Spatially Adaptive Wavelet Threshold Ing With Context Modeli
The automatic method to determine a optimal constant of wavelet threshold function of minFDR for...
Transcript of The automatic method to determine a optimal constant of wavelet threshold function of minFDR for...
-
7/31/2019 The automatic method to determine a optimal constant of wavelet threshold function of minFDR for mitigating int
1/6
VCCA-2011
VCCA-2011
The automatic method to determine a optimal constant of wavelet threshold
function of minFDR for mitigating interference application
to industrial systems
(1) (2)(1)ng [email protected]
(2)Vin Nghin c n t, Tin hc, Tng Ha, H Ni, [email protected]
tr da tr wat tr t tr d rta tr t trong phn t t k p t rt
a a ra t ppp t att tr d t t t pt ta dr rat- ak tr t
pAbstractThere are 3 steps in de-noise by wavelet
thresholding. The second step is very
important. It determines threshold value and
using threshold function to mitigates noise
coefficients. The exactitude and confidence
in the analysis, appraise of signal is
dependent on this step. The paper proposes a
automatic method to determine a optimal
constant of wavelet threshold function using
minimize of the false discovery rate ruleminFDR for mitigating interference
application to industrial systems.
K hi aw atw at tr (.) x x k p
1W a tr at t a a
k t a
i t a
)(mp t t t
N d t L1 t atL2 d NL 22 log
h, g a at 1(.) Hm phn b tch lu ca phn b chuna t tr
C SNR Signal Noise Rate
DWT Decrete Wavelet Transform
IDWT Inverse DWT
TIDWT Translation Invariant DWT
1. r at s c gi tr ln mangnhiu thng tin v tn hiu (thng tin hu ch) cn cch s nh mang t thng tin c ch m ch yu linquan ti nhi ta tng s dng thut loi b cc h s mang nhi a t toli tn hiu gc bng bi c wavelet.P pp ng wavelet thc hin qua a c a :
-c mt l bi i thu at ccc h s bi i wavelet.
- a nh gi trng v s dng c b cc h s nhiu.
-c ba l bi at khi phctn hiu.Ca u quan trng trong qu trnh x l tnhiu. x tin cy trong phn tch, u qu kh nhiu phthuc rt nhi bc hai. u tin trong kh nhiu l chn wavelet chobi i thu c wavelet. Sau khi bi ithu at c cc h s w, thc hin giithut c cc gi tr ng w :
)/( ww (1)
hoc: )( ww
, (2)
tr l gi trng, ng v ng ca lch chun nhiu. Cc bin
62
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected] -
7/31/2019 The automatic method to determine a optimal constant of wavelet threshold function of minFDR for mitigating int
2/6
VCCA-2011
VCCA-2011
php kh nhiu khc nhau vic chn (.), v . ng s quyt nh vic p d ivi tn hi t ng nhiu quyt nhmc nhiu v gi tr nh t cc lut
c cui cng ca kh nhiu l bi ic wavelet cho cc h s w k p thiu:
wWx 1 (3)
2. Ph -N [1]
tr : )4(log2 N
p d t (1). N t t t t p t garit trong tr nh b p t
t t k- SURE[2] tr t ra t a k t t t a p N t p t tr t :
),(minarg0 ll
wSURE (5)
wl l c at tt SURE(,wl) a k t P pp k p a a tr a k t - Bayes [3]
N t t p :
s
l
2
, (6)
r 2 p a 2s
l
p a t t :
)0,max( 22 xs
(7)
tr
lN
nnlx
wN 1
22 1 (8)
p a a d Nl
wavelet wn p 22
x th
:1 = max(wn) (9)
tt k t t 2).- minFDR[4]
N tr k a t a tr t t d t t tr N at n tr t t tr p:
)]/(1[2 wpn (10)
Sa p p tr pn:
)(...)2()1( Nppp (11)
Bt = :
qN
nnp )( (12)
a:
2
)(1 1
mp (13)
N k a t t P k ta p d [4], [5], [6], t t p t t a t a at t tr 7 t k t a k t a, t tr = :
)14(2
)(
11
.
.
).1.(
mp
ia
r : tr t c tnh
phn b nhi k t a tr i
p a t a nh t matr a at t a a a tr p t a t tr 7 a y gi tr bng 2.Trong bi ny chng ti s trnh by c th tt t t s a ny. Gi tra c xc nhvi m t kt tt t t
p t d t t a:
- : at .
- : p t t t t tn hi t M (3,4,5,6,7,8).
- 3: t k t N- 4: d - : a k
a t tr tr tr SN rt tp
- 6: d t tr p p a
- 7: tr t - 8: SNR tr t
SN a (4). tr - : a t k
t tr t t (3, t M tn hiu.
- : tp t t t a at k, a a t t .
