The Canadian Identity

19
The Canadian Identity By Eric Tolman

description

The Canadian Identity. By Eric Tolman. The Roots of Quebec Nationalism. From 1936-1939 and again from 1944-1959, Quebec was controlled by Premier Maurice Duplessis and his party the Union Nationale - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Canadian Identity

Page 1: The Canadian Identity

The Canadian Identity

ByEric Tolman

Page 2: The Canadian Identity

From 1936-1939 and again from 1944-1959, Quebec was

controlled by Premier Maurice Duplessis and his party the Union Nationale

Duplessis was a strong nationalist who was devoted to Quebec as a distinct society and he introduced the fleur-de-lis as Quebec’s flag

The Roman Catholic Church was the main defender of Quebec culture praising farm ,faith and family and exerted tremendous influence in society through the control of schools and hospitals

Duplessis encouraged foreign investment while keeping foreign culture out-labour was cheap since Duplessis had banned most union activity

The expectation from business was that they would give financial contributions to his party resulting in corruption and bribery

The Roots of Quebec Nationalism

Page 3: The Canadian Identity

In 1960, after Duplessis died, Jean Leage and the Liberals came

into power moving to stamp out corruption, awarding jobs and contracts according to merit, wages and pensions were raised and restrictions on unions were removed

The gov’t took control of education , social services and added more science and technology to curriculums

Quebeckers were happy with the changes toward modernization, but the RCC would see its power and influence decrease significantly

This period of change became known as the Quiet Revolution In 1962 the Liberals went further by strengthening Quebec’s

control of it’s own economy like nationalizing several hydro companies and turning them into one powerful provincially owned company- Hydro-Quebec

The Quiet Revolution

Page 4: The Canadian Identity

Despite the great achievements of the 1960’s many Q’s became angry by what

they perceived as injustices at the hands of English-speaking CDNs Why was the national capital overwhelmingly English speaking, why were Q’s

seldom holding key cabinet positions and why were FCs not given access to French schools outside Quebec while English speakers enjoyed those rights in Quebec?

For some the solution was separation of Canada, and some young radicals joined terrorist groups like the FLQ (Front de liberation du Quebec)

Most Qs disapproved of such tactics, but in 1967 the influential Quebec cabinet minister Rene Leveque left the Liberal Party and formed the Parti Quebecois (PQ)

Leveque sought a peaceful divorce from Canada Pearson became PM during height of the QR and believed that Canada should

become officially bilingual To make this official, Pearson sought to create a new flag, free of the Union Jack

which angered Qs The result was the maple leaf And on Feb 15, 1965 it was raised on Parliament Hill

but the French remained bitter and and continued to fly the fleur-de-lis

Birth of Separatism

Page 5: The Canadian Identity

In 1969 Trudeau passed the Official Languages Act making Canada an officially

bilingual nation and now all federal gov’t agencies were required to provide services in both languages- consumer products would also be packaged in both languages

Many embraced bilingualism but the farther west you got, the more resistance there was to it- in addition some Qs thought Trudeau had not done enough and they wanted “special status” in Confederation

Trudeau said that Quebec is an equal partner just like everyone else On October 5th 1970, members of the FLQ kidnapped James Cross, a British diplomat

from his home and both federal and Quebec authorities agreed to many demands but not the release of FLQ prisoners from jail

As a result, the FLQ kidnapped Quebec labour minister Pierre Laporte Trudeau declared martial law through the War Measures Act making membership in

the FLQ a crime Laporte’s body was found in a trunk of a car and two months later Cross was found

in a Montreal house- in exchange the captors were given passage to Cuba where they were granted asylum

25 of the 450 detained during the WMA were charged and the crisis was over

Trudeau and Quebec

Page 6: The Canadian Identity

In 1976, Rene Levesque and PQ were voted into power in Quebec with

promises of a peaceful referendum to determine Quebec’s place in Canada-Quebec had voted in a party with an ultimate goal of separation from Canada

First step was passing bill 101- making French the only official language of Quebec

All government employees had to speak in French and all visible signs had to be in French-children of immigrants were required to attend French rather than English schools

English Quebeckers felt threatened and they looked to the FG for support In 1980 a referendum was held- Levesque pleading Quebeckers to vote a new

association with Canada based on the sovereignty – association and Trudeau making an equally impassioned speech to remain part of a forward looking unified Canada with promises of a new constitution should the “no” side win

