THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum...

49
THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE ISSUED: March 17,2011 REPORT NO. PC-1I-032 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: OWNER: APPLICANT: SUMMARY Planning Commission, Agenda of March 24, 2011 FLEISHER RESIDENCE - PROJECT NO. 218795 PROCESS TWO Mark R. Fleisher and Bruce R. Fleisher, Trustees of the Fleisher Family Trust (Attachment 12) Michael E. Turk, Permittee )!'/E,S TV "''''-''L.. Issue(s): Should the Planning Commission approve or deny an appeal of the staff decision to approve the construction of a three story, 2,226 square foot single family residence on a vacant lot at 1056 Chalcedony Street in the Pacific Beach Community PJanning Area? Staff Recommendation: Deny the appeal and uphold the staffdecision to Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 779217. Community Planning Group Recommendation: The Pacific Beach Planning Board voted to recommend denial of the project on October 27, 2010, by a vote of 11-0-0 with recommendations (Attachment 11). Environmental Review: This project is not pending an appeal of the environmental determination. The environmental exemption determination for this project was made on October 1,2010, and the opportunity to appeal that determination ended October 22, 20 I 0 (Attachment 8). Fiscal Impact Statement: None. All staff costs associated with the processing of this project are paid from a deposit account maintained by the owner. Code Enforcement Impact: There are no zoning or building code violations on the property.

Transcript of THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum...

Page 1: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

DATE ISSUED: March 17,2011 REPORT NO. PC-1I-032

ATTENTION:

SUBJECT:

OWNER:

APPLICANT:

SUMMARY

Planning Commission, Agenda of March 24, 2011

FLEISHER RESIDENCE - PROJECT NO. 218795PROCESS TWO

Mark R. Fleisher and Bruce R. Fleisher, Trustees of the Fleisher FamilyTrust (Attachment 12)

Michael E. Turk, Permittee

)!'/E,S TV"''''-''L.. ,r·c~

Issue(s): Should the Planning Commission approve or deny an appeal of the staffdecision to approve the construction of a three story, 2,226 square foot single familyresidence on a vacant lot at 1056 Chalcedony Street in the Pacific Beach CommunityPJanning Area?

Staff Recommendation: Deny the appeal and uphold the staff decision to ApproveCoastal Development Permit No. 779217.

Community Planning Group Recommendation: The Pacific Beach Planning Boardvoted to recommend denial of the project on October 27, 2010, by a vote of 11-0-0 withrecommendations (Attachment 11).

Environmental Review: This project is not pending an appeal of the environmentaldetermination. The environmental exemption determination for this project was made onOctober 1,2010, and the opportunity to appeal that determination ended October 22,20 I0 (Attachment 8).

Fiscal Impact Statement: None. All staff costs associated with the processing of thisproject are paid from a deposit account maintained by the owner.

Code Enforcement Impact: There are no zoning or building code violations on theproperty.

Page 2: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Housing Impact Statement: The Pacific Beach CommWlity Plan designates the 0.07acre site as low-medium residential density at 9 to 15 dwelling units per acre. Based onthis land use designation the project could accommodate I dwelling unit. The proposedproject would result in construction of I single-family dwelling Wlit on a vacant lot. Theproposed project is not subject to the Affordable Housing requirements of the City'sInclusionary Housing Ordinance. The project qualified for the Affordable-In-Fill Housingand Sustainable Building Expedite Program because it will provide 50% or more of itsprojected total electrical energy consumption by utilizing a photovoltaic renewable energysystem. Therefore, the project meets the "sustainable buildings" definition as establishedby Council Policy 900-14.

BACKGROUND

The 0.07 acre project site is located at 1056 Chalcedony Street in the Pacific Beach Community(Attachments I and 2). The property is located in the RM·I·I Zone, Coastal Overlay Zone (non­appealable), Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone, Parking Impact Overlay Zone, within thePacific Beach Community Plan and Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan (Attachment 3).

The rectangular shaped flat lot is vacant and was previously utilized as a landscaped open yardfor the residence on the lot to the west. The southern property bOWldary fronts on ChalcedonyStreet, and the northern property boundary fronts on an unnamed 20 foot wide alley. Residentialproperties are adjacent to the western and eastern property boundaries. The adjacent land usesare residential. Site elevations range from approximately 74 feet at the southern propertyboundary to approximately 76 feet Mean Sea Level at the northern property boundary. Theproject is located above the 1OO-year floodplain, is not located within or adjacent to the MultipleSpecies Conservation Program (MSCP) Multiple Habitat Planning Area (MHPA), and is notlocated in or adjacent to any Environmentally Sensitive Lands. The property is locatedapproximately a half mile from the waters of the Pacific Ocean. No public views are impactedby the development. The proposed development will take place entirely within private propertyand will not encroach onto or impact any existing or proposed physical public access ways.

DISCUSSION

Project Description:

The proposed development is located in the non-appealable Coastal Overlay Zone requiring aCoastal Development Penni!. The project proposes construction of a new sustainable three story2,226 square foot single family residence on a vacant lot (Attachments 5 and 9). Constructionincludes a detached 400 square foot two car carport, a 66 square foot second story balcony, and a338 square foot third story roof deck. The carport and decks total 804 square feet and are notincluded as gross floor area. Solar panels will be located on the roof of the residence. The threestory residential building will be a maximum height of 29 feet 9 inches, and the carport 12 feet 1inch in height. The buildings will be under the maximum 30 foot Coastal Height Limit allowedby the zone.

- 2 -

Page 3: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

The zone designates the property as multi-family residential RM-l-l, The purpose of the RMzones is to provide for multiple dwelling unit development at varying densities. The RM zonesindividually accommodate developments with similar densities and characteristics, Each of theRM zones is intended to establish development criteria that consolidates common developmentregulations, accommodates specific dwelling types, and responds to locational issues regardingadjacent land uses, The RM-I-I zone allows a maximum permitted density of 1 dwelling unitfor each 3,000 square feet oftot area. The lot is a 3,125 square foot site allowing 1 unit. The lotwidth and frontage are 25 feet. However, the minimum required lot size is 6,000 square feet,with a 50 foot wide lot and frontage. Though the project does not meet these criteria, the lot is alegal lot as defmed by SDMC 113.0237(a). The SDMC states that any lot or parcel that does notcomply with the minimum lot area or required lot dimensions may nevertheless be used incompliance with the applicable zone if the lot is a legal lot as determined by Section 113.0237(a).The required lot depth is 90 feet and the lot depth exceeds this amount at a depth of 125 feet.

The project does not exceed the gross floor area allowed by the zone. The zone allows amaximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.75 and the project is designed at 0.71 FAR. Themaximum FAR of 0.75 times the 3,125 square foot lot area allows a 2,344 square feet FAR. Theproject requests 2,226 square feet FAR meeting this requirement. The FAR does not include 404square feet of decks and 400 square feet for the carport as these areas are exempt from the FARcalculation. The project meets the required zoning yard setbacks. The front yard setbacks are 15feet for 50% of the width of the building and 20 feet for the remaining area, along the southemfrontage on Chalcedony Street. The minimum side setbacks adjacent to the western and easternresidential properties are 3 feet based on the premises that is 25 feet wide or less (SDMe131.0443(d)(2)(B). The rear yard abuts the alley, therefore the allowed setback is 5 feet. The projectwill provide 2 off-street automobile parking spaces in the carp011 which is accessed from thealley. The project was designed in conformance with the underlying zones and is not requestingdeviations or variances to the Land Development Code (Attachments 4, 6 and7).

Community Plan Analysis:

The purpose and intent of the Pacific Beach Community Plan is to promote the development of avariety ofhousing types and styles to provide a greater opportunity for housing that is bothaffordable and accessible to everyone, The residential goals are to enhance the neighborhoods byestablishing and maintaining street tree patterns and promoting general maintenance andimprovement. Design standards are to be implemented to ensure properties reflect the scale andcharacter of the established neighborhood. The implementation of the Community Plan policiesand recommendations are accomplished by applying the Land Development Code regulations ineffect for the site. The RM-I-I Zone in combination with the Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zoneeffectively limits the bulk and scale of the building by placing a height limit, establishingstaggered setbacks which create off-setting planes and building articulation.

The project is located at 1056 Chalcedony Street within the Pacific Beach Community Plan andLocal Coastal Program Land Use Plan. The Pacific Beach Community Plan designates this sitefor Low-Medium Density (9 to 15 dwelling units per acre). This density category ischaracterized by lower intensity multifamily housing, such as two-on-ones or duplexes. Theproject proposes 1 dwelling unit on a 0.07 acre legal lot for a density of 14 dwelling units peracre. The project is therefore consistent with the prescribed density in the community plan.

- 3 -

Page 4: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Development in the vicinity is characterized by one, two, and three story single and multi-familyhomes with various architectural styles. The proposed three story residence is consistent with thesurrounding development. Although the project site is not located within a designated viewcorridor in the Community Plan, a view to the ocean exists through Chalcedony Street lookingwest. The project observes the required front setbacks, therefore the functional view corridordov,n the street is maintained. The project site is located within Community Tree District 3 inthe community plan. The proposed street tree selections are consistent with the allowable trees inDistrict 3. The Conservation Element of the City's General Plan contains Climate Change andSustainable Development Goals and Policies which exceed the expectations ofthe SustainableBuilding Expedite Program. The project is a "sustainable building" as established by CouncilPolicy 900-14, therefore will provide photovoltaic panels for electrical energy located on the rooftop of the buildings. The building also adds sustainable features which include energy starappliances, high efficiency lighting, natural ventilation, dual pane low-E glazing on windows,low VOC materials, engineered wood, permeable paving areas, water conserving native and pestresistant plants, rain sensor shut off devices, and a high efficiency irrigation system. The projectis consistent with the Conservation Element of the General Plan.

The proposed structure is designed in a Spanish Colonial style of architecture with white stucco,dark wood accents, variegated clay rooftile and harrnnered iron railings. The building exteriorwill be stepped several times and use detailed architectural features to create a textural changeand an offset appearance for the walls. Beyond physical setbacks, several decks, railings andbalconies were included to soften and delineate the three levels for a stepped back appearance forthe structure. The landscape plan includes native and accent planting to create a stylisticallyappropriate setting as well as comply with the sustainable features of the project design criteria.The project conforms to the 30 foot Coastal Height Limit requirement, and meets the requiredzoning yard setbacks. No public view or public access to the water would be adversely affectedby the approval of this project. The project meets the intent of the guidelines for the CoastalOverlay and Coastal Height Limitation Overlay zones, and the Pacific Beach Community Planand Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan.

Project Appeal Issues:

A Process 2 decision for this project was approved by the Development Services Department(DSD) staff on December 17,2010. An appeal of this decision was filed January 11,2011 bythe neighbors (Attachment 10). The appeal issue with a response is provided below:

Issue - Bulk and Scale:

The appeal states that the project does not coruorrn to the community due to bulk and scale. Theneighbors feel that the proposed project is an eyesore for the community with no aesthetic valueto the look of the height, lacking consistency with the existing structures in the area.

StaffResponse - Stafffound the project to meet the requirements of the Community Plan and theunderlying zones. Staff notes that the implementation of the Community Plan policies andrecommendations are accomplished by applying the Land Development Code regulations ineffect for the site. The RM-l-l Zone in combination with the Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zoneeffectively limits the bulk and scale of the building by placing a height limit, requiring staggered

- 4 -

Page 5: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

yard setbacks which create off-setting planes and building articulation. The proposed singlefamily residence does not exceed the allowed density. No variance or deviations to the SOMCare being requested. The project meets the required step-backs and yard setbacks which limitconstruction in the setback areas. The proposed landscaping meets the landscape regulations.The project is limited to a maximum height of 30 feet by the Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone.Neither the Community Plan nor SOMC limit a structure to two stories. Applying the RM-1-1development regulations effectively regulates the bulk and scale of the new development per therecommendations of the Community Plan.

Community Group:

The Pacific Beach Planning Board voted to recommend denial of the project on October 27,2010, by a vote of 11-0-0 with recommendations (Attachment 11). The denial was based on theBoard's opinion that the carport should be included in the FAR as historically these carports havebeen enclosed after completion.

StaffResponse - SOMC 113.0234(a)(6) exempts carports from the FAR calculation when theyare constructed and maintained with more than two elevations ofthe element that are at least 75percent completely open. The proposed carport meets this criteria, therefore is not included inthe total FAR for the project. The project does not exceed the FAR allowed by the zone. Anyfuture conversion to enclose an approved carport would become a neighborhood codecompliance issue. To address the Board's concern, staff and the applicant agreed to add PermitCondition No. 17 to clarify the requirement for an open carport otherwise the project mightexceed the allowable FAR for the zone (Attachment 6).

Conclusion:

In summary, staff recommends denying the appeal and upholding the DSD decision to approvethe project as the project is consistent with the recommended land use, design guidelines, anddevelopment standards in effect for this site per the adopted Land Development Code, PacificBeach Community Plan and Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan,and the City of San DiegoGeneral Plan.

ALTERNATIVE(S)

1. Deny the appeal and Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 779217, withmodifications.

2. Approve the appeal and Deny Coastal Development Permit No. 779217, if the findingsrequired to approve the project cannot be affirmed.

- 5 -

Page 6: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Respectfully submitted,

\

Mike WestlakeProgram ManagerDevelopment Services Department

MW/DM

Attachments:

1. Project Location Map2. Aerial Photograph3. Community Plan Land Use Map4. Project Data Sheet5. Project Rendering6. Draft Pennit witlt Conditions7. Draft Permit Resolution with Findings8. Environmental Exemption9. Project Plans10. Copy of AppealII. Community Planning Group Recommendation12. Ownership Disclosure Statement13. Project Chronology

- 6 -

Diane MurbachProject ManagerDevelopment Services Department

Page 7: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

S8m Snea(JAll AmerocanGolfCot.ne

GenP,;lef' Pla73Shopping Center

~\

MtBrmdagePark

ClalremontMesaWesl ~

<Q

,Jg

'l.

$"

Ave

TecOIOte Uniyer1lrtYol I ~>-n

North I ~~- ...,-

Tecolote Canyon ..Natural Park

\9,~<:l,.

(()'l>

Q~

o~~ Cra,irEl~Ii

Z.c1c..

"J Bay Pa

u

>;0,.

\~'Ii

~"'(I

?<J>

61-Q'

1n~ p..ve(:)'Ii '

G!s!''!! p.."s

Mission1El3V Public,Golf CotJ'&e

LI",,"I.7 I IV

FieSla.8ay

MISsion!J.a:¥lPark

Ski Be'iOn

ael~\ S\

~~..m

..,.

~.""%~

<f).

PacificBeacl1

.~

'!J

-1'\

~c

~.a.tliIia CoY'e'

.8 Jolla Alta ~"0..CL'

CfJolla Mesa '"

Kate 0 Session"...Memonal P8~'

-s $I-IlOl"

~10

'"~ (;1 i)\~O "~'e

~~

Project Location MapFLEISHER RESIDENCE· PROJECT NO. 218795

1056 Chalcedony Street - J'acifie Beach

Bird Rock

Project Site~

~~

Pacific Ocean

Page 8: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

1056 Chalcedony Street - Pacific Beach

FLEISHER RESIDENCE - I'ROJECT NO. 218795

~~

~IV

o;..3~OTl~S\

North-...d. .,_

-

c~¥:.#J(I'j S\

Aerial Photograph

Project Site•

8>

Page 9: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Project Site

,

PACIFIC BEACHCO\lMU lTV PLA

LAl\'D USE

"-low - Medium Density -- • __

9.15 dulac :a -- .-----'=.-: .:--.-­.-.­.--.-­.--...-

ATTACHMENT 3

•Community Plan Land Use MapFLEISHER RESIDENCE· PROJECT NO. 218795

1056 Chalcedony Street - Pacific Beach

Page 10: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

ATTACHMENT 4

PROJECT DATA SHEETPROJECT NAME: Fleisher Residence - Project 218795

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construction of a three story 2,226 square foot singlefamily residence on a vacant lot at 1056 Chalcedony Street

COMMUNITY PLANAREA: Pacific Beach

DISCRETIONARYCoastal Development Permit

ACTIONS:

COMMUNITY PLAN LANDLow-Medium Density Residential (9-15 dulac).

USE DESIGNATION:

ZONING INFORMATION:ZONE: RM-l-l

HEIGHT LIMIT: 30 feet Coastal Height Limit Overlay ZoneLOT SIZE: 6,000 square feet

FLOOR AREA RATIO: 0.75FRONT SETBACK: IS feet/20 feet

SIDE SETBACK: 3 feet minimumSTREETSIDE SETBACK: NA

REAR SETBACK: 5 feet/AlleyPARKING: 2 spaces required

LAND USEADJACENT PROPERTIES: DESIGNATION & EXISTING LAND USE

ZONE

NORTH:Low - Medium Density

Multi Family ResidentialResidential and RM-1-1

SOUTH:Low - Medium Density

Multi Family ResidentialResidential and RM-l-l

EAST:Low - Medium Density

Multi Family ResidentialResidential and RM-l-l

WEST:Low - Medium Density

Single Family ResidenceResidential and RtVl-l-l

DEVIATIONS ORNone

VARIANCES REQUESTED:COMMUNITY PLANNING

On October 27, 2010, the Pacific Beach Planning BoardGROUPRECOMMENDATION:

voted ll-O-O to deny the project with recommendations.

Page 11: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

•Project RenderingFLEISHER RESIDENCE - PROJECT NO. 218795

J056 Chalcedony Street - I'acifie Beach

North

LJ

~

Iv,

Page 12: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

ATTACHMENT 6

RECORDING REQUESTED BYCITY OF SAN DIEGO

DEVELOPMENT SERVICESPERMIT INTAKE, MAIL STATION 501

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TOPROJECT MANAGEMENT

PERMIT CLERKMAIL STATION 501

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USEINTERNAL ORDER NUMBER: 24001121

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 779217FLEISHER RESIDENCE - PROJECT NO. 218795

PLANNING COMMISSION

This Coastal Development Pennit No. 779217 is granted by the Planning Commission oftheCity of San Diego to Mark R. Fleisher and Bruce R. Fleisher, Trustees ofthe Fleisher FamilyTrust, Owner, and Michael E. Turk, Inc., Permittee, pursuant 10 San Diego Municipal Code[SDMe] section 126.0708, The 0.07 acre site is located at 1056 Chalcedony Street in the RM-I­I Zone, Coastal Overlay Zone (non-appealable), Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone, ParkingImpact Overlay Zone, within the Pacific Beach Community Plan, The project site is legallydescribed as: Lot 27, Block 113, Map 1042, Pacific Beach, City of San Diego, County of SanDiego, State of California.

