The Bologna Process and QA in 2020: Priorities for ENQA Tibor Szanto Vice-President, ENQA Brussels,...
-
Upload
jenna-stafford -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of The Bologna Process and QA in 2020: Priorities for ENQA Tibor Szanto Vice-President, ENQA Brussels,...
The Bologna Process and QAThe Bologna Process and QA
in 2020: Priorities for ENQAin 2020: Priorities for ENQA
Tibor Szanto
Vice-President, ENQA
Brussels, 3 June 2009
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 2
Leuven / Louvain-la-Neuve, 28-29 April 2009
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 3
Leuven / Louvain-la-Neuve, 28-29 April 2009
Position paper, preparation
Board decision (Nov 2008) working group
Draftx Board (+ former President)
Draftx+1 member agencies
Final version L/L conference ENQA website
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 4
ENQA contribution to L/L
To define▸ principles and values▸ priorities
Basis for work programmewww.enqa.eu/files/ENQA_position_paper%20(3).pdf
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 5
Aim of the position paper
ENQA Principles1
1. Diversity (HE, QA)2. Harmonisation and convergence of QA3. ESG as an overarching framework4. External evaluation of QA agencies5. Roles of internal - external QA6. Education and research7. Balance of internal and external QA
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 6
ENQA Principles2
8. National legislations diverse approaches9. Fitness for purpose (purpose process)10. Co-operation of QA agencies11. Increasing need for information12. Explicit goals and methodologies13. Clear distribution of roles and respons.14. Dialogue
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 7
ENQA Priorities
1. ESG, implementation, clarification2. Co-operation of agencies, E43. QF, LO, RPL QA4. QA of TNE, joint programmes5. QA of LLL6. Information on quality of HE7. Staff development at agencies8. QA awareness, expectations
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 8
Work programme
Priorities on paper actions in practice1. Determining actions (Action Plan)2. Implementing actions,
producing results3. Dissemination, feedback4. Fine-tuning where needed
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 9
P
D
C
A
Action Plan (AP) - structure
Priority X1. Intended result(s)
2. Way(s) of achieving (methods)3. Person(s) / organisation(s) responsible4. Person(s) / organisation(s) involved5. Available info, experience6. Time span (starting and finishing dates)
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 10
Priority No.1, ESG interpretation Possible elements of AP
1. Intended result(s)a) interpretation code for membersb) proposal for E4 wider usageFocus? Ch. 1-2-3?
2. Way of achieving (method)working group▸ analysis of documents▸ analysis of decisions?▸ survey? (members? Board? RC?)
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 11
AP – ESG cont.
3. Person(s) / organisation(s) responsible▸ co-ordinator (Board member? Agency?)▸ members of WG
4. Person(s) / organisation(s) involved▸ individual experts▸ member agencies▸ EHEA agencies?▸ HEIs?
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 12
AP – ESG cont.
5. Available info, experience▸ ESG▸ agency review reports▸ self-evaluation reports?▸ ENQA Board decisions?▸ EQAR expectations (web)▸ EQAR RC decisions?▸ E4 documents▸ Surveys done (CEEN, NOQA, ENQA QP)▸ ENQA workshop reports
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 13
AP – ESG cont.
6. Time span starting date: ASAP?finishing date:▸ March 2010? (Budapest/Vienna meeting)▸ 2012? (Bucharest meeting)▸ Other?
A lot to do … … quickly?
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 14
And this is only one priority, one element in
the Action Plan and, moreover, only the plan, not the implementation
itself…
03.06.2009, Brussels Tibor Szanto 15
Thank you for your
attention!