Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

35
Text Complexit y Robust and Rele vant 21 st Century Demands TEXT COMPLEXIT Y

Transcript of Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Page 1: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Text Complexity

Robust and Relevant

21st Century Demands

TEXT COMPLEXITY

Page 2: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Why Text Complexity Matters

• How do you know if a student is college-or career-ready? According to ACT’s Reading Between the Lines, “what appears to differentiate those who are more likely to be ready from those who are less likely is their proficiency in understanding complex texts.”

• Over the last 50 years, the complexity of college and workplace reading has increased, while text complexity in K-12 have remained stagnant.

.

Page 3: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

ROAD BLOCKS TO ROBUST LEARNING

• K–12 Schooling: Declining complexity of texts and a lack of reading of complex texts independently

• Not enough informational reading—too much note taking without students having to read

• Too much copying vocabulary and just “looking” up words versus understanding and using academic language

• Limited reading and writing connection activities

Page 4: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

The Staircase of Text Complexity

In many respects, text complexity is the hallmark of the CCSS as it reveals the depth of educators’ commitment to providing American students every opportunity to be prepared to meet future global challenges.

The combination of the increased text complexity and the depth of cognitive demand within the task, such as incorporating discipline-specific questions, generates higher levels of rigor.

Page 5: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

The Staircase of Text Complexity

Providing a specific Standard 10 presence in each grade

level, the Common Core’s text complexity standard provides a

backward-mapped format to scaffold instruction. Notice the scaffolded expectations in the Staircase for Text Complexity within the standard on the

next slide.

Page 6: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Specifically, within reading standard #10:Anchor Standard: R.CCR.10 Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.Example Grade-level Standard (6th grade):RI.6.10 By the end of the year, read and comprehend literary nonfiction in the grades 6-8 text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range.

Page 7: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

The Question is…

What do the Common Core State Standards mean by text complexity?

• What is a text complexity band?and

• How do we ensure the texts our students are reading are in the appropriate text complexity band?

Page 8: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Common Core Text Types

Literary Text• In elementary grades this

includes stories and poetry for both read alouds and independent reading. Read alouds include chapter books, even at the kindergarten level.

• In secondary grades this includes novels, short stories, poetry, and drama.

Informational TextInformational text and literarynon-fiction for both elementaryand secondary grades includes:• Exposition• Historic non-fiction • Biographies and auto-

biographies• Speeches• Historical documents• Technical documents

Page 9: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Holistic Approach to Determining Text ComplexitySource for chart: Adapted from Sue Ellen Patterson’s presentation of chart from the 2011 Leadership and Learn

Center Conference, “Digging Deeper into the CCSS,” 2011

LowComplexity of Text

MediumComplexity of Text

HighComplexity of Text

Level of Meaning

Single More than 1 level Multiple levels

Purpose Clearly Stated Inferred or implied Unstated and/or obscure

Structure Simple, direct, conventional structure that makes the information more cohesive (such as chronological order in a narrative text)

Mostly conventionalstructure that is more explicit than implicit

Unconventional or discipline-specific structure

Language Literal Some implied and/or inferred meanings and figurative language

Figurative language, ironic, and/or specialized vocabulary

Experiences, Events, Information

Common or “everyday” to the reader

Some are uncommon or unfamiliar to the reader

Complex, sophisticated, or highly unfamiliar to the reader

Page 10: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Measuring Text Complexity

Qua

litat

ive

2. Qualitative measures – levels of meaning, structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands often best measured by an attentive human reader.

Quantitative

1. Quantitative measures – readability and other scores of text complexity often best measured by computer software.

Reader and Task3. Reader and Task considerations – background knowledge of reader, motivation, interests, and complexity generated by tasks assigned often best made by educators employing their professional judgment.

Page 11: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Where do we find texts in the appropriate text complexity band?

Choose an excerpt of text from Appendix B:

Or…Use the GeorgiaText ComplexityRubric!