The no side won 60-40 and Levesque had to accept defeat- Trudeau would have to follow through on his promises to Quebeckers

The PQ in Power

Page 7: The Canadian Identity

True to his promise, Trudeau wanted to bring the BNA Act of 1867,

under British jurisdiction, home to Canada First step was to establish an amending formula which would

determine how many provinces would have to be in agreement for a change in the constitution

The provinces supported the Charter with a “notwithstanding clause” allowing the F or P governments to opt out of some of the clauses in the Charter

Levesque felt the Charter did not identify Quebec as a distinct society and as a result Quebec did not sign the Charter

On April 17, 1982, the Act was signed by Trudeau and Queen Elizabeth outside Parliament in Ottawa

Canada celebrated, but Quebec flew flags at half mast and Levesque led an angry demonstration through the streets of Quebec City

The New Constitution

Page 8: The Canadian Identity

In 1984 election campaign, Brian Mulroney promised to repair

the damage of 1982 by obtaining Quebec’s consent to the Constitution with “honour and enthusiasm”

When Levesque retired, the pro-federalist Liberal party took office with Robert Bourassa, Mulroney began negotiations

However, opening this debate just brought other concerns from Alberta and Newfoundland who wanted greater control of their resources

With continuing western alienation, the Reform Party is formed in 1987 to be the voice of western Canada

In 1987 Mulroney called the Premiers to a conference at Meech Lake where he proposed a package of amendments to the Constitution

The Constitution Debate

Page 9: The Canadian Identity

Among other provisions the MLA offered to recognize Quebec as a

distinct society and proposed giving more power to other provinces in Canada

Trudeau, now out of office, argued this designation would create “two solitudes” by making them less part of a collective experience

Many westerners did not like the distinct society clause and FNs asked are we too not a distinct society?

Others argued that CDNs did not have enough time to process and participate in these monumental changes

Manitoba and NFL withheld their support and the MLA disintegrated in June 1990

Quebeckers felt humiliated and by late 1990, 64% favoured separation Lucien Bouchard, a powerful member of Mulroney’s cabinet, resigned in

protest and formed the Bloc Quebecois-the separation debate was renewed

The Meech Lake Accord

Page 10: The Canadian Identity

Mulroney continued the debate and to avoid previous mistakes, his

government set up a “Citizens Forum”- a committee that travelled across Canada to hear views from CDNs on the future of the Constitution

Mulroney proposed reforming the Senate by making it an elected body with equal representation from all Provinces

It also addressed and supported Aboriginal self gov’t to draw support from FNs

54.5% of voters rejected it as it the CA had so many clauses BC made the greatest opposition as the clause which gave Quebec 25%

of the seats in the H of C regardless of it’s size of population, angered them

Quebeckers protested that most senate seats were given up to the West In addition, Quebec feared Aboriginal self-government because it would

effect a large portion of Northern Quebec

The Charlottetown Accord

Page 11: The Canadian Identity

Angered by these debates, Quebec elected the

separatist Parti Quebecois again in 1994 A referendum was held while CDA held it’s breath and

astonishingly 49.4 voted yes and 50.6 said no By the end of the century no solution was clear and

when Jean Chretien became PM he said that should Quebec ever seek sovereignty the cost would be high

By 2000, the move toward separation was waning in Quebec and more recent leadership have sought a restructuring of CDN confederation into something resembling the European Union

Referendum 1995 and After

Page 12: The Canadian Identity

From WW1 until the 1960’s, CDA had a fairly restricted immigration

policy preferring British and Northern Europeans In 1962, new regulations removed limits on African, Asian and other

peoples of color- by 1967 legislation made policy officially “color blind” and education and skills became primary requirements

In 1971, Trudeau introduced multiculturalism encouraging different ethnic groups to express their cultures

Community folk festivities and multi-cultural activities were organized across the country

In 1976, policies allowed immigration of family members with relatives already in CDA- especially those fleeing persecution or war zones

By the 1980’s most were Asian, and they predominantly entered the larger cities like Vancouver and Toronto

A Multicultural Nation

Page 13: The Canadian Identity

In 1988 the FG established the department of MC and Citizenship to

promote MC in all areas of gov’t policy Most believed the policy was constructive by promoting a welcome

atmosphere of tolerance which encouraged national unity and mutual respect

Some believed that MC prevented a common identity by encouraging groups to maintain their own identity

