The An Glop Hone Problem in the Human Right Context
-
Upload
shungmo-amos -
Category
Documents
-
view
60 -
download
0
description
Transcript of The An Glop Hone Problem in the Human Right Context
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that this work is the original work of Shungmo Amos Ngimndo presented
to the University of Buea in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of a LLB
in LAWS. It is open to public consultation; however it can not be used without
acknowledging the author. The author will appreciate any corrections or questions as to the
facts in this book.
SUPERVISOR: AUTHOR:Dr. J B FONYAM SHUNGMO AMOS N
……………………………….. ……………………………
AUTHOR: Tel: (+237) 77-46-26-72
E-mail: [email protected] 2008 BUEA
1
DEDICATION
This work is dedicated to the three people that I hold most dear in the world.
The first is the almighty god without whom we are nothing. Followed by my
father Mr. Ngimndo Denis who has made me what I am in life, and finally to
the one who has followed every step that I have taken to achieve this work. She
provided me with the will to go ahead and all the comfort. Without her this
work would never have even started. All I will say is “Sheila, you are one in a
million”
2
AKNOWLEDGEMENT
My greatest thanks go to my father Mr. Ngimndo Denis and my mother
Zemoh Justine who has made me what I am in life today. I am most grateful to
my lovely fiancée Akwa Nche Sheila who virtually forced me to go back to
school after my first degree program, to accomplish this task. Her endless
encouragement even when I was at the verge of giving it all up and the comfort
she gave to me made it possible for me to achieve this work.
My sincere thanks also go to Dr Johnny Fonyam who was instrumental in
getting me back to school and who also supervised this work. I am indebted to
Dr, Yanou Michael who encouraged me to take on the program and helped me
during registration and through out my studies.
I am also grateful to the Nkweteyim Family in general and special thanks go to Pa
Nkweteyim Thomas who has done everything possible to see that I succeed in life. There
are so many people who have helped me in one way or the other in this work and all I can
say to them is thank you.
3
ABSTRACT
The people of every given society have a spirit that is embedded in their national
culture. It is this spirit that shapes the people’s lives, activities, and their respond to inner
or outer drive to change, their emotions, their choice and their values. When this spirit is
kept alive, and can function normally, the people are able to strive for and improve in a life
more meaningful in its ramifications. When this spirit is cherished and nourished, the
people can claim to be alive and can talk meaningfully of having a community or a society.
But when it is the contrary, (i.e. the spirit no longer exist, or is distorted through conquest
or forceful imposition of another culture by another society like the case in Cameroon
today where the English culture is in the process of being annihilated in fervor of the
French culture) life becomes mechanical and ceases to have a direction or any real
meaning, because the people are spiritless and thus hopeless….. If the physical body
disagrees seriously with the spirit on their values and priorities, the being cannot have
peace. The body may compel the spirit to succumb to its values, but the subdue spirit will
remain in rebellion until the body wears out of its perpetual friction with the spirit. In such
a state, the being cannot have peace and very often degenerates into senility and insanity.
The body will thus remain in this state, until the spirit can succeeds to quit its prison. This
can happen only when the body becomes lifeless.
The state has a spirit that keeps it together. This spirit in most cases is in the
constitution of the land. Thus, serious violations to this spirit will constitute a great affront
to the wellbeing of the state as it can be seen as an attempt to murder the state, thereby
constituting a felony. WANG METUGE: The African concept of man 1972.
4
TABLE OF CONTENT
Certification…………………………………………………………………i
Dedication………………………………………………………………….ii
Acknowledgement………………………...………………………………iii
Abstract…………………………………………………………………….iv
Table of contents………………….……………………………………….v
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction……………………………………………………….1
1.1 Background to study…………………………………………………2
1.2 Introducing the Topic…………………………….…….……………3
1.3 Statement of the Problem……………………...…..………………...4
1.4 Objectives of study………………………………………………......4
1.5 Literature Review…………………………………………………....4
1.6 Relevance of study…………………………………….…………….5
1.7 Definition of Concepts…………………………..…………………..6
1.8 Research methodology……………………………………………...6
1.9 Hypothesis of study……………………………..…………………..6
1.10 Scope of Study.……………………….…………………………….7
1.11 Limitation of study…………………………………………..……..7
5
CHAPTER TWO
GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN RIGHTS
2.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN RIGHTS………………………..11
2.2 FREEDOMS AND LIBERTIES…………………………………………………14
2.3 RIGHTS ………………………………………………………………………….17
CHAPTER THREE
ANGLOPHONE PROBLEM IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS CONTEXT
3.1 INTRODUCING THE REGION………………………………………………..21
3.2 NATURE OF THE PROBLEM………………………………………………...23
3.3 THE RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION…………………………………..26
3.4 DENIAL OF CIVIL LIBERTIES AND JUSTICE……………………………..27
3.5 DISCRIMINATION AND MARGINALIZATION……………………………30
3.5.1 POLITICAL RIGHTS…………………………………………………………..32
3.5.2 CULTURAL RIGHTS………………………………………………………….34
3.5.3 DIPLOMATIC ISOLATION…………………………………………………..35
3.5.4 EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS…………………………………………………….36
3.5.5 CIVIL DISCRIMINATION……………………………………………………38
3.5.6 ECONOMIC MAGINALIZATION …………………………………………..38
6
CHAPTER FOUR
CONTEMPORARY SITUATION AND HOPES FOR A SOLUTION
4.1 GLOBALIZATION…………………………………………………………42
4.2 DEMOCRATIZATION…………………………………………………….43
4.3 HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS………………………………………………46
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………………48
BIBLOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………...50
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The denial of justice or impunity in any part of the world has always given the signal
to the perpetrators of such acts of injustice that what ever they do; they can not be held
accountable. This has often created fertile grounds for more abuses which have in the past
let to serious humanitarian calamities such as the concentration camps of the Second World
War, Dafur crises, the Rwanda genocide etc. Such crises often come about as the result of
isolated Human right abuses, which often go with impunity. A classic example of such a
situation is the case of Rwandan genocide of 1994
7
For a better part of history, a few people knew about the existence of a country in
Africa called Rwanda. Many people all over the world could not even place it on a world
map. However, after 1994, Rwanda became very popular and people from all parts of the
world have been trudging into Rwanda to contribute in the making of history. Perhaps the
Hutus and the Tutsis should be proud of finally drawing the attention of the whole world to
what for years had existed in Rwanda, but nobody gave a dame. But at was cost was this
finally achieved? Before the actual genocide in Rwanda there had been a series of killings
and other human right abuses which the world choose not to notice until it degenerated to
genocide.
Cameroon is not too far away from the pre genocide Rwanda of 1994. there
presently exist so many human right abuses which if not checked, may lead to another
humanitarian calamity, this time around in what should be considered one of the most
peaceful nation in central Africa. This research will better explain this assertion as we
move on.
1.1 BACKGROUND TO STUDY
For more than four decades now, the Anglophone in the republic of Cameroon has
suffered serious persecutions and catastrophes that can be compared only to the biblical
apocalypse, due to the false union contracted in 1961 between the Southern Cameroons
and the republic of Cameroon.
This union in reality never existed except in the minds of the leaders who failed
from the onset to take into consideration several factors. The world is witnessing the
8
making of another Rwanda in Africa, but like in the traditional way, every one is silent and
sees it as an internal problem, which is the main concern of the Cameroonian government.
The Anglophone problem is one of the most volatile problems in the African
continent, which the international community has refused to recognize because of the
seemingly peaceful nature of the country. However it should be noted that this seemingly
peaceful country is on a gunpowder foundation that may explode at anytime. And what a
great explosion will that be?
In the next few chapters we will ride through this problem to see if there is really a
Human right problem. The Cameroon government in trying to alienate the Anglophones
has committed all kind of atrocities that are aimed to forever render the Anglophones
silent. This is to prevent the crux of the matter from getting to the international level.
Therefore everything has to be done to silence the Anglophones before it is too late, and in
trying to do this, the government of Cameroon has gone an extra mile in their quest for
total secrecy of the Anglophone plight in Cameroon.
There always come a time when the cup of endurance becomes full, and people are
no longer willing to be plunged into the abyss of despair, frustration and dehumanization.