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Permit, permission is granted toOwner and Permittee to construct a three story 2,226 square foot single family residence anddetached carport on a vacant lot described and identified by size, dimension, quantity, type, andlocation on the approved exhibits [Exhibit "A"] dated March 24, 2011, on file in theDevelopment Services Department.

The project shall include:

a. Construction of a three story 2,226 square foot single family residence on a vacant lot.Construction allows a 400 square foot two vehicle carport, a 66 square foot secondstory balcony, and a 338 square foot third story roof deck for a total of 804 square feetnot included as gross floor area;

b. Landscaping (planting, irrigation and landscape related improvements);

c. Off-street parking;

Page I of 6

Page 13: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

d. A roof-mounted photovoltaic system consisting of solar panels sufficient to generate atleast 50 percent of the project's projected energy consumption in accordance withCouncil Policy 900-14; and

e. Public and private accessory improvements determined by the Development ServicesDepartment to be consistent with the land use and development standards for this site inaccordance with the adopted community plan, the California Environmental QualityAct [CEQA] and the CEQA Guidelines, the City Engineer's requirements, zoningregulations, conditions of this Permit, and any other applicable regulations of theSDMe.

STANDARD REOUIREMENTS:

I. This pennit must be utilized within thirty-six (36) months after the date on which all rightsof appeal have expired. If this permit is not utilized in accordance with Chapter 12, Article 6,Division I of the SDMC within the 36 month period, this permit shall be void unless anExtension of Time has been granted. Any such Extension of Time must meet all SDMCrequirements and applicable guidelines in effect at the time the extension is considered by theappropriate decision maker.

2. No permit for the construction, occupancy, or operation of any facility or improvementdescribed herein shall be granted, nor shall any activity authorized by this Permit be conductedon the premises until:

a. The OwnerlPermittee signs and returns the Permit to the Development ServicesDepartment; and

b. The Permit is recorded in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder.

3. While this Permit is in effect, the subject property shall be used only for the purposes andunder the terms and conditions set forth in this Permit unless otherwise authorized by theappropriate City decision maker.

4. This Permit is a covenant running with the subject property and all of the requirements andconditions of this Permit and related documents shall be binding upon the Owner/Permittee andany successor(s) in interest.

5. The continued use of this Pennit shall be subject to the regulations of this and any otherapplicable governmental agency.

6. Issuance of this Permit by the City of San Diego does not authorize the Owner/Permitteefor this Permit to violate any Federal, State or City laws, ordinances, regulations or policiesincluding, but not limited to, the Endangered Species Act of 1973 [ESA] and any amendmentsthereto (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.).

Page 2 of6

Page 14: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

7. The Owner/Pennittee shall secure all necessary building permits. The OwnerlPermittee isinformed that to secure these pernlits, substantial building modifications and site improvementsmay be required to comply with applicable building, fire, mechanical, and plumbing codes, andState and Federal disability access laws.

8. Construction plans shall be in substantial conformity to Exhibit "A." Changes,modifications, or alterations to the construction plans are prohibited unless appropriateapplication(s) or amendment(s) to this Permit have been granted.

9. All of the conditions contained in this Permit have been considered and were determined-necessary to make the findings required for approval of this Permit. The Permit holder isrequired to comply with each and every condition in order to maintain the entitlements that aregranted by this Permit.

If any condition of this Permit, on a legal challenge by the OwnerlPermittee of this Permit, isfound or held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable, or unreasonable,this Permit shall be void. However, in such an event, the Owner/Permittee shall have the right,by paying applicable processing fees, to bring a request for a new permit without the "invalid"conditions(s) back to the discretionary body which approved the Permit for a determination bythat body as to whether all of the findings necessary for the issuance of the proposed permit canstill be made in the absence of the "invalid" condition(s). Such hearing shall be a hearing denovo, and the discretionary body shall have the absolute right to approve, disapprove, or modifythe proposed permit and the condition(s) contained therein.

10. The Owner/Permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents,officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, orcosts, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating tothe issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void,challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision.The City will promptly notify OwnerlPermittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and, if theCity should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the OwnerlPermittee shall not thereafter beresponsible to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers, andemployees. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, orobtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In theevent of such election, OwnerlPermittee shall pay all of the costs related thereto, includingwithout limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement betweenthe City and Owner/Permittee regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority tocontrol the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to,settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the OwnerlPermittee shall not be requiredto payor perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by Owner/Permittee.

Page 3 of 6

Page 15: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

AFFORDABLE/SUSTAINABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS:

11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, construction documents shall fully illustrate theincorporation of a roof-mounted photovoltaic system consisting of solar panels sufficient togenerate at least 50 percent of the project's projected energy consumption, in accordance withCouncil Policy 900-14.

ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS:

12. Prior to foundation inspection, the OwnerlPermittee shall submit a building padcertification signed by a Registered Civil Engineer or a Licensed Land Surveyor, certifying thatthe pad elevation based on USGS datum is in accordance with the approved plans,

13. Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the OwnerlPermittee shall incorporateany construction Best,Management Practices necessary to comply with Chapter 14, Article 2,Division I (Grading Regulations) of the San Diego Municipal Code, into the construction plansor specifications, satisfactory to the City Engineer.

14. Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the OwnerlPermittee shall submit a WaterPollution Control Plan (WPCP). The WPCP shall be prepared in accordance with the guidelinesin Appendix E of the City's Storm Water Standards, satisfactory to the City Engineer.

15. This project proposes to export 8 cubic yards of material from the project site, All exportmaterial shall be discharged into a legal disposal site. The approval ofthis project does not allowthe onsite processing and sale of the export material unless the underlying zone allows aconstruction and demolition debris recycling facility with an approved Neighborhood Use Permitor Conditional Use Permit per LDC Section 141.0620(i).

PLANNING/DESIGN REQUIREMENTS:

16, Ov.l1erlPermittee shall maintain a minimum of 2 off-street parking spaces on the propertyat all times in the approximate locations shown on the approved Exhibit "A," Parking spacesshall comply at all times with the SDMC and shall not be converted for any other use unlessotherwise authorized by the appropriate City decision maker in accordance with the SDMC,

17, The carport shall be constructed and maintained with at least two sides that are at least 75percent completely open. The carport shall be included in the calculation of Floor Area Ratio(FAR) ifless than two sides of the carport are 75 percent completely open, The project may notexceed the allowable FAR of the zone.

18. A topographical survey conforming to the provisions of the SDMC may be required ifit isdetermined, during construction, that there may be a conflict between the building(s) underconstruction and a condition of this Permit or a regulation of the underlying zone. The cost ofany such survey shall be borne by the Owner/Permittee.

Page 4 of6

Page 16: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

19. All private outdoor lighting shall be shaded and adjusted to fall on the same premiseswhere such lights are located and in accordance with the applicable regulations in the SDMC.

WATER & SEWER REQUIREMENTS:

20. All proposed private sewer facilities located within a single lot are to be designed to meetthe requirements of the California Plumbing Code and will be reviewed as part of the buildingpermit plan check.

21. The Owner/Permittee agrees to design and construct all proposed public water and sewerfacilities in accordance with established criteria in the most current edition of the City of SanDiego Water and Sewer Facility Design Guidelines and City regulations, standards and practicespertaining thereto. Water and sewer facilities as shown on the approved Exhibit "A," shall bemodified at final engineering to comply with standards.

22. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Owner/Permittee shall assure, by permitand bond, the design and construction of new water service(s) outside of any driveway, and theremoval of all existing unused services, within the right-of-way adjacent to the project site, in amanner satisfactory to the Director of Public Utilities and the City Engineer.

23. Prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy, all public water and sewer facilities,including services and meters, shall be complete and operational in a manner satisfactory to theDirector of Public Utilities and the City Engineer.

24. No trees or shrubs exceeding three feet in height at maturity shall be installed within tenfeet of any water and sewer facilities.

INFORMATION ONLY;

• The issuance of this discretionary use permit alone does not allow the immediatecommencement or continued operation of the proposed use on site. The operation allowedby this discretionary use permit may only begin or recommence after all conditions listedon this permit are fully completed and all required ministerial permits have been issued andreceived final inspection.

• Any party on whom fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions have been imposedas conditions of approval of this Permit, may protest the imposition within ninety days ofthe approval of this development permit by filing a written protest with the City Clerkpursuant to California Government Code-section 66020.

• This development may be subject to impact fees at the time of construction permitIssuance.

APPROVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Diego on March 24, 2011 andResolution No. PC- _

Page 5 of6

Page 17: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Pennit TypeJPTS Approval No,: CDP No. 779217/PTS 218795Date of Approval: March 24, 20 II

AUTHENTICATED BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO DEVELOPMENT SERVICESDEPARTMENT

Diane MurbachDevelopment Project Manager

NOTE: Notary acknowledgmentmust be attached per Civil Codesection 1189 et seq.

The undersigned OwnerJPermittee, by execution hereof, agrees to each and every condition ofthis Permit and promises to perfonn each and every obligation of Owner/Pennittee hereunder.

[FLEISHER FAMILY TRUST]Owner

BY~---,---=--==--=---,--- _Mark R. FleisherTrustee

[MICHAEL E. TURK, INc.]Pennittee

By c:-c:-:-----:-=--=----:---------Michael E. TurkPresident

NOTE: Notary acknowledgmentsmust be attached per Civil Codesection 1189 et seq.

Page 6 of6

Page 18: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

ATTACHMENT 7

PLANNING COMMISSIONRESOLUTION NO. PC-__

COASTAL DEVELOPlvIENT PERMIT NO. 779217FLEISHER RESIDENCE - PROJECT NO. 218795

WHEREAS, Mark R. Fleisher and Bruce R. Fleisher. Trustees of the Fleisher Family Trust, Owner. andMichael E. Turk, Inc., Permittee, filed an application with the City of San Diego for a permit to constructa three story 2,226 square foot single family residence and detached carport on a vacant lot, as describedin and by reference to the approved Exhibits "A" and corresponding conditions of approval for theassociated Coastal Development Permit No. 779217, on portions ofa 0.07 acre site;

WHEREAS, the project site is located at 1056 Chalcedony Street in the RM-l-l Zone, Coastal OverlayZone (non-appealable), Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Parking Impact Overlay Zone, within thePacific Beach Community Plan;

WHEREAS, the project site is legally described as Lot 27, Block 113, Map 1042, Pacific Beach, City ofSan Diego, County of San Diego, State of California;

WHEREAS, on December 17, 2010. the Planning Commission of the City of San Diego consideredCoastal Development Permit No. 779217 pursuant to the Land Development Code of the City of SanDiego;

BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Diego as follows:

That the Planning Commission adopts the following written Findings, dated March 24, 20II.

fINDINGS:

Coastal Development Permit Findings - Section MC 126.0708

1. The proposed coastal development will not encroach upon any existing physical accessway that is legally used by the public or any proposed public accessway identified in a LocalCoastal Program land use plan; and the proposed coastal development will enhance andprotect public views to and along the ocean and other scenic coastal areas as specified in theLocal Coastal Program land use plan.

The project is located at 1056 Chalcedony Street in the Pacific Beach Community. The southernproperty boundary fronts on Chalcedony Street, and the northern property boundary fronls on anunnamed alley. Residential properties are adjacent to the western and eastern propertyboundaries. The adjacent land uses are residentiaL The project is located in the non-appealableCoastal Overlay Zone requiring a Coastal Development Permit The project is not located on oradjacent to a coastal bluff, coastal beach. or any Environmentally Sensitive Lands. The project islocated approximately a half mile from the waters of the Pacific Ocean.

Page I of3

Page 19: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

The 0.07 acre parcel is vacant and was previously utilized as a side yard with landscaping for theresidence on the lot to the west. The project site is a rectangular shaped flat lot. Site elevationsrange from approximately 74 feet at the southern property boundary to approximately 76 feetMean Sea Level at the northern property boundary. The project proposes a new 2,226 square footsingle family sustainable residence with a detached 400 square foot two car carport, 66 squarefoot second story balcony, and a 338 square foot third story roof deck. The carport and deckstotal 804 square feet and are not included as gross floor area. The three story residential buildingwill be a maximum height of 29 feet 9 inches, and the carport 12 feet I inch. The buildings willbe under the maximum 30 foot Coastal Height Limit allowed by the zone. The residentialbuilding will include a photovoltaic system supplying more than 50% of the project's totalelectrical energy consumption in confonnance with Council Policy 900-14 requirements. Thesolar panels will be located on the roof of the residence.

The proposed development will take place entirely within private property and will not encroachonto or impact any existing or proposed physical public access ways. Access to the coastline isprovided via the adjacent public right-of-ways. The proposed development is not located betweenthe shoreline and the [,rst public roadway, therefore no views to the ocean are required to bepreserved. The proposed development will adhere to the required yard area setbacks pursuant tothe Land Development Code in confonnance with the underlying RM-l-I Zone. No public accesswill be affected by this project. The proposed development will not impact any physical accessway and will protect public views as recommended in the Pacific Beach Community Plan andLocal Coastal Program Land Use Plan. Therefore, the proposed coastal development will notencroach upon any existing physical access way that is legally used by the public or any proposedpublic access way identified in the Local Coastal Program land use plan; and the proposed coastaldevelopment 'will enhance and protect public views to and along the ocean and other sceniccoastal areas as specified in the Local Coastal Program land use plan.

2. The proposed coastal development will not adversely affect environmentally sensitivelands.

The project is located at 1056 Chalcedony Street in the Pacific Beach Community. The adjacentland uses are residential. The proposed development will take place entirely within privateproperty. The City of San Diego conducted an envirorunental review of this project anddetennined that the project was exempt per the State of California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Section 15303. The project site is above the 100 and 500-year floodplain, is not within oradjacent to the Multiple Species Conservation Program, Multiple Habitat Planning Area, and isnot located in or adjacent to Environmentally Sensitive Lands. Therefore, the proposed coastaldevelopment will not adversely affect environmentally sensitive lands.

3. The proposed coastal development is in conformity with the certified Local CoastalProgram land use plan and complies with all regulations ofthe certified ImplementationProgram.

The project is located at 1056 Chalcedony Street within the Pacific Beach Community Plan andLocal Coastal Program Land Use Plan. The Pacific Beach Community Plan designates this sitefor Low-Medium Density (9 to 15 dwelling units per acre). The project proposes 1 dwelling unit

Page 2 of3

Page 20: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

on a 0.07 acre legal lot for a density of 14 dwelling units per acre. The project is thereforeconsistent with the prescribed density in the community plan. Development in the vicinity ischaracterized by one, two, and three story single and multi-family homes with variousarchitectural styles. The proposed three story residence is consistent with the surroundingdevelopment. Although the project site is not located within a designated view corridor in theCommunity Plan, a view to the ocean exists through Chalcedony Street looking west. The projectobserves the required front setbacks, therefore the functional view corridor down the street ismaintained,

The project conforms to the 30 foot Coastal Height Limit requirement, and meets the requiredzoning yard setbacks. No public view or public access to the water would be adversely affected bythe approval oftbis project The proposed development is not located between the shoreline andthe first public roadway, therefore no public views to the ocean shall be preserved. The projectmeets the intent of the guidelines for the Coastal Overlay and Coastal Height Limitation Overlayzones, and the Pacific Beach Community Plan and Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan,Therefore, the proposed coastal development is in conformity with the certified Local CoastalProgram land use plan and complies with all regulations of the certified Implementation Program.

4. For every Coastal Development Pennit issued for any coastal development between tbenearest public road and the sea Or the shoreline of any body of water located witbin theCoastal Overlay Zone the coastal development is in confonnity with the public access andpublic recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act.

The subject property is not located between the nearest public road and the sea or the shoreline ofany body ofwater. Therefore, the project is not required to demonstrate conformance with thepublic access and recreation policies of the California Coastal Act as required by this finding.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the findings hereinbefore adopted by the PlanningCommission, Coastal Development Permit No, 779217 is hereby GRANTED by the PlanningCommission to the referenced O'-'TIer(s)/Permittee(s), in the form, exhibits, terms and conditions as setforth in Coastal Development Permit No. 779217, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a parthereof.

Diane MurbachDevelopment Proj ect ManagerDevelopment Services

Adopted on: March 24, 2011

Internal Order No. 24001121

Page 3 of3

Page 21: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

ATTACHMENT 8

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

(Chock one or both)

TO: X RECORDER/COUNTY CLERKP.o. Box 1750, MS A-331600 PACIFIC HWY, ROOM 260SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-2422

___O.FFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH1400 TENTIi STREET, ROOM 121SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

PROJECT TITLE/ NO.: FLEISHER RESIDENCE 1218795

FROM: CITY OF SAN DIEGODEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT1222 FIRST AVENUE, MS 501SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

PROJECT LOCATION-SPECIFrc: 1056 Chalcedony Street, San Diego, CA 92109

PROJECT LOCAnON-CITY/COUNTY: San Diego/San Diego

DESCRlPTION OF NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT: Applicant is requesting a COASTAL DEVELOPMENTPERMIT to construct a 2,226-square foot three-story single-family residence with 239 square feet of balconyand roof deck area combined, and a 400-square-foot carport. in addition the project would also constructvarious site improvements, which includes assodated hardscape and landscaping. The 0.0717-acre project siteis located 1056 Chalcedony Street; the project site is designated Low-Medium Density (9 to <15 dwelling unitsper acre) and is within the RM-l-l (Residential-Multiple Unit) Zone, theCoaslal Overlay Zone (Non­Appealable 2 Area); and the Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone within the Pacific Beach Community Plan andLocal Coastal Program Area. (LEGAL: Lot 27, in Block 113, Map No. 1042).

NAME OF PERSON OR AGENCY CARRYING OUT PROJECT: West of Ingraham, LLC, 4641 Ingrallarn Street, SanDiego, CA 92109, (858) 488-2382.

EXEMPT STATUS; (CHECK ONE)() MINISTERIAL (SEC. 21080(b)(1); 15268)() DECLARED EMERGENCY (SEC. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a))() EMERGENCY PROJECT (SEC. 21080(b)( 4); 15269 (b)(c))(X) CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures)() STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS;

REASONS WHY PROJECT IS EXEMPT: The City of San Diego conducted an Initial Study that determined that theproject would not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment in that the project isconsistent with the density as determined by the community plan and implemented by the applicable zone.The prOject would not result in any significant impacts to biological resources, historical resources, traffic,noise, air quality, or water quality. The project meets the criteria set forth in CEQA Section 15303 which allowsfor the construction of a duplex in an urbanized area; and CEQA Section 15332 which allows for theconstruction of infill development within an urbanized area that can be adequately served by all requiredutilities and public services. In addition, the exceptions listed in CEQA Section 15300.2 wouJd not apply.

