The A-Train: How Formation Flying Is Transforming Remote Sensing Stanley Q. Kidder J. Adam...
-
Upload
desmond-beagle -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
3
Transcript of The A-Train: How Formation Flying Is Transforming Remote Sensing Stanley Q. Kidder J. Adam...
The A-Train: How Formation
Flying Is Transforming
Remote Sensing
Stanley Q. KidderJ. Adam Kankiewicz
Thomas H. Vonder Haar Curtis Seaman
Lawrence D. Carey
2
The Afternoon Train is lead by Aqua, with an ascending equator crossing time of 1:30 pm
The A-Train
Aura
PARASOLCloudSatCALIPSO Aqua
3
AquaAn observatory-class satellite with six instruments:Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
(MODIS), Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS),Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for EOS
(AMSR-E)Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU-A)Humidity Sounder for Brazil (HSB)Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES)
Yet there is so much more to do….
4
CloudSat and CALIPSO
CloudSat carries the 94 GHz Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR)
CALIPSO carries532 and 1064 nm Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with
Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) Imaging Infrared Radiometer (IIR) Wide Field Camera (WFC)
5
PARASOLand Aura
PARASOL carries POLDER (Polarization and Directionality of the
Earth’s Reflectances)
Aura carriesHigh Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS)Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS)Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI)Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES)
6
Formation Flying:Control Boxes
Aqua is maintained in a control box of ±21.5 seconds
CALIPSO is maintained in a control box of ±21.5 seconds
PARASOL is maintained in a control box of ±21.5 seconds
30 sec
Aura is maintained ~15 minutes behind
Aqua
15 s
ec
131 seconds
73 seconds
900 seconds
CloudSat is maintained 12.5 ± 2.5
seconds ahead of CALIPSO
7
Formation Flying: Horizontal Separation
Equator
20°N
40°N
40°S
20°S
60°W 30°W 0°
CloudSat
CALIPSO
Aqua
PARASOL
Aura
8
Formation Flying:Horizontal Separation
NIGHT
DAY
Aqua
CloudSat & CALIPSO215 km
Ascending Node
Descending Node
To avoid sun glint, CALIPSO and CloudSat are offset 215 km in the anti-solar direction (maximum 240 km) from Aqua’s ground track at the ascending node.
9
Requirement on simultaneity of radar and lidar measurements: Measurements of the same
cloud fields taken 15 seconds
Requirement/goal on spatial overlap of radar and lidar measurements: Footprints must pass 2000
meters edge to edge Equivalent to controlling
CloudSat's groundtrack to being within ±1 km of CALIPSO's lidar track
Goal for footprints to overlap at least 50% of the time
Lidar footprint(Dia= 70m)
Radar footprint(Dia= 1400m)
CloudSat Groundtrack
Position of footprints relative to groundtrack
2000 m
15 seconds(
113 km)
Goalconditionmet
Time delayedLidar footprint
Science Requirements Relatedto Formation Flying with CALIPSO
10
Mid-Level Clouds
11
Cloud Layer Experiments (CLEX)Ten experiments since 1995
Optically Opaque Mixed-Phase
Region (~300-500 m deep)
Precipitating Ice Region
(~.2-2.5 km deep)
Generating Cells ~ 1-1.5 km in Length
Typical Particle Concentrations: 100-200 cm-3 (Liquid)20-150 L-1 (Ice)
SupercooledLiquid
Ice
=
=
What we have learned:
12
Typical Mixed-Phase Cloud Structure
The vertical profile of LWC (red diamonds) and IWC (blue diamonds) during the 14 October 2001 straight-line ascent from 1440 to 1510 UTC.
Liquid Water on Top
5
4
3
Hei
gh
t (k
m)
Tem
per
atu
re (
C)
o
-5
-10
-15
-20
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25(g m )-3
Water Content
LWCIWC
Ice Below
13
B
A
Mixed-Phase Clouds Viewed By MODIS/CloudSat/CALIPSO
7/21/06 22:55 UTCMODIS 11 µm
−166− 168− 170− 172− 174− 176− 178
− 22
− 24
− 26
− 28
14
VIIRS Cloud Phase
Algorithm B
A
Mixed-Phase Clouds Viewed By MODIS/CloudSat/CALIPSO
15
CloudSat Radar Reflectivity (dBZ)
CloudSat Radar Reflectivity (dBZ)
BA
Hei
gh
t (k
m)
0
5
10
Hei
gh
t (k
m)
0
5
10 CALIPSO 532 nm Backscatter
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
CloudSat & CALIPSO Data
16
Hei
gh
t (k
m)
0
5
10
25
-35
TB
11 (
°C)
GEOPROF-Lidar Cloud Layers: Detected by CloudSat
Detected by CALIPSO
MODIS TB11
VIIRS Cloud Phase Algorithm (top of image)
A B
17
The Future: More satellites
Joining A-Train in 2008(?) are GLORY and OCO
18
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
LANDSAT 7EO-1
SAC C TERRA
Orbital Plane
Equator
The Future:More Trains
The A-Train was not the first Train:
• EO-1 flew 1 min behind Landsat 7
• SAC-C flew 27 min behind EO-1
• Terra flew 2.5 min behind SAC-C
19
The Future: Overflyers
A-Train (705 km)
Overflyer (~824 km)
Satellites in the same orbital plane, but at different altitudes would leverage the extensive cal/val efforts of the A-Train satellites (or satellites in other trains).
