The Anti-terrorism Act and Security Measures: Public Views, Impacts and Travel Experiences Nicole...
-
Upload
melissa-harrington -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of The Anti-terrorism Act and Security Measures: Public Views, Impacts and Travel Experiences Nicole...
The Anti-terrorism Act and Security Measures: Public Views, Impacts and Travel
Experiences
Nicole Crutcher, Senior Research Officer
March 25, 2006
2
Custom Survey – March 2005
Methodology Compared visible minority and non-minority
responses Addressed five areas
Awareness and concern regarding terrorism Application of terrorism-related legislation Racial profiling Impact of legislation Travel experiences
3
Awareness and Concern
Most Canadians were concerned about terrorism but that the threat had been exaggerated
General approval for government action Only 1% could identify the Anti-terrorism Act (ATA) Most noticed government security measure change
was increased security at airports General interest in receiving more information
regarding the ATA – preferred methods for receiving information were household mailings and the Internet
4
Awareness and Concern
Statistically Significant Differences Government measure to increase security at
borders/airports Familiarity with the ATA Safeguards within the ATA Interest in more information
5
Application
Most felt the ATA was necessary Canada is safer because of the ATA Overwhelming support for law enforcement/security
officials to investigate in Canada and abroad
Statistically Significant Differences Necessity of the ATA Safer Canada Applied fairly
6
Racial Profiling
Familiarity with term “racial profiling” – stereotyping Screening for potential terrorist activity based on
race/ethnicity/religion is inappropriate Canada does not have an official policy Felt an individual targeted based on ethnic or racial background
would still get a fair trial, but racial profiling was seen to violate the Charter
20% of visible minority respondents indicated they had been racially profiled within the last 4 years
7
Racial Profiling
Statistically Significant Differences Stereotyping as racial profiling Canadian policy to racially profile Likelihood of getting a fair trial Racial profiling unofficially
8
Impact
Most have not been personally affected by post-9/11 measures, nor had their immediate families
Legislation has had little to no impact Law enforcement changes have had little to no impact Affected most by increased security at airports or
delays in travel
Statistically Significant Differences Security measures Immediate family
9
Travel Experiences
No significant differences between minority and non-minority respondents on any of these variables
Many had travelled over last 4 years Additional screening in 12% - 25% of sample Most common additional screening: property
searches, personal searchers Support for additional screening highest with air
travel, but overall, additional screening was deemed as justified
10
Conclusion
Public awareness of legislation is very low Concerns over application by visible minority respondents Racial profiling continues to be an issue but general
acknowledgement over Charter violation Impact of ATA appears to be limited Race/ethnicity used in targeting at borders appears unlikely
despite greater proportions indicating being affected by changes in security
More research is needed to look more closely at these issues