Page 22: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON' E. Shearer-Nguyen TELEPHONE: (619) 446-5369

October 1. 2010

IF FILED llY APPLICANT:

1. ATTACH CERTIFrED DOCUMENT OF EXEMPTION FINDING.

2. HAS A NOnCE OF EXEMPTION BEEN FILED BY THE PUBLIC AGENCY APPROVING THE PROJECT?

()YES ()NO

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO HAS DETERMINED TliE ABOVE ACTIVITY TO BE EXEMPT FROM

CEQA.

~(l n/((Jfuw--SIGNATURE/TITLE

CHECK ONE:

(X) SIGNED By LEAD AGENCY

( ) SIGNED BY ApPLICANT

DATE Of PROJECT ApPROVAL

DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING WITH COUNTY CLERK OR apR:

Page 23: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

- .......-----------..----__...__.........._............................._, . .. ._-............_....~_~.~~__~_~ ......._...__..., .........."" ................._.~_ ... ...._~T_~ ..._-...",,__ ............... -... .. -..=.,._.. ....,.... .. _ .. ......-_

ATTACHMENT 9

FLEISHER RESIDENCE1056 CHALCEDONY ST.

PACIFIC BEACH, CA 92109

A SOLAR POWERED PROJECTCOASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

Pr'"epc:::red Bij: ~vl!lion 14.REBtCCA MA~Z Revis-ion l~t~O:2~ ?ie:Eiot ~rel street ReVI~lon 1:2,$v1t8 106 ReVl&lon II,Sc::ln DlIl!Igo, CA. "!2101 Revj&iOn 10,(61"1) .2ar-QQ05 Revl~ion l1:li,':-0>(, .261--42ee Revl~lon eo

Rsv1~lon 1:~v19Ion 6~

Pro reGot Addrel5~; ~vl~lon 5,los6' c:;.HAL.c;.I;;DoNY' -:;T. ~vl~'on 4,F'AGI!"'h::.. BEAG-H, CA 'llI::2I~ RevisIon 9,

RevisIon 2, H-30-IORev~'on I: 0'1-03-10

COVER SHEET

Page 24: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

- -- ......_--_...._-----..._P---"''I'__._--.,--

<l

_1040_ISo_1:1,_Ih_1Clo_..._eo_1,_.._50_4­_51_.2,1__1,--­_.2'" 1:1

~ H.IrlJIo&A. • AMOGIAlB, '*".668"~A""iItI:llo~~.eA iQ)151!9... .... 2M-f'116.'7CoClNT'M-T, ..Jc:ltI(~

~~~Iiric..1ClZ!"eT~ IT... 41Q6&6,N DIiMCl'. U. oJttlOlTIO..~~GONTAI:oT.~~

,~~.;.;

"",,- -~

OIRECTORY"

HI' P'WtM".~r"\..QICIIIt"'-""'N

~J ~~.~1I'1..'N

~.2 GIIrIII""II:M~'~AT"Il:Ita,t.:2.O ~AnoNa

.t4J .......A~M.t:J au..J:HN5 IIleTlCte

....-JlIIIQ!. ""',.., ......IT'I"5"M7r

--'Tlf) ~...-r

"J .L.BMtI) JtN:) NdJIG."!' CAT"TI.::l ~~--G-l ~~-ItDD ~l"'I..NI.

_.

-

.... ,....LEGEND ANDPROJECT DATA

41l'llGlIIIQQ

"'A""......

"'A

""""

S,Ia .."..

"'A.:z.!l-'IB.'1!I Y. (0." x B,D!I ....J

.... HGOAS'fAL~ LlMtT. UTT' c;.oAM".....~I!"P..-.:;T

c.D/IIff/ltL.~~P"CR1H!"""TIU:::TIQH "'" /It. '5fNIN.I: P'N1Ll"~NCl'Prr~~.

..Alto~. 2,S1e.... ~. lQ.1I .x S,IZIi !II"J

LMMo-...BtIT'Il'l".&.INa. ......~•1JIIIIIIfl~·IfIfICJ~.'t'MIItD~ .. ...., .....

~~~. "51".1Ill:Ic:lP~ .!!11!6~.

TOTAl-~ NfBII • ~..,..

NW!:Ie 'aN a' +nr!"

....,......,..

2~~.AI:Z&~ fIeIIl: SI'NiIl.J! P,H4j,.Y~J'II1lt.~ (4009J".~

.....-PRO..JEG.T OATA

-----­.......... .......-

SGlUARE FOOTA6E TOTALS:

_UIC

~~~"", "

I II I\ I

" I...._-_.1'''

S"I"'MBOlSABBREVIATIONS

"""'"' ............... ....... ...TIlIOIAL......T. ~~Ga."'1U.!: I'W<. .................... ----- ........ ~CAL.....,.. AT f"'INIItISI I"lDOR - ---. -", ....... ....-........ ............. -- -""'-....T. ......-", - --..... -- ....... ~INec:Il •-. -", MD.

_........."""" ~.......... ...,.". """'-"""""- _T ..",. .."..,.".-T. -- ""-

_.......,..,. ","""",'!1G ....... M.U.ION

.... ........ ... NOIm1...,.. '"""""" NJ.o. !NaT 1\1 c..clfl'T1IItAGTBar. - .... -BIJA iI.lL.T .....~ -. ...........

XU. ,."."'~..- ....eoer"""- """",-,,'TION .... ..-AU.c..L. - .... 0.0. "" ........""" av.IO OS>. 0lII'0IC!I!~..... ........ O~D. """""'-"" """""...... .......... _.

"""""o><.u. ""'"""'" ............ ...". .... ~""'- -- .".,.. ........."""". .-",

_."""""""GON'. """'"""""COOl<. .,."...,'TION ~Av. ~A""'"-. .,.,..."..,.""" ~.o. -............. """""""" .... ................... ..........,"'" ~....... ........., ................-. _... ........ ......""........ ~ ...-. .........-. .......",. .....,. .,..-• .J. """"""" ....... ...... ........

.:o.T. ..........,lU ...... -..... ......... -.. ~

.l"L ...........- .-. ..........,~U. PQIICW~ !ICiIJNII!!: II'OQT...... ........ "'~l. ~"",~INUI_.

-.:>unoN ....,. ..-....... Dt1*MTJoeNT ~ ..-.rT1C'IlI>IA. - ~. """"-. 0-.""". "..,..,. ....... .......",.,.PIM. --PW. ........,. It. -""' ..-. -. --",.. p,:"~DIIo ...... .......-........ ..- It.Ql"L IIIblIHT CJ/II ........

""-_.... .....,. """"".... --o. ..... ........ ~"IB) GelLIIe iI'LAM..... ....... ..... _......

.... ~A""" -. --....... .......,.,..,. ...... -.... .....TIIlO"'- ........ -"'"1U'o'. ......,,,- ...... ...--- -" ........ --..-"""'- ............ -- ......T_....... .....- _. --tNT. ..........a - .........!W. -- ..... '"""'"o. ...... a&'J'IIIUrr,I,,"-Ata., It.o. ...-~.... ......._. -- ... ...",.~ I!!!!I.E'JM::. .....Tat~ ...... .....,.-....... .........,. 00lCl>. ...-........... 0><IImI6 :COT• """""""..... - ....... -...om-_.

""""'" ..... --..... -• S>• ....,... ...... ...... .......""" ......".""" ..... .....-.... ....- .... ..."...~. I'IItI!H ....,... ..... .T..-...."'" ....._- ...... --• 0<. ...... ....... -"- ....,... .... ..........lUI<. ........... ~. ..........,.."........... .............,. ...... "'A"""..... ""'" .",. ...-....... ..-.- 1m.. ."........... - .""" .-M • ........ 0Tl0lC.. ."""".........,.,.... -...... -- ...... ........."....""v. ""v--....... -.... T• -...... ........ Tb. _a...,.. .....- TAO. -...,..."..".,.... """"" T.... """"""...,~~.IiP.-- TIO.. TEUI"HONI!-.-. ................ """" ""'" ...... 1-......:>........ .- ...... """"...... -_.... "'T• ........,....... -.-.-.... ....... -.... ...... T:v. ~Hr• ....... ~. ..........."'"-

_....."'V",," teA.'rI*, V!!tfTLIr,1'1ON ...-. -""'A,.."Hl"L ""' ...- -. ....".,...".....,. ......on--._... - ..... lITtl.ln'"""'"'. ..................... """"""'" ""G. v................... .........,.." V£.T• .........~TU:INT. """""" .....,.. "",,",-,,'TION.......... """"""",,,,1& ......... ...................... .,.,..........- ......"..". VJJI. ".,...,.".......,JT. ...... ""'- -V.T. ........ .....laT. I<ItOIt!!Ol ... -....... .............. r<.o.

...._...."...,..- .......-r ...,. """"loAV. LAV.A~ ...... ..............,""'" .....- ..... .....1!II;teA~...... L..-_ - -LT. LlOHf ..... --....... ...._............ .......... ..... ...-.......... ~ ..,.,.. ---MAL ...........

YD. TNI!/>

I. ~~trotaT~A~""UiII PlIlI9 1m...... ,I...J5'I'INto~ IN ""f: ~'"""QH nEI"\JIrHD AL.L ....,.."~ iI"!!CW. 1N5per..n,,,,.. M LIM......-r.~~rc:.ND....,.~W,..

....... l!Im~~IIMIIlW..Dt'IIf~PO-fII.~~~~PGW~UM.

2. 'n"Il)1'a>~y~~~~t7T1'C!~~~~TIIe I!I..tlM'TTSt AT'1tI!P!!IIMT ~:DIVIMQNPIlII:IfI: TO~ 0f6 TH!!! P'I!IID4T.

L "'"~111 ('If'~~~CDt<IPlETION etfIl'tI:MK~~IAL.~TIONH&T l!Ie~,ItM)seH'T1!D 'W"l1'C ,.IB.P ~'nCJN PfVII4l:lIN."

.... -AM ~llc:'Mf"(IR~~ HI!!iT I!!I!!Its'IT1m om,. "1Il.P ~TiCJN PMDaoN I"'OIt~AJ..~ TO ~n=:4tl.

!l. ·A~rc...-.~,,"~~~~n::t/;~,*~NCI~TOTM!!!I"'e!.D~~~ 'JO tleC;.T1ON cr~A8ItIl::AftD~ 'P'ClI~1

SPEGIAL INSI=ECTIONSI

TtI!~III"IU.~~TNf·~~l1C~t:J(''M!~AT1OH~atJl1'If;c:n"t'" C1I' ....... ~.-.rA&.ft..M

..~'ft)~~~ne~TII"lLI.~'TM!!!-

Page 25: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

--....------------ ...__ ..__.... .. . ...... __..-._.....-. ...__-........_~, ........... ~_ ..__.._._..r.... .....-.._M!""' ~ ..._._.... _ ....._."U ... ........._-.. ... ............ -.._...,. ............. ... __

<JNOTES

08-24-10

'Sr1eet :3 or 1:2

GENERALSh....t Tltl..,

11_ CClNT'RAC.TQR StIAl..L.. ~~ C~TION Qf ~I~~

~L!:,A,N. ANI" GLEAR: THE ENTlR.E A'REA OF A.L.l.. t:lf'BR:IS ~ ANT'~"""~I.AL. 1;.....~liiD~,. t-ll~ Of"Ii~T1Qf'l.

12, TrE oHie~ ~t;Ft.v'I;=- T.-.II'" ItII5HT TO ~NI5I';.. INC~o;f!' 0ItRf:DJ.)c.f T+E SGOPE OF n+15 I"I::lI'oIK. ALl. CtiAN5l::5 TO THI5c..~T :=.H"'.L..l. ElI: F.OlJT'ED~ Tt-te: A~HI~T

"l. fflEPi".E NO ~0H5~TI~ DE:TAIL.~ A~ ~OI"G'; ~ NOTEDFOR. "'NoY 'P....RT OF Tt1E; ~, DETA,IL.5 ~Ll. f'lE; 'l'1iE 51'11"11'; 1>5FOR. OTHEtt ~IMIL""~~ or;;; F""- MANJF"'C,T<.I~~

~TAMDA~ DETAI~ Al.Itl I"t&TAUJ.,ToOM ~IJI~TS A'ND~~IFI~ATIOhI~.

GENERAL NOTES:

6_ k.l- W'-l'5~TICll'.IANO INo;TALL....TI~ ~.a.Ll.. CQ'MPLY"'ITH ALl.- A"U~I'" l.-~AL, '5TATE. Afm' ~il~AL COl')ES,...,.;p F!.E5Ub....TI~ Jl\lHICH GoOVEFI:'N THIS> TYF'E OF GON5~"I~,THI'!:o f~c:.L~OE'S. 6:.IT 15 IN "NO MY LIMITED TO, ,tIE GIJI<'.RENTADOPTE.:~ m;>ITlor-: OF iHJ; IJNI~ 61JH..DI~ ~0IJ'Iii (1"1"'11E;DITIOK), LNI'FORM f"L.1J!ot'l1ra. c:.ODE, 'NAilDNAI.. i::L.EC.TRIc:.Al..CO::-E AND TJiL.E :24.

.,. C.~TQ~~L I'NDlv'IO~Al...L'( WARRANT I"Q'" 0l\E~R ALL 1-1A~I""L'5~ ~1-1':"M~I'I"f!>(G~ AS0TtI~1&E NOTEP.

Revl.srcn 14,R&vf!,ron 13,Revi:!oron 1.2,Rev~~on II.~vl:!oion 10,Reovl~ion c:l,Rtc<vl:!olon f1,~vliStIOr'l1.

Rt!lvl6lr::on 6.'Revl&lon S~

Ti'.evl&lon 4,Re....lslon 3:Rftvlslotl 2, 11-~O-lO

R.avl$l,oo I: 0"1-0::1-10

e. ~II'Y1ENSIONS 5I-i.'lo.L.L T~ ~6JE:!"J':.E ~ 5C-AL:;Dl:=TAIL DAAl"IIN~ SI'1ALL. TAK;; ffiEc:.EDf~OYE'R 5l'-1AL.L.SCALE PRA"'IN.6S, DO NOT sc.A.!-E I:l'PAJ'll1N6:5-. T;.IEC~TO!=!.!STO 1~EJ:>IAiEl-'"NOtiFY j"E APJ::HITEc..T or....'NT' [jj~PA'NC-IEo, ~N. THEO~I~ PRIOR jC;J ~i"'RTINc;. JoN'(

I"ORTIO'N ~ ~K

~. COOTRA.CTOIi<:&. ....1iU: TO ~TEGTALL. pt;;:0l"':E~ AND T1'IE~ OF ALL OTHER~ ....-G-...IN~T D'A'MA6oE OR IN~'"

~~ ElY .-..c;.nVITY OF "''I'"OTHEfil: ~TOf'i,:, OR6l:N-~ c.oN~T~, "-N'" DI:<'FOl:t;""',A.."tI~rtlTJ-l OTHE~~'5 KO~~ 5"'AL.L. 6f -r<.."'F~TED TO THE6~~TOf;o, ~ T~E:: ....~i'lI1Ec:.T PRIOR TO c.oMJ'-',l;NC-I~ ANY

"""".

I"'. T~ c..oN~TOFt~ ~ 'flI"'~t8ll"'J....1'" F"~ AWYOA~ TO UNDEfi:6lFl.C'lJI'D lJ1'1L.lTIE5 ENGQIJNT'ERED IN ARl:A5~~ EXf:.AVA,.IONS ARE. N~E:'SS~ A"'ID 5H,II.ll R!:f',oA,IR At.rr"5~e.tI DA~.E AT HI5- 0h'N D:PE1'6!:::. IJTILITY" L1'NCSo SHALl. ~~f'~'f fNOTECTED ~Fl:E n-E1'" MJ5T BE MAIIIITAINE:DI.l>ItlERAWIL.~I~.

I., TM'l;~ ~I~A~ I~O A~ A '5ET ....~ A~ M6T TO~!>E'f"AMTEP

Ie. .All.. c..ON5~c.TIOf,l 5f;oIo,J...L c..0N"'0FlM !"LITH Tttr:. E!lJILDIN6~I"ARTMENT STAMPED AN:) ....PPROVl:D SET Of'" l"'RA~l~

13. CO~'T'R"i,c.TDR '5I-W....L NOT MAl<:.!:: C+-IAN60I!~ OR :Dei ANY~~~ITtGVT I'«ITTI'Ji ,r.,uT~I.zATION~ THE.ol"l~ OR HI~ ~IZ~f':,f;F'~~IiiNi"'TIY'f;.

l4. T+-lE' A'RCHITEc.T o;iolAU- lfJ. NQ JI"IA'" BE' ltEo;"'r)N;,IBl-E 'F'rJ!:tHolWII THo: 1"11:'l-D ¥'lGIRK I:; 'I"1"~F~R.1"'IED I"", ClN. ~ ARDIA'>tO TH.EJCIE3 51TE OF<. FOR 1'o'E~ OR TI ~IN'::5 OF PER'FORI'fA~

OF"Tl-£ ~.

10. I~ ~r:..I"I<:D o!'IIl".l-A~ ANO ~1F-Ic..Anr:n..o;

~ it<J;' T'rFe. ....m ~lTY 1'l::I:'~1~,

5LeGON'T'RAl:;T0!=<5'!"1A"- 5Le5TInJT'f: ''!:GUAL" ITEt-S IN Tl-EIF!. EHDHEN. .....F"P~O',IED 1M J1RITIN6 5Y T"H!C~ AND ARCHITEc.T.

15, THE c.o~"TC1iO. ~ 6E ~~mla..E: FQIIilR.EF\.ACE'I-'lE~ OR REPAIR., ~n'Hovr ::JAMJooSE, Of' A~ DA,...,A!So£~~~IiiP ~ HIM .;Jf'!.I"II$ $UIk.~T~.

I. T+«; ~1f'ICATI0!'6. ~1:l!3t ",~~T1:: c..ovl::~, APl:. AN1Nlf;~ F"A~T OF THESE (LJN-;ill~IJc".-rIDN OO~lI""'e"''''T'':'

:3. TH~ ~T~1'l ",*,Ml... M FART ~ THI~ ~'TRA.CT

f'~ISH AU.. 'MA,TE~IA.I..,~';RA'NlWQ~ATION~

EaJl'ft""IENT ....ND ~R.bY IN5T,olo"LL A:...l.. i"O~ ~IFIEDHfYEIN. ~i"N ON Tt1E ~INS5, Ofii. l'iO'l:~b Y 11"IFL.I:=DTO c..OMFLETE Tt-IE GON5TRUCTION

04. ~ r;.ON"TI'i;:~T~ ~ ~ ~1~1ii FO'R TJ-II=FIl"I:.oH~~ OF t11~ ~ I~ Tt€ r-tANNf~ ""NO "'t*l"1 ~sc.~18ED6-1" Tl-iE f".........1'1$ ANP ~1"lc.ATI~. Jte'F"¢ltT pl$GFtI"'.PA~I~,

ERRO~OR OMISSIONS IN THE .............\0.5 A~ ~GIFICAi'ON.5

PRf~ TO 5l.B1"'lITT~~(io A'H'( 'F'~NA.b BI05 OR COMl'o'lEr>.IC.l'N.6 I'11T't-lANT ~K

:2. Tt-e; REe;~~[7ATIClt-6 c..O,,""AI~ 114 TtIE' o;DlL'=o REflClRTFOR:EART~~~ AN." FOUNDATION EXc..AVATION A'F<..E A P""'R":'Cfi'!!- n-ll~~, A c..0P'T" OF TH~~ ~POP..i IS. AVAILABLE Ai 1'-£EOFFICIO' OF TI-E A~HITEc..i

GENERAL NOTES:

I, IJ'liTERlorl: "'lltlSH St'ALL r;..OMPL.'!"I"'IITt' c.OPES /"eJ 'FOU..O~U,S.c:... ""'AP"T'E~ e

::l, eLJll..DlN6 NLoM6.E~ :=.H~ ~E E.A,":'IL'(v'SIEI.L.£ ....~ I-E6-IBLE'F'I'"'OM TtIE ~~T O~ ~AO 'F'r<oNTIN.S ~RTY. N!"'.t:r.~TI~"I01".")

0;'1, THE; r;..o\o·I~"TlWCTlof,l. ~L., oft :D:;MOL.ITION OF AEWll•.,DINlS SHI'U c:.OMPL."- ""IT"" L!.F.c:.., AR'flc:.LE; e"1

I. Tl1E CONTRACT~ 5HA.LL IN~CT n-tE PREMI~ D~INS­

Ttle CO!.J'fl!::.f: Or 510011'16 AND r"'R~C$: TO Trlt;; :STAAT orCDNS~TIO'\:! IN ClRDER TO BE FAIMI)...IAR Io;'ITo/1 Pa:'J51Bl-EFIELD C-O"NVITloN5 TtiAT r-1AT A~I5E, $:Jc:.-H c:.ONDITION~ AIitETO ElE F!.eF~~CTEL? AN,? ~A.L.IFI~i,:l IN il-lE SIP.

.:;::~, AL.L. ~'!"N:.E:!:J . .DI~, f:~E:~ AND f'L.ANE~ ARE TO ElEMAINTAIr-tED AND COMPL.E"TEtJ- ~I' A I'\ATEfl!.TI<!I+!T M,A,NN.E~.

$HQLIl.IJ' n-!E:~~T~ vI5u:Nl;~ DR +IAvt: ~WarlL.~E::Df=A~"'" DEjAIL ~ CONOI-rION ,AA, MAT ~t f;['; rt'oTatil6tW~c...oMI"E1"EN.l", T""E CDNn~TIC!'II ';f'CJI.t.J' eE REPO~TEl) IC;J~....~HIT!OGT It-!'r''lEOI....TI''L.... FOR ,;u:VI~ ANO ANT'RE:COMMENDATI~

.2f>. THE: WNT1"A::.T~ ~ NOT~FY THE "~ITEGT

IM"f'o'EDIATEL.l'" OF AWY DI~~f'ANCY OR VARIATION~ Tl'lEf'RDF'06f:D DRA1"lINl5rS OR rr-e ORIISo'NAL COl'6l'1t.JJ::;nClKPPQJM~ T+lAT~A'I=I"~T~ P:!::~~~Af£.,1:: ~

It-6TAJ.-L-A'T"ION OF' A"N"r' i"r'1"1(..AI- OR SIMIi.---AA, C~~Tlt:lN."ETAIL

2'. AU.. PROt:'IJG,T5 .....lID M .....TERIAL..S R!::GIJIRE~~INi&::' AND &AI"'1F'L.E :&IJE!~ITTAL FOR AR.C.+IITECT-5A'l"'P'RDVAJ.. PRIOR. TO IN5TALL.A.T~ON

FIRE DEPT. NOTES:

2.4. ,Ao.L.1..~ f"lETAL. FL.~I~ 1"'I....~IN..S ~ TO Si::~r-A~:,J (£;;T~e!IN5) ANP ~1MJ;;:p 9'N~ ~"rv;..t~ ~Ioo::. TOIt-I5TA!-J-ATI[;fo,I. TWr:J CoAT':. OF PAINT ARE TO BE APPLIED TOAlL ~1t'l"At.I"'';. Pltr:'VJOE~ rolk'.H1J15 ~IO~ TDItGTALLATIOI'l OF AN'( I-ETAb 'F1.E:GE:5 ON. ffilCH 'PRI"'IE~ !:;,5CF:'JIo,Tc.HEl:' ::i.JE TO ~N9F'OR.T,ll..TIC'NOR..J06 c.o~:::II";IOI'S.

EXHAU5"l' 'FAN I VENl1LATION SY51'B"': ';"0 Pli;OYIDE AHINIMIJI-I OF :; AIR CftA"li$E:50 f'El"!: I-Ol.JR - I'15'-tlAf26INi5 TOTtlE EXTERIOR OF l1-lE B.JILDIN6 N.::tT c..lC6ER T!1AN:5 FT.rfi<:OM ANY eXTERIoR oFBiIN6

;;10. VIMEN510r-15 A~ TO ToHE FAc:.E OF 5TlJ:;l:;' A'lO/~c..0t-GRE"T"E :6I..OGK LlNL.E5S OTj.+j;~I;.J; 1"N.:D1c..,A,TeD TO 6E TOF'INI5tt DI""1EN510N5.

'''I. iHE:: ·5E"N.r.'RAL r.or.tI:'lTIOMi OF iHE G-Ol'TRAC-T ""ORC-ONSTf'WC;TION" 9TAi'I:D,A,Ii(D 'FORM 0'"'''''1:: AMERICAN lN5TI'T'IJTEOF ""'F<O-IITECTS, LA1E~T EDITION,. IS f-tEr-I.Ee.Y" 'MAOI:: A 'P~ OF'Tt-M::5EJ:)~INS6

Z'l. ALL ")HEET t-tET"""-. A~ 6lJT'T'ER 1"N5TAlLI.iIONS SHM.l..C~Y rllTH T+-lE LA'!E~T (;~ITI-Q1.l5 01" ,.HE lL""Al':..'NAA~HITEc:.iUl'UI.b~E1 MET-""J... !""ANJ.....L

20. ,.HE WNTRAl:.,.QI<: I~ TO J.o1AI'N'TAIN Al.J... EXISTIN&c;.O~ITI~5 IN ".., I"I.ATJ:Rf"'ROO'F ""NIi' PROTEc;.11:tl ~TATf' VU~IN6

T1"'l.E C-~ OF DE~LlnO~ ,II.~D AL.L. ~~AI~ AIOCoON5;r;ll,,1c..TION~.

:<II. ALL. FA,&Ut-ER.£, ON ~I~ PRO..IECT A'RE TO Sf; CORROSION~I~TANT, l,t. ~AL.VANI;o;~ $T....I!Ue;$ $T\;I;L. ~ ~AL..

~~. ~ Dl;~T~o; o;lo+AJ-1-. ~ INo;TALl-$1:l I"':EIt. -:l-!I'"REGI)~~ME:N.TS OF 7i-IE C~Ni EDIiiON OF n·e UNIFORMBl.IlLDI'N5 COl7'!:: IN AN'( ~OO~ M R.:OOI~ PE~ "I"H: GOD!:.

.31, ~R TO DHTAIN A GONST'1'i:l...t:.TI~N 'PER..,IT FRO""'! THE:E~INEE~INl.'iIo ;;:lE'PARTMENT AT LEAST 4e-H~ PRiOR TO~rlK.I~ IN THe PlJa-1C- FO:I6+''T-or-~Y, 'l"AII..URE TO ~O ~~

NILL ~5lJL" IN I~I)AN(;.E OF A 5T~~ NOTJG:E AND'OClJBL...E ~ft"1IT Ff!!~, IT I~ TrE ltE~f"'CIN51SILITI'or TI"!!OfiNEI'! 10 1Ol0n jlllHE~ tl'I$Il-<E"I':: ~~TI' L.IN£; I:;'.

;1:2. vrILlTIt.~ t""If,TINo OR n:~AAf'tT ftHA.LL et: LQc.A:rWANO ~-KED 6'1' THE c...crNT'RAGTOf<. TO AVOID DA'MA5E OR"PERSONAL IN.J..IRT'. c;.Or-rrRAG.TOR TO F'1':OV~;;J'E ....LLTE\'o1PO~YUTIL.ITI6 REGlUIRE., D~IN~ CONSTll!!.JCTIO~

.::1"1. 'T-(F'~CAL" 'l'-'fE:ANS IDE'NTICAL FOF!: ALL SA'HECONDITIONS. lJ!'tI..E:$ OTHE:~ISf NOT'EI'. 'SrMH..,A.R;" MEAN5CQ""""A~r c..HARACTERl"loTIC.e,!"QR T+-lr: c..QNClITloON9NoTED. V:;~IrY' DIMeN:.l~.ANDo~II:NTATloNoN l"1-Iff"LA~

:54. THE HIG+-lf'5T ~.JECTIONOF ANY PART Of' Tt!'"SUILOIN6 INCl.L!I'I\<.I~ OIiMNeT'~, VEI-nS. TO~$. ETC. $~LL1'oOT Exc.EED 30' ABOVE 6RADE (AFPL.IES TQ PRO.JEG.T51"tE5T a= I"'IE~TATE 5 ONLY)

VENTILATiON NOTE:

:99. Tl-lE~..JEc.T AREA. AW EUIJ...D11'J.l!I 51ff :SHALl. 6EMAINTAI~ IN A ';AFE ~Q~ITIQN~ "'~ THE~ULA.TIONOF Df'~15 AND' :5G-AA'P MA~IAL

2eo, THE c.oi'Jnv-.cT~ AND TtoIEI" ;uecOrnF.A.c.TCR5 AREReo;pONs.l~~ ,"Q~ ~IE"IN6 THE CON.TRJlo.C T L>OC-LIMEN~ INC'ET.....IL I~LlJDIJttle- I'IMe'I-6IC+tl:s r~ THe ~!X OFOEiE~ININ60 iHAT iri:::~ CAN 5E PEr;!:FOf':.~I' A';>5HOY'IN ~I~ TO f'I;l:oc.EDINs ~1n1 n1E .f'\O~, fF.ANY'CONrLIC.T5 A~ISE:. THE CONTR.A,.::'..TOR 1:5 ~~N:;';6LE FO~

CBTAININ6- A C;;LAI<JFI~ATION 'A<L.lM Tt-IE ~HITE~T PRIORTO ~ffVlN6nm'l Ttr.: ~I<;. 1"1 GiUcvTION~ ~ITH

REL.A.TeD ~I<

:55, TI1E CQNTJii'.AC.TOR 5HALI... WON =:uB5TANTIAJ..GOMPLE.TloN, F~'l151-1 TtIE ARC.HITEGT AND HI5I tiER+ENC.HMEN I"iITH A C.A'Sf OF "FINE I~PORiED ~11\lE'

BIDDING NOTES:

~, ~E ~1N5:'~~~NT l1-1E 'FINI5I1EI' 5TJiWc:.TlJI<!:AI>IO 00 NOT INOIc..A.jE tHE MET+-lOO OF CQN:;.Tl'WGTloH. THl;;c:.ONTl':Ar;.T~ IS ~~I6L.E FOR ALL TEMPORAr-<:.Y~"I1.Jc.7. ~INIlio. ANO S~RT liE"E~RY TO AGHIEV!:TJ-E FINI~ 5Tl<lJC7l.IRE.

4, THE c..O~TOF<.~~Ll. VERIFY" ALI.. DIME~I0N5,ELEVATIOIoo'b AND ~nE GDNDITION5 BEFaRE 5TARTIN~

I"t:l~. Tl-lE ARCoI+ITECT AND EN.:ioINEER &HAU SE NOTIFIE'D,Il-lV>IRI,.fN6, IMMEOIATl';l.-Y~ A.N.,. t"15CFrEflAt<.IE:SDll"'I'ENSb01'eo !:>HOULO NOT BE S;:.ALED FROM" PL.....NSEl-EVA'TIOWS-, ~~TIQ'N5, ~F;l: l"'r=TAIL~ OF' 1'++eo;.: l"~I~.

I. c"ON'11"A(;,TClJii: SHA.!..L TAKE ~R"" PRf:c..AUTION TO~NT DAlwIA6E TO At:' ..J:::lINfNfS. AREA£', i"IHE~.....P""J...IGA5I..E

b. Al-I- CU'T.l-I;TS ANlj ~ITc.+Eo;. TO 5E 'I'!:=COAA' T"T"PE.COLOR, BY ~+-lIT:Ec:..T

2. c:.EILI~ HCI~HT AT.AtJ..b ~no:::.tlE~. HALl..5, c.o~I;}oR:!::l.

L.A.:..l'-lDR..... ROOI'-'lS, AND BA~OM&~,6,L1.. BE A MINIl'-11.JM OFi'-O" CLEAR. ~!"ellt TO n.ANo;, FOR 'I..C:T1JA.L. CEILIN6H!:16HTh)

:2, GOfo.,"iRA.CTOR TO ~'RE~:E ~E:"l FLc:oR PLANS AND&ITE PLANS FOR ~CH;E L1MI,..", OF DB-10~..JTIO'N ":'O'N~I-TARCHITECT IN AREAS OF U!'GER:TAINTf OR ~15C..~ANC..Y.

I. FLlRN1:*1 All .L.A6OR.. MATERIAL:!'>, TClOL5, :EGlJ1PMf'NT.5PEG.1AL-T11:5, TRA~TATI"'h:, IN.C-lUl''INt$o THf C05T5THE~OF. R.Ec:iit!IIU:D 'F~ ~ 1li::",.IDENTAL TD PE~~M ALLC'F'E~TIO'N;,ANO iNSTALL. 'l'"HE ~K cc+1FLETE,A5 ANEXTENSION Of' THE EXISTIN:50 SY5TI:l-1.

5. EXCAVATION, c.oMPAc.":'ED aAC-Jo.: FIL.L., AI'm CONCRETE:~K TO G-01'-1F'l.ETE TtlE YiO~ lINVEI;;:; ,..,15 5CC.TION

2. MA~ I'ETAIL.ED A~N6EMENTS1""'l!'n.. UTIL.IT"r'.c;.~Aklt~ rOf':. !>l:~y'lc:.e$, .....NI} PA~ ALL 'FEES ...."OCoI-lA~E;, .L.EVIW 6'r" THEM. ~OTIFY UTILITY COMPANIESi"VHEN~ llN::7ER THtS 5EC.TlON COM~'NCE;'.

4. COl-'l""L.~ LI~-VOL.TAO-E Ji.1F<.INO TO A1'lI' CONNECTlONor llt:c:.TItlc.AJ.. .cc:lIJII?tENT ~"IDEV iJKoER OTI-IE~

