The American Legal System and the Courts
-
Upload
richard-rivas -
Category
Documents
-
view
41 -
download
3
description
Transcript of The American Legal System and the Courts
![Page 1: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The American Legal System and the Courts
Chapter 10
![Page 2: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
In this chapter we will learn about
• The notion of law and the role that it plays in democratic society
• The constitutional basis for the American judicial system
• The dual system of state and federal courts in the United States
• The Supreme Court and the politics that surround and support it
• The relationship of citizens to courts in America
![Page 3: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The role of law in democratic societies
• Provide security
• Provide predictability
• Resolve conflict– Through the courts
• Reflect and enforce conformity to society’s values
• Distribute benefits and rewards society has to offer and allocate the costs of those good things
![Page 4: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Characteristics of theAmerican legal tradition
• Based on common law instead of civil law– Judges have discretion and follow stare decisis (past
precedents)
• Adversarial instead of inquisitorial – Reveal the truth through competing view points vs. “who did
it?”, judge as fact finder
• Litigious – 44 lawsuits per 1,000 people annually
![Page 5: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Kinds of law
• Substantive laws vs. procedural laws– What you can/can’t do…vs. how it’s applied and enforced
• Criminal laws vs. civil laws– Prohibit actions harmful to society vs. interactions between individuals,
“torts”
• Constitutional laws– Stated in document, or past decisions on the meaning of it
• Statutory laws– Made by legislative bodies
• Administrative laws– bureaucracy
• Executive orders
![Page 6: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The development of judicial review
• Hamilton and Federalist No. 78
– Least dangerous branch of government
– Court had power of neither the purse nor the sword
– Approved of judicial review because it would check the momentary passions of the people
• Constitution as true will of people
![Page 7: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The development of judicial review, cont’d.
• Marbury v. Madison– “Midnight judges”
• John Marshall and the expansion of the power of the Supreme Court– 4th chief Justice, Federalist, Secretary of State under Adams
• Used sparingly to strike down federal law (158 times); more frequently to strike down state law (1,261 times)
![Page 8: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Understanding jurisdiction
• Courts with original jurisdiction– U.S. district courts– State trial courts
• Courts with appellate jurisdiction– U.S. courts of appeals– State intermediate appellate courts– State supreme courts
• Court with both original and appellate jurisdiction– U.S. Supreme Court
![Page 9: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
U.S. district courts
• Lowest level of federal court system
• 94 district courts (each state has at least one)
• Hear both criminal and civil cases
• Juries responsible for verdict
![Page 11: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
U.S. courts of appeals
• Arranged into 12 circuits
• Solely appellate jurisdiction
• No new evidence or witnesses
• Panel of three judges makes ruling, not a jury
![Page 12: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Selection of judges
States• Method varies by state
-Appointment
-Nonpartisan election
-Partisan election
Federal• All federal judges are
nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate
• Senatorial courtesy is often invoked for lower level federal courts
![Page 13: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The U.S. Supreme Court
• Nine justices– Has varied from 6 to 10
• Appointed by the president, confirmed by the Senate– Senate—”advice and consent”– No Senatorial courtesy for the high court
• Serve during good behavior– What is “good behavior”?
• Can be impeached
![Page 14: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Four criteria considered forSupreme Court appointments
• Merit– ABA ratings, FBI background check– Reagan nominee Ginsburg (pot smoking)– Bush 41 nominee Thomas (sexual harassment case), plus lack of
judicial exp. and low ABA score
• Political ideology– Traditional liberal vs. conservative labels– Strict constructionist vs. judicial interpretivism
• These two ideas don’t necessarily fall on each side of the spectrum
• Reward– Sometimes friends, acquaintances, political allies
• Representation – demographics
![Page 15: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Choosing which cases to hear
• Petitioning the Supreme Court
• The role of law clerks
• The Rule of Four
• Other influences, including whether U.S. government is a party in the case
![Page 16: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
How many cert petitions are considered?