It is at such a time that the majority government might think of the final solution to a bad
tooth in the mouth. Extermination or should we say annihilation, may be the only solution
so that they will forever enjoy the resources of this economic giant which has been turn
into economic and political dwarf. This should be the most callous act of ingratitude that
the world is yet to notice since the end of the Second World War.
9
1.2 INTRODUCING THE TOPIC
Much ink has flowed on the Anglophone problem in Cameroon especially with the
liberalization of the media in 1990, coupled with globalization and the coming of the
internet. There is much already on the topic, but all what already exist only views the
problem in general term.
However this work is going to portray the problem as a human right problem which
has to be resolve as fast as possible before another can of worms is open in an already
volatile region. This work is intended to bring out all the Human rights abuses embedded
in this problem from the view point of an Anglophone.
1.3 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
That the Anglophone problem is a Human rights problem and is the greatest contributor to
the high rates of human rights abuses in Cameroon.
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
The objective of this work is to study the Anglophone Problem in the context of
Human Rights from the view point of an Anglophone. We shall look at how an
average Anglophone sees the problem.
1.5 LITERATURE REVIEW
To accomplish a task like this we have to research into much Anglophone literature
on the problem, the view of independent observers and even the view of the Cameroon
government.
We shall be aided here by works of general historians such as Dr. Julius Ngoh,
williad Johnson, Takoungang $ Krieger, Mbu ATN, NN Mbile, Rev Nja’ah Peter etc10
We shall also look at works of activists such as Dr Nfor, Dr, Calson Anyangwe, Albert
Mukong and many others
Another source of literature for this work will be gotten from interviews, news papers
articles, periodicals, journals and other small documents such as “The two alternatives” etc.
The internet will be very useful in this work and we shall also look at human right
documents such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other specific human
rights documents such as human rights fact sheets.
1.6 RELEVANCE OF STUDY
The aim of this work is to examine the Anglophone problem from a totally different
angle which is the Human Rights view. This is aimed at getting Cameroonians to know the
reality of what the Anglophone problem is all about. There will also be an in-depth study
of the basic Human rights concepts such as freedoms, rights, liberties etc. This will be of
great importance to students especially and all those who want to understand the basic
tenets of Human rights and a general understanding of Human rights.
A whole chapter of this work has been dedicated to general introductions to human
rights which is the basis of any human rights studies any where in the world. This chapter
will be of great importance especially to many young Cameroonians who all through their
lives have taken human rights to be what the authorities want them to belief.
This work also aims to make young Cameroons to grow up knowing their rights and
be able to defend those rights at any given point in time. Human beings by virtue of their
11
humanity are born with these rights. They are not acquires and so it is just a matter of
proper education to get these rights protected.
Also this work aims to bring to the world what an ordinary Anglophone feel his problem
is.
Finally this work is aimed at throwing more light on the Anglophone plight in
Cameroon which for long has been regarded as a taboo. The mere mention of the SCNC
which is the front runner or the main organization struggling to break this taboo by letting
Cameroonians know the truth of the matter has for long been synonymous with arbitrary
detention and imprisonment.
1.7 DEFINITION OF CONCEPTS
ANGLOPHONE: this term is used to refer to the citizens of former British
Southern Cameroons. It is used interchangeably with Southern Cameroonians.
1.8 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
As stated above much research is needed to accomplish this work. This will be done
in the following ways.
The first method will be through previous researches on the topic which can be
gotten from available books, novels, pamphlets, class discussions,
12
personal interview with some of the major actors in the field conducted in 2002 by
this researcher will also be used to analyze the situation
Journals, periodicals, news paper articles, press releases, conference discussions, etc
will also provide most of the material needed for this work.
The internet will be widely exploited to bring this work to light
Questionnaires are absent due to lack of time and the sensitive nature of some of the
issues raised in this work.
1.9 HYPOTHESIS OF STUDY
The Anglophone problem in Cameroon is a human rights problem. All what will be done
in this work will be to defend the above stated hypothesis.
1.10 SCOPE OF STUDY
This study will be based mainly on the Anglophone problem from 1st of October
1961 till date. The main focus will be those issues which make the problem that of
human rights such as marginalization, torture, denial of the right to self
determination etc
Part of the study will also focus on the emergence of democracy, globalization, the
internet, human rights groups and other NGOs actively participating in the field of human
13
rights in Cameroon. We shall look at the effects of these organizations and concepts on the
problem.
Finally we shall look at the contemporary situation and we shall also attempt a
solution to the problem.
1.11 LIMITATIONS OF STUDY
The Anglophone problem in Cameroon for close to half a century has been label a
taboo or a no go area and so only very few people have been courageous enough to talk
about it in the open or even put it in writing. This has greatly limited the availability of
facts on this field of study especially from those who have lived through it.
This lack of information from those who lived through the various stages of the
transaction that have taken place since the coming together in 1961 was greatly enforced
by decree No. 66-LF-18, of 12th December 1966 which clamped down on freedom of press,
and law No: 67/LF/19 of 12th June 1967 which banned all meetings and political
associations. These two decrees effectively silence all those who could have agitated until
after 1990 when the liberty laws of 19th December were passed to liberalize the country and
to uplift most of the restrictions
Thus for about four decades, much literature on the Anglophone problem did not
exit. Most of the information we now have on such issues can only be second hand or
authentic memories which in most cases are tainted by political ambitions.
Another great limitation of this work will be the absence of direct interview with any
of the founding fathers of modern day Cameroon who are either death or have clouded
memories and can not objectively explain the situation due to their shadow political 14
ambitions. For instance J.N Foncha the founding father of unification only started talking
of the Anglophone plight in Cameroon when he was quite close to his grave.
Again most of those who have written on the problem are either in prison, death or
in exile. They are hard to pin down and most of such documents can not be sold publicly as
their ideas are obviously different from what the government will want to the majority of
illiterate Cameroonians to belief. For long such documents or books were banned and
destroyed by the government.
This work will also be greatly limited by the fact that there is no concise trend as to
the order of events that have occurred so far. There is no book or document in existence
which will tell you about the abuses that the Anglophones in Cameroon have suffered since
the formation of the union in 1961. Therefore we can only depend on isolated newspaper
articles and documents especially from the Southern Cameroons National Council (SCNC)
which in some cases may be bias and not academically oriented.
The above, and lack of questionnaires which even if produced very few people will
be willing to give their opinion on the issue, will greatly limit this work. However this
researcher has taken five years of serious research on this field and has enough documents
to support his hypothesis.
15
CHAPTER TWO:
2.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN RIGHTS
The whole idea of Human rights is founded on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR) that came into force in December 19481. It was the first ever generally agreed
declaration on what are considered fundamental rights of all humans all over the world.
1 See “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948”. Also see explanatory notes on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other related international instruments published by the Human rights defense group in Cameroon
16
It declares these rights in the following words. “now, therefore the general
assembly proclaims this universal declaration of human rights as a common standard of
achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every
organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and
education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures,
national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and
observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples
of territories under their jurisdiction”2
Several definitions for Human Rights have emerged all over the world. However
there is no generally accepted text book definition as everything is contextual. Although
there is no general text book definition of human rights, which is accepted worldwide,
there is a general understanding as to what constitutes basic human rights.
They are those rights which are fundamental to all human beings by virtue of their
humanity, age, sex, color, height, weight, race, country, social situation in life, language,
level of education, development or underdevelopment, and all other arbitrary criteria not
withstanding.
The Human rights enjoyed by the president of the United States should not be more
than that of a poor refugee in Rwanda because they both are humans. A pigmy in the
equatorial rain forest of Africa has nothing that should prevent him/her from enjoying the
same rights as his/her fellow human being in Washington DC.
2 Ibid 17
Many definitions of human rights have been developed but it should be noted that
non-of these definitions has been generally accepted as conclusive on what should be
recognized worldwide as a definition for human rights. Many theories have also come up
aimed at trying to explain human rights.3 However, it should be understood that definitions
in most cases are meaningless if one cannot fully grasp the meaning behind them. It is for
this reason that I have decided to explain what human rights are, and not try to define them.
The necessity for the Universal protection of Human rights is clearly spelled out in
the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as follows:
“Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights
of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace
in the world,
Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts
which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which
human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and
want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,
Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last
resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be
protected by the rule of law,
3 As cited by Shungmo Amos, in Human rights in the former Southern Cameroons page 3. (unpublished work) Here you can also find the various definitions and theories that have been developed to support or define human rights. All these theories are aimed at bringing greater understanding to the concept of human rights.