SECTIONS, ~NCLOOI~ A~IAN::oES. PLJ.LL 60~, oLlTl.:tT 00>::~n~.

:l. COMF"Ll::TE POriER AND l..1G+ITINiSo 9R.ANCH GI'R.CLlIT~IRING. 1t>t:.L.LlDINS JlJNc.TIar... BOXl:5, RI'_L BOXES, O'JTLETOOXE;" :DEVICES. t-\.ATER,IAL.5, ""-"II' EQlJIF'KENT FOR. ACQMP\...ETE IWS"l'A.U-ATION.

,. FIELt:' VERIFY ALl. EXI5TIl'I.I6 CONDITIONS

I. CEI.l-ING HElbHT AT AL-l of.lAeITA8LE; ROO1-1$ (CT!-'E'R TI-OANI<ITc.++ENe AND B ....,.~J ~L BE A ~INII-1IJ1-1 Cl'F ,._t;."(REFER 10 P...AN5 FOfi ,ACTVAL. C.:EILIN~ HEIc:.~)

04. PRDVIDf' ~OKE :DETEC.TORS AT ALL BEDROOMS PER:2001 c..e.c.. 5fc..TION "'101.2.10,1.:2, HA,'f;tD~IRE AL.L. ;,MO~D£TECTDfii.S TO 8lJILDII'i6 ELEc.TRlc.AL A,. NElI'lC~l"RUCTION

:e. G,l..AZIi'JG ADJAr.fllT Tn l"~ AN~ oLAZI~ IW FI)lEOPAHEJ..:S> AI'JACENT TO i"IA.L~11'6 5L'!U'AGE5 MU:'3T BE OF'SAFETT tirLAZI~ r'iEMPER£O 1!O-L..a.S5) H'ATER:IALS

ELECTRiCAL NOTES:

DEMOLITiON NOTES:

ROOI'-1 REQUIREI'-1ENTS:

1. -=-ROVIvI;: PC~'NENTVAWIJM BREAKE'FG AT AT ALl.f-Gl~ BI6$, NS"l • EXISTII'6 LOc:.ATIONfl TYF'

e, l'-1AXIJ'VUl-1 FLOl"l AT ALL NEJ"l. FAuc:.E~L ~..2 ~A1- f>al:MIN.J'iE (6PM)Iof,ll.XIMIJI'iI rLOI"i AT ALL NEI"t 5HOJ"lER t-EADS, :2.!3 GAL. P'!;;~

M'INln;; (15of"M)

1.2. 5TATE: t-lEA.LTH 4 ':'JA.1::l';T'f CQOE~ 1'<lI21,"'l 6AN~ Tt'IELi5E C1F CHLORIAATED Pc':lLYVIWVL ~i-0RIm: ~PoJ''') ANOCRQ~INKI;PPOLT'ETI-e.,TN (PD<) FOR 1~loR

~T1:'f'if.-5IJF'FLY FI'PIN60.

Ii. PROViDe MIXINl':i VALVE5- AT 51-tOJo'.lE~ FER SEC. 41.8.0CPC. 20.01

~. AU NEi'\ "~ILET5 TO ~ ~'T"RA-LOI"I' I"LiJ~ TY1"'f:. (L.t>r:.AL FLlJ5H)

II. ~T'!!"" HeAie~;') :.HALL ca~T I'4ITtI 5ECo, 6oe..~ c:.f'G.20m F~ THE.R'MAI- EJ<PAN5ION FlEGIJI~"'1E"'lT5.

NOTE, DETEC,TOFltS ~AJ..L SOLll'J.:' AN ALARM AWI'BLE IN AU:9LEEPING AREAS OF TI-E UNI,.. SECTI~ ~""1.2.IO.

114 NEJ"'l. An~I"IOi'J ~VII":IE nl~!, IN :'~E DeTeCT~

I"lITtl SATTER"-PO~6~ U'" FOIo"tf;:R IN EAC-Hst....E::r:;pI~ ROOK ANI.? IN A CENTRA.!.. Lc;lc.ATION TO ~~n:c:.T

5L...EEPING AIii:EAS PER ~OOi C,SilCo. ~". "01.2.10.2

~. ~I"E 24" CLEA~ .. TOILET~T • I~" c.L!:,A"I, •.:.a-rr:t:ItJ...INE OF TOILeT TO TOILET SlDE~;'.

10_ 6-A5 I/E.NiS ANO NON-CO~TlaLf~IFING 1'1'1 Jo'tIoIl,LL5F ....55ING T~5t1 Tt1~EF~ OR L.~, -;'HAL.L. :6E­EFFECTIVELY :DAAH :'T~ A, E.JIlI&:;H FLOOR OR c:.EIUN6LeG 5Ec.TjON ill,3

;;l. ~~E C.O'NNE;;CTf~ ~LL E1e MAVE ElT 1T"iEc:.O~TOI'I.:. THE c..o'NmAC-T~5AAL.L. DETER~INE DePTl-lA~~~~ ~O'PE FOl": ........STE L.I"I!:5 l"R10fi:. TOE;,TABLl~IN"Fk..OIOR ~EhSHT.

9. 'HATE~I,A,LS 5H,Io,.LL BE STANDARD Un.N, r-<ATER L.tNESS/-I"-LL SE~ ~ COPFE:~ 6E:L.OI"II~ ,4.,ND TT"F':E: 1'1A8QVl!: 6RAOE, r'A5iE NO VENT SHALL ElE: ~!Dffl

4. FI)(TlJRE;:;'. ~IM. ANv 1¥L1AIolc.e:5-:THE c.oONTRo/Io,C,TOR 54-1AL.L IN;.iALL. ALL. FI.XTl.II"!;ES, ~IM AN:;)Ar¥U,.i.:Hc:.E$ TO E1E c:.ONN!:c:.TEO TO 'I"ffl:: ~I..Ufo'eINel 515TEMT"'IE CON'f'RA,CTOR &+IAU.. I~CT AJ..1.. LlNIT& V'#-IENDEU\fEREI) TO THE ..JOB 51TE AND REJE:CT AL.L. :DAMA6E"OOR INGOtvF'L.ETe ITEM::'. AlL ACGfFT"!::D lJlolIT~ ~A.LL BE 'rHERE~PON5IElILITYOF THE C.O~C,TOR. LlN'TIL C.OHf'LETIONOf THE.1OB

SMOKE DETECTORS:

I. TtIi:~ (;,0N5I=:TS OF !'<. G-QMPLETE 5Y5T"E'1'1 A~ ANEX1"EN5ION a: TIE EXlfoTINIS ~YSTEM IN:::.LUDING ~Vlc.E

G-ONNE~ilaNS, Ll'<.AIN-I'"\IN'>TE5. \lENT , +<::'T .....~D COLt:'AATE~ AND 6AS L1Nf's,. EXCAVATION Ai'JD c.Q101?AC:TEDSAO'-F'II..L lQEGiJ~IleO A'NO THe IN:.TAL.LATION of .......LFIXnJIitE5. AND TRIM A'NO ....'F"F'LIA.NC.'E5.

PLUMBING:

STORM ~ATER QUALITY NOTESCONSTRUCTION BI'-1P'S

THI!:o ffiOJECT ~AL.L. COMPL.Y I"tITH AU Rf'OOIREMf'NT!l OF THE 5TA'T'I;: PE~\"'iII,

C-ALIR."RNIA R,f~I~,Io.,J.. ~TER GtJAL.ITY C01'ITROI 60A~,~N DI!:oSO ~GIQN, ORDERNo::l. 2001-01 NF"D'l;;, NO. c.ASOIGe'12.>

~rE5 1--6 B:LOfII TC:l:~~TKEY ~INIM.J~ F:!EQl..IIREMENTS FOR C-ON.e.TRrx::.TICYN BMP'5

I. THe G.Ot'oITJi"oIl,c:.TOR 5t1AL.L. 6E ~f>F'ON£>I:6l.E FO~ G-L£At>uF' OF Ai-L ""1.1-T A~ t-1.!OON AD.JACENT 5~rns). Dl.l:: TO c..oNSo~TloON~I-II"U::~ OF/: A.NT' OTHE::~

CQN!':ll'RlK;.TIONo ACTiviTY, AT n-£ I::IoJ.D or~~ ~RIC:: VA'( OR A'F'TEF': A e.TORM EVEHTTHAT C.~E:' A eft..!:E;e.-H IN INSTAl..LED CON5TRVC-TION~~I~ MAT c:.OMF'ROMI5:E5TOfO:M I"\A~ GIJALITY 1'iJTioIIN AIff" ~mEE:T(S), A ""TA6ILIZEl? CO'r-l5~TI~ eXIT l'-tAT~ R.i:::a.rl~ TO ~NTC.~5~l1ONVEt+ICL.ES OR EGUIPMENT FROM TRAGKIN61'o11JI:l C'R SIL.TONTO TloIE SoTF::El:"T.

~. AU.. STOGIo;;.PILEe. OF ~IL. A'NO/Ol"! elJILOIN!!t MA~fAL. THAT ....~ I1'lTENDEP TOI3E L..£FT roIt: A ~~Ioo r;5oREATE~ THAN SEVEN CoAL.EN;::-AR. I>,A,T':;, A~ TO BEC.OVERED. .ALl. REMOVABLE 6t-t'F' veYlc;Ci ~A.l.L EIr: 1111 PLACE AT THE E:ND OF EAC!o"~I~ OAT' I"lHEN THE FIVE DAY R,,6,jN F"ROElASIL.IT'r' FORf"GA&T EXCEEf:l"'> 4Q~_

9 A c.oN::.~ ~OJT SIfAU. .6E FROVIJ:lE~ ON ....U F'RO....lEG·,.5 NHICH PfII(OFOSE"ruE; c..O~~iIONOF ANT GONGoREiE IMF'ROVEHE:NTS l"Hlc.+I ARE TO 6E: POLIRED INP-....Aa: ON srn:

4 THE CONTRAC-TOR Si-'AU RE5TORE All EFlC6101'J.lSE::D1t-1E1.JT CON~1. DEV16E9TO ~IN~~R AF''l'E1l E:Ac..H RuN-OFF PIO:DDUGIN6 RAI'NF,Il..LL. OR. AFIE~ M-r'HAreRlAJ.. 6REAGtt IN EffECTIVENE:;.5.

5. ALl. ~LOF':E:5 THAT AIFU; C.RfAT1;;D OR, LJI$~ ElY G.ON5~c..TbONACTIVln"'l-l1)$f BE ~TEC:rED A\S'AI~5, ERcel~ A.NO SEDIMENT ~5PORiAT ALL TI1-1I'~

6. THe ~TO'fiUIt6E Of' AJ..L CO~l'RI ..\::TION MATERIAL:!'> AND EGtJIPMENT ~T eE!'~c..TED ~AIN:;;T AN'( ~OTENTIALRELEASE OJ' ~L...L.JJTANT5 INTO T~E:

t\llVlfO':O"r>MENT.

POST-CONsTRUe.TION BMP REPORT~.£C.T, C~C~O'ttT'Rt5Irn:Nc:.E1096 c.+-lA.LG!::I.'01<oIY S7'PAC-IFlC eDAoGH, c;.A "1'210<\

'FRQ...II!GT pe.;;..glfTIONTtl!: ~..lEGT IS THE C.OJ!Q~TIQNOF A NEVi &INGLE FAMII- 'f' FZE51l"e~ IN 'f'"AGI~I~

5EAc:;.H. IT 15 Ac.c.E'5~ED Dl~c;.n."" F'ROt-1 A "In' rot.o.lf'l. (No v....,~,.)ON A l.evEL..'1T'E

ACCOROIr6 TO Af¥ENVlx A, STORM rlATER REGl.IlR.E~Af",:>U.c.,o,sILlTY CHEC.Kl-.I~T,

THIS ~...a:;CT 1$ ~iJ6.JEiCI O'lLY TO T'I-fE STANDARD Pf....KA.NENT e.T~H ~n:R B""IP1JO:EG'J1~M'ENT5. IT I~ AL50 AATED "LOrol Plii;JORIT'(" ..O~ 'T"+'E CON:'-~TION ~1Tl::.

F'Oi-blITANT5,tHE roTfNTI.-.L FoLUlTANT5 A.:::.CaRDINISo TO ~TION IlUA l'~T ARE 'REI-.~A'N.'T TOTHIS F'RD,JE'CT ~l..O Be f,E-o~ENT5,NlJTRIal-TS, !"ESTIe-I:DES, TflASH, :D~~=-, OXl"6ENVE,..,..,NDIN/So 5UElS'ANCE;S, OIU6~~ ANCl ~'TE'fl1A.N1Rve£5.

~J~~ITHIN r"'E -5ITE :DE:'I~N I"lE I-1lI.VE INGORPOR,.6..1"'E;:::;l BOT+< PERt"1E...a:.E LAND&:':-AF'INGAJIW c:.ONCRE;TE J1.oI',J.ICJ'!IA.T;', THE ~NT YAlIU:l 1;5 OVER~ l'E'Rt-'EA61..E: L ....N[;I5GA~THE: ~ot'" ~11'6 5L.DPE TO TIE F'ERlt-1ET'E:~ elm: YA~

50~ c.QNTEQb BMPo.THEI'<'.E ~IU. BE 'NO HAZARDOU:;, ~5TE ~TORl':D

P.L.ANT5 A.~ TiotOSE: ~~ND~D AIt:D A~I.? :6T Tt-l2 LAND$::.,/I.PE :DEFT.IRI'i:IGA'iION .1"111..1.. BE ~OOHINATE.bYDRIP :;YSOiL;M ~I-f :;'TORAI$o::iA~ :iJl"3AI...lBE, (I) F'Ay'tl;! i"'IlTH AN fMPR..ER.VIOLIS aRFACE. OE£>II&NED NOT TQ AUJ:"1'! RLJN...ON. FR,O""1,oI..p~ININer ""RE,.ol.$, ... ~'p;O;CEJ-ee:t::' OR IIio'.UED TO PREVENT Of'f'--5Il'E "TRA'N5'F'rni;T OFlRJA..~;. (.2.1 CONT..... IN ATT....C.H~ L.!~ oN ALl.~ (;,ONTAINERS THAT EJ<C~I.!DE~IN, l.sE ~L.,A.NT 'P:;;:S>T~ITANTOR re.L.t.-AP~O PL.ANT vARI~TIE;e -6ii.JG.tl AS-NATIVE P.l-.....N.T5 • Dis.c.~ PE5T5 BY" MODiFYINe;. T~ ~ITE AND L."'NOSCAPIN.:SoOf:'I~. ~1S.-,;;t,I6IJTE ~FM ~TICNA.i. MAT'I:i~IA.L.$o TO f=~ fiij::6IDENi5- El-1!"'L.OY~IN ~OFF oevl'-E:;' TO ~VE'N.T 1f(Fi:l6....TION 'DLIRINI5o « AFTER 'f'REc.l~IT.a.TION

D!:=:'I6N IRRIGATION ;,Y:5iEMS TO EAc:.H l.A~APE A~A'~ ~PECIf'IC Y'(A.Te~

~rR.EMENT5. IJ5E F.LOIIII Rf:;lI.k:-:ER:5 OR. Sl-fl1TOFF VALVE'; TO CONTROL WATER LOS:;'IN T~ EVENT OF eROK.EN £FRI'NKLER: f-I!':~ OR LIJ',E~.

OPERA":'I@ AW t=!Al'\:!JFKAh'C~

MAIN'T'i:NANCf' Jo'tIlll BE THE ~N:;'r61L1T'l"Of' THE ~II<.., iHE ClMlER A6REE:5 TO~ T'rlE LA'Nt>:.:.AFE AI'itEAS TRI~EO ANO CoL.EAREI> of DEaRI'6. INDrVIDUAL REREoETRASH BIltl5 ToO BE 5TO~O IN ~c:.t1IlNIT AND EXTERIOII<.. mASH '5TO~E AREALO'C:' ....-rEO AT CA'Ei~ WALl. II:OTC~, DRAIN:;, AND IRRI6ATION JIIlILL BE I~EC;"/'E~

ANlIIJAI-I..'(, NA~ r~M~ OF PE5T GGlNT'ROL. ~~J...L. BE IMPLEKENTEIi.

'------------------------'

Page 26: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

CFL~PH[C: SC;\u,:

I l~ j'1!.~1" lI Oll~;l - ~ :l

,~ .-'

8"'f'" [;'

Ir.:.~:·:~~'::'.G..O:':'. _ ..

UI~ "'~' ';;,'':::',' :'to.. ... ,,1:'-~ T,.O;L:O- - -- - - --

c,'.lfl.i.,N:",';

;!

TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY

KO DE:VELOPUENt4641 iNGRAHAM STR£ETSAN Dl£GO. CA 92109

San Diego Land Surveying &Engineering, Inc.

",,61jtl (ht''101il;>:.,k~ DI'i'/e.~u"" :l':'~>' ;~~1, l)le~<J. Cf),I)fMtli~ 9:.l1~::' 1:J5~

['Ilone lll'll'..) :lGn-IJ~r.;2 f'll;{ (t'~ln ,'jn~ -··+a~~4

't.

:>.<':0

,j"'l

'"'-'...,

""::t:'-'

:<1

2(1 r, .f-......................... ,,~... _ .

I l'Y. ~ ;'

,-1'''. "

'" "

- iF ~·:'.i'U -,;

r (;':;',h'!; 'r'<.::I!.'! ,;'n:..-.."c'- (j',)

'·Y,:<A'I~; rOL';\':O 5'v"?'''[~ W::,'-!!I.'II17,~~ !iii

'j .~

2 7

r) ;:

.~... 2 :;~ ;"J',) ~U~'·J:

') r: ;(

LOT

.--:,::::,;",,'.- \. .....

..!.,.."fy<.........~.. ,--'~~------··v ~ r.)'..'~: .. ',\,()

,)~·'.:.Cl,.\-',;C(j,'v:':"Rf~C

S Ii !? ;: A C r

S Li f.I .' ACE

L

.!:.\;',sr",-,;r;A,~-CC

C·,·,C·~[i[

L; R ;: A C .-

lEGAL O[SCRIPT,I(]N.-..._---------

Slit' ADDRe-SS

,\' fJ~:,I'ji:J W/

10:S~ C!·'),~:':DOo\·'v s~"r:E"'

S,:,,Ii D'[·::;o, C.<l SJ':: ,COl

~'OL:r'-:i::,10 r CQ""'-I~!< {J,"'./J~~ F'LJV. I'T :i·i.': ;,·':'~'<;':i·~T"OI\' ~"F

'::H'/",r:rr-;--;, ... 1 "';r,~cr:T /If.'.') r:-'<Il';':"; ::;i".'H.1 ~'[!<' CiTY e-;: 51',,\,1 c;:C:.':;i~

'.tl(,,':41.. C,]'ITTi(:L 300KPi E'iHr:ON-"i5.'::CJL: c ,\.I.5.~ "J~;,,~i 1~.29

L0f 27·', J-'--CCr: J I.J 0- p,~~y,(' b,o).~li 'N h,E ~ .. ':' Gi- ',A,"DIE;:;O, COL-'I,'T! OF' ~u.; Di~t{). :;~",,.£ 0; (;,'.~.Iro~,-.:CI•., ..\C('(!.'.'I:'!,\·C:rQ I.V,P ~t-i",o:;"c;-" ....0. ;;')4" ~~:....(:!~ '-,', j;;-lC;: or I! If -:::0'-"\',,," ,;'""R[C:~',,-:J~-F:)F :'>".N QICC';;; CGOr·.'7Y, /,PRfL ). < 'F'7

II·

i.GY"'"'

.i.'J( ·,'5

Page 27: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

__"" ...... _ ... ... ....._~__....._~_"'" ""'_....O, • _... ..... .__• .......T .._~,~................ .. .. ............ _ .. ...__ .......__..... "'__~__ ~__...,..__~_ ... ...--......-.-... ....... ""--.,, .... __... ....... ....,."" ......."'__.""__

III

II

lr=>~-----1' I i

I

z ,g 1

III ,

\) 1

~ ,

G 1-I

I

~

<

1

Ij

I I1

I I

01 I

~I I!I I,I I

~II

I II

I j

I II ll~jlIllil<

Revl'!olot\ 14Rs"I~iofI 13:~,,~~Ie:tn 1.2~"i~le:tn II,~v~~lon 10·~vi~lon ~,

R&lvl~l~r'1 e,Re....i6Ior'1'.Revi&lor'16:~vie.lor'15=

R8vle-lar'14,Ravl!".lo':lr'l9,R8....1$1ol'1 ;2, 11-80..10RDvls1011 I, o=l-O~-IO

Ob-24-10

$heet ~ Of' 1::2

PLANSITE

~!'>L.E' I/b"=I'-Q"

A~a~;::.

'RE~IDENCE~

INDI~TEEi~RTT

.L.1'Pi:::

INDI:::Ai"f$ $EieA,C<

C"'"'NEItIl:'l..ECTRIC METER

SITE KE1:

I. TI-I~5 ~..E:C:':' SI-/,oI.L.L 'NOi E:<c.s:O 30' IN. ~15HT I!to;.C.CJ~MANC'E: "'III"" SOMeT""E~ ""1iI-E 1'l0 ~1'!!>TII'<6 0IIi.~O E.A.5EI'1ENTST+-II:'FU: AR;; 1'10 ~1':l;'TI~ ~~D 6US/ ~w.:.IT STOPS~I~[" BUIL.DINGo ,oI,OD'RES5 N.JIo"S.EIi.5 Vl51~ AND LE6119L.E:F~ Tl-1E:. =iTR.EET OR Fi'.OAlJ 'FRONHNI& THE ~ER;"r'_ (\"f'G­"1':'1 ..4,4)

5. ~I~"NCI':', ALL ~I~ LA'-ID5GAF':E AREAS ~L ~E;

MAI""'-AINEP 6"(~ "~R, "'TK: L"'NOSG~ A'Rl":....o; 50HALLElE: 'M"oI.IN'rAt~ 11>1 A FlU'!:. 0/" IJ~I$ AND l-iTTER. GO"tIDITIQNAND AU- FJ..ANT MATERIAJ.. ::.MAL.L. m; ~AjNTAI'N.EO IN At-/E ......Tt-tf C;;~IN6 c.ot-OITION. Ol~ Cfol. DEAl:' f'\..ANT1"1ATE:~IAL SHALL. 6E SATI5FAGTOR.IL'f ~iE:D OR~~1:Il" 'P.Ef:/. 'Tt\E c.oNDITI0N5 OF THI'" F'ER."'i'IT

4 LAND5G.A'PIt-<!i M'"TE~IA;..5 Eit' ......L. I'<)T !:N::'Fi.O...CI-I OF/,~H""NG IMTO L.At-10NT ::,1RE:E:":'" R.11!o'HT---.Q"'-.Io'(A'" 8EJ.OO AHI"'.I6HT OF ce') 'FEET~ TIofE 'FINIt-M ~,o.,c:;.E OR FlNIg,l-l~DE A~ HE....~O~ Ttl[ ~K

S!=N::R.AL NOTES,,oI.L.L. ~-""F'E 1*.0 1~~16"'TI6N~~QNF~ TO TME;5TANJ:;lARV:5 OF iHE c;.1TT"-~lre J..A~[)SG.,IF[ RI:GUJ..,oI.TlO~

A/'O THE l..:o,~ 'fEC.H'I'..I1C. ...... MANu...... AND "L.":,,,L an--ER.~f"E II!f:I-A1'ED C;Irf' AND ~IOI'l.A.L. 5T""N;l""'R[)50.

:2 1~R.h&"'T"lON TO BE 'F'R.:'VIO.E:tl B"r' A~~1RR.16ATloN. ..:tr"ST!::I"1, 1~16ATlQN TO eE DE516'IED TOIN::ORF'ORAll: ifIT"'iE OF l'olE A~T IRIIl.16AiiON H!!,6,V; Amc.oNl"P.OI..L..EFtS TO ~IDE EFF'IC,IEN.T AF'F':,.Ic;.ATIQN OF~1'ER TO ~ f'L.A'tJT r--v.TE,",-IM. XITf--I01JT GoCNER.ATIN6­~.

;; THE ~T'T" OVolNER r-;ILL ~ TfoIr; ~~~I;EJL.E "' ....I':TY FO,",­Tl<E: J..O'tooO$ 'reRM l.J.,~"'f"13 Ato SoliE' 'MAi"l'r1'NA'NG1:' !"DRTHI::'~O-..IE'-T

SITE NOTES·C:;LIT',I&-"'A~

FILL, 10 YARI:'5

l"J r:uEl1.:':.. ""A~ ~ICf"OI'!.T

CUT DEPIl-t, MAX Ie"MAX Fil-L, b"

iFF"''''l pI"'l:I NO:r::E...!:1lI"tJ...1. F'ROP05EC" RMLI~ f'lA.TE~ F"AGILlT~E5,

1"~L.LVII'l6- ~:ERVIc;.E5 ....ND ~TERS, Ml)S.T BE~~ll5oNEp AND c;.~TIllJGjj;:D INACC0R:7ANe.f .¥'11TH ESTAElLI:.HED G~Ir:;~IA

IN it-IE MOS>T C~N.T rolTlO,," OF THE '-IT'(at' :=.AN Ol~ i"\I.A,.TEt:: "'~II.ITT P~I~r-L

6UIDB-INf!S AN.O C.li'r' ~ATloN;t,S,.~~A~ PFU'..G'tIe..!"<; ~ltTAIN.I'1>5

T'I"{l;~T".

PFlJOR iO F~ATIDN 1'N~L.TloN, I.-IE.....~_JC; ...N'T SHALL ~IT A eJlLO"INI§, i='A~

C:ER.TIFICATIOr-i. SIGNED e.,.. '" 'RE5015TE~

CIVIL ENe;I"'IEE~ or-: A L.IG~D LAI\D~'f0R,C;E~iIFYINI$ THot..i Tt-IE f'Al:<EL~Ai1ON e"':5ED Or-( lJ'f6'!EI DATIJM F~ INAC.f:.Olttl~e: I'IIITfoI "THE ,Io,F'PROV"'-D F'L.A'N!O

5f'ECJAb F"LAN NOTE III,""O~ 1'!-IE ~E, OATE, AN" ;DAToIM 1.F.ii;;>rOF!. T~6~F'l+"" 'Od"'c '5l-EE~ e.-i

$F"cclAL. FL.AN NQIE "'t>~IOI"I: TO THl;' 1~Af..r:;E OF N-rrWN5T'RJJCTION FERMIT, "'T'l-II: Oi"lNE~ITlEE~AL..L '5IJBMIT A rtA.TER. f'OL.UJTION cor.'mQL"'LAN (~F')_ "rHl'" ~;.t-IN..J.. eE

r~;~ Ij~~~~~~~~TYS5i~'M .......~ SiANO,llo.P.05

T+Il'" 1-l11So;.ll;~T FOIWT OF"TI-lE~ EQLJIPMEiNT,OR. AN.... 'JE'NT, PIPE, Jl,NTENNo'.. ~ OTHEI';PFW...ECTION SI-lt'o.U. NOT E:1CGEED ~'-O·

..-..BOVl": T'I-I"" I5RAJ:;II'" r;Dl'-\<:. 109.o~2e..I2,J

;;eEo;.1 AL. F1.....N NOTE PO'

~I~ TO TH:E 1~N::.l: Of' AN'(COl'6TRJ,.C:TION P.ERMlT. THE O\III.NEI=:.I'PE~I5HA.l..L. INGORf'ORATf: AN"( ~-muc:.ilO'N81"'ST ""'A~E;~ PRAGTIGE& ~G:E'~R.'f

TO C;OMp\.'" ""11TH '-t!AFTEJ<:. I"",,, A"'ITlc;.l..fi: 2.DIVISION I [6RAC'JJN05 ~ATIONS) OF T"r"l!:5OMC, INTO it-IE ~iRl.JCTION PL.A'I<.tS oR5PEC.IFI'-Anol<o6_

SPEC lAb. P!..AN W;;lTE .:-THI50 15 A SV5oTAINA6J..:E ~JECT PER SA'"Ol~ CI"!Y u:lL.!1'GIL. POL.IG,... "100-1""". ALLLoNli5 ~rl-L 6I"':NI"'~n; M9l"CE' TMN~ OFTHE IF/; ELE.c.rRlCoIn' F~QM ~J..Afil­

PHa"l'OVOLT"'l~ Sy.;~

-4. Aff~,wJ ;"-i~iorI""'1 ~nr~~~~.mc.4>~~ ~~ .-I~C~~"'"Ct1h]i:l JI'ldI.;7t'telOpIrat.~~~~~r<: 4111 c.'lbIer I"elaU~ lI'I\i:f~~Ii

1. rAoI fII.q;lil'dl~ ..." iI"'\.8IlJ a. H!,.,;ItNJd i:1i ~. ~!",...".~ *'- __I~ ~I~~~" '" llI"~ IMd~, II!J plrt l'M.:.s:n,.1 Nllilofm~~ .I'iNIW\i ~"II!I~1;~ ,P!NIelui (.\"" 4AICi~ ne.rl.ll nil Pf;~\I~V'll.CollId~ rftP&M pt:tr~ ~l:"'M fJt V1-11 ~ri.

:::z. ~wtlC:¢f, .....It!t;, wll~ "Or-lrW,,;..re: ro~.,;--,", ~W~~"~

:I. Mh\PftYl'!I' ~-~~I'I'olIrrt.M1~&I.G¥lIll:at..MOeI.,....,,:.; "lplV~.11\l"1 Xl'Ntt~ .. j,Jnft 101'"tt~Clllt'J~NlI!a.l~ ~r'ft; • ~

~~nci ..~IJa.;.Ilt.~W'''-lD~ "ioOf'i'.eI:Kl~fi ~~«

"'l.ANTING NO'T'e

'-----------~-----------c---------

iE'WI.!'lTINGo L.EG-ENP1- ~L. eorANlc.o.J.. NAMl!! - COMMON NAMI!

I "':."':-:O

Bauhinia blakean. (ORCHID TREE)'" Cassia leplophylla (GOLD MEDALLION TREE)

Melaleuca qUlnquene",. (CAJEPUT TREE)Pm:iocarpus graciJior (FERN TREE).-------------

Page 28: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

-_........._--_ ....__.............--.. ..._-"" ... "" ...__ ..._"'-"'....-.., .......--

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

0) K(0) ~

"I 0

L55'·SIW

...,l.ol_~~·

1f>'-C"

f®I 30·...• ~'~ Ir.rI

I @ @ ® 0"t- @] ~~-~~

V._._---------- ! V W I'-jC!j--------m I

5TORP.6E

I : ® c:>J I,.",,,