• In recent terms, there have been between 8,000 and 10,000 cases appealed to the Supreme Court each year
• Out of approx. 9,000 petitions in the average year,
about 70-75 are granted (0.8%)
Paid PetitionsPetitions that pay the $300 filing fee
In forma pauperislitigants who can’t pay the filing fee (often prisoners)
~20% of petitions ~80% of petitions
3-4% granted 0.2% granted
Make up 85-90% of docket
Make up 10-15% of docket
![Page 17: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Cert: Cases Disposed in 2008-09
6,209 IFP Petitions
1,612 paid Petitions
77 cases decided after arguments
0.98% of all petitions!
7822 total Petitions
+
+ an additional 1,097 the didn’t get to yet
![Page 18: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Cert: The Justices’ Role
With 9,000 petitions per year:
If a Justice spent 40 hours per week, 50 weeks
per year ONLY reading cert petitions, they
would be able to allocate approximately 13
minutes to each petition (which may include
the petition itself, the brief in opposition, a
reply brief, and amicus briefs).
The Justices cannot possibly read all the cert petitions. They just don’t have the time.
![Page 19: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The Role of Law Clerks
• Heavy-duty research assistants
• 1972: “certpool”– Memo summarizing facts of case,
questions of law, recommended course of action
• Prepare bench memos for oral arguments
• Help draft opinions
![Page 20: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Cert Pool
IN the pool NOT in the pool
Roberts
Scalia
Kennedy
Souter
Thomas
Ginsburg
Breyer
Stevens
Alito
=
4 clerks x 7 justices =
28 law clerks
read 9,000 petitions
Each clerk reads and writes a memo on 320 petitions/yr
4 clerks x 1 justice =
4 law clerks
read 9,000 petitions
Each clerk reads 2,250 petitions/yr
=
![Page 21: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Advantages of the Pool
• Saves time• Someone is more thoroughly going
over each petition• Clerks from other chambers can
mark up pool memos and give to their justice
![Page 22: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Disadvantages of the Pool
• Reduces independence if seven of the nine justices are in the pool and they’re relying on one writer for each memo
• The pool gives clerks - generally one year out of law school and only at the Court for one year - too much responsibility for setting the Court’s agenda
![Page 23: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
“Discuss List”
• The Chief Justice generates a discuss list, based on memos prepared by clerks. Other justices may add to the list.
• All cases generated by Solicitor General (head Supreme Court lawyer for federal government) are automatically discussed
• All Capital Cases discussed (no such thing as a “frivolous case” here)
![Page 24: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The Rule of Four
• If four justices vote to grant cert, it is granted
• Designed to prevent tyranny of the majority• If a case does not gain four votes, a justice
may write a “dissent from denial,” but this is extremely rare
• All votes are secret
![Page 25: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
More “cert-worthy” criteria
• Conflict in lower courts • Important
– Multiple amicus briefs at cert stage– Affects large number of people – Unique/one of a kind case this Court must decide
![Page 26: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
More reasons to deny than to grant!
• The issue hasn’t “percolated” enough• A petition that raises too many
questions (prefer focusing on one issue)
• Bad vehicle for reaching this legal issue
• A better case “in the pipeline”• Case is deemed “frivolous”
![Page 27: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Cases are fungible!
• What’s important is the legal issue raised, not the parties or facts
• Assumption is: a better case will come along if the issue is important
• Don’t want to risk producing a fractured opinion (4-4-1 or 4-2-3 splits)
![Page 28: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Petitions filed by individuals are less likely to be granted
Ranking tends to be:#1 - U.S. government#2 - Corporations#3 - States#4 - Organized groups#5 - Individuals
![Page 29: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Deciding cases
• Judicial activism vs. judicial restraint– The court as a policymaker vs stare decisis,
rejection of lawmaking
• External factors– Public opinion– Executive branch– Amicus briefs
![Page 30: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Writing opinions
• Opinion– Chief justice, if in the majority, will assign this
opinion to someone in the majority– If chief justice is in the minority, senior-most justice
in the majority assigns the opinion
• Concurring opinion
• Dissenting opinion
![Page 31: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The citizens and the courts
• Equal treatment by the criminal justice system
• Equal access to the civil justice system
![Page 32: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: The American Legal System and the Courts](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813757550346895d9ee65a/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)