The brain balance program in review
-
Upload
carrie-leschak -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
2.232 -
download
0
description
Transcript of The brain balance program in review
![Page 1: The brain balance program in review](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070302/546fc87aaf795904458b4571/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Brain Balance Program in Review:A Critique Through Sperry’s Eyes
Carrie LeschakPSY 405
Spring 2013
Photo courtesy of nap.edu
![Page 2: The brain balance program in review](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070302/546fc87aaf795904458b4571/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is the Brain Balance Program?• “Neurobehavioral/developmental disorders”
• Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)• Autism/autism spectrum disorders• Asperger’s syndrome• Childhood disintegrative disorder (CDD)• Dyslexia/processing disorders• Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)• Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)• Tourette syndrome• Nonverbal learning disability
• Functional Disconnect Syndrome (FDS)
![Page 3: The brain balance program in review](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070302/546fc87aaf795904458b4571/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
FDS• “An imbalance in the connections and function between and within the hemispheres (sides) of your child’s brain”
![Page 4: The brain balance program in review](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070302/546fc87aaf795904458b4571/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Problem #1—Speculation
•Melillo says neurobehavioral disorders can all be “accurately grouped” into the category of Functional Disconnection Syndrome
•Mere speculation
![Page 5: The brain balance program in review](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070302/546fc87aaf795904458b4571/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Problem #2—Miracle Cure• Melillo calls Brain Balance a cure rather than a treatment
• Claims that symptoms “disappear” because of Brain Balance
• Cost• Claims to be a panacea• No scientific evidence (a separate problem in itself)
![Page 6: The brain balance program in review](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070302/546fc87aaf795904458b4571/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Problem #3—Lack of External Verification•One of the most problematic issues about Brain Balance
•Completely theoretical at this point in time•No evidence
• Website offers one pilot study• List of references on the site are unscientific, dead-links, or referencing works written by the founder of Brain Balance himself
![Page 7: The brain balance program in review](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070302/546fc87aaf795904458b4571/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Problem #4—Lack of Primary Sources• Melillo’s book, Disconnected Kids provides countless statements about the science, the statistics surrounding certain diagnoses, previous findings…yet he never mentions anything directly
• Uses generic labels: • “Researchers now know”• “Scientists are now finding”• “They say that”• “It’s been found that”
![Page 8: The brain balance program in review](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070302/546fc87aaf795904458b4571/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Problem #5—Oversimplification• Sperry recognized that the brain was made up of two independently functioning halves
• People have manifested this idea into a cut and dry list of abilities for both sides of the brain, and although there is evidence for localization of function, multiple areas of the brain are often part of a single function
![Page 9: The brain balance program in review](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070302/546fc87aaf795904458b4571/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Sperry’s Biggest Complaints•Lack of external verification
•Lack of primary sources
•Oversimplification
![Page 10: The brain balance program in review](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070302/546fc87aaf795904458b4571/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Sperry’s final say on the program:
• Further research needed to support findings
• Primary sources are needed to validate statements made in the text
• Sperry’s presumed critique turned out overwhelmingly negative