~~~

"" ?! ''''''''

r-i~,~~,

F.-.MII-""~ --.$ '!:l~5 _J ~; 0 "--,.FI~T~ , c -

, ;--- hC>INI~ LIVINe; '!i:OOM (i) i

KITc.+cr-J []--- ®._~'~ ~

.

n~ ®---T-/-X--\.-l • I ~ \ ..._---

,~._:::.' ••• I

@ @ @1

® 0 ®1.2'.31/2'14'.....- ';,Ib" ft'---'llr.l' ;;fT'-~ 1,/;"

l ".d'-5 I/'I'l' I

4

-_..._-----------..._..........------_......._~-----~,--_._ ..........._--------,-~'"-,.,-~-"""~_ ...__.__.-------..._""_.._-""--'-~--_ .._---------.----_..._~-

ab-24-IO

~v1~lon l4,~v1~lon 19,~vl~lon 12.RDvlslon II.RevIsion 10,RBvr.ton '=I:~vl:&lon e,~fEIk:>r'11.

~yl$.l¢ri to"~..,I~k,)n 5~

RI!IIvl~Lo~ 4~

~vls.Lor'1 :.\~

~vl!3-Lor'1 2~ U-aG-IOFlBvl~lon I ~ oat-OS-lo

& SECONDPLAN

Sheet Title.

FIRSTFLOOR

$C:~o 1/"'"=1'---0·

SEC.OND FLOOR PLAN

Page 29: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

&

08-24-10

'R.eJvl~lon 14.~vr5lon IS.'l<$vt$IOn l:il:~"itrOn II,Revts ron 10:~vi&'on ~:Rev55IQn 21=~vl~lon "1,~vl~IQn 6=~vi:!!oiQn 5:Revl~IQn 4:~v'~lon 3.~vls.lon .:2: 11~;30~IO

~vl~lan 1, Qq-as-IO

5hsst. i Of 12

FLOORPLAN

sc..4.Lf, 1/4""1'-0'

THIRDROOF

FWOF PLAN

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

14'·Cl 1/fI'

l'======~========;=:J 1~~~~~~~~~-.~~~~~~_~~~.~._~.~.~J·4

t- "'.,,",. ~f "l "..,SI..•.•.. ·..·.·.-..·.·-..·.-.....®.D..-...·.·.j...'..... ::.c::.::;==z=±=!=1======:j~ ~I~le...~~~I~~~~~

~

""

--...........-------...------...... ~ .......... - ..--.... -----...... ..._._....... ""'II "' ....__ ~<.~................ • ... _..". • .. ...._ .. _ ..._ ..... _ ..... _--.._-.. ....__"'"-i __~. .."'_......_~ ... .. _ ... __

Page 30: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

.. _..._--------------,

~I"T''''~~,~~~~~,~ !

__.........__.........__""'..... _ .. ._............... • __ ... "'--... TTP-.......-.-."' ....... _

III

"'-fWII.'=""_~ ~

II,.,1

---(TO~-!:~~~~6.iA-)-·'--·----1

-.I,l~ ~ ''''''".,,'-·------------.l~

ofl-:24-lo

~vli!-IOrl ~4,

~1/1~lon ~3:

~vl~lon l.2,~vl~lon II,RelI/I~lon 10,Relll/l~lcm "'l,F-tlvl$ol¢n ,e.:R4!vl&lon '1~

Revl&lon 13:~vI61"n~:

R.Bvls,lan 4:Ravl!"J101'113:R8v19101'11 2: 11-30-10R8vl~lon I: oq-OS~IO

CARPORT PLANS& ELEVATIONS

5('..AL.E',1/4"=I'-o'

Sheet Tltl..,

Pro lo>(;t AddreeB,1056G-HALC-E:OONV ST.PACIFIC. BEACH, C.A Gl210L1

Pr"pC:lI"'..d Bu,REBEc.c.A MARtxuEZlo:2~ i"'W=-t 1...aJr~~ $tre~t

~tta lObSol"l Diego. CA Q;2101(blq) :2::>[-••05I"", :2::>1-4:2~

00'-0' $15..25'

C.ARPORT MS.Lr_r.

~.'~CA~T

---::c::,""-'?-'::1'~~?-.:TOP OF qr-;::;sL

c.AR'F'~

5G"l....l:- 1/4"=1'-0'

C.AR.POR.T PL.AN

~. , .. ,,'.,:, :---1-'4

",,,\ , . ...;~

ELEVATIONS

~~.:,:.;,:•.•,...-"",,,/,·t' ":,:i'.'J:',:"';" "":'''''''''''':,'''y,'''"j'::,', __--- -----

I"IE5T EL.EVATION

EAST EL.EVATION

Pc

L~

ITO"'OF~

c;..A~'"'C'RT

C.AR.POR.T R.OOF PL.AN

'i

I

F_

SOUTH EL.EVATION

NOR.TH ELEVATION

00'-0'~ '!:3..25'_ .........,...:;""=c... ..:;;:;;;:o:.__..:...~

F,F

Page 31: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

---... .. ~ .....__~ • __........__T,_ ... __ ~___.. .... _..._ __....._ ..__.....<.. _._._............. , .. __..".. .. ...__....__... ~_ ... ..................__.-.-. .....-..... .,. """-'- ..__ .._...... _ .. _

08-24-10

'R.;vr~k'n 14,~vt~1on ISo~

~vi&iOf'I 1:2:~vi:&i~l"Ill:

Revi&ion 10:Revi&lon l:lI:Rs....lall:m e,Rsvlalon 1:RI!lvlalon 6:~vl~lon s~

Rsvl~lon 4:R&v1:5lon 31~v1~lon .2, 11-30-10~I~ron I, OC4-05-l0

ELEVATIONS

Froj"Gt Name,CHAtc.EDONY RESIDENCE

9h.."t Tltl..,

Fr"",,,,r,,d Bu,f<EatoCCA I'1ARtluEz1025 ~8t LaJrsl streetSUite 106S<lo Dl~" (;,A ";>101(61'1) .2!!f..q'lOSfax: 2~1-4.2.ee

If>'--b" $' .m::.,S'.;-,",I~ 11.5.L..

FCOO"

0'-0" ~ --m..2~'FIRST~ MSL

fLOOR.

2'"1'-5'$ 102.1i:>.4"TOf" or !"I'5l.

""OF

"'I'-~" ~ e2,l;";.~:o. M.S.1..

FLOOR

EAST ELEVATION

50LlTH ELEVATION

Jf'o'\oIrVC'alILI:lI1i6t-lEI&t-IT90'--0" M',O./E (E)

~"

- ------------- -----

12-'4~

L~ EI;.IllDl-.1lr 1-E1:lMf:9O'-C:>'~r'e)

. --- ----- ---------------------------- -------~-------------------------------------------------------_.------------------ --- ---------------- -- -----------,.------- •. ,-._..

EXI5TIN6 ....ND~~

Page 32: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

-----------...---....---- ...._ ..._.__.... v ..__............. ... ~_... _ ... ....__.,__... ....,. ..__-.._-... ..,. ._...~_,..._."'-~ ...__...... _ ..........._~ ..._-.u._~ ... _...... ....,..........__

08-24-10

~vl~lon 1-4.~vl~IOf1 IS.Retvl~ron 12,Rbvi6fOn II,RDvl&k)n 10.~vl&ion ~:

ReVI&lan e=Revi~IOl"l 1,RevilliOr"l &,Reyl:!lolon 5~

Revl:!!rlor'l4:Revl:!!rlon 9:Ft&vl:!!rlan :2: 11-90-10~"I&lon I, o:t....03-IO

ELEVATIONS9neet Title,

0'-0' S i3..2S'FI~T I 1'-1.5.L

FCOOI<

5GA!..E, 1/4"=1'--0"

~''6-.~'T~ OF--"'CpI' '!"I.S.L..

OOOF

2C1'.S'"$ I0.:2.f>.4·TOP OF y..5.L

ROOF

NORTH ELEVATiON

v-lEST ELEVATION

Page 33: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

_~_"' ~ ' "'_M • ~ ._,___...T _ ..T, _-.:.. _ .. _ ....---- __ __• --.. ..", .- _IP__-. __.._ -' _ .. _

08-24-10

,*",..t II ofl::I

t

I

Revlsl".., 14,Revi~IQn 19,~vl~IQn I:h~vl~~II,

~vl~lon 10.Re;.vl~jon "1,~vli!l~QJ"le(

Revl6ion I'Revision btRsvl&ion 5:Rs-vh~.IQn 4,R.a-vl$i(')1"l 9,~vl$iDn .2l 11-90-10Re.vl:!loion I: oq-Q9-IO

SUILDIN60 SECTION 'A'

Sh.....t Tltl.. ,

SECTIONS"!oGAJ...E. 1/4"_1'_0'

SUILDIN60 SECTION '6'

~.:;rc,oND FLOOR 'P' M,;'.L,

~::llBE]

o

II' "II

102,t>4"

~----L------------:

o

Page 34: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

ProjEd Owner;

Mall\. Fk!i=herQ1'8-5Grc.$ll.mI;Jrl\ 8w;;.lll.~~\!I,CA

O~~(':lmifiQl;jQn R"::'&,ildlng HIIi~hl ~Q'

I;;;;"

I' ~II '($)HII~i; __

DAwES sr~,

SCiIk: 1" ... 1-Ci

Orgnal Dste; ~tllll' 3, 2C10

:::: i2-t3-2010 Sheet 1 of 1------------

VICINITY' MAPNO SCALE

I ~~<l'II·~L~ ~~ $~rw,' toy Sa'I DI~ Ulo'Id SuNe1 o~1~22-2~1 ~

I P~~R$qI.lire.i

Ic~~p~rn'iIBLildn;P1KrniI

~-----'1 ....0 _

ClIl'IIIlru.um T7~ ~

N!Jmbllrol SIOOu.: J.

