The Case for Incentives in the U.S. Corporate Tax Code
-
date post
19-Oct-2014 -
Category
Technology
-
view
456 -
download
0
description
Transcript of The Case for Incentives in the U.S. Corporate Tax Code
The Case for Incentives in the U.S. Corporate Tax Code
September 27, 2011
Rob Atkinson, President, ITIF
The Obama Administration’s Economic Recovery Board report on tax reform:
“The combination of a high statutory rate and numerous deductions and exclusions results in an inefficient tax system that distorts corporate behavior in multiple ways. Because certain assets and investments are tax favored, tax considerations drive overinvestment in those assets at the expense of more economically productive investments.
The New Conventional Wisdom: “The Tax Code Should be Neutral”
2
Markets generally get it right There are few market failures; and The lion’s share of growth comes from allocating goods and services according to market price signals alone.
Neoclassical Economics Assumes:
3
Tax incentives distort allocative efficiency. The most efficient tax code is one that is neutral between corporate decisions – ala 86 Tax Reform Act
Neoclassical Economics Assumes:
4
The goal of economic policy is to spur the effective creation of new goods and services and increased productivity. Market forces alone often do not always produce optimal outcomes and policies to correct for these mismatches can enhance societal welfare. As Aleb ab Iorwerth argues, “There is no presumption that distortions are necessarily welfare-reducing. Distortions that favor the contributors to long-run growth will be welfare-enhancing.”
Innovation Economics Assumes:
5
Key Inputs to U.S. Economic Performance Are Down Cap ex growth rates are down
Expenditures on workforce training are down as share
of GDP Corporate R&D is not growing
U.S. competitiveness has fallen.
The Case For Tax Incentives
6
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
350%
400%
1959-1969 1969-1979 1979-1989 1989-1999 1999-2009
Percentage Change in Fixed Asset Investment, by Decade
Manufacturing
Total private fixed assets
Performing arts andspectator sports
Funds, trusts, and otherfinancial vehicles
Investments in Fixed Assets is Falling
U.S. Ranks 43rd in Rate of Progress on Innovation-Based Competitiveness (1999-2011)
8
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0Chi
naS. K
orea
Cyp
rus
Slo
veni
aEst
onia
Cze
ch R
ep.
Latv
iaSin
gapo
reEU
-10
Por
tuga
lH
unga
ryLi
thua
nia
Indi
aAus
tria
Chi
leG
reec
eJa
pan
Slo
vaki
aFi
nlan
dD
enm
ark
Aus
tral
iaIn
done
sia
Irel
and
UK
Bra
zil
Mex
ico
Pol
and
EU
-25
Net
herlan
dsTu
rkey
Spa
inArg
entina
Rus
sia
Can
ada
Mal
aysi
aEU
-15
Fran
ceG
erm
any
Sw
eden
Bel
gium
NA
FTA
Sou
th A
fric
aU
.S.
Ital
y
U.S. Manufacturing Job Growth Was the Worst of A Sample of OECD Nations
9
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
manuf job growth as share of pop growth -97-2010
Correlation between change in manufacturing jobs from 87 to 2005 and total change in employment from 2005 to 2010 was 0.57
Can Counter U.S. Corporate Short-Termism
• As the Business Roundtable reported, “The obsession with short-term results by investors, asset management firms, and corporate managers collectively leads to the unintended consequences of destroying long-term value, decreasing market efficiency, reducing investment returns, and impeding efforts to strengthen corporate governance.”
The Case For Tax Incentives
10
Most Incentives Are Focused on “Traded Sectors” Where Tax Competition Has Large Impact on the Location of Economic Activity.
• 85 percent of the value of the deductions claimed under the
Domestic Production Deduction are claimed by traded sectors such as manufacturing, information technology, or mining.
The Case For Tax Incentives
11
R&E Credit
Accelerated Depreciation and Expensing of Capital Equipment
Investments.
The Domestic Production Deduction
Key Incentives
12
Robert Atkinson [email protected]
Facebook: facebook.com/innovationpolicy
Blog: www.innovationpolicy.org
YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/techpolicy
Website: www.itif.org
Twitter: @robatkinsonitif
Follow ITIF:
Thank You