18
Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between
nations,
Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith
in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in
the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress
and better standards of life in larger freedom,
Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with
the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human
rights and fundamental freedoms,
Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest
importance for the full realization of this pledge”
For a better and greater understanding of human rights, we are going to break this subject
matter into two major parts. There are two basic constituents of human rights, which if
studied, will leave us in no doubt as to what human rights are. These two major
constituents can be brought to light in the form of freedoms, rights and liberties.
2.1 FREEDOMS AND LIBERTIES
According to Robert Green an American politician, “Intellectual liberty is the air of
the soul, the sunshine of the mind, and without it, the world is a prison, the universe a
dungeon.”4 Few people think of freedom in very similar terms. To some, it is about
political rights: the right to assemble, to free speech, to participate in government, etc. To
4 See http/www.worldquote.org (2003)19
others, it’s all about property rights: to do with one’s land, possessions, or body as one sees
fit. To others, freedom means freedom from hunger, health, fears, or other woes. To a few,
freedom means total freedom to do anything in some cases limited only by other people’s
freedom, and in other cases limited only by the individual’s will and ability to exercise
power.
Among the basic freedom to which men may aspire that their lives might be full and
unclamped, freedom from fear stands out as both a means and an end. A people who will
build a nation in which strong, democratic institutions are firmly established, must first
learn to liberate their minds from apathy and fear.
In recent times due to prevailing trends, it has increasingly been noticed that one
man’s freedom fighter might be another man’s terrorist. Thus, whenever we have to say
anything about freedom, we should be specific on what freedom we talk about. However,
when we talk of political freedom, we can then be able to reach a certain level of
agreement. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
a) Freedom of conscience and religion;
b) Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press
and other media of communication;
c) Freedom of peaceful assembly; and
d) Freedom of association.5
5 See Canadian Charter of rights and Freedoms (internet) 20
The most important fundamental freedom as described by John Locke in his treatise
of government is that; “every man has a property in his own person, this nobody has any
right to but himself”6
This fundamental freedom has been claimed to include free choice of job or
occupation, free choice of spouse and free movement within countries and across borders.
However it should be noted that some freedoms might be restricted to people who are
legally and dully convicted of crimes or committed into mental institutions.7
The second important freedom is the freedom of the mind and conscience. This
contrast greatly with practices of ideological intolerance, religious intolerance, political
intolerance, and the zealotry of moral or patriotic righteousness or enormous social
pressure towards conformity.8
The freedom of mind and conscience can be expressed in one’s expression of his
convictions without fear of reprisals. These include freedom of speech, of the press, of
debate, and discussion. It is the freedom to criticize, to question, to challenge, and to say
unpopular things, the freedom to be creative by thinking of things different from the
official position etc. This fundamental human right shows that every one is free to think
and spread whatever ideas with out fear of reprisals.
The next fundamental freedom is that of equal access to advantages and
opportunities available in a free society. This freedom deals with those ills such as
discrimination and marginalization, which is rampant in our Cameroon society.
6 See John Locke two treaties of government (internet)7 Class discussion and notes with Dr TN Fonchingong. (2002)8 Ibid.
21
Discrimination and marginalization, negates the foundation of freedoms and Human
right in every society. Such practices destroy the very foundation of states and there can be
no national culture in such states. Such states drift about aimlessly as there is chaos
everywhere. People in such societies lack the will or motivation to forge ahead. There is
lack of commitment in everything the people do and one can never talk about concepts
such as national unity or national integration.
Cameroonian are suffering today because the opportunities that exist are been
restricted to a particular group of people who now see it as their birth right and thus no
need to strive for excellence.
Another fundamental freedom that is often considered very important is the freedom
of political and social activities. In every society, we have the inputs and out put values in
what Political Scientists call the political system9. It is the will of the people. Inputs from
the civil society go into the political system through the effort of political parties, trade
unions, pressure groups, liberation movement, etc to bring about output that is of general
interest.
Since Political and social activities are the main reservoir from which inputs can
leave the civil society to the political system. Where people cannot freely participate in
social and political activities, such reservoir become empty, and the few politicians at the
top take all the decision which will obviously favour them. When this happens, the will of
the people is not respected and thus their views are not taken into consideration. Here we
say the political system has failed and thus a new one has to be developed to replace it.
9 For more on the political system, see David Easton. University of California. (internet) 22
2.2 RIGHTS.
A right is a just claim or a title to have, possess, use something, or act in a particular
way to enjoy certain privileges that exist in a free society. Without these rights, one cannot
fully develop him self to the fullest, and thus will remain a sub human. Man has a right
first of all to his life and existence, conscience, thought etc, before all other things
necessary for his existence such as cloths, food, shelter etc.
Once born he has the right to life, to think, be brought up, and most of all to be free,
the right to education and assistance from his parent and also the society in other to realize
his best self, to develop his physical, mental, moral and creative faculties.
Although man has the right to life, he also seeks what has been described as the
highest good of man by most philosophers namely happiness. Most philosophers of the
past such as Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus, Zeno etc dwelt much on this right to happiness
because it is the ultimate good of all humanity. When man is happy, all things around him
are pure and clean, man is in his best form, and there is joy and peace everywhere.
Man is also endowed with his personal dignity and thus the right to be respected and
regarded by every other person as a human being no matter his position or status in life. If
human life is to be secured, if man is to develop his faculties and realize his best self, if
man is to achieve happiness, and if human dignity is to remain unimpaired then man must
be free and secure in his physical person, free in his mind, and free in expressing himself.
23
The right to freedom has since time in memorial been developed through natural
law, and enshrined in constitutions and landmark documents such as the magna Carter, the
Habeas corpus, and the famous American constitution.10
We have the right to pursue our happiness, protect, and express our personality, but
we cannot pursue these rights without thinking of the people with whom we live, the state
and the society at large. We should know that as we have these rights, so do others. Thus,
rights go hand in hand with obligations.
There are approximately three types of rights which can be conveniently divided
into: first generation rights which involve the basic human rights such as to the right to
freedom of thought, conscience, religion, worship, respect as a human being etc. Second
generation rights are mostly economic in nature such as the right to education, the right to
employment etc. while the last group of rights or third generation rights are collective
rights such as the right to self determination, solidarity etc11.
In his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance statement, President Carter said: “My concept
of Human rights has grown to include not only the right to live in peace, but also to
adequate health care, shelter, food, and to economic opportunity. I hope this award
reflects a universal acceptance and even embrace of this broad-based concept of human
rights.”12
Human rights are inviolable. This is explained by the fact that if we consider the
unique place that man occupies in the universe, and by virtue of his reasoning and
10Cited in Lessons from Fonlon. Published in The freedom forum of June 2003. (This document was first published by Bernard Fonlon in “The task of today”)11 Also see Shungmo; Human rights in the former southern Cameroons pg 3 (current work)12 see The Carter center (internet).
24
intelligence. If we consider what man has been able to achieve with the force of his mind,
we realize that he is an extraordinary being who deserves the highest respect.
Successive repressive Francophone regimes in Cameroon have been able to succeed
up to this moment because they have succeeded in preventing the people from knowing
their rights. Human rights have been removed from all educational curricular and thus
people leave the university without knowing what fundamental human rights are.
In such a society, people grow up believing that blatant human rights abuses are
normal day-to-day events and thus are comfortable with it. A slap from a police officer,
arrests without warrant, mid-night arrests, denial of educational opportunities,
discrimination, unlawful detentions, etc become very normal and there is no cause for
alarm.
The various human rights organizations in the country are beginning to create
awareness and the people are beginning to know the limits of government
From the fore going, we realize that duty of the state or government as far as the
rights of the citizen are concerned, is to respect and protect those rights. Try to regulate the
relationships between the various members of the society with the aim of upholding and
safeguarding these rights and try to see that people do not abuse the rights of others in
other to increase the enjoyment of their own rights. However the government does not have
monopoly over any of these rights as members of government who safeguard the equal
enjoyment of these rights are subjected to same rules too.
25
However it should be noted that human rights as of now has no general definition, as
people from different parts of the world define human rights based on their various
traditions and customs, their environment, upbringing and natural situation in life.