.

Page 12: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

How will you get there? What steps should I take?

A Four-step Process:

1. Determine the quantitative measures of the text.

2. Analyze the qualitative measures of the text.

3. Reflect upon the reader and task considerations.

4. Recommend placement in the appropriate text complexity band.

Page 13: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Step 1: Quantitative Measures

Measures such as:• Word length• Word frequency• Word difficulty• Sentence length• Text length• Text cohesion

Page 14: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

The Quantitative Measures Ranges for Text Complexity

The following chart outlines the suggested ranges for each of the text complexity bands using -Rigor Expectations of the CCGPS:

Lexile Alignment to College & CareerReadiness to Close the Gap:

Grade Band Old Lexile New Lexile

2-3 450-725 450-790

4-5 645-845 770-980

6-8 860-1010 955-1155

9-10 960-1115 1080-1305

11-CCR 1070-1220 1215-1355

Source: Susan Pimentel, November 3, 2010

Page 15: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Step 1: Quantitative MeasuresLet’s imagine we want to see where a text falls on the quantitative measures “leg” of the text complexity triangle, using the Lexile text measures. (Video)

For illustrative purposes, let’s choose Harper Lee’s 1960 novel To Kill a Mockingbird.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hjc2yKfHEso

Page 16: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.
Page 17: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Step 1: Quantitative MeasuresLexile Text Measure:

ATOS Book Level (a measure used in the state of Kansas):

870L

5.6

In which of the text complexity bands would this novel fall?

Page 18: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Text Complexity Grade Bands

Suggested Lexile Range

Suggested ATOS Book Level Range**

K-1 100L – 500L* 1.0 – 2.5

2-3 450L – 790L 2.0 – 4.0

4-5 770L – 980L 3.0 – 5.7

6-8 955L – 1155L 4.0 – 8.0

9-10 1080L – 1305L 4.6 – 10.0

11-CCR 1215L – 1355L 4.8 – 12.0

* The K-1 suggested Lexile range was not identified by the Common Core State Standards and was added by Kansas.

** Taken from Accelerated Reader and the Common Core State Standards, available at the following URL: http://doc.renlearn.com/KMNet/R004572117GKC46B.pdf

Quantitative Measure Ranges for Text Complexity Grade Bands—Taken from

Kansas Common Core State Standards

Page 19: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Remember, however, that the quantitative measure is only the first of three “legs” of the text complexity triangle.

Our final recommendation may be validated, influenced, or even over-ruled by our examination of qualitative measures and the reader and task considerations.

Page 20: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Qua

litat

ive

Quantitative

Reader and Task

Step 2: Qualitative Measures

Measures such as:• Levels of meaning• Levels of purpose• Structure• Organization• Language

conventionality• Language clarity• Prior knowledge

demands

Page 21: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Structure:Complicated text-structures (chronological, problem-solution, cause-effect, etc.)

will add to a text’s complexity level. *Holes, by Louis Sachar Quantitative Measurement: 660 L Qualitative Measurement: Structure: Story continuously jumps back and forth between three different time periods/settings, and character groups.

Adjusted text-complexity value: 5.9 – 7.5 for independent reading.

• Possible “Stretch-Text” : In order to challenge students’ reading capacity—stretching them to grow to a higher reading level--teachers might have students read the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, (7.9) describing the effects of racism during the slavery period.

• Scaffolding needed: Teacher should provide critical backgound knowledge, along with teacher-directed reading of the text.

Page 22: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

The Sun Also Rises by Ernest HemingwayQuantitative Measurement : 610 LQualitative Measurement: Hemingway

uses images and word choice to convey emotion rather than describing it; words are sparse but and have multiple connotative meanings; the novel as a the story contains multiple themes.

Adjusted text-complexity value: 11.5+

Similar “stretch-texts”: The poems of Emily Dickinson (11.5+) and Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison (12+) also use sparse, precise

word choice with multiple connotations.