I ~rapoaed 1J4ll!l: $u'>YI& ~amil)o fWl~~ ~"F:IWIlIli'R.fl;;Iz"",~-n..IIi~ RS1-1BIAl~ COO!I: -cBSI2CCI & UBC 2000Yo!:IIIr Ilt" eow.trudkJn (~I$t. !ltruetwfol;: J;:

Grou FlOOrM~ tGF=.II1: z.z;w SFF1wr~ROIIIotfAR! 0.71

12-1J-2010

SAi-i DIEGO lANO ';lJ'RV£'()rJG &: fNGINURJNG. J/otc9655 CH5APEAXf LJRNE, SUITE 11.4,.5S4N DIEGO. -CAUro"NIA 92123 (858) 5o's-8J52P~CVECT NO. 4)4-4%-15CI'MLCfDON\"'STT05~ IlIJP,DWG

/fYI~,uICHAn '-. SMffi1', R.C,~, .;3:;47r DATERfGJSrRArrON t:XPI,,!::S $("f"lfM!l'.!:)~ .Jo. 2en I

r'flOIYRTY LINE

£XlSUNG BLOCK WALL

Ej,'tSTlrl/G WATfIi' ~ET£_'1

£..I:rsrrNG WQOO FfUC£

Ep$TrNG W/I:<OU(]/'1T 1>«)11/ .[NCE:

txlSTrNG SEl'IfR M!\l'JH'[]lE"

fXJSTIN6 SRICK Sl,.lRFACE

ASPi1AlT SlJRFA{;[

FLO.., I.JNf

mp Of CURB

aJSTING W4TER SD~vICf

ENGlNEfR OF WORK:

TOTAL SITE AREA = 31 Hi SJ· or~ u.cnlj cKRC~

PROPOSf() SITE JMF'ERVro~s AR,fA '" f 4JJ SF

SA.N- DIEGO l.ANO SlJRIlEYINGAttDENGINEERING.lNC96ei C<iliSAPe,l,Ki O~IVi, SUITE 41$6SAH DlEOO. CA n'2!f'b:Jnil; f5.Il-~~J82 FIR; e5~5fI5-4J54Wt!bo:_.3dle.oom EmsII: ,bdttii5l&4JLdllII,com

Cor1!Mtant~--GOLllA AACHlTECTLRE. INC10-ZS WEST 1.J\1JREl. STREE, SlIm; 1085AN Oli:CiO. CA. 9210.,PtlONE !I1~231"~ FAX:: &111-n1HJ.1I1J

1056 CHALCEDONY STREET

WATER QUALITY STUDY

L~~~. __,1

""-",SOlffi1EAST COONER', ElR/l,SSPLlJG., ATTI-IE

Il~SECliCH OF' CH.\.LCeOOrlv' S"f'REFr ANI:}PAi"IES S'ffiEET p~ CITY Of SAN QICOO

: VEFmCl.L COmROL ~OOKI E:tH.VI..TION,,'~_MEl. ~.$,I... ~1f/:'l1tl~.

-_ ..._._~.~~-,-"._,,',~--_... _._.-

rrojeellUqalO~

. LOT 2T IN 8LOCK lt3 Of' F'ACIFlCtlEACf-l,. ~N TI-lEcnv Of SAN [)lEOO, r;otJN1Y OF SAN DI!;~,

STIIoTE' OF CA.LIFOR~A_ "'OC~NGl'OfAAP

li'I~E.OF ~, 10.42 FIlED WOA=tcE OF Tl£crn..JNTY OF RECORD or $AN IjEGO C{lIJI'flV,

JI~RIL",'~'

'";;

I<

I

, ~ I'

I

I ,'.!Yi'"'"/

"

POTE:NTtAL POLLUTANTS GENERATED BY SITE

70

SOURCE CONTROL BMPs

HCI,JSINr; Drvn.OP.uE"NT - S~ENTS, f\lUTfiIE"lrs, :~,l.SH IWD DffiR.'S, Oi:YCENOEMA/'JOtJliG SLiBSTilNC£S, OIL AND ,j~-UlS!. eAct(RIA ANO VIRUSES. ANDPESTiCJDES

5. NO $1QxM DPAfN F"AcrWlfS ARf PROPOSED fOR rl-l~ s,'Tf SO NO STAMPir~G

OR !i'IGNACf JS R(QJjIRr.o-,

6. T/-IJ:i -SIN""f FAMiLY HOME Will NOT HA...~ }\ (IRE: :5PRlNKLfR Sr5TE"hf THATCOUIO aiPACT mE EXISnNG $fORM URAI/1 SY.5:rtM

<'I .. IRRIGATION ,tWO L4JIIDSCAPE D~IGN - moE' if(R~nofl,' srsrt:1t 'NIH EMPlOYRAJ/.i SHUTOr:F Ofl/lC1;S TO P~81E:l'T IJNN£CESSilRY IRRlCiAflON EACHI..AIW5CAPED AREIL .rs: ro Sf: JRRIGATfO ACCORDING m IY$ RE"OUIRCJ.iElIlrs,ROW REDr£ERS AAlD SHUTOff" VALVfS WilL Sf. INSTo\t.t.rD TO SHUT OO~N rhEIRR/GATrolol S'fSJTM IN mE 81ENT OF A .8RCiKEN ~PR'INKLfR HEAO 00- UNE.

~, NO ovroOOfi' I.IAf';:P/At. ST{,lR.l,G[ "'R£o'\5" ~ PP.OP'O~~I] FOR THiS PiiOJECT.ALl.. -WlTffiw. STur«Gr WlU rAKE' PLACt WITHiN THE SINGlE FAMrl y toIOMf_

2. Tr'iII.5/1 STORAGE W!ll BE; ETrHf:R ~NSID£: THE $!NVLt:: (1lJ,f1LY HOME OF? IN TH~

"'cITY APFROI"E"D mASH CONTAJNfR' PRO'l1[JED fOR SWOLE FAMtt,r' HDuE"S

J. PE:5T ~NACEME:NT PRrNCIPl.£S WILL iNCLUDE P[ST 11t:sJ5Pllvr P!.APlTS

s. SOIL AlWfNDMrnrs - FUll uSE or SOt/.. A"'fNIntE~rs Will 8( MADE SY THISVRO.}fTf IN JJ.{E LANDSCAPED AREAS.

WATER QUALITY STUDY

J. I4JN!MiZE DiRECTLY CONNECTED il.lPE.",WQUS .AR'EA - 11-115 pR'OJ£Cr is liNINFrLL PRo.JECT WITH A I).R{;!:: SlNfAf FAMrt '( ,..O/,f[ AND .o/l, C4J'l'JIG[ WHiCH ISSEPARA.Tf fROM lHF: /10ME ro ,qWI'oI STORM WATER INFlLr~rION MIH!I\I i1-I£LOT,

.t. I.fINI~IZf SOJL.. COMPACrJ.ON IN LANOSCAPE" ARf:A5 - THE AR~ OF!.ANDSCAPfNC WHFilN rHf PRCVrcr WItt. 6.[ CO~FAC'TID iO SUPPORT LAWN,J,ND CARDEN USE

LOw fMPACT D£V£LOPM£NT BMP3 REQUIRfM~NTS

I. CONSf))I,I~' NJ1.rU#Al AREAs - /HIS SIlT WAS l00,:f Df.VaOPED Pf?IOR TO rh'~

PROPO$[[) PRw£Cr. Ti/£r"i'( ARC NO NArtiRJII. AREAS Rrw.INIMt;

2. MINIlJIZ£ 1,wF'E"R'LIIOUS F'OOrp"'j~T - rHtS PfiOJrcT IS A~ t.t.lFrl(. PROJECT IV/1ft46% ROOF' !.ND CJ,RPO/ii COVfRAGE (1IofPE/i'YiOtJS ARlA) ~I-I!CH JS BELOW !H[::; IJ.tPERV!OUS ro~ Trt1S TrP[ Of lC,ljr", rlJmH£R Ii'ESiI1'fCllON OF mEJUPERV.IOIJS ARE:4 IS LIM/fill BY rI--JE 30 Foor HDCI-!T ~Mrr.

I~R CIn- Q. SA/tl DJ€"GO jJRAJNAr;(; fJ£SIGN ifA}fLJ.l\1, mR SINQ.~ FAIiII.YRt~ID~fI<TCAl t.JSE: THE CO,fFF','CiE"NT OF RUNOf'F ·C· !S ~5.

1. ilF.;G"'ATf SLOPES Wi'i.,I NATIVF GR DRGUCj./T mU:fMNT \lEC.l:TAnoN - TH~~

ARf NO SLoPES ·rI'tTMJi\' T'Hf BClUNCAAy or tHrs PFiOJI:CT,

8. SiASJLfzt P!~"""'Nf'Nr CI-lANN£l CROSS/NriS - TI-r£F;[ ARC NO CJ.WlNrLCROSSINGS W1rHW Tfl'£ BOUNDARy OF THiS PR-"...-JECT

9 rNSTAl.c. t;N(RcY .oISSit='ATERS - ALL S,ORIJ DRAIN ~T[1;2 is DJRfCITD TOIMPROvr- Pl)E!VC PlGi-lT ~ WAYS m LJMrT my t~OSIGN rrr.::CfS. 1Ht'eX)S1'1NG SrOil.M DRA;/oi SYST[,w OF Ci,lRB A"'JD {;WT[~ D/SC-rl!lR(;[ TO ""rSS,'ONflAY,

I' CONI/IT RU/oi(JfF SAFflY F'ROAI THE roPS 0':- SWPES - THfflf ARt rtO5UJPES WITHIN THE: BOUNOA,R'f 0':- n-JIS PROJECT.

2 B1042

1138EACH

1056 CHALCEDONY STREET

LOT21J

LOY 26

LoTMAP NO

BLOCKPAC/rJc

,-.J

IlX,',:,','h!C-:GAR<E

t IN tilT )L iIlch .,..\1 lL

GRAPHIC SCALE

10.00'

Page 35: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

MAY 2010

FORM

City of San DiegoOevelopment Services

. - 1222 FIt'S1: Ave, 3rd FloorSan Diego, CA 92101

THO:: CITY"'" SAN l:I,mo=a (619) 446-5.210

ATTACHMENT 10

Development Permit!Environmental Determination DS-3031

Appeal Application

See Information Bulletin 505, "'Oe'leJopmeF1t Permits Appeal Procedure,n for informatron on the appeal procedure.

ifr;ype of App.al: 8 Environmenta! Determinatlon - Appeal to City CouncilProcess Two Decision e Appeal to Plannln~ Commission8 Process Three Decision - Appeal to Planning Commission Appeal of a Hearing Officer DecisiOn tQ revoka a permitProcess Four Dectsion - Appeal to City Council

,/

2. Appellant Please check one U Applicant U Officially recognrzed Planning CornmiUee IU "Interested Person" (Per M.e sAC1130103\

Name: E-mail Address:Eddie Silverber~ & Stephanie Roth Eddie"'FI~vitlleAssemtllv.r.nmAddress: City: State: LI~;;~~e: Teleghone:1050-Chalcedonv Street San Dieno CA 140lii's07-11173. Applicant Name (As snown on Ine ~ennlrlApprovai being appealed). lAJmplOta iJ different rrom appellenl.

FLEiSHER RESIDENCE4, P~el~et ,nlonnallon

Date of Decision/Determination: CIty Project Maoager:PermitfEnvironmental Determination & PermitIDocurnent No.:

PTS 2187g6 December 17th, 2010 Diane MurbachDedsion_~d.scnb~he cermivapprovel deciSion):On Decemb~r 17 11i'i Develilnmenl S.",]""s Stall APPROVED an aoclica""n for a Coastal Oev.looment Permit 10 construal a

three staN 2.226 souare foot sino!et famllv ree.idence and detached caroort on a vacant 0.07 acre site located at 1056 Chalcedonv St

5. ~rUnd$_IOT App.a,_~~.a choclc all /hat apply! . o New Information 'Pl"QC$$$ Three and Four dsCUiklns only)Factual Ert'Or (ProceBB Three and Four decisions only)Conflict with other maners (Prccass Three aod Four decisions only) o City·wide Signifw:ance (Process Four decisions only)

l;J Findings Not Supported {Process Three and f'=our decisions only)

Description of Grounds for Appeal (Please relate your description to 'he allowable reasons for appeal as more fufty described inChapter 11 Ar1JcIe 2, Divlsjon 5 Ef;U)§ Sao Diego Municipaf Code. Attach sddffions! sheets ff necessary.)1a recrate 0 takin the time rev$9W our re uest for a eal. Our anneal to Ults develooment is related to the bulk and scale

nft"~. t nrnipct. ThR n-rnnno;;;",ri r.nnslfuGtion is ::m e BSDre for tn~ . h nn ;;IScetiC vahJ8 to the Illnk Of the hp,illht.

The desk:lO of this construction lacks any consistency with the existina structures in the area. This kind of devaloDrnant would havA

a severe immu::::t on the 10[';/;1 Pacific. BeBch environment & community.

We are not aoainst new t::Clnstruction in the area however we are aoamst construction that takes awav from the flavor of the

nelohbnrhnod an" '''i_ , I ".velonman! "enalivelv im,.ds Pecilio Reach. The reason we moved !o Paoifio Beao"

and I believe others feel the same way Is because of1he charm of the area. To start buiJdit1c homes that lack arw inteClritv

will have a neoBti'Je irnoact on the whola community. This kind of construction will set a precedent for other builders to

conl:truct oversized structures in other narts of Pacific Beach.

I would like to emnhasiza ~hat the Pacific Beach Plannilln Gro~Tl IPBPG' recommended that the cilll den" the nroncsad MveJoM'I'T'I""'''

Their r:::llt'on:::ll", h"':ino that there Is a cnri......fuTinlianCB issu-A It dn~ Iln~ r.omolv with thR- ~nIT1fT1unihr nl~1f1 in termS or bulk and SC::lle

of established neighborhoods. Among other reasons far denial the P8PG stated that the same developer has just completed and put

for sale a pfojeci on Honeycutt with completely enerased garages. clearly in violation of approved plans.6. APP.llan:~re: I certify undar penalty of pe~ury that the 1Ore90lng, Including all names and addres..s, is true and correct

s,g0"l1e\:- ~ _" Date: l !lOI \ \VL.IVt:U '... - J

Note.: Faxed appeals are nctaCC?J'~,,--refUndabJe.JAN 1120rj Printed 0 Gl'.JJffilt-ctrt"dtfsl1e a1 www·sandieqQ gpvtt:hWQlonmarn·seryjCes

C,lrxf.~~\'l.W['>Upon request, lhls Informalion is available in altemative formats lor persons witl1 disabilities.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES06-3031 (05-101

.IA~; i 3 2011~.'U::::CEI\Ij::::1"~- .... l: ,~;_~

Page 36: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Attention: City Of San Diego Development Service Department

RE: Appeal of Project "FLEISHER RESIDENCE", Permit # PTS 218795

The appeal to this development is related to the bulk and scale of the proposed project. The proposedconstruction is an eyesore for the community with no ascetic value to the look or the height. The design ofthis construction lacks any consistency with the eXisting structures in the area. This kind of developmentwould have a severe impact on the local Pacific Beach environment & community.

We are not against new construction in the area however we are against construction that takes away fromthe flavor olthe neighborhood and this prOpOsed development negatively impacts Pacific Beach. The reasonwe moved to Pacific Beach and we believe others feel the same way Is because of the chanm ofthe area. Tostart building homes that lack any integrity will have a negative impact on the whole community. This kindof construction will set a precedent for other builders to construct oversized structures in other parts ofPacific Beach.

We would uke to emphasize that the Pacific Beach Planning Group (PBPG) recommended thatlhe city denythe proposed development Their rationale being that the", is a code compliance issue. It does not complywith the community pian In temos of bulk and scale of established neighborhoods. Among olher reasons fordenial the PBPG stated that the same developer has just completed and put for sale e project on Honeycuttwith completely enclosed garages, clearty in violation of approved plans.

We are only a few of the local residents who are speaking out against this however we feel that our opinionsregarding the denial of this development rep",sent an overwhleming majority of the community in PacificBeach.

Concerned Residents:

19HZ C4"'k"CcOcl<.'(Street Address

L 1 .. f, iJ~(.-9Street Address !2)

Street Address

/---"'~--7

) -J0 -I)

J4J? 10 -IIDate

Date

Signature

;:,::V-:::-:'_V_I_l4-_,/_Il'---I1_tL_"'---;)"...I......,.."....,,---:0=!u=·lVI-=~'<.-::.l<f'-::I1....,.-.:.~_..th_·__I_·-=I_{'~/,-/_(..k,..::::.J=.:I\:~""",,Name Date Street Address J

\II

""'.~~.~5",:w-..~,---~-=Cl'":~11:':':; 5::cJ=.:c,_.~~~.~-""·~s·2;:;:>..:::_~:...---!..../...,;-/,..:C'---'._-!.-!-'-I_----'/~O::..:6:,~·'i"::,.·....:cx:::..:1.~rk~..;~~<l1\.'::;:L_!-::.:·{c,'f-LName S' nature Date Street Address

~.

\Jh?~Name

Page 37: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Attention: City Of San Diego Development Service Department

RE: Appeal of Project "FLEISHER RESIDENCE", Permit # PTS 218795

The appeal to this development is related to the bulk and scale of the proposed project. The proposedconstruction is an eyesore for the community with no ascetic value to the look or the height. The design ofthis construction lacks any consistency with the existing structures in the area. This kind of deveiopmentwould have a severe impact on the local Pacific Beach environment & community.

We are not against new construction in the area however we are against construction that takes away fromthe flavor of the neighborhood and this proposed development negatively impacts Pacific Beach. The reasonwe moved to Pacific Beach and we believe others feel the same way is because of the charm of the area. Tostart building homes that lack any integrity will have a negative impact on the whole community. This kindof construction will set a precedent for other builders to construct oversized structures in other parts ofPacific Beach.

We would like to emphasize that the Pacific Beach Planning Group (PBPG) nacommended that the city denythe proposed development. Their rationale being lhat there is a code compliance issue. Jt does not complywith the community plan in terms of bulk and scale of established neighborhoods. Among other reasons fOrdenial the PBPG stated that the same developer has just completed and put for sale a project an Honeycuttwith completely enclosed garages, clearly in violation of approved plans.

We are only a few of the local residents who are speaking out against this however we feel that our opinionsreganding the den/aI of this development represent an overwhlem/ng majority of the community in PacificBeach.