26
CHAPTER THREE
THE ANGLOPHONE PROBLEM IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS CONTEXT
3.1 INTRODUCING THE REGION.
Anglophone Cameroon refers to the ex-British Southern Cameroons which, united
with the ex-French Cameroon in 1961 to form the Federal republic of Cameroon, a union
on the basis of equality. This territory has a total land area of 43.000sq.Km, and a
population of about five million. It is more populated than at least sixty and larger in land
area than at least thirty United Nations member states. 13
The origin of this territory dates back to 1884 when Germany proclaimed a
protectorate over an undefined territory between west and central Africa, which she named
“Kamerun”. At the end of the First World War, Germany was forced to renounce her claim
over Kamerun by the Versailles treaty of 1919, that recognized the 1916 division of the
country along what was known as the picot line, between Britain and France who had
jointly wrestled the territory out of German hands.
Following this agreement, France obtained 4/5 of the territory, while Britain was
satisfied with the remaining 1/5. France renamed her own portion French Cameroun while
13 Nfor N Nfor: (2002) the Southern Cameroons, truth of the matter Bamenda p 427
Britain renamed her own part British Cameroon, made up of two disconnected strips of
land.
By article 22 of the League of Nation’s covenant British Cameroons and French
Cameroun were given a new legal status, and were placed separately as mandated
territories under Britain and France respectively as class C mandates. The responsibility of
Britain and France was to bring up or prepare the people of the territories towards self-
determination and independence.
In effect what we are saying is that the German Kamerun, which existed before the
First World War in 1914 had completely disintegrated after 1922, and each part either
formed a new country, or joined another to form a new country. Thus the German
Kamerun which existed after 1884 was shared up to include part of present day Chad,
central Africa, Republic, Gabon, Congo and later Nigeria when British northern Cameroon
decided to join Nigeria following the 1961 plebiscite.14
With the demise of the League of Nation in 1939 and the emergence of the United
Nations Organization (UNO) in 1946, all mandated territories where transferred to the
UNO as trust territories, with Britain and France maintaining their role over the two
territories. The role of the trusteeship council was clearly stated in article 76(b) of the U.N
charter, which shows that the objective of the trusteeship system was to promote the
advancement of the inhabitants of the trust territories and their progress towards self-
government or independence.15 Also article 1514(XV) of 14th December 1960 of the U.N
14 ibid15 Nfor N Nfor (1994) The hidden agenda, Bamenda (1994)
28
charter was to the effect that no state or even a microstate could be refused independence
on the basis of its size or population.16
For 46 years, Britain administered British Cameroons as part of her larger Nigerian
colony. The Southern Cameroons was administered as part of the eastern region of Nigeria,
and the Northern Cameroon as part of northern Nigeria. Within this period the people of
British Cameroon were taught democratic values.
To proof their political maturity, in 1953, the 13 members representing Southern
Cameroons in the Eastern regional house of assembly in Enugu, staged a ’’walk out’’
following the eastern regional crises, and were granted a quasi federal status in 1954. From
this period southern Cameroon had taken a determine step towards full independence and
self-government. However, instead of granting Southern Cameroon independence as
enshrined in the U.N charter, Britain sacrifice the future of the very people she had
protected for 46 years in order to strengthen her relationship with France and Nigeria.
She misled the U.N to endorse the two alternatives, a choice between attaining
independence by joining either la Republic du Cameroun that attained independence on the
1st of January 1960, or Nigeria that gained independence on the 1st of October 1960. The
result was in favor of la republic du Cameroun.
The Anglophone problem in Cameroon today is based on the fact that since the
formation of the ill-fated union, Anglophones have come to be a people with a problem.
This problem has been seen in many ways. However there now seem to be a consensus on
the fact that it is “annexation” and nothing less.
16 Op.cit. Nfor (2002)29
3.2 NATURE OF THE ANGLOPHONE PROBLEM
The Anglophone problem is fundamental to the future of Cameroon and has
occasioned much controversy and confusion as to what the problem really is. In the past
people use to look at it from various dimensions; such as marginalization, deprivation,
exploitation, neglect, assimilation, etc. However, more recent studies have blended all the
above approaches to come out with one word, which encompasses all “Annexation”. This
new school has come about as a result of the fact that all the factors or views listed above
are present in the Anglophone problem.
As Per the Buea declaration of, the All Anglophone Conference (AACI) 1993 the
Anglophone problem can be seen in the following words. “We have been disenfranchised
marginalized and treated with suspicion. Our interests have been disregarded. Our
participation limited to non-essential functions. Our natural resources have been ruthlessly
exploited without any benefit accruing to our territory or its people. The development of
our territory has been negligible and confined to areas directly or indirectly of benefit to
the Francophones. Through maneuvers and manipulations we have been reduced from
partners of equal status in the union to the status of a subjugated people.”17
Independent Southern Cameroonians have also described the Anglophone problems
in various ways. For instance Dr Christopher I. Atang, describes the Anglophone problem
by using the following words “our territory has witnessed the most gory act’s of vandalism
by la Republic’s army of occupation…wanton elimination of human lives and destruction
of properties. Our people have been callously tortured; shamelessly raped; our sons and
17 The Buea declaration 3rd April 1993, Mount Mary Maternity.30
fathers maimed and massacred; our businessmen and farmers have had their property
looted or burnt”18.
To Fon Gorgi Dinka, “instead of government by dialogue, we have government by
terror. Instead of legislation by debate we have legislation by ambush. Instead of law and
order by persuasion, we have law and order by banditry and piracy; he Ahidjo himself has
been referring to it as a peaceful revolution”19
The definition to the Anglophone problem which has captivated me most is that of
Dr. Nfor Ngala Nfor in his Truth of the matter (2002) where he had this to say. “The
Southern Cameroon question is not mere marginalization, deprivation, neglect or lack of
people in strategic positions. It is annexation while marginalizations, naked, exploitation
among others, are the manifestations and consequences of a chronic disease. It is a
political question and not a cultural issue. If this were not the case some southern
Cameroonians who have completely assimilated French values and speak French better
than some Francophone Cameroonians would have occupied some of the prestigious and
powerful positions”20
Many Southern Cameroonians believe that decree No 72 -270 of 2nd June 1972 was
the final annexation of Anglophone Cameroon while decree No: 84-001 of 4th February
1984 was to completely assimilate the Southern Cameroon.
18 Cameroon life October 1993, page 13,19 Gorji dinka,The new social order: 1985.Also see Mukong AW 1990, The case for the Southern Cameroons USA, CAMFECO, pg 9520 Nfor Op.cit ,2002
31
The Anglophone problem as seen above has had unbelievable consequences on the
Anglophones or west Cameroonians. The following pages will concentrate on looking at
some of these problems in the Human rights context
3.3 DENIAL OF THE RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION
Self-determination is defined as free choice of one’s own acts without external
compulsion, and especially as the freedom of the people of a given territory to determine
their own political status or independence from their current state. This right to self
determination is succinctly stated by the American constitution in the following words
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights. That
among these is Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these
rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from
the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,
and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and
organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect
their Safety and Happiness….. But when a long train of abuses and usurpation,
pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under
32
absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such
Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security”21
This basis Human right rule does not apply to the Anglophones in
Cameroon. From the very beginning, Anglophones were denied this right to
self determination by the UN which gave them only two alternatives which
precluded the right to self determination.22 It was even alleged that Charles de
Gaulle had referred to the Southern Cameroons as ““The southern Cameroons was
a small gift from the queen”. (un petit cadeaux de la reine)23
After independence Southern Cameroons then West Cameroon was again refused
the right to self determination in 1972 when the unitary constitution was changed without
them having much say to it, as the referendum to decide an issue affecting only them was
open to the whole country. As if this was not enough, in 1984, by presidential decree No:
84-001 of 4th February 1984, the name of the country was not only changed, but east
Cameroon simply revive the name with which they gained independence in 1960 to include
west Cameroon. Many have suggested that by this single act, a whole nation was simply
assimilated or annexed.
