The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up...

47
The 2018 Elections Kathryn Pearson Associate Professor of Political Science University of Minnesota

Transcript of The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up...

Page 1: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

The 2018 Elections

Kathryn PearsonAssociate Professor of Political Science

University of Minnesota

Page 2: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

• All 435 U.S. House seats were up

• 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up

• Midterm Election Effects:– President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential approval and the economy

matter– Lower turnout than in presidential elections

2018 Midterm Elections

Page 3: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 4: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 5: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

23 GOP Districts Voted for Clinton

Page 6: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

12 Democratic Districts Voted for Trump

Page 7: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Midterm elections are nationalized and a referendum on the President

Page 8: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 9: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 10: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 11: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Red Shift from 2012 to 2016

Page 12: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Democrats Gained Seats in the Suburbs

Source: New York Times

Page 13: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Democrats Gained Seats in Wealthier Districts

Page 14: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Minnesota House Races: Half of delegation switches parties

• 1st District Flips – Jim Hagedorn (R) + 0.4

• 2nd District Flips – Angie Craig (D) + 5.6

• 3rd District Flips – Dean Phillips (D) + 11.4

• 8th District Flips– Pete Stauber (R) + 5.5

Page 15: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Minnesota Independent Expenditures(with one week to go)

Page 16: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 17: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Turnout

Page 18: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 19: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Vote Choice - Gender

Page 20: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Gender Divide – 1982 to 2018

Page 21: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Gender Gap: Men Have Left the Democratic Party

Page 22: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Women are not a monolithic group

Page 23: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Age

Page 24: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 25: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

18-29 and 60 plus, 1982 to 2018

Page 26: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Race

Page 27: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 28: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Race, 1982-2018

Page 29: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Education

Page 30: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 31: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 32: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 33: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Midterm Voters Vote Their Party

Page 34: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 35: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 36: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Immigration and Vote Choice, 2018

Page 37: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Scholarly research shows that when women run for Congress and the state legislature, women win at the same rate as men.

Why So Few Women in Congress?

Page 38: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Women set records in 2018• 476 U.S. House primary candidates

• 53 U.S. Senate primary candidates

• Won primaries at higher rates than men

• Partisan gap – Women were 43% of Democrats’ nominees

for U.S. House and Senate– Women were 22% of Republicans’ nominees

for the U.S. Senate and 13% for the House

Page 39: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Record number of women were on the ballot in 2018

Source: The New York Times

Page 40: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 41: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Non-incumbent Dem. women won at a higher rate than men

Page 42: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 43: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

First Term Democrats First Term Republicans

Page 44: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Minnesota

• Senator Amy Klobuchar won with 60%• Senator Tina Smith won with 53%• Governor-elect Tim Walz won with 54%• AG-elect Keith Ellison won with 49%

• 18 statehouse seats flipped for DFL control of the Minnesota House– Minnesota suburbs are key

Page 45: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 46: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Source: Pew Research Center 2018

Page 47: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Implications for Governing• Divided Government in Washington

– Competing policy and political agendas• Gridlock • Minimal bipartisan cooperation

– Oversight and investigation of the Executive Branch

• Narrowly Divided Government in Minnesota– Incentives for cooperation and conflict

• Both parties positioning for 2020 elections