Levels of Meaning or Purpose:Texts that contain multiple levels of meaning or purpose (connotative or implicit

language, satire in narrative texts; informational texts with implicit purposes) have a greater text complexity than texts with a singular meaning or purpose.

Page 23: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Language Conventionality & Clarity:Texts that rely on literal, clear, contemporary, and conversational language tend to be easier to read than texts that rely on figurative, ironic, ambiguous, purposefully misleading, archaic

or otherwise unfamiliar language or on general academic and domain-specific vocabulary.

• Examples:– Shakespeare – Arcane classics– Medieval, Puritan, or other dialects/ language

patterns

The actual reading level is not difficult, but due to unfamiliar language patterns and old-fashioned language, the reading becomes more difficult.

Page 24: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Knowledge Demands:“Texts that make that make few assumptions about the extent of readers’ life experiences and the depths of their cultural/literary and content/discipline knowledge are generally less

complex than are texts that make many assumptions in one or more of those areas.”

*A Raisin in the Sun, by Lorraine Hansberry Quantitative Measurement: 6.8 (Fry Readability value). (NP)

Qualitative Measurement: Knowledge Demands: To fully understand and appreciate the play, students

require a knowledge of the following: assimilationist debate Pan-African Movement, the Great Migration, racial tension of the time period, race/real estate issues Adjusted text-complexity value: 9-11

• Possible “Stretch-Text” : In order to challenge students’ reading levels and “bridge the gap” to the next reading level, teachers might also want students to read Black Boy by Richard Wright (10-11) or

Black Like Me by John Griffin (10-11)

• Scaffolding needed: Teacher should provide critical backgound knowledge along with teacher-directed reading of the text.

Page 25: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Qua

litat

ive

Quantitative

Reader and Task

JIGSAW-EXPERT GROUPSFour Corner Jigsaw Activity:Teacher Perspectives

1. Levels of Meaning2. Structure3. Language

Conventionality4. Background

Knowledge

Page 26: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Qualitative Dimensions DiscussionFour Corner Jigsaw Activity: Directions

1. Levels of Meaning2. Structure3. Language Conventionality4. Background Knowledge

Step 1: Move to your assigned color station.

Step 2: Discuss and become experts about your assigned qualitative dimension.

Step 3- Return to your original table, use the qualitative dimensions flip-book graphic organizer to write down key points that you learn from colleagues about their expert areas of study.

Page 27: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

GEORGIA TEXT COMPLEXITY RUBRIC

The Georgia Text Complexity Rubric allows educators to evaluate the important elements of text that are often missed by computer software that tends to focus on more easily measured factors.

Page 28: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Use the qualitative section of theGeorgia rubric with the

To Kill A Mockingbird example.

Page 29: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

From examining the quantitative measures, we knew:

Lexile Text Measure: 870LATOS Book Level: 5.6

But after reflecting upon the qualitative measures, we believed:

Page 30: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Step 3: Reader and Task Considerations

Examples of variables specific to readers:MotivationKnowledgeExperiences

Examples of variables specific to tasks:Purpose for readingComplexity of taskComplexity of questions asked

YOU are the best judge of what your students can manage.

Page 31: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

READER AND TASK CONSIDERATIONS are best evaluated by teachers employing their professional judgment, experience, and knowledge of their students and the subject.

Page 32: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Based upon our examination of the Reader and Task Considerations, we have completed the third leg of the text complexity model and are now ready to recommend a final placement within a text complexity band.

Step 1

Step 2

Step 3

Page 33: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

Step 4: Recommended Placement

Based upon all the information—all three legs of the model—the final recommendation for To Kill a Mockingbird is….

Page 34: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

In this instance, Appendix Bconfirms our evaluation of the novel. To Kill a Mockingbird is placed within the grade 9-10 text complexity band.

Page 35: Text Complexity Robust and Relevant 21 st Century Demands.

MetroRESA

Building Leaders of Teaching and Learning