So assimilated, the Anglophones have remained in this state of assimilation or non
existence till the 1990s when they were liberated by the liberty laws. Since then much has
been done towards the achievement of their right to self determination under the leadership
of the Southern Cameroons National Council (SCNC). Efforts have been ruthlessly
suppressed and it is these efforts that have led to the greatest degree of human rights abuses
recorded in the history of Anglophones. Arbitrary arrests, illegal detentions, torture,
21 See The American declaration of independence. (Internet)22 The two alternatives” was a document published and circulated by the U.N, bearing the impact of the two questions to be posed, on southern Cameroonians, and the implication of each choice. The two alternatives were adopted by the U.N resolution 1352(XIV) of 16th October 1959. This resolution also made arrangements for the plebiscite. Resolution 2013(XXVI) was also passed on May 31st 1960 requesting the administering authority of the southern Cameroon to make sure that the people were fully informed of the constitutional arrangements that will follow the results of the plebiscite. The two alternatives was a blatant abuse of article 76(b) of the U.N charter which was to the effect that “The objective of the U.N trusteeship system was to promote the advancement of inhabitants of the trust territory and their progress toward self determination or independence”.23 See Hotline news No: 0075.
Also see Nja’ah peter: 2001, The Anglophone problem in Cameroon pg 65)
33
killings and even assassinations. These abuses are the crux of this work and we shall
discuss them as we go along.
3.4 DENIAL OF CIVIL LIBERTIES AND JUSTICE TO ANGLOPHONES
Civil Rights are privileges that every person is entitled to. When a person is
discriminated against for associating with or being part of a certain group of people, his or
her civil rights are violated. In many legal spheres, discrimination based on race, sex, age,
religion, ethnicity, physical/mental disability and sexual orientation is prohibited. When
these rights are interfered with, civil action can be taken against the perpetrators.
Fundamental individual rights such as freedom of speech and religion are protected
by law against unwarranted governmental or other interference. Civil Liberties on the other
hand are enjoyed by all human beings based on their humanity. Under no condition should
some one be prevented from enjoying these liberties
The text book definition of justice is: “The principle of fairness; the ideal of moral
equality.” In this work, we shall not go into polemics, as we all at least understand what
justice and civil liberties are all about. With the case of the Anglophones the persistent
violation of their civil liberties, has greatly hindered them from living freely in the country
that they are supposed to call their own.
An idea on what I am talking about here can be gotten from reports of what
happened in Bamenda in 1992. One reporter describes the situation in the following words.
“Bamenda is hell on earth. Bamenda is an inferno where human beings are reduced
to something less than animals’…being of northwest origin is a crime. Your social status
34
doesn’t mean anything to the army of occupation. People are harassed, humiliated and all
sort of indignity is melted to north westerners… retired justice Nyo Wakai was arrested in
his house beaten with wife and children before taken away and detained
incommunicado…. some of those arrested are taken to bushes around Mendankwe,
stripped of their clothing and drilled on guerrilla warfare for the cameras of CRTV….as
part of the diabolic mission in Bamenda, victims of the emergency laws are not allowed to
go to the hospital or receive any form of medical assistance… red cross personnel who
tried to assist the victims were force to sit on dirt…many corpses have been abandoned in
the mortuary because of the impossibility to withdraw them…Two expectant mothers gave
birth on the streets on October 26 and 31….Last Sunday people going to church were
assembled and forced to sit on the road and recite “gendarmes are more than god”…
Many people are reported death in gendarme custody: according to one detainee who
bought his freedom, all those arrested are beaten three times a day…they are locked up in
overcrowded cells which makes breathing difficult…To date more than 1500 persons have
been arbitrarily arrested, detained and tortured. There are reports that some detainees are
beaten to death. Food water and visits are denied hence verification impossible…Torture
and looting of private properties by gendarmes are common place…infringement on
freedom of worship as gendarmes force worshipers and clergy to rub themselves in mud
and return home saying God is dead”24
These civil liberties are well spelt out in the preamble of the 1996 constitution as any
other right, but when it comes to the Anglophones, there is always the un-written law that
24 le messenger vol 2 no: 40 of 12th November 199235
applies. An Anglophone can be arrested at any time, accused of anything and tortured to
sign false confessions which the courts always take to be the truth.
Anglophones have been arrested in the middle of the night in front of crying children
and wives who were seeing them for the last time. There are many others languishing in
francophone prisons without crimes and there is no body to tell their families of their
whereabouts. The police or gendarme officer who is suppose to be the servant of the
people has become the master and every where you hear people calling them “chef” to
please them.25
The absence of civil liberties and denial of justice has been successfully carried out
in Cameroon because the judiciary has been muffled. The independence of the judiciary a
very important feature in all democratic societies has been thrown to the dogs. The
judiciary is simply the extension of the executive arm of the ministry of justice. The judge
can be appointed and dismissed at any time and thus for the judge to keep his position, he
must be willing to play ball and not offend the master at the top.
It is hard to belief that in our modern society the chief judge of the Supreme Court
could declare over the national television and radio that he can not do anything because his
hands are tied. But this was exactly what happened in Cameroon in 1992 during the
reading of the results of the presidential elections. Still in 1992 in Bamenda, authorities
rejected a high judge’s ruling because the decision freed Anglophones who have been
incarcerated at the Bamenda central prison for long. These people were later transferred to
Yaoundé were they were sentenced by a French judge in a military tribunal.26
25http/ www.thesoutherncameroons.org(2006)26 Judgment No: HCB (CMR) 92
36
3.4 DISCRIMINATION AND MARGINALISATION OF ANGLOPHONES
The United Nations charter has defined discrimination in the following words; “any
distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference which is based on any ground such as race,
color, language, religion, national or social origins, birth or other status and which has
the purpose of nullifying or impairing the recognition enjoyment or exercise by all persons,
on an equal footing, of all rights and freedoms”. From this definition, there are some
words that we need to take note of: they include DISTINCTION, EXCLUSION, and
RESTRICTION OR PREFERENCE. The U.N has thus bared all its members from
practicing discrimination that has been found anathema to human existence. Discrimination
goes hand in hand with marginalization, which is the deprivation of a group of people from
effectively handling important government positions. Cameroon ratified the U.N charter in
1984 and thus is bound by all the laws and decisions of the said organization.
However, what goes on in Cameroon is far from being this as there is a blatant abuse
of whole aim and objectives of what the national assembly ratified and the president
signed. Since the coming together of the Southern Cameroons and la republic du
Cameroon in 1961 to form the federal union, the Southern Cameroonian or Anglophone
who is a minority in the union has undergone lots of discrimination in the hands of the
French speaking Cameroonian who are in the majority.
According to A.N.T Mbu, “Every thing including positions look like gifts or
privilege. West Cameroonians have no right for any thing in the republic. They have been
discriminated and colonized anew” He goes further to say “They are treated worse than a
37
conquered people, discriminated upon and marginalized. Their lands and property are
looked upon as enemy property, as they stand idly by and watch it looted and carried
away”.27 The English speaking Cameroonian from the former Southern Cameroon is
highly discriminated upon. He is excluded and restricted from the government and several
areas of public life by his francophone brother.
The base of this discrimination and marginalization is the language or name of the
person in question. From the language you speak, you can easily be identified as an
Anglophone. Secondly the name you bare can also clearly tell from which part of the
country you hail. Speaking French in most cases does not mean you will be fully accepted
as you are forever condemned to be a second-class citizen, you are denied the right to
employment, you are to be arrested and tortured without being charged in any court, and to
be denied the right to all freedoms. You are to be humiliated no matter the circumstance.
Per Dr Atang “enough is enough! We are firmly determine to die on our feets than to
cringe on our bellies as untold misery, injustice, domination, discrimination, exploitation,
manipulation…are visited on us daily by; la republique du cameroun’s troop of
occupation.”
3.4.1 POLITICAL RIGHTS
The cardinal rule has always been that the Anglophone, no matter how intelligent he
is must always come after his Francophone counterpart. It is unbelievable to think that
there exist whole ministries in a bilingual country like Cameroon without a single
27A.N.T Mbu: 1993 civil disobedience in Cameroon, Impriemerie Georges frere ( page 324),38
Anglophone at the higher echelon. However they can always serve as messengers and
occupy other lower positions.
Dr. Nzefack. Peter Stanley had this to say “Anglophones are hardly privy to
national secrets let alone secrets of political power which are remotely controlled from the
Elysee palace. The only secret Anglophones are initiated into is how to thwart the popular
aspirations of the Anglophone populace and deliver critics, dissidents and non-conformists
to the sledge hammer of CENER”28.