- : a tt L*M pc a SN t.P pp a tt t t tr t
at tr t tr ra a:
63
-
7/31/2019 The automatic method to determine a optimal constant of wavelet threshold function of minFDR for mitigating int
3/6
VCCA-2011
VCCA-2011
t at
- To tn hiu v nhiu kch tc N- Chn b l k tc L1
- Tnh cc h s lc: h, g- c dch vng L2
i = 0
Dch vng phi cc mu tn hiu
- ng thch nghi
2
)(11..).1.(
mp
ia
W c cc h s wk
a=1:1:10
Ch ng
0
-Tnh cc gi tr hp bi p a
IDWT khi phc tn hiu
Dch vng tri cc mu tn hiu khi phc
i=i+1
i = L2 ?
1
Ly trung bnh tn hiu
S SN SN
Kt thc
1
0
p p SNR SN
p t : M tn hiu
- x
a SNR max
64
-
7/31/2019 The automatic method to determine a optimal constant of wavelet threshold function of minFDR for mitigating int
4/6
VCCA-2011
VCCA-2011
3. t t a a tr k t u. Ba t t Doppler t
tr t ata, t k ta t t tr tr pka t tha t k a t t t t t. at k ad t k p ta d t pt a pp at at kt k a t t a= t t k t SN k - u Doppler
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Tin hieu goc
-
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Tin hieu co nhieu
b-
SNR = 9.2274 dB
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Tin hieu khu nhieu DWT
-
SNR = 13.3442dB
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Tin hieu khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=3
-
SNR = 13.3701dB
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Tin hieu khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=4
-
SNR = 10.9215dB
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Tin hieu khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=6
-
SNR = 9.3289dB
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Tin hieu khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=2
-
SNR = 14.7669dBt t k tr t ppr t a= t SN a t k tt t k- i
65
-
7/31/2019 The automatic method to determine a optimal constant of wavelet threshold function of minFDR for mitigating int
5/6
VCCA-2011
VCCA-2011
0 50 0 1 0 00 1 50 0 20 0 0 2 5 00 3 00 0 3 50 0 40 0 0 4 5 0010 0
20 0
30 0
40 0
50 0
60 04320 mau tin hieu dien
H3 -
0 100 200 300 400 500 600100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Tin hieu Dien tron nhieu
H3b
SNR = 24.6001dB
0 100 200 300 400 500 60100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450Tin hieu Dien khu nhieu nguong deu
H3
0 100 200 300 400 500 60050
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450Tin hieu Dien khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=3
H3
0 100 200 300 400 500 600100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450Tin hieu Dien khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=4
H3
a=4, SNR=26.9690dB
0 100 200 300 400 500 60050
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450Tin hieu Dien khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=6
H3f =26.9690dB
0 100 200 300 400 500 60050
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450Tin hieu Dien khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=2
H3g
=29.9780dB
- C
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
x 104
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
622087 mau tin hieu do khi CH4
H4 -
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4512 mau (3000-3511) tin hieu do khi CH4
H4b
SNR = 24.3218dB
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4Tin hieu thuc khu nhieu nguong deu
H4
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4Tin hieu thuc khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=
H4
66
-
7/31/2019 The automatic method to determine a optimal constant of wavelet threshold function of minFDR for mitigating int
6/6
VCCA-2011
VCCA-2011
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4Tin hieu thuc khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=4
H4
=30.4424dB
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4Tin hieu thuc khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=6
H4f
=27.3075dB
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4Tin hieu thuc khu nhieu nguong thich nghi minFDR a=2
H4g
=34.2258dB tr p t t t t t k kt t t t d tr t k t a= t t tt tr t SN a
p pp tr t k
4. r t t tt t tr p d d t d k a tr a a t k t a= tr k a tr a= t a kt
p tr t r tt t ch s a t a= tc ca nhm tcgi xut l:
2
)(11..).1.(2
mp
i
N p pp k
tr t kt k tnghi wavelet minFDR ( a=) t tr tr SNR a t
t k p tr tr da t ra k t d ra
[1] D. Donoho, I. M. Johnstone: Ideal SpatialAdaptation by Wavelet Shrinkage, Department of
Statistics, Stanford University, USA. April 1993.
[2] Donoho, D.L., Johnstone, I.M.: Adapting to
unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage.
Department of statistics Stanford university, USA,
1994.[3] Sanyam Anand1, Amitabh Sharma, Akshay
Girdhar: Undecimated Wavelet Based New
Threshold Method for Speckle Noise Removal in
Ultrasound Images. IACSIT Press, Singapore
2011.
[4] V.V.K.D.V. Prasad, P.Siddaiah and B.PrabhakaraRao: Denoising of Biological Signals Using
Different Wavelet Based Methods and Their
Comparison. Asian Journal of Information
Technology 7 (4): 146-149, 2008.
[5] David Donoho and Jiashun Jin: Asymptotic
minimaxity of false discovery rate thresholding
for sparse exponential data. The Annals of
Statistics, Institute of Mathematical Statistics,
Vol. 34, No. 6, 2980 -3018, 2006.
[6] Martina Pavlicova, Thomas J. Santner and Noel
Cressie: Detecting signals in FMRI data usingpowerful FDR procedures. Statistics and Its
Interface Volume 1, 2332, 2008.[7 r N r P
: . t tr COMNAVI 2011, 142-147, 2011
r t tt
tt t t tr a t
N a a - t tr ra a t t
N tt k t t k p
67