Some preferred the US “melting pot” model of assimilation-giving up identities to some degree and taking on the mainstream culture to a greater extent

In BC, traditional holidays like Easter and Christmas based on the Christian faith, posed a challenge for schools with large ethnic groups

Most schools opted to focus on multicultural holidays instead of removing traditional CDN holidays

MulticulturalismPros and Cons

Page 14: The Canadian Identity

When FN obtained the vote in 1960, it did little to improve

their living conditions-those that tried their luck in the urban areas faced discrimination and hostility

In the growing activism of the late 1960’s, Trudeau proposed a “white paper” in 1969 which called for an end to the protective attitude of gov’t policy and FNs should be treated exactly like other citizens

The gov’t believed that more assimilation with the mainstream would solve their problems- this made many FN groups furious

FNs would present their “red paper” which outlined self-government and Jean Chretien, the Indian Affairs minister at that time, decided to shelve the “white paper” but offered no new policy in its place

FirstNations

Page 15: The Canadian Identity

FNs saw education as primary, especially on the heels of the

cultural impact of the residential schools which were, for the most part, abandoned by 1969

Band schools emerged in various parts of the country focusing on language, culture and traditions, but a lack of secondary schools near the reserves caused problems-requiring high school kids to leave home and attend schools in urban centres leading to loneliness and isolation-again!

Although the residential schools had been dismantled, its legacy continues to haunt many who lived through it

Stories of abuse and mistreatment led, in 1998, to the federal government apologizing for it’s role in the problem and they announced a $350 million dollar healing fund

Educational Concerns

Page 16: The Canadian Identity

The expansion of CDN industries of hydroelectricity and natural gas drew concern form FNs that their traditional activities of hunting, fishing and trapping were threatened

In the 1970’s Inuit, Metis and Denes groups in the North opposed a pipeline through the Mackenzie Valley and they demanded a study to determine the impact on their lands-the FG agreed

The Berger Commission conducted hearings all over the North, listening carefully to FNs concerns

The commission recommend a 10 year hold on development to allow for thoughtful study, but it was not until 2000 that FNs became open to the idea

FNs wanted control and some ownership of the project In Quebec after a long dispute in the 80’s and 90’s, Cree residents

of the north managed to halt construction of a James Bay hydro project which threatened flooding of ancestral territories

Environmental Concerns

Page 17: The Canadian Identity

In 1980 the Assembly of FNs was formed to represent them in

their dealings with the FG Leaders pressured for FNs rights which would be entrenched in

the Charter The increase in band council powers begged the question,

“What other powers should be transferred from the FG to band councils?”

Self government would give them rights to manage their own resources, education, culture and justice systems

Specific claims arose in areas where treaties between FN and the FG had been signed, but their terms not kept

Comprehensive claims questioned the ownership of land in large parts of Canada that were never surrendered by treaty

SelfGovernment

Page 18: The Canadian Identity

Land claims occurred largely behind the scenes, but in the summer of 1990 in a small Quebec town called Oka, events made headlines across Canada

When the Oka town council decided to expand a golf course into land disputed because the Mohawk considered it sacred, the FNs decided to block roads to prevent development

The mayor of Oka called on Provincial police to remove the blockade and on July 11th, gunfire broke out leading to the death of an officer

Both sides set up blockades and violent confrontations occurred between Quebec communities, police and Mohawks

Federal troops were called in and under pressure from other bands, the Mohawks of Kanesateke, ended the blockade

The FG would purchase the land and then give it to the Mohawks

The Oka Confrontation

Page 19: The Canadian Identity

The vast and remote character of BC, in addition to being a late addition to the British Empire, meant that many areas were never officially claimed

As early as 1887, the Nisga’a people of the Nass Valley asserted their land rights and in 1912 became the first to lay a claim against the CDN gov’t

In 1993 the Nisga’a won a partial victory when the Supreme court agreed they were entitled to land

In 1996 they were offered a settlement that gave them to 8% of their original claimed land, ownership of forests, and partial profits from salmon fisheries and hydro development

They also won the right to develop their own municipal gov’t and policing, and they received $190 million over 15 years in compensation for lost land- and they agreed to be taxpayers, giving up their tax- exempt status under the Indian Act

The creation of Nunavut in 1999 resulted from the largest treaty ever negotiated in Canada, giving the Inuit control of 1.6 million square kms on the eastern Arctic

Land Claims in BC