There are certain ministries in the country where English is unheard of such as
defense, economy and finance, external relations, territorial administration, national
education, investment and many others. Taking of secretary-generals in ministries, it is a
no go area for Anglophones.
When we talk about discrimination in ministerial positions, some misguided
opinions always call the attention of the people to the fact that the last three successive
Prime ministers of the country have all been Anglophones. However it will be of great
importance to clarify them on the fact that the power structure in the office of the Prime
Minister has greatly changed as compared to the time a francophone was Prime Minister.
No one can claim that the powers of the Prime Minister during the Biya era and that during
the Achidi Achu or Musonge era are the same.
Before power could pass on to the Anglophone the power structure was greatly
modified. Thus secretary-generals and vice prime ministers had to come in. Cameroon has
always proclaimed to be practicing what is known as advance democracy. However it is
appalling to believe that in Cameroon with advanced democracy, there are traditional
28 Cameroon reviews vol. 1 of June 1994)39
Anglophone ministries such as transport and mines. These ministries became traditional
Anglophone ministries only after they have been stripped naked of all the juicy
corporations under them.
All these corporations such as CAMAIR, CAMSHIP, in the ministry of transport
and HYDROCABURE, SCDP, SONARA etc in the ministry of mines, have direct access
to the presidency, thus making the general managers of such corporations more powerful
than their ministers. The ministry is only a small faction of the whole vampire scheme
because if we go to the diplomatic missions, we realize that the situation is even worse as
there are whole diplomatic missions without a single Anglophone in the mission.
To better clarify this situation, it will be better to look at some statistics published by
the post newspaper of Monday April 14, 2003.
“Cameroon cabinet made up of 53 members…has only 6 Anglophone…of the 32 full
ministers there are only 2 Anglophone. There are seven ministers of state with no
Anglophone…there has been only one Anglophone minister of state since independence…
Of the 32 secretaries of state, only two are Anglophone. In the 32 ministries, no
Anglophone is director of general administration. In the ministry of territorial
administration, of the 268 divisional officers (DO’s) only 9 are Anglophone, and only 6
Anglophone senior divisional officers (SDO’s) of the 58…the military reeks of Anglophone
marginalization. There are only two Anglophone generals out of 25…the police force
witnesses the similar marginalization… There is no Anglophone head of department at the
delegation for national security…Anglophones have been condemned never to dream of
heading the national security or defense ministries. In the police-training academy found
in Anglophone Cameroon, more than 90% of the trainees are francophones…. Of the more 40
than 30 heads of diplomatic missions, only 4 are Anglophones…the Anglophones are
frightened away from most important state corporations in the national oil refinery found
in Anglophone Cameroon, more than 90% of the senior staff are francophones… and the
list goes on.
3.4.2 CULTURAL RIGHTS
The official language of the arm forces in this bilingual country is French. Thus to
belong, you must be ready to give up your birthright (which is the English language). In
the CRTV, which is the state owned television house, the official language is French,
English is given less than 10 hours a week, English films have to be translated to French
before they can be shown, English is barely tolerated in this bilingual country. If you watch
CRTV, no body needs to tell you that it is a French channel.
According to S.T Muna: “Television programs even those originally made in
English are shown only after they have been translated into French. Also According to the
Buea declaration Anglophone who share equally in the burden of financing the C.R.T.V get
far less than ¼ of the services provided by this republic utility”.29
3.4.3 DIPLOMATIC ISOLATION
It is a taboo for an Anglophone to hope of ever becoming an ambassador to any
important country in the world, English not withstanding such as the U.S.A., France,
Britain, Australia, Canada, Germany, South Africa etc. There are whole diplomatic
29 Also see the Buea declaration and Shungmo (2003) pg 58.41
missions without a single Anglophone. By the way, Cameroon is known in most cases as a
French speaking country. This was clearly demonstrated during the NEPAD negotiations
in Mauritius Island were Cameroon was presented as a French country.30
3.4.4 EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS
In the educational milieu, the situation is no better. In the words of ST Muna, “entry
qualification, into ENAM, ENSA, IRIC, ESSTI, ENSET, polytechnic and Ngaoundere
university centers, limits the number of English speaking students very seriously”31 The
only Anglophone University in the country created of recent due to pressure from the
Anglophones has totally lost its Anglo-Saxon tradition as appointments to various positions
is now by presidential decree based on party affiliation and not by the senate council as it
ought to be. To continue with assimilation, French has been made a compulsory
requirement for graduation. Meanwhile we cannot say it of English language in the other
five French language state Universities.
Still in the educational domain, we have schools all over the Anglophone provinces
with no teachers or classrooms and children are forced to study under trees if they wish to
learn. In the technical sector, the prevailing tendency is that only francophone teachers are
sent to the English provinces. The lack of language or communication skills has forced
30 See Nja’ah peter (2001): The Anglophone problem in Cameroon. Prospects of a non-violent transformation. Bamenda quality printers pg 29. Also see Shungmo (2003) unpublished long essay pg 33.31 See Muna ST, (1984): some problems of social justice and balanced development in Cameroon. Yaounde. Here it should be noted that S.T Muna was one of the fathers of unification.
42
them to give lectures in languages that are neither French nor English. The constant poor
results obtained from these schools attest to this fact.
There have been constant attempts by the francophone government to wipe out the
English system of education and culture that existed in the former Southern Cameroons by
introducing French syllabuses to Anglophone schools and changing names of place such as
Victoria to limbe. So that future generations will never know that they had any links with
English.
In other higher professional institutions, the frustration of the English speaking
Cameroonians can be seen in the number of English speaking Cameroonians graduating
from these schools. Admissions into schools such as EMIA, ENSET, ENAM, IRIC and
others greatly restrict Anglophones. In most cases the entire board of such schools is made
up of francophones and thus during interviews Anglophones are rejected if they cannot
speak the language. Those who wish to go there must have Godfathers or strong party
barons. In most cases, these are no go areas for Anglophones.
English speaking graduates are frustrated at every level. After graduating from the
University, most of them cannot continue with their higher degree programs, as they are
nonexistent in English. To continue you have to do it in French or go abroad which is the
only other alternative but expensive. To get jobs with English degree is another serious
problem, as all francophone employers will tell you that English degrees are less than their
French equivalents.
According to S.T Muna; “in order words virtually all Anglo-Saxon qualifications
are inferior to french ones and so Anglo-Saxon standards are supposed to be inferior to
French ones. This gives an idea of the frustration which English speaking citizens faced 43
virtually at all levels, in the University, in the public service and in state corporations with
regards to their progress”32. However, it is also amazing to think that most of the greatest
Cameroonian scholars recognized internationally are these very Anglophones whom the
francophones claim having lower qualifications.
3.4.5 CIVIL RIGHTS
In the normal day-to-day relations between the normal francophone and
Anglophone, the general government policy has given rise to mistrust and entrench
relations. The normal francophone citizen following the example of his brothers in the
government sees his English brother as an enemy who should be shone. This has given rise
to several appellations such as les biafrais, les enemis dans la maison, les anglos etc which
are aimed at ridiculing the Anglophone.
Delegations such as sporting and athletic will always portray Cameroon as a French
country. Anglophones have been greatly discouraged from this sector. It is no surprise for
those who know that in the Cameroon national football team there is no Anglophone.
Should we say it is because Anglophones are not talented? Can we justifiably claim that if
Anglophone Cameroon was a separate country, it would not have been able to put up a
strong national team or send athletes abroad?
3.5 ECONOMIC MAGINALIZATION
32 Ibid. Also see Mukong: 1990,pg 27
44
Destroying the land and infrastructure of any nation in the world is just the same like
telling the people not to exist at all or to forever remain beggars. Moreover, to be candid no
one will watch you destroy his source of lively hood without offering a word. Through out
the history of the unification of the two Cameroon, this destruction of infrastructure,
businesses, and all other sources of livelihood of the Anglophone have characterized the
relationship.
