. Gerdes, M. Jeuken, M. Kettunen, U. Kirchholtes, C. Klok, A. Markandya, P. Nunes, M. van Oorschot, N. Peralta-Bezerra, M. Rayment, C. Travisi, M. Walpole.
Wageningen / Brussels, May 2008
Based on the Report to the European Commission, May 29, 2008
![Page 3: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Changein
Biodiversity ChangeIn
EcosystemServices
Change inEconomic
Value
InternationalPolicies Change
inEcosystemfunctions
Changein
Land use,Climate,
Pollution,Water use
OECDBaselinescenario
Changein
Biodiversity ChangeIn
EcosystemServices
Change inEconomic
Value
InternationalPolicies Change
inEcosystemfunctions
Changein
Land use,Climate,
Pollution,Water use
OECDBaselinescenario
COPI CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
![Page 4: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
1. The OECD Baseline scenario and international policies
9.1 billion inhabitants by 2050
GDP global average: 2.8% per year
![Page 5: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2. The Global Loss of Biodiversity
The total biodiversity loss 2000-2050:All biodiversity of 1,300 million ha converted to asphalt.(about 1.5 times the United States)
73%
62%
![Page 6: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2000The Global Loss of Biodiversity
![Page 7: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2030The Global Loss of Biodiversity
![Page 8: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2050The Global Loss of Biodiversity
![Page 9: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2. The Global Loss of Biodiversity: deforestation in Brasil
GLOBIO MODEL OUTPUT OVERLAY ON GOOGLE EARTH
![Page 10: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
We are fishing down the foodweb – D. Pauly (UBC, Canada)
2. The Global Loss of Biodiversity
CBD indicator:Marine Trophic Index
![Page 11: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
2. The Global Loss of Biodiversity
THE DEMISE OF GLOBAL FISHERIES
Source: Sea Around Us project
2010
40 %
40 %
20 %
![Page 12: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Source: National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, UC Santa Barbara
Anthropogenic Impacts on Marine Ecosystems
2. The Global Loss of Biodiversity
East-carribean North
Sea
EastChineseSea
![Page 13: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
CBD global 2010 target: significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss
The Targets will not be met,
not by 2010,
2. The Global Loss of Biodiversity
European Union 2010 target: halting the loss of biodiversity
And in a no-new policyScenario:not by 2050
![Page 14: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2. The Global Loss of Biodiversity
PARKS AND PROTECTED AREAS IN THE WORLD
![Page 15: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
3. Changes in Ecosystem Services due to loss of Biodiversity
2000 20502000 2050
![Page 16: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
3. Changes in Ecosystem Services due to loss of Biodiversity
Pristineforest
Degradedland
Extensive use
Plantation
Originalspecies
Fossil fuelsubsidized
Extensive use
Subsistence agriculture
![Page 17: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
2000 2050
Ecosystem service level
Population: 9100 million
GDP 2.8%/year
Population: 6092 million
GDP: 41.4$ trillion (PPP) (10^12)
GDP/capita: 680$ (PPP)
Services that would have been there, had biodiversity loss been halted
GDP, with feedback to economy from biodiversity
losses integrated - illustrative
GDP adjusted for impact of biodiversity loss - illustrative
Source: Patrick ten Brink (IEEP), Leon Braat (Alterra), Mark van Ooorshot (MNP), Matt Rayment (GHK)
4. Changes in Economic value due to loss of Biodiversity
Remaining ecosystem services
![Page 18: The Cost of Policy Inaction The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013101/56815202550346895dc04566/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
THE GLOBAL MONETARY COST OF POLICY INACTION
The loss grows with each year of biodiversity and ecosystem loss.
Land based ecosystems only
4. Changes in Economic value due to loss of Biodiversity
Relative to
2000Relative to
2000
Area
Billion EUR
Equivalent to % of GDP in
2050
Natural areas -155678 -7.97%
Forest managed 1852 0.95%
Extensive Agriculture -1109 -0.57%
Intensive Agriculture 1303 0.67%
Woody biofuels 381 0.19%
Cultivated grazing -786 -0.40%
World Total -13938 -7.1%