20
BACKUP SLIDES
21
The Future
22
Hei
gh
t (k
m)
0
5
10 CloudSat Radar Reflectivity (dBZ)
BA
Hei
gh
t (k
m)
0
5
10
Hei
gh
t (k
m)
0
5
10 CALIPSO 532 nm Backscatter
GEOPROF-Lidar Cloud Layers
25
-35
TB
11 (
°C)
23
OCO Joining A-Train in 2008
24
Formations…
Their mean anomalies and arguments of perigee must be related.
Let t be the desired separation time. Then their angular separation must be:
T
tM ~360
Their right ascensions of ascending node must be related so that they travel over the same ground track:
tdt
d earth
Assumes a circular orbit, for which M =
25
A-Train Orbital Parameters
Aqua ECT = 13:35:19
A-Train satellites make 233 orbits in 16 days and fly on the WRS-2 grid
26
Constellations
Several identical satellites in cooperative orbits
Make possible new observing capabilities
Take advantage of economies of scale
Can reduce launch costs
27
A Sunsynchronous Constellation
• 7 satellites• Observations each
101 minutes
28
Abstract
The A-Train, consisting currently of five satellites—Aqua, CloudSat, CALIPSO, Parasol, and Aura—constitutes the latest and most advanced example of formation flying. In this paper we will detail how the A-Train has transformed the way we study mid-level clouds, which obstruct visibility, pose an icing hazard to aircraft, and are difficult to forecast. Although they have been studied for many years using satellite and aircraft data, we still do not know how many mid-level clouds there are, what their geographical distribution is, or how they relate to cirrus clouds above and liquid water clouds below. A-Train instruments, especially MODIS, CloudSat, and CALIPSO, are yielding answers to these and other questions that are unobtainable by other means. Finally, we will discuss what we see as the role of formation flying in the future of remote sensing.
29
Outline
The A-Train (4 min)
Examples, including mid-level clouds (4 min)
The future (4 min)
30
The A-Train
31
The A-Train
CloudSat lags Aqua by a variable amount <120 s
CALIPSO lags CloudSat by 15 ± 2.5 s
CloudSat and CALIPSO fly about 220 km to the right of Aqua to avoid sun glint
PARASOL lags Aqua by ~2 min
Aura lags Aqua by ~15 minStephens et al., 2002: The
CloudSat mission: A new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation. BAMS, 83, 1771-1790.
32
A-Train Control Boxes
15” Aqua Orbit
15 min max
Aqua is maintained in a control
box of ± 21.5 s
21.5”
15”
21.5”
Parasol is maintained in a control
box of ± 21.5 s
21.5”
Calipso is maintained in a control
box of ± 21.5 s
CloudSat is maintained 12.5 2.5sahead of Calipso
Aura is maintained
about 15 min behind Aqua
15”
Aqua, CALIPSO, and Parasol have independent control boxes CloudSat’s control box is slaved to CALIPSO when formation flying
CALIPSO positioned 73 s behind Aqua (CALIPSO is controlled to +/-10-km at the Equator crossing
measured along the equator = +/- 21.5 sec)
• Satellite positions in the A-Train and Control Box dimensions specified in theACOCP document
33
CloudSat, Aqua, and CALIPSO in Formation
orbit
116 sec(870 km)
30 sec(225 km)
43 sec
(322 km)43 sec
Aqua Control Box Calipso Control BoxCirculation OrbitCirculation Orbit
CloudSat C.B.
Circulation Orbit
≈ 15 sec(112 km)
Aqua, CloudSat, and CALIPSO in their formation configuration. Aqua leads. CALIPSO follows but maintains its motion independent of Aqua within its control box. CloudSat is tied to CALIPSO's movement around its box. CloudSat follows a small circulation orbit, 2.2 seconds (16.5 km) along-track, positioned 12.5 seconds in front of CALIPSO.
34
The original goal of the CloudSat formation flying architecture was to overlay the radar footprints on the lidar footprints of CALIPSO at least 50% of the time. Analysis indicates that the overlap occurrence of radar and lidar footprints >90%, exceeding the goal.
35
Examples