Anglophone Cameroon or west Cameroon is blessed with natural resources
including; crude oil and gas, coffee, cocoa, tea, palm oil, banana, timber and minerals such
as diamond, gold and uranium. The territory produces more than 70% of the gross national
products of Cameroon (G.N.P). But since unification, has walloped in underdevelopment
and poverty.33
The systematic destruction of the infrastructure of Anglophone Cameroon started
immediately after unification. To render the Anglophone weak and un-viable to agitate, all
the independent powers of west Cameroon were taken by article five and six of the federal
constitution.34
With grounds cleared as such, the systematic closure of all viable Anglophone
businesses such as CHE AUTOMOBILES, FOMENKY DIRECT SUPPLIES AND
THE KILO BROTHER. State corporations such as the NATIONAL MARKETING
BOARD, POWERCAM, CAMEROON AIR TRANSPORT,(CAT) and all other revenue
producing infrastructures such as banks, and industries was the next issue in their diabolic
political agenda.
33 Loc .cit Nfor, 2004 pg 434 1961 unitary constitution of Cameroon.
45
Sea and river ports were closed down, airports and warehouses were neglected and
finally closed down. Care was taken to make sure that everything that could give the
Anglophones a little independence were taken over or destroyed. This was followed by the
neglect of the remaining infrastructures. Roads were dug up with the pretext of
maintenance and left at that stage.
The responsibility of town planning was taken over from the west Cameroon
government and ghost towns developed everywhere. The Buea declaration of 1993
describes the situation in the following words
“They dug up the existing tar, destroyed the roads and in that state abandoned them
as in the case of Kumba-Mbonge and Kumba-Tombe roads.” Furthermore., “The
government has not added a single Kilometer to the network that existed in
Anglophone Cameroon prior to unification, other than the few kilometers from
Mongo - Tiko, Victoria - Idenau and from Santa - Bamenda, Which were done
primarily to serve the economic and commercial interest of Francophone and to
provide easy access to oil installation, manned and exploited by Francophones”.
All viable towns west of the mongo which use to boom with economic activities
were turned into ghost towns and everything is being done to keep them in that stage. They
reap the wealth and resources of Southern Cameroons, as if they have a target date to
depart or underdeveloped it. The timber, banana, tea, palms, rubber, etc are being exploited
everyday with little benefit to the people of Anglophone Cameroon.
Moreover, even though all oil resources in Cameroon originate in Ndian division of
west Cameroon all oil related companies such as societe national de hydrocarbure
46
(S.N.H), societé nationale de reffinage (SONARA), societé Camerounaise de deport
petroliere (S.C.D.P), HYDRAC etc are predominantly staffed by Francophones. Also, this
region of Cameroon has never seen a single mile of tar road. All oil revenues are paid
directly to Yaoundé, while taxes are paid to the Douala city council which harbors most of
these companies.
In economics, we all know of location of industries and the concept of comparative
cost advantage, which are all based on the fact that we can progress by using natural
advantages. However in Cameroon, we have to remove all the natural resources from one
part of the country to another just because the people of this other part of the country
should not be allow to benefit from the fallouts. I did personally ask this question to the
secretary general in the North West governor’s office in 2002 and was told that factors of
location of industries were not present in Bamenda.
The next question as to why Bamenda produces the greatest quantity of eucalyptus
trees use for electricity poles, yet they were processed in Baffousam, received no answer.
The most annoying part of the whole issue is that every step is taken to prevent foreign
investors from investing in this part of the country.
PECTON OIL Company, which was first registered as PECTON VICTORIA
CO.LTD, was forced by the government to be set up in Douala. GUINNESS also wanted
to settle in Ombe but Government pressure forced it to Douala. Again for several years
American companies have been trying to set up a cement factory and flour mill in west
coast Victoria, to no avail etc.35
35 Op. cit Mukong: 199047
CHAPTER FOUR
CONTEMPORARY SITUATION AND HOPE FOR A SOLUTION
4.1 GLOBALIZATION
Globalization in its literal sense is the process of globalizing, transformation of some
things or phenomena into global ones. It can be described as a process by which the people
of the world are unified into a single society and function together. This process is a
combination of economic, technological, socio-cultural and political forces.
48
Globalization means increasing the interdependence, connectivity and integration on
a global level with respect to the social, cultural, political, technological, economic and
ecological levels. The civil liberties are enhanced and there is a more efficient use of
resources. All the countries involved in the free trade are at a profit. As a result, there are
lower prices, more employment and a better standard of life in these developing nations.
The effect of globalization of the Anglophone problem is that with the increase in
globalization. Many people are now aware of the Anglophone problem. The greatest agent
in this category is the internet which has greatly helped in creating awareness of the
Anglophone problem all over the world. More people now know of the Anglophone
problem than in the 90’s when there were no internet services.
Also with the coming of the internet many people can now write and post articles
over the internet without fear of government crackdown. The most popular news blog on
the internet visited by Southern Cameroonians all over the world
(http/www.thepostnewsline.com) has so many forums and questions on the Anglophone
problems are the most hotly contested issues with so many ideas from those who can not
even mention it in public. This has created so many debates on the issue thus awareness.
Many people feel very free discussing these issues over the internet.
The influence of the internet is that it has made so many people to be talking about
the problem at the same time thereby creating international recognition and debates on the
issues affecting the Anglophones. Many can now talk about it all over the world with
certainty as to what it is all about. For a very longtime now in Cameroon we have not heard
of books being banned like before, because globalization has brought about so many means
49
of communication and so most of the information is now free for all over the internet and
cell phones.
In this era of globalization, nothing is hidden as happenings in one part of the world
are known all over the world in a matter of minutes. The effect of this is that the
international community has brought pressure to bear on the Cameroon government and
thus limiting the number of human rights abuses. Now when a man is arrested, within the
next few minutes the whole world is talking about it and so the person can not be detained
indefinitely like it use to happen.
4.2 DEMOCRATIZATION
Democratization is the transition to a more democratic political regime. It may be
the transition from an authoritarian regime to a partial democracy, transition from
authoritarianism to a full democracy or transition from a semi-authoritarian political
system to a democratic political system. The outcome may be consolidated (as it was for
example in the United Kingdom) or democratization may face frequent reversals (as it has
faced for example in Argentina). Different patterns of democratization are often used to
explain other political phenomena, such as whether a country goes to a war or whether its
economy grows. Democratization itself is influenced by various factors, including
economic development, history, and civil society. However in this work we shall be
limited to the effects of democratization on the Human rights of Southern Cameroonians or
the Anglophones.
The wave of democratization that swept through most African states in the late 80’s
and early 90’s had it toll on Cameroon. The process though ugly in Cameroon came
50
anyways and most people could then savor the much heard about democracy. Though we
can not say Cameroon was completely democratized within this period, it will equally be a
fallacy to say nothing came out of the whole process
Following the launching of the Social Democratic Front (SDF) in May 1990, there
was no turning back as the wheels of democracy started spinning in Cameroon. The late
90’s heralded the liberty laws which came to liberalize both the economy and the political
system.36 Though the process may be very slow, what is important is the fact that it is in
motion
The effect of democratization on the Anglophone problem is that it brought about
considerable freedom of speech and the press which has been very important in the
creation of the awareness of the Anglophone problem. Also the liberty laws officially
brought to an end most of the repugnant laws that existed in Cameroon prior to this period.
The difference here was that people could talk freely even though talking had no impact on
the decisions of the government. Though people could still be locked up arbitrarily, they
had to at least give a reason for their actions. There was thus a small degree of
accountability on the part of the government.
With democratization, the courts could even go through the charade of a mock trial
with the aim of portraying to the world that Cameroon is a land of justice, though the
judgments are made before the trial even starts. The absence of the independence of the
judiciary only means a judge can be told what to do at anytime and any thing contrary to
the wishes of his employers is seriously detrimental to his position. He can be removed
from office at anytime with the stroke of a pen.
36 See the liberty laws of 19th December 199051
With democratization, fabulous documents have to be written to portray to the world
the greatest democracy in paper. This is only on paper as the reverse is true on the field. A
good example is the 1996 constitution of Cameroon which made provision for democratic
institutions and guarantees to human rights which have never been implemented till date 12
years later. To prove that there is no intention to follow that particular constitution;
revisions have already begun with the hope of keeping the president in power for life.
Also democratization has led to the development and implementation of some
democratic rules such as law No: 2005 of 27th July 2005 on the new criminal procedure
code intended to improve on the system of justice in Cameroon. Before the coming of this
law, the Cameroonian justice system could be epitomized by Albert Mukong’s Prisoner
without a crime which describes vividly what was done to Anglophone prisoners of
conscience.