Signature

Name Signature

Name Signature

Name Signature

.(2rfr:-Date

Dale

Date

Dale

\ 0 S" 0 GhA., c -r:d or. '1Street Addnass j

SIreet Address

Street Address

Street Address

Street Address

Page 38: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

. ,TO: Kelly Broughton, Development Services DirectorFrom: John Shannon, Chairperson, Pacific Beach Planning Group (PBPG)RE: "Carports" loophole exploited by developers in Pacific BeachDate: December 8, 2010CC: Kevin Faulconer, Councllmember District 2, Bill AndilfSon, Director of Planning, lesleyHenegar, Senior Planner, Thyme Curtis, District 2, Robert Vacchi, Deputy Director of CodeCompliance, Jerry Sanders, Mayor, San Diego Community Planning Commil1ee

The PBPG voted to send this letter informing you of a loophole in the municipal code that adverselyeffects the Community of Pacific Beach and wastefully increases workload on C~y staff. Using theloophole developers obtain approval for projects that are contrary to the community plan. Additionally,these projects are problematic and require move staff time for plan review, building inspection and codeenforcement.

Over the last few years, several residential projects have included carports that misuse Municipal Code.Section 113.0234(a) (6) regarding gross floor area (GFA) calculations. The municipal code allowscarports to be built and not included in the GFA if they maintain 2 elevations at least 75% open.Excluding Carport square footage, allows for more square footage In the primal)' building structure.

Not in compliance with Communilv Plan Adding more square footage to the building creates a mOremassive structure, effectively exceeding the Municipal code maximum GFA and conflicting with ourcommunity plan in terms of bulk and scale and established neighborhood standards. Most of theseprojects are created by demolishing a residentiai structure(s) on a 50 foot wide property and developingtwo separate 25 foot wide lots, thereby further emphasizing tall narrow structures, not In character withour community. See Attachment "A"

Plan Review Phase: In reailty the carports, once built, appear like enclosed garages. As seen inattachment "B", they do not comply with the intent of an "open elevation". In tenns of visual bulk andscale there is no difference between these garages and any garage not using this loophoie in themunicipal code. Considerable staff time has already been spent interpreting the complaints of ourplanning group and trying to add conditions the approval process.

Building Phase: Approved plans are vague in details for open walls. Building inspectors can't beexpected to interpret and enforce the confusing "75% open eievation rule". As seen in attachment "C"buildings pass final inspection and do not comply with the 75% rule nor the intent of an "openelevation" ,

Code Compliance: Typically, after final building inspecton, the developer sells the property and thenew owner encloses the two "open elevations" with either rolling garage doors, windows, bars andnylon mesh or studs I dl)'Walil stucco. Attachment "D" illustrates several projects in Pacific Beach withenclosed walls that are now code violations. Does neighborhood code compliance have the resources

. to play cat and mouse with these projects that Were obvious code compliance disasters at the time ofplan review?

The PBPG has been raising this issue with developers, arcMects and city planners for 3 years now.The only solution offered is a condition on the permit stating that the open walls will not be enclosed.We do not consider this an acceptable solution. Four of these projects have come before the PBPG inthe last 2 months and we will continue to deny them. The situation is only getting worse and the codeviolations continue to proliferate. Do we really want to burden our community with regular reporting ofviolations and our Neighborhood Code Compliance Department with regUlar inspections?

This problem can be resolved by either a change in the municipal DOde or a change during the approvalprocess. We respectlully request that you respond with a plan for resolving this issue

Page 39: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

· ,Attachment A

Tall Massive Narrow Structures

3943 thru 3947 Sequoia

21

Page 40: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

1161-1167 Oliver Ave

Attachment BCarports appear like Garages

4052 and 4056 Promontory

1058 and 1064 Diamond 4032 Honeycutt

Page 41: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Attachment COpen Walls "as built" not in compliance with ''75% open elevation rule"

Carports at 1058 & 1064 Diamondwith 75% open elevations as theyare typically approved and pass finalbuilding inspection

Open wall at 1165 Oliver

Page 42: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Attachment DOpen Elevations in-filled after final inspection

4052 and 4056 PromontoryApproved by City in 2008

Carport "open elevation" in-filled with studs I drywall! stucco

1161-1167 Oliver AveApproved by City 2007, Project #106427

In-fill with bars and nylon mesh or studs! drywall! stucco

. -S_"::..::

Page 43: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

.'3943 thru 3947 Sequoia

Approved by City in 2008, Project #137821Carport 'open elevations" as they appear now

r II

4028 and 4032 HoneycuttApproved by City in 2009

Carport "open elevations' in-filled with rolling garage doors

Page 44: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Murbach, Diane

From:Sent:To:Subject:Attachments:

Diane and Jeff

Chris Olson [surferoly7@att,nel]Monday, November01, 2010 5:56 PMPeterson, Jeff; Murbach, DianeFleisher and MudgettPBPG_MinutesOcI2010.doc

ATTACHMENT 11

Attached are the draft minutes from the last meeting and it includes your project. You each have a projectthat is essentially Identical with the same issues. Vou might want to read the portion just prior and just afterthe votes as it gives background information and the committee decision that we will hereafter deny allprojects with carport/ garages having 2 "open" walls and not induded in the FAR calculation. The PBPG willbe drafting a letter stating our rational for denying these projects and we will send it to the Director ofPlanning and Development, I tried the motion to approve with the condition on the title regarding the carportand the group did not accept it,

Thanks, Chris

1

Page 45: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

PACIFIC BEACH PLANNING GROUPEARL AND BIRDIE TAYLOR LIBRARY

DRAFT OCTOBER 27, 2010 MEETING MINUTES

6:34 p.m. meeting called to order, quorum established. Attendees: John Shannon, MarcieBeckett, Scott Chipman, Greg Daunoras, Diane Faulds, Blake Hysni, Chris Olson, Rosalie Schwartz,Baylor Triplett, Barham Williams, Jim Morrison (6:40 p.m.) and CllfSmith (6:40 p.m.).

Agenda & Minutes: Chris Olson motioned to adopt the meeting agenda for the evening, BarbaraWilliams seconded, motion passed 9-0-0. Blake Hysni motioned to approve the September 20 I0minutes, Diane Faulds seconded, motion passed 7-0-2. Those abstaining did not attend theSeptember 2010 meeting.

Chair's Report: John Shannon discussed vacancies on the PB Planning Group and the upcomingcity engineering meeting regarding the comfort station construction at Palisades Park.

Government Office Reports:Mayor Sander's Office - Not PresentCity Council Djstrict 2 - Not PresentLong Range Planner - Not Present

Non-Agenda Public Comment:Marcie Beckett discussed some misinformation regarding Proposition 19 on the upcoming Midtermelection here in California.

Informational Items:Don Gross provided an update on the Rose Creek Bridge Project.

Action Items:PBPG Vice-Chairperson Election: Jim Morrison nominated Diane Faulds for ti,e vacant position ofPB Planning Group Vice-Chairperson, Scott Chipman seconded the nomination. After confirmingwith Diane Faulds that she would accept the nomination, Marcie Beckett motioned to elect DianeF.ulds as PBPG Vice-Chair, Scott Chipman second. Motion passed 10-0-1. Diane Faulds abstainedfrom voting.

Mission Bay High School Modernization Plan and Fund Allocation: Scott Chipman briefed theplanning group On how Mission Say HS did not receive an adequate amount of Proposition S fundsas compared to other high schools within San Diego Unified and how certain areas ofthe campussuch as the athletic fields arc showing a deteriorating condition. Because ofthe poor condition oftheathletic fields, many sporting events such as Track & Field must be held at other campusesthroughout San Diego.

Vacation Rental Issue in residential areas and letter proposal was discussed by Rosalie Schwartz.The issue involves the question ofwhether a person or entity offering visitor accommodations in aresidential dwelling within certain residential zones constitutes a commercial service.

The second question raised is, if a residential dwelling is offered for visitor accommodations in aresidential zone (RS or RM) does this commercial service provider violate Section 131.0420 of theSan Diego Municipal Code? Chris Olson motioned to send a letter to the city attorney andcouncilman for District 2 asking these questions, Scott Chipman second, motion passed II-o-O.

Page I ofJ PS Planning Group October 27, 2010· Minules

Page 46: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

CPC request of PBPG feedback on Council Policy 600-27 and proposed regulations for medicalmarijuana dispensaries. With regards to Council Policy 600-27, Scott Chipman motioned ti,at thePBPO should consider affordable housing and sustainable development as separate issues, Clif Smithsecond. Motion passed 11-0-0. Regarding sustainable development, Marcie Beckett motioned thatthe PBPO oppose any incentive that compromises the Pacific Beach Community Plan on densitybonuses, parking ratio reduction, confonning setbacks and allowing deviations from height limits,Scott Chipman second. Motion passed 11-0-0.

Regarding proposed regulatLons for medical marijuana dispensaries. Marcie Beckett motioned tosupport Community Planners Committee (epC) Motion Number 2, Rosalie Schwartz second, PBPGmotion passed 11-9-0. Marcie Beckett then motioned to support CPC Motion Number 1, excludingparagraph C, Scott Chipman second, PBPG motion passed 9-2-0.

Residential! Milled Use! Commercial Subcnmmittee ReportCIiris Olson stated tilat the subcommittee met on October 14,20 I0 and there were 5 commineemembers present and 2 persons representing applicants. The next subcommittee meeting isscheduled for November 11, 20 10 at 12:00 p.m.

1). Oliver Avenue Oceanfront Public Land: Development plan for tile "paper street" and adjacentpublic right ofway. Chris stated that Lane Mackenzie of the City of Sand Diego Real EstateServices DiVIsion has been working to get a title search and related restrictions and interpretation ofthe title language. His report is still forthcoming. Subcommittee members brought forth somepossible uses: a) Meeting Hall I Community Room that will bring revenue, b) Concept like Spanishvillage in Balboa Park, c) Per community plan all unused right of ways should be used for pocketparks. Paul Ross added that the property is owned by the streets division and we should ask ourcouncilrnember to get it transferred to park division, cany out a short term plan (e.g. water meter andpalm trees) then long term something else. Tim Golba agreed with Mr. Ross and added we mightlearn something from the experience of the OB gateway park which is a similar situation.

2). Development ofRM-l-l zoned properties: Chris Olson provided the background that is pertinentto these developments. There is a trend over the past few years to demolish existing structures builtacross two 25 foot wide lots and develop each 25 foot lot separately. TIlis allows for each home tohave a street front and alley access. It also gives the builder ti,e advantage ofa reduced parkingrequirement (5 for a 50ft wide development versus 2 for each 25ft wide development) and a reducedside yard setback (5 fi for a 50ft wide lot versus 3ft for a 25 foot wide lot). It is Mr. Olson's opinionthat this creates the look oftall narrow structures that are very close together as seen in MissionBeach. Additionally, some developel's have taken advantage ofa municipal code loophole regarding"carports" built with "2 Open walls". The open walls allow rhat carport square footage is notincluded in the maximum square footage for the development. Thereby, the developer increases thesquare footage of the house and builds a more massive structure. These "carports" actually appear tobe garages, Once the house is sold, the new owner encloses the open holes in the walls and itbecomes a completely enclosed garage. Almost all of these structures built in the Jast couple yearsare now enclosed garages. Since it is obvious that buyers want an enclosed garage, they should bedesigned and built that way in the first place.

3). 4080 and 4084 Morrell St. Project #218555: CDP to demolish 2 existing residential units andconstruct 2 residential units zoned RM-I-I. Chris Olson explained that this project was similar to4028 and 4032 Honeycutt (al&O presented by Golba Architecture) to the PBPG in June of2008. ThePBPG approved the Honeycutt project however Mr. Olson voted against it due to the issues alreadystated aud especially the carport I open walls.

Page 2 of3 PB Planning Group October 27, 2010 - Minutes

Page 47: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

The Honeycutt project is now completed and the garage walls are enclosed. Mr. Olson has discussedthe issue with the city planners and they have proposed a pennit condition to address this problem.Mr. Golba presented the project and pointed out that these types ofdevelopments aliow the lots to bedeveloped as single family developments mther than multi-family developments.

TI,e side yard setback for the two lots provide 4 X 3ft ~ 12 ft total which is more than 2 X Sft ~ lOfttotal for a 50ft lot. Thereby, mare open space is provided. The detached garage allows for abackyard between the house and the garage. The new design for the garage shows open walis on theside. Now, the owners will not need to enclose the garage for security reasons. Although, the twostructures have the same floor plan they will bave a different front design.

Chris Olson motioned to approve with the following condition placed upon the permit: "The carportshali be constructed and maintained with at least two sides that are at least 75 percent completelyopen. The carport shali be included in the calculation of FAR if less than two sides ofthe carport are75 percent completely open, The project may not exceed the allowable FAR of the zone." Thiscondition regarding the carport and FAR shall be reflected and disclosed on any future sale or leaseagreement(s) of the dwelling units on this property, Barbara Williams second.Motion failed to pass 0-10-1.

Jim Morrison motioned to extend the PBPG meeting by 10 more minutes, Scott Chipman second,motion passed 11-0-0.

Chris Olson motioned to deny the project as the carport I garage should be included in the FAR andhistorically these carports I garages have been enclosed after completion, Diane Faulds second,motion passed 11-0-0.

4). 1056 Chalcedony St. Project #21&795: CDP to construct a 2,226 square foot single familyresidence on a 0,07 acre site in the RM-I·l zone. Mr.Golba presented the project and the primarydifference is that tilis is a vacant 25ft wide lot that was recent sold separately from a larger parcelwith a house on it. The lot is deeper than the previous projects and allows for a bigger rear yard.

Chris Olson motioned to deny the project as ti,e carpan I garage should be included in the FAR andhistorically these carports I garages have been enclosed after completion, Barbara WilIiams second)motion passed 1]-0-0.

Chris Olson motioned to reschedule Novemher's PBPG mceting within the first two weeks ofDecember 20 I0, Scott Chipman second, motion passed 11-0-0.

Subcommittee Reports:Alcohol License Review: Scott Chipman stated the next subcommittee meeting will be on Nov 9'" at6:30 p.m. here in the PB Library.Election and Vacancies: No reportTraffic and Parking: Jim MorrisonNeigbborhood Code Compliance: ~o reportSpecial Events and Community Advisol)': No Report

Meeting adjourned at 8:52 p.m.

Page 3 ofJ PB Planning Group October 27, 2010 - Minutes

Page 48: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

ATTACHMENT 12

Ownership DisclosureStatement

"~ /TY <>1" -Approval Type: Check appropriate box for type of aPPJo\l"al (s) requested: r Neighbortlood Use Perm" ~l DeveloPment Pennit

r Nsignborhood Developmerrt Pennit r Site Development Permit r Planned Development Permit I Conditional Use Permit["Variance ,Tentative Map r VestingT£lntative Map rMap Waiver r Land Use P[an Amendment· r Other

Project Title Ptosect No. For City Use Only

te5 r, cAl' .. c?CI? .0""""4Project Address:

,

195(,,- ckaQc¢~ ~\

Part I • To be completed when property Is held by Indlvldual(s) IBy signing tile OWnership Disclosure Statement the ownerf§l acknowledge 1:hat an application for a permit map or other matter as idBnljfiedabove will be filed with the City of San Diego on the subject propertY with the Intent to record an enwmbrance against the property. Please listbelow the owner(s) and tenant(s) (if applicable) of tile above referenced property. The list must inch,Jde the names and addresses of all personswho have an interest in the property, reoorded or otherwise, and state the type of property interest (e.g .• tenants who will benQfit from the permrt, allindividuals who own the property). A signature is tequired of at least one of the property owners. Attach additional pages if needed. A signaturefrom the Assistant Executive Director of the San Diego RRd8VQlopment Agency shall be required for all project. parcels for which a Di5position andDeveropment Agreement (DDA) has been approved { executed by the City Council. No1e: The applicant ~ r~ponsible fOT notif:{ing the ProjectManager of any changes in ownership during the time the application 15 being processed or ooosklered. Changes in ownership efElto be given tothe Project Manager at least thirty days prior to any public hearing on the subieet property. Fa~ure to provide accurale and GtIrrent ownershipinformation coukf res1J1t in a delay in the hearing process.

Additional pages attached ryes r No

Name Of inmVlduai <tYpe or pnniJ: Name oT indIVIdual (iYPS or pnm):

&zd6'~ EM;r.~1fd5l? Bp,I/,c::,E' F~L:IS"H"':L;Jt)Owner TanantlLessee r Redevelopment Agency ~er r TenantILessee r Redevelopment Agency

street Address: Street Address:91gS-Gf',oSSf» <:> <Q'T /B..Lv-b .56~

City/SlalelZip, CilylSlaleJZiP:

4& ;:P.£$fjo Crt 2('2~)Phone No: Fax No: Phone No: Fax No:~ l't- 1310- 63<:'17 8:S$-4'8$-~£3Signature: Date: Stgnature: Date:

~-, ~

8- 1'1" Ii>

Name of Individual (lype or plint): Name of Individual (type or point):

r Owner rTenantflBssee I Redevelopment Agency r Owner rTermnULessee- r Redevelopment Agency

Street Address: street Address:

CltyJStateJZip: CitylSlaloiZip:

Phone No: Fax No: Phone No: Fax No:

Signature : Date: Sfgnature : Date:

..,.

Cilyof San Diego~, ~. Development ServicesJ~~. 122,2 First Ave., MS-302

. ',""._. San Diego, CA 92101T C ... 0 (619) 446-5000

Pnnted on recyded paper. Visit our web Site at w..Wf.sandiego.gov'development-servj~i?_

Upon request, this information is available irJ altemative formats for persons wi1h disabilities.

DS-318 (5-(l5)

Page 49: THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION · The project is limited to a maximum height of30 feet bythe Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone. Neither the Community Plan

Fleisher Residence - Project No. 218795

PROJECT CHRONOLOGY

ATTACHMENT 13

Date Action Description City Review ApplicantTime Response

0910311 0Project Deemed Complete Applicant paid Affordable Housingand accepted into the Expedite program fees.Affordable SustainableHousing Expedite Program. Project distributed for City staff

review as a Process 2.

09103/10 - First Review and Initia.I/First Assessment Letter to 19 days

10101110 preparation of Initial ApplicantAssessment Letter

10101110 CEQA Notice of Exemption Environmental Exemption(NOE) Determination

101O21l0 - Applicant resubmits for City 2M project review resubmittal from 3S days

11129110 review applicaot

10/22/10NOE Final

Environmental determination [mal

11130/10- 2nd Expedite staffreview Second Review to Applicant10 days

12/14/10

12/17110 Process 2 Decision Noticed Staff Decision - APPROVAL

11/11/11 Appeal Appeal of Staff Decision

03/24/1l Public Hearing Planning Commission

TOTAL STAFF TIME Review Working Days29 working

days

TOTAL APPLICANT TIME Review Working Days38 working

days

TOTAL PROJECT RUNNING TIME From Deemed Complete submittal to 3 Months, 14 days (CalendarStaff Decision - Approval Days)

(09103110 to 12/17/10)