The new law has given hope to many Anglophones as with a good lawyer and
enough money you can be sure to get a somehow fare trial. Unlike before where
Anglophones were triad in francophone courts by French judges with the inquisitorial
system of justice37. This single piece of legislation has greatly improved on the human
rights of Anglophones as it seems they will no longer be arrested arbitrary and detained for
very long periods without trial. However we still have to see how effective it will be.
4.2 HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS
Human Rights groups are fallouts of democracy and have greatly proliferated in
Cameroon since the introduction of multi party democracy in the 90s. There are so many of
37 See Judgment No: HCB (CMR) 9252
these groups present in Cameroon today all advocating for the rights of Cameroonians to
be respected. The first major human rights groups in Cameroon created by ARBERT
MUKONG, The Human Right Defense Group (HRDG), had as one of its initial aims the
protection of the rights of Anglophones.
Local Human Rights organizations are often the first to notice that human rights are
violated and start to react. This is because they are there at the grass root close to the
people and most people often run to them when their rights are abused especially the poor
who can not buy justice in Cameroon.
International Human rights groups such as amnesty international, transparency
international have been actively involved in Cameroon since the early 90s and their
presence is highly felt through their annual Human rights reports which have to force the
government to revise most of the repugnant laws that hitherto existed in Cameroon.
Most of these Human Rights groups are seriously victimized by government agents
who find their presence as a threat to the kind of absolute power that they will want. This
has led to a situation where most human rights defenders have become victims of human
rights abuses. However it should be noted that the aim of this work is not to critically look
at the works of Human Rights groups, but to look at the effects of their presence on the
Anglophone problem.
To this effect we can say they have been very instrumental in educating the public
on their fundamental Human Rights which ought not to be violated, and what they ought to
do if those rights are violated. The greatest hindrance to Human Rights defense is the
ignorance of those whose rights are abused. You can not complain of something you do not
know. It should be noted that Human Rights is a relatively new concept in Cameroon and 53
so for a very long time, many Cameroonians have lived under a totalitarian regime that
they can not even differentiate between what is right or wrong. Thus for long every one has
gone along with the abuses of their rights as if they were natural things that ought to be
done by the authorities.
Thus Human Rights groups have a long way to go for Cameroonians to be
completely educated on human rights. It may sound funny, but it is a reality in Cameroon
that many young Cameroonians leave our universities without and idea on what basic
human rights are. Such people can then only be educated by these groups.
From our hypotheses of this study, the Anglophone problem in Cameroon is a
human rights problem. If this is the case, then the Anglophones need all the human rights
groups that they can get to help not only in educating them on those rights, but also defend
them. This has been going on for a very long time now, and this is why many Anglophones
can now claim that their rights have been violated from the very onset and thus they can
not continue in the union, if those rights are not respected.
From all the evidence we have seen above, the fact is that the Anglophone problem
not only exists, but it is a human rights problem. It has single handedly contributed
enormously to Human Rights abuses recorded in Cameroon.
In a nutshell, what we are saying is that globalization, democratization and the
presence of Human Rights groups have greatly ameliorated the hitherto deplorable
condition of Anglophones, especially the talking type whom it is hoped with the new
criminal procedure will be accorded some degree of respect. Thus following the new law
we do not expect midnight arrests, arbitrary detention, torture and the injustices which have
54
characterized the relationship between the government and Anglophone activists for over
40 years.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATIONS
After an in-depth study of the Anglophone problem in the Human rights context, we
can conclude that the Anglophone problem in Cameroon is a human rights problem which
should be handled like any other Human Right issue. Thus there is need for the
intervention of the international community to resolve the problem. This is due to the fact
that many Anglophones have taken the matter to a different level and they see no other
solution other than the creation of an independent Southern Cameroons. It should be noted
that the Southern Cameroons National Council (SCNC) went as far as declaring the
independence of THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTHERN CAMEROONS in 1999
over radio Buea.
This is proof to the fact that most Anglophones are no longer interested in the union
of the two Cameroon, and thus want the United Nations from where the Problem arose to
come back quietly to Cameroon and review the union, to see if it is working or the people
can assume their right to self determination which is a fundamental Human Right38
The Anglophone problem has not occasioned any uprising in Cameroon today
because of the facts that the Anglophones have been constantly terrorized and now live
constantly in fear of a military crack down, or even genocide. Any attempt by
Anglophones to raise their voice has often been ruthlessly suppressed such as the strike
cases in the University of Buea and Kumba were many young innocent Anglophones have
38 Many Southern Cameroonians or Anglophones believe that their problem emanated from the very floor of the UN, which refused them the right to self determination by the two alternatives.
55
lost their lives. Most outspoken Anglophones or leaders have been forced to flee the
country while the rest have become traitors to the Anglophone course. However the new
brand of Anglophone youth now should greatly worry the world at large because they can
not be expected to forever remain quiet if conditions continue the way they are right now
with the presence of modern means of communication.
The recommendation of this author is that the United Nations should come back to
Cameroon and conduct another plebiscite for the people to choose where to live, and not
listen to leaders who keep giving the assurance that things are fine meanwhile a tornado is
building from within, and it is inevitable that it will one day come to light. One stitch in
time saves two. I think at this stage, only the people themselves can decide their fate. They
should be allowed to exercise their right to self determination which has been denied them
for many decades now.
SELECTED BIBLOGRAPHY
Ambanasome, S.A, (1994): Education of the deprived, Bamenda, Unique Printers.Che, Tita Julius, (1993): A time of hope. PO box 31 Limbe, Nooremac pressDelancey, Mark, (1989): Cameroon, boulder and San Francisco, west view Press.Fonge, P. Fuabel, (1997): Modernization without development in Africa, New Jersey, African world pressKonings, piet & Nyamnjoh, Francis, (1997): “The Anglophone problem in Cameroon” Journal of third worlds study, vol 35Maimo, A.M, (1993): Cameroon Anglophone case, a rejoinder to where Things went wrong by Albert Mukong.
Mbile, N.N, (1999): Cameroon political story, an authentic eyewitness Account. PO box 13 Limbe, Presbyterian printing press.
56
Mbu, A.T.N, (1993): Civil disobedience in Cameroon. Douala Cameroon, Impriemerie Georges frere BP 391Mukong, A.W, (1990): The case for the southern Cameroons, USA CAMFECOMuna, S.T, (1984): Some problems of social justice and balanced Development in Cameroon. Yaounde.Nfor, N. Nfor, (1994): The hidden agenda, Bamenda.__________, (2002): The southern Cameroons, truth of the matter, BamendaNgoh, V Julius, (1990): Constitutional developments in southern Cameroons, pioneer publishers.___________, (1999): “Origins of marginalisation of the former southern Cameroonians (Anglophone) 1961-1966”. Journal of third world studies. Vol XVI No 1.___________, (2001): southern Cameroons, 1922-1961, a constitutional History. Aldershot and Burlington; Ashgate.Nja’ah, Peter. N, (2001): The Anglophone problem in Cameroon, prospects of a non-violent transformation. Bamenda, quality printersGobata, Rotcod, (1996): I spit on their graves, book two of the past tense… USA, kola Tree.Susungi, N, N, (2000): Why United Nations intervention in Cameroon in the Furture is necessary, BamendaTakoungang, J & (1998): African state and society in the 1990s,Cameroon’s Krieger, M political crossroad, westview press.
Williad, R. Johnson, (1970): The Cameroon Federation, political integration in a Fragmented society, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, west view.
PERIODICALSCameroon life, of January 1992.Cameroon life of May 1992.Cameroon post, Numbers: 64,159,172, and 192.The pilot, vol. 001 No: 002, of May 1997.
News links, vol. 001 No: 005.Cameroon reviews vol. 001 June 1994.The messenger vol. 01 No: 26 of Nov 1993.Le messenger vol. IV No: 05.Southern Cameroon News No: 09 of Feb 2003. Hotline News No: 075 and 0067.The post, No: 0413 of Dec 1992.
57
OTHER DOCUMENTS
The West Cameroon Journal. 1994.SCNC press conference of 8th July 2002, Bamenda.
SCNC, (2002): Understanding the southern Cameroon question.The two alternatives.Cameroon constitutions of; 1961, 1972 and 1996.The new criminal procedure codeThe concept of man